Particle Swarm Optimization Of Direct Yaw Control Using Linear Quadratic Integral For Vehicle Stability

Direct Yaw Control (DYC) for Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) system is recognized as an effective method to enhance the vehicle lateral stability during severe manoeuvre and critical situation. However, when driving in a high-speed environment, the effectiveness of the DYC might be degraded especial...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Omar, Mohd Firdaus
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2020
Subjects:	T Technology (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25397/1/Particle%20Swarm%20Optimization%20Of%20Direct%20Yaw%20Control%20Using%20Linear%20Quadratic%20Integral%20For%20Vehicle%20Stability.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25397/2/Particle%20Swarm%20Optimization%20Of%20Direct%20Yaw%20Control%20Using%20Linear%20Quadratic%20Integral%20For%20Vehicle%20Stability.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.25397
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Ghazali, Rozaimi
topic	T Technology (General) T Technology (General)
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) T Technology (General) Omar, Mohd Firdaus Particle Swarm Optimization Of Direct Yaw Control Using Linear Quadratic Integral For Vehicle Stability
description	Direct Yaw Control (DYC) for Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) system is recognized as an effective method to enhance the vehicle lateral stability during severe manoeuvre and critical situation. However, when driving in a high-speed environment, the effectiveness of the DYC might be degraded especially during wet road and sidewind disturbance. Thus, an appropriate controller strategy is essential to assist the DYC method to overcome these problems. Besides that, an optimization method in the controller gains playing vital role in the overall performance. In this study, the mathematical model for single-track car based on Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) was developed. The bicycle model is used in this research to investigate and analyse the performance of DYC which taking into account the effect of uncertainties and disturbance occurred in the system. Then, a Linear Quadratic Integral (LQI) controller is proposed to assist the DYC for the vehicle’s yaw rate and sideslip angle regulation, specifically for the VSC. The LQI control strategy is formulated based on minimization of the linear quadratic cost function, where the system input and the states of the function are the measured performances. However, there are inadequate study involves for the LQI controller in the DYC system or vehicle handling and until to date, there is still no proper method for selecting the parameter gain for this control strategy. Therefore, in order to achieve an optimum performance of the DYC, the LQI controller gains have been properly selected by using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. Apart from optimizing the controller parameters, the LQI with optimization using PSO algorithm capable to maintain the stability of the vehicle in several manoeuvre circumstances. In the results of the Step Steering and the Slalom manoeuvre in dry road condition, all the controllers performed well even struck by sidewind. However, in the wet road test, there are significant changes in the performance of all controllers. The result shows the optimized LQI controller produced significant improvement in yaw rate performance for the Step Steering manoeuvre in wet road condition. Compared with the optimized Proportional-IntegralDerivative (PID) and the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controllers, the LQI controller outperform with 0.84% overshoot, 0.49s settling time, 0.3996s rise time and 0.5648x10-5rad/s steady state error. In the sideslip angle performance, the optimized LQI controller produced 0.84% overshoot and 1.33s settling time compared with optimized PID and LQR controllers. For the Slalom manoeuvre in the wet road condition, the optimized LQI controller has lower Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) which is 0.4220x10-2rad/s compared with optimized PID and LQR controllers in yaw rate performance. In the sideslip angle performance, the optimized LQI controllers produced 9.5408x10-6rad lower RMSE compared with optimized PID and LQR controllers. As a conclusion, the optimized LQI controller by using PSO has successfully performed as an effective control method to overcome the vehicle lateral stability issues.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Omar, Mohd Firdaus
author_facet	Omar, Mohd Firdaus
author_sort	Omar, Mohd Firdaus
title	Particle Swarm Optimization Of Direct Yaw Control Using Linear Quadratic Integral For Vehicle Stability
title_short	Particle Swarm Optimization Of Direct Yaw Control Using Linear Quadratic Integral For Vehicle Stability
title_full	Particle Swarm Optimization Of Direct Yaw Control Using Linear Quadratic Integral For Vehicle Stability
title_fullStr	Particle Swarm Optimization Of Direct Yaw Control Using Linear Quadratic Integral For Vehicle Stability
title_full_unstemmed	Particle Swarm Optimization Of Direct Yaw Control Using Linear Quadratic Integral For Vehicle Stability
title_sort	particle swarm optimization of direct yaw control using linear quadratic integral for vehicle stability
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty of Electrical Enginering
publishDate	2020
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25397/1/Particle%20Swarm%20Optimization%20Of%20Direct%20Yaw%20Control%20Using%20Linear%20Quadratic%20Integral%20For%20Vehicle%20Stability.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25397/2/Particle%20Swarm%20Optimization%20Of%20Direct%20Yaw%20Control%20Using%20Linear%20Quadratic%20Integral%20For%20Vehicle%20Stability.pdf
_version_	1747834118031278080
spelling	my-utem-ep.253972021-11-17T09:03:44Z Particle Swarm Optimization Of Direct Yaw Control Using Linear Quadratic Integral For Vehicle Stability 2020 Omar, Mohd Firdaus T Technology (General) TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Direct Yaw Control (DYC) for Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) system is recognized as an effective method to enhance the vehicle lateral stability during severe manoeuvre and critical situation. However, when driving in a high-speed environment, the effectiveness of the DYC might be degraded especially during wet road and sidewind disturbance. Thus, an appropriate controller strategy is essential to assist the DYC method to overcome these problems. Besides that, an optimization method in the controller gains playing vital role in the overall performance. In this study, the mathematical model for single-track car based on Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) was developed. The bicycle model is used in this research to investigate and analyse the performance of DYC which taking into account the effect of uncertainties and disturbance occurred in the system. Then, a Linear Quadratic Integral (LQI) controller is proposed to assist the DYC for the vehicle’s yaw rate and sideslip angle regulation, specifically for the VSC. The LQI control strategy is formulated based on minimization of the linear quadratic cost function, where the system input and the states of the function are the measured performances. However, there are inadequate study involves for the LQI controller in the DYC system or vehicle handling and until to date, there is still no proper method for selecting the parameter gain for this control strategy. Therefore, in order to achieve an optimum performance of the DYC, the LQI controller gains have been properly selected by using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. Apart from optimizing the controller parameters, the LQI with optimization using PSO algorithm capable to maintain the stability of the vehicle in several manoeuvre circumstances. In the results of the Step Steering and the Slalom manoeuvre in dry road condition, all the controllers performed well even struck by sidewind. However, in the wet road test, there are significant changes in the performance of all controllers. The result shows the optimized LQI controller produced significant improvement in yaw rate performance for the Step Steering manoeuvre in wet road condition. Compared with the optimized Proportional-IntegralDerivative (PID) and the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controllers, the LQI controller outperform with 0.84% overshoot, 0.49s settling time, 0.3996s rise time and 0.5648x10-5rad/s steady state error. In the sideslip angle performance, the optimized LQI controller produced 0.84% overshoot and 1.33s settling time compared with optimized PID and LQR controllers. For the Slalom manoeuvre in the wet road condition, the optimized LQI controller has lower Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) which is 0.4220x10-2rad/s compared with optimized PID and LQR controllers in yