An approach to burr free precision metal stamping
The research study presented in this thesis is to evaluate the approach of burr-free in precision metal stamping. The primary process of the metal stamping always start from the metal separation process which may include the blanking operation and the piercing operation. These operations are to prod...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25384/1/An%20Approach%20To%20Burr%20Free%20Precision%20Metal%20Stamping.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25384/2/An%20Approach%20To%20Burr%20Free%20Precision%20Metal%20Stamping.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my-utem-ep.25384 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
collection |
UTeM Repository |
language |
English English |
advisor |
Muhamad, Mohd Razali |
topic |
T Technology (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery |
spellingShingle |
T Technology (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Boey, Kok Hoong An approach to burr free precision metal stamping |
description |
The research study presented in this thesis is to evaluate the approach of burr-free in precision metal stamping. The primary process of the metal stamping always start from the metal separation process which may include the blanking operation and the piercing operation. These operations are to produce a cut-off blank of the intended geometry. The rationale of the inability to produce a burr-free blank lies on the understanding that burrs are the function of material’s ductility. The increasing popularity of the six sigma philosophy among original equipment manufacturers also has forced all metal components manufacturers to take in an interest in what most previously have considered unimportant – the burr edge. Now they must adjust their thinking to view burrs as a source of variation that can have adverse effects on product quality aside from added cost in the attempt to remove them. This formed a concrete motivation platform to continue and pursue on this research to derive a Burr-Free Technology (BFT) tool for a blanking operation gearing towards burr-free blank in one operation of the stamping process. Commercial package of LS-DYNA was used for the finite element modelling on blanking operation. The concluded numerical model was further validated with the experimental samples. The agreable numerical model was used to evaluate the potential inputs factors such as punch-die clearances, punch and die plate corner radius and the blanking load to the shear edge geometries such as die roll parameter, smooth shear zone parameter, the fracture initiation point and the fracture propagation patterns. The results obtained were used as a foundation for the BFT blanking tool design and fabrication. The fabricated BFT blanking tool was run under normal mass production mode to evaluate the effectiveness of the burr-free characteristic on the 1.0mm thick, JIS G3313 SECC work material. All experimental studies by BFT concept was performed under the conventional air clutch power press with the capacity of 110 ton. The presence of die rolls on edges at both planes of the blank signifies the onset of burr-free characteristic. The burr-free blanks finally was concluded with the BFT blanking tool structure on the case of lower punch protrude of 0.7mm with the correct pairing of positive clearances of 5% on upper punch and lower die and a negative clearance for lower punch and upper die. Aside, the optimum spring loads used for the upper die and lower punch forms an important parameter to the success of the burr-free blanking operation. The output of this BFT parameters produced the most desirable outputs in terms of the edge quality on burr-free blank. This was validated statistically through ANOVA method on the variance of the produced die rolls. |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD.) |
qualification_level |
Doctorate |
author |
Boey, Kok Hoong |
author_facet |
Boey, Kok Hoong |
author_sort |
Boey, Kok Hoong |
title |
An approach to burr free precision metal stamping |
title_short |
An approach to burr free precision metal stamping |
title_full |
An approach to burr free precision metal stamping |
title_fullStr |
An approach to burr free precision metal stamping |
title_full_unstemmed |
An approach to burr free precision metal stamping |
title_sort |
approach to burr free precision metal stamping |
granting_institution |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
granting_department |
Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25384/1/An%20Approach%20To%20Burr%20Free%20Precision%20Metal%20Stamping.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25384/2/An%20Approach%20To%20Burr%20Free%20Precision%20Metal%20Stamping.pdf |
_version_ |
1776103127605313536 |
spelling |
my-utem-ep.253842023-07-27T14:48:48Z An approach to burr free precision metal stamping 2020 Boey, Kok Hoong T Technology (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery The research study presented in this thesis is to evaluate the approach of burr-free in precision metal stamping. The primary process of the metal stamping always start from the metal separation process which may include the blanking operation and the piercing operation. These operations are to produce a cut-off blank of the intended geometry. The rationale of the inability to produce a burr-free blank lies on the understanding that burrs are the function of material’s ductility. The increasing popularity of the six sigma philosophy among original equipment manufacturers also has forced all metal components manufacturers to take in an interest in what most previously have considered unimportant – the burr edge. Now they must adjust their thinking to view burrs as a source of variation that can have adverse effects on product quality aside from added cost in the attempt to remove them. This formed a concrete motivation platform to continue and pursue on this research to derive a Burr-Free Technology (BFT) tool for a blanking operation gearing towards burr-free blank in one operation of the stamping process. Commercial package of LS-DYNA was used for the finite element modelling on blanking operation. The concluded numerical model was further validated with the experimental samples. The agreable numerical model was used to evaluate the potential inputs factors such as punch-die clearances, punch and die plate corner radius and the blanking load to the shear edge geometries such as die roll parameter, smooth shear zone parameter, the fracture initiation point and the fracture propagation patterns. The results obtained were used as a foundation for the BFT blanking tool design and fabrication. The fabricated BFT blanking tool was run under normal mass production mode to evaluate the effectiveness of the burr-free characteristic on the 1.0mm thick, JIS G3313 SECC work material. All experimental studies by BFT concept was performed under the conventional air clutch power press with the capacity of 110 ton. The presence of die rolls on edges at both planes of the blank signifies the onset of burr-free characteristic. The burr-free blanks finally was concluded with the BFT blanking tool structure on the case of lower punch protrude of 0.7mm with the correct pairing of positive clearances of 5% on upper punch and lower die and a negative clearance for lower punch and upper die. Aside, the optimum spring loads used for the upper die and lower punch forms an important parameter to the success of the burr-free blanking operation. The output of this BFT parameters produced the most desirable outputs in terms of the edge quality on burr-free blank. This was validated statistically through ANOVA method on the variance of the produced die rolls. 2020 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25384/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25384/1/An%20Approach%20To%20Burr%20Free%20Precision%20Metal%20Stamping.pdf text en validuser http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25384/2/An%20Approach%20To%20Burr%20Free%20Precision%20Metal%20Stamping.pdf text en public https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=119745 phd doctoral Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering Muhamad, Mohd Razali 1. Adam, L., and Mark, L., 2019. One-Way ANOVA: An Introduction. Laerd Statistics. [online] Available at: https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/one-way-anova-statistical-guide.php [Accessed on 18 August 2019]. 2. Aldowaisan, T., Nourelfath, M., and Hassan, J., 2015. Six Sigma Performance for Non-normal Processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 247, pp. 968-977. Aurich J.C., Dornfeld, D., Arrazola, P.J., Franke, V., Leitz, L., and Min, S., 2009. Burrs - Analysis, Control and Removal. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 58, pp. 519-542. 3. Boey, KH, Muhamad, M.R., and Sivaroa, S., 2017. Experimental Validation of Cutting Edge Quality for Blanking Process Modelled by LS-Dyna – Introducing a Novel Burr-free Technology (BFT). ISoRIS, 4. Boey, K.H., and Muhamad, M.R., 2019. Study on Tribology in Precision Metal Stamping Processes: Blanking Operation, 3, pp. 1-4. 5. TESC, 2018. Sharp Edge Tester Model SET-50: Technical Engineering Service Corporation. [online] Available at: https://www.sharpedgetester.com/html [Accessed on 3 January 2018]. 6. Berger, K., 2004. Proposal for a Standard for the Description of Edges in Automotive Engineering. In: Laboratory for Manufacturing Automation (University of California at Berkeley). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Deburring and Surface Finishing Berkeley, CA. 7. Chen, L., Yang, J.C., Zhang, L.W., and Yuan, S.Y., 2007. Finite Element Simulation and Model Optimization of Blank Holder Gap and Shell Element Type in the Stamping of a Washing-Trough. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 182, pp. 637-643. 8. CDMC, 2019. The Problem with Minimizing Burrs on Manufactured Parts. Cleveland Deburring machine Company. [online] Available at: https://cdmcmachine.com/the-problem-with-minimizing-burrs-on-manufactured-parts/ [Accessed on 10 September 2019]. 9. Choi, J., Choi, B., Heo, S., Oh, Y., and Shin, S., 2018. Numerical Modeling of the Thermal Deformation during Stamping Process of an Automotive Body Part. Applied Thermal Engineering, 128, pp. 159-172. 10. Choomlucksana, J., Ongsaranakorn, M., and Suksabai, P., 2015. Improving the Productivity of Sheet Metal Stamping Subassembly Area Using the Application of Lean Manufacturing Principles. Procedia Manufacturing, 2, pp. 102-107. 11. Chu, C.C. and Needleman, A., 1980. Void Nucleation Effects in Biaxially Stretched Sheets. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 102 (3), pp. 249-256. 12. Cui, J., Xie, F., and Wanf, C., 2015. Numerical Investigation on Thermal Deformation of Friction Pair in Hydro-viscous Drive. Applied Thermal Engineering, 90, pp. 460-470. 13. Cui, Z, Bhattacharya, S., Green G.E., and Alpas, A.T., 2019. Mechanisms of Die Wear and Wear-induced Damage at the Trimmed Edge of High Strength Steel Sheets. Wear, 426-427, pp. 1635-1645. 14. DSC, 2019. Tukey’s Test. Statistics How To. [online] Available at: https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/tukey-test-honest-significant-difference/ [Accessed on 5 October 2019]. 15. Davidson, D., 2007. Surface Condition Impacts Part Performance: Burrs, Edges Can Negatively Influence Function of Components. Metal Finishing, 105(2), pp. 22-31. 16. DuBois, D., Mengin, J., and Prade, H., 2006. Possibilities Incertainty and Fuzzy Features in Description Logic. A Preliminary Discussion. Capturing Intelligence, 1, pp. 101-113. 17. DynaSupport, 2019. Hourglass. LSTC. [online] Available at: https://www.dynasupport.com/howtos/element/hourglass/ [Accessed on: 12 September 2019]. 18. Elena, N., Valery, M., Aleksandr, V., 2019. Investigation of Deburring Process at Vibro-abrasive Treatment of Parts Having Small Grooves and Holes. Proceedings. [online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.726 [Accessed on 1 October 2019]. 19. EmergingTools, 2018. Denomination of shearing edge on blanking: Edge_Term_Blank Standard. Document Control. 20. Fabien, E., and Dirk, M., 2013. Ductile Fracture of Low Carbon Steel Sheets: Stress-based Versus Mixed Stress/strain-based Mohr-Coulomb Model. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 50, pp. 1055-1066. 21. Falconnet, E., Makich, H., Chambert, J., Monteil, G., and Picart, P., 2012. Numerical and Experimental Analyses of Punch Wear in the Blanking of Copper Alloy Thin Sheet. International Journal of Science and Technology, Wear, 296, pp.596-606. 22. Farzin, M., Javani, H. R., Mashayekhi, M., and Hambli, R., 2006. Analysis of Blanking Process Using Various Damage Criteria. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 177, pp.287-290. 23. Feistle, M., Koslow, I., Krinninger, M., Golle, R., and Volk, W., 2017. Reduction of Burr Formation for Conventional Shear Cutting of Boron-alloyed Sheets Through Focused Heat Treatment. Proceedings of the 50th CIRP Conference, Elsevier Publisher. 24. Fernandes, L., Silva, F.J., Andrade, M.F., Alexandre, R., Baptista, A.P.M., Rodrigues, C., 2017. Improving the Punch and Die Wear Behavior in Tin Coated Steel Stamping Process. Surface & Coatings Technology, 332, pp. 174-189. 25. Garajeu, M., Michael, J. C., and Suquet, P., 2000. A Micromechanical Approach of Damage in Viscoplastic Materials by Evolution in Size, Shape, Distribution of Voids. Computational Damage Mechanics Application Mechanics Engineering, 183, pp. 223-246. 26. Gaudilleire, C., Ranc, N., Larue, A., Maillard, A., and Lorong, P., 2013. High Speed Blanking: an Experimental Method to Measure Induced Cutting Forces. Experimental Mechanics, 53 (7), pp. 1117-1126. 27. Gillespie, L.K., 2004. Deburring and Surface Finishing. In: University of California. Berkeley, 7th International Deburring and Surface Finishing Conference, California. 28. Godina, R., Pimentel, C., Silva, F., and Mathias, J., 2018. Improvement of Statistical Process Control in an Automotive Manufacturing Unit. Procedia Manufacturing, 17, pp.729 - 736. 29. Golovashchenko, G., Zhou, W., Nasheralahkami, S., and Wang, N., 2017. Trimming and Sheared Edge Stretchability of Light Weight Sheet Metal Blanks. Procedia Engineering, 207, pp. 1552-1557. 30. GQYR, 2018. Global Metal Stamping Market Professional Survey Report. Global QY Research, London. 31. Grand View Research, 2017. Market Estimates and Trend Analysis: Metal Stamping Market. Grand View Research, USA. 32. Gronostajski, Z., Pater, Z., Madej, L., Gontarz, A., Lisiecki, L., Lukaszek-Solek, A., Luksza, J., Mroz, S., Muskalski, Z., Muzykiewicz, W., Pietrzyk, M., Sliwa, R., Tomczak, J., Wiewiorowska, S., Winiarski, G., Zasadzinski, J., Ziolkiewicz, S., 2019. Recent Development Trends in Metal Forming. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 19, pp. 898-941. 33. Gurnam, S. Simranpreet, S., Dogra, M., 2017. Techno-economic Analysis of Blanking Punch Life Improvement by Environment Friendly Cryogenic Treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, pp. 1060-1068. 34. Gustafsson, E., Oldenburg, M., Jansson, A., 2014. Design and Validation of a Sheet Metal Shearing Experimental Procedure. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 214, pp. 2468-2477. 35. Hatanaka, N., Yamaguchi, K., and Takakura, N., 2003. Finite Element Simulation of the Shearing Mechanism in the Blanking of Sheet Metal. Journal of Metal Processing Technology, 139, pp. 64-70. 36. Hirota, K., Yanaga, H., and Fukushima, K., 2009. Experimentation and Numerical Study on Blanking Process with Negative Clearance. Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering, 3 (2), pp. 247-255. 37. International Standard ISO 13715:2000. Technical Drawings – Edges of Undefined Shape. Vocabulary and Indications. 38. Jang, S.M., Eom, J.G., Lee, M.C., Joun, M.S., and Mori, K., 2009. Determination of Critical Damage Value by Comparing Experiments with Predictions of the Tensile Test of a Cylindrical Specimen. Proceedings of ISMAI-03, pp. 147-150. 39. JFE, 2019. Product Fields: Steels, JFE Steel Corporation. [online] Available at: https://www.jfe-steel.co.jp/en/products/sheets/index.html [Accessed on 12 August 2019]. 40. Jose, M., Filipe, X., and Francisco, M., 2010. Theoretical and numerical issues on ductile failure prediction-An Overview. Computer Methods in Material Science 10 (4), pp. 279-293. 41. Kai, W., Greve, L., and Wierzbicki, T., 2015. FE Simulation of Edge Fracture Considering Pre-damage from Blanking Process. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 71, pp. 206-218. 42. Katoh, K., and Kondo, K., 2018. Control of Rollover of Sheared Edge in Punching of High Strength Steel Sheets. Procedia Manufacturing, 15, pp. 584-589. 43. Kitamura, K., Makino, T., Nawa, M., and Miyata, S., 2016. Tribological Effects of Punch with Micro-dimples in Blanking Under High Hydrostatic Pressure. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 65, pp. 249-252. 44. Ko, D.C., Kim, B.M., and Choi, J.C., 1997. Finite-element Simulation of the Shear Process Using the Element-kill Method. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 72, pp. 129-140. 45. Ko, S.L., and Kim, W.S., 2006. Development of Effective Measurement Method for Burr Geometry. In: Proceedings of 6th Int. Conference on Precision Surface Finishing and Deburring Technology, St. Petersburg, Russia, 5-7, pp. 101-123. 46. Krinninger, M., Steinlehnera, F., Opritescua, D., Gollea, R., and Volka, W., 2017. On the Influence of Different Parameters on the Characteristic Cutting Surface when Shear Cutting Aluminum. Proceedings of the 50th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing System 63, Elsevier Publisher, pp. 230-235. 47. Leblond, J. B., Perrin, G., and Devaux, J., 1995. An Improved Gurson–type Model for Hardenable Ductile Metals. European Journal of Mechanics, 14, pp. 499-527. 48. Liu, Y., Tang, B., Hua, L., and Mao, H., 2018. Investigation of a Novel Modified Die Design for Fine Blanking Process to Reduce the Die-roll size. Journal of Materials Processing Tech., 260, pp. 30-37. 49. LS-Dyna, 2006. Theory Manual. Livermore: LSTC. 50. LS-Dyna, 2009. Keyword User’s Manual – Vol 1. Livermore: LSTC. 51. DynaSupport, 2019. Hourglass. LSTC. [online] Available at: https://www.dynasupport.com/howtos/element/hourglass/ [Accessed on: 12 September 2019]. 52. LSTC, 2019. LS-DYNA: General-purpose Finite Element Program Software. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, CA. 53. Lu, J., Chen, J., Fang, Q., Liu, F., and Jin, T., 2016. Theoretical Analysis and Finite Element Simulation of Poisson Burr in Cutting Ductile Metals. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 66, pp. 260-272. 54. Luo, C, Chen, Z., Zhou, K., Yang, X., and Zhang, X., 2017. A Novel Method to Significantly Decrease the Die roll During Fine-blanking process with Verification by Simulation and Experiments. Journal of Materials Processing Tech., 250, pp. 254-260. 55. Mahmudah, A., Kiswanto. G., and Priadi., D., 2017. Analysis of Shear Edge Quality for Different Punch Velocities in Micro-Blanking Process. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 6 (4), pp. 279-284. 56. Madanhire, I., and Mbohwa, C., 2016. Application of Statistical Process Control (SPC) in Manufacturing Industry in a Developing Country. Procedia CIRP, 40, pp. 580-583. 57. Majernikova, J., 2013. The Effect of Punch-die Clearance on Blanked Edge Quality in Fine Blanking of Steel Sheets. Mechanika, 85, pp. 479-488. 58. McClintock, F. A., 1968. A Criterion for Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 35(235/2), pp. 363-371. 59. Minitab Express, 2019. Interpret the key results for One-Way ANOVA, Minitab LLC. [online] Available at: https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab-express/1/help-and-how-to/modeling-statistics/anova/one-way-anova/interpret-the-results/key-results/ [Accessed on 8 August 2018]. Mori, K., Abe, Y., and Sedoguchi, K., 2019. Delayed Fracture in Cold Blanking of Ultra-High Strength Steel Sheets. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 69, pp. 297-300. 60. Morin, L., Leblond, J.B., and Benzerga, A.A., 2015. Coalescence of Voids by Internal Necking: Theoretical Estimates and Numerical Results. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 63, pp. 240-263. 61. Mytek, 2012. Components for press dies shop: Catalogue, 1st ed., Mytek Industrial Supply. Malaysia. 62. Newmann, J. and Richtmyer, R.D., 1950. A Method for the Numerical Calculation of Hydrodynamic Shocks, Journal Applied Physic, 21 (3), pp. 232-237. 63. NIST, 2019. Anderson-Darling Test. Engineering Statistics Handbook. [online] Available at: https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35e.htm [Accessed on 5 October 2019]. 64. Pack, K., Tancogne-Dejean, T., Gorji, M., and Mohr, D., 2018. Hosford-Coulomb Ductile Failure Model for Shell Elements: Experimental Identification and Validation for DP980 Steel and Aluminum 6016-T4. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 151, pp. 214-232. 65. Pardoen, T., and Hutchinson, J.W., 2000. An Extended Model for Void Growth and Coalescence. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 48, pp. 2467-2512. Pavuluri, S., Rajashekar, B., and Damodhar, B., 2016. Process of Press Tool Design and its Manufacturing for Blanking Operation. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(5), pp. 8602-8609. Peter, D., Hartmut, H., Roland, G., Carsten, I., and Wolfram, V., 2015. Interaction of Heat Generation and Material Behaviour in Sheet Metal Blanking. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 64, pp. 249-252. Peter, U., 2013. Metal Forming Magazine: Defining Acceptable Burr Height. [online] Available at: http://www.metalformingmagazine.com/magazine/article/ Dafaults.asp ? 2013/8/1/ Defining Acceptable Burr Height.html [Accessed on 30 April 2019]. Rice, J. R., and Tracey, D. M., 1969. Computational Fracture Mechanics in Numerical and Computer Methods in Structural Mechanics. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 17(3), pp. 125-217. 66. Richtmyer, R.D., 1967. Difference Methods for Initial Value Problems. New York, Interscience Publisher Inc. [online] Available at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt? id= mdp.39015002073842;view= 1up;seq=8.html [Accessed 8 January 2016]. 67. Sachnik, P., Hoque, S.E., and Volk, W., 2017. Burr Free Cutting Edge by Notch-shear Cutting. Journal of Material Processing Tech. 249(4), pp. 229-245. 68. Sasada, M., Shimura, K., and Aoki, I., 2006. Coefficient of Friction Between Tool and Shearing. JSME International Journal, 71 (712), pp. 3583-3589. 69. Sasada, M., and Katou, S., 2018. Effect of Use of Protrusion Punch on Length of Burnished Surface in Piercing after Half Punching. Procedia Manufacturing, 15, pp. 653 -659. 70. Sergejev, F., Peetsalu, P., Sivitski, A., Saarna, M., Adoberg, E., 2011. Surface Fatigue and Wear of PVD Coated Punches During Fine Blanking Operation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18, pp. 1689-1697. 71. SEYI, 2019. Products: C Frame and Solid Frame Mechanical Press, SHIEH YIH Machinery Industry Co., Ltd. [online] Available at: https://www.seyi.com/ englobal/ product / index/c frame & solid frame mechanical press [Accessed on 18 August 2019]. 72. Shanbhag, V., Rolfeb, B., Arunachalam, N, Pereira, M., 2018. Investigating Galling Wear Behaviour in Sheet Metal Stamping Using Acoustic Emissions. Wear, 414-415 pp. 31- 42. 73. Smith, S., 2002, EHS Today: New Study Points to Causes, Prevention of Hand Injuries. [online] Available at: http://www.ehstoday.com/news/ehs imp 35483.html [Accessed on 10 January 2016]. 74. Skotny, L., 2017. Correct Mesh Size: A Quick Guide. Enterfea. [online] Available at: https://enterfea.com/correct-mesh-size-quick-guide/ [Accessed on 24 September 2019]. 75. Solid Objectives, 2018. Corporate Objectives: QM 002/97. Solid Precision Engineering Sdn. Bhd. Central Doc Con. 76. Solid Prod Records, 2018. QBR Reviews: QBR Q1/18-Q4/18. Solid Precision Engineering Sdn. Bhd. Production Office. 77. Solid QA, 2010. Standard Operation Procedure for sharp edge confirmation: Doc SE/001/10. Solid Precision Engineering Sdn. Bhd. Central Doc Con. 78. Solid QBR, 2019. Customer Feedback and Rating: Quarterly Business Review Records. Solid Precision Engineering Sdn. Bhd. Customer Service Department. 79. Solid Technical Drawing Library, 2014. DDIC_registered document: SG54PP. Solid Precision Engineering Sdn. Bhd. Central Doc Con. 80. Solid Tooling, 2008. Tooling Design Procedures- Blanking: Doc Eng/007/08. Solid Precision Engineering Sdn. Bhd. Central Doc Con. 81. Subramonian, S., Atlan, T., Campbell, C, and Ciocirlan, B., 2013. Optimum Selection of Variable Punch-die Clearance to Improve Tool Life in Blanking Non-symmetric Shapes. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 75, pp. 63-71. 82. Suri, B., 2019. Material Selector for LS-Dyna. LSTC.com. [online] Available at: https://q=material+models+in+LS-Dyna&rlz=1C1GGRVenMY752MY752 oq=material models in LS-Dyna aqs chrome.69i57j0l5.12553j1j8 sourceid chrome ie=UTF-8 [Accessed on: 28 August 2019]. 83. Suriyapha, C., Boonsong, R., and Bopit, B., 2011. Material Flow Behaviour on Fine Blanking Process for Sheet Metal Extrusion. AIJSTPME, 4(1), pp. 77-80. 84. Suzuki, Y., Shiratori, T., Murakawa, M., and Yang, M., 2018. Precision Stamping Process of Metal Micro Gears. Procedia Manufacturing, 15, pp. 1445-1451. 85. Taupin, E., Breitling, J., Wu, W.T., and Atlan, T., 1996. Material Fracture and Burr Formation in Blanking Results of FEM Simulations and Comparison with Experiments. Journal of Material Processing Tech. 59, pp. 68-78. 86. Technavio Research, 2017. Global Metal Stamping Market To Be Worth USD 149.38 Billion by 2021: Technavio. [online] Available at: https://www.businesswire.com/news/ home/ 20170512005512/en/Global-Metal-Stamping-Market-Projected-Worth-USD.html [Accessed on 30 July 2018]. 87. Toboła, D., Brostow, W., Czechowski, K., and Rusek, P., 2017. Improvement of Wear Resistance of Some Cold Working Tool Steels. Wear, 382 - 383, pp. 29-39. 88. Tvergaard, V., and Needleman, A., 1984. Analysis of the Cup-cone Fracture in a Round Tensile Bar. Acta Metallurgica, 32 (1), pp. 157-169. 89. Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 2004. UL-1439 – Tests for sharpness of edges on equipment. Northbrook, UL. 90. Watanabe, Y., and Hirota, K., 2018. Investigation of Shear Droop Formation Around Convex Portions of Blanked Components. Procedia Manufacturing, 15, pp. 647-652. 91. Wood, P.K.C, and Schley, C.A., 2015. Strain Rate Testing of Metallic Materials and Their Modelling for Use in CAE based Automotive Crash Simulation Tools. 1st ed., iSmithers. 92. Xie, X.L., Zhen, Z., Song, Y., Gu, S.G., Chen, J., and Li, M.H., 2006. Mechanism of Localized Severe Plastic Deformation and Damage Fracture in Fine-blanking Using Mixed Displacement and Pressure FEM. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 16, pp. 1021-1028. 93. Xing, Z., Chen, L., Lei, C., Cai, T., and Yu, H., 2018. Simulated Analysis and Experimental Investigation on Edge Qualities of High Strength Steels Hot Blanking Parts. Procedia Manufacturing, 15, pp. 619-626. 94. Xu, J., Guo, B., Wang, C., and Shan, D., 2012. Blanking Clearance and Grain Size Effects on Micro Deformation Behavior and Fracture in Micro-blanking of Brass Foil. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 60, pp. 27-34. 95. Zhao, P., Chen, Z., and Dong, C., 2017. Investigation and Prediction of Tearing Failure During Extrusion Based on a Modified Shear Damage Model. Mechanics of Material, 112, pp. 28-39. 96. Zhou, M., Li, Y., Hu, Q., Li, X., and Chen, J., 2019. Investigations on Edge Quality and Its Effect on Tensile Property and Fracture Patterns of QP980. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 39, pp. 509-518. 97. Zhang, K., Wang, Q., and Ding, Z., 2013. Influence of Relative Clearance to Hole Quality in Punching Process. Advanced Materials Research, 1004 - 1005, pp. 1365-1368. |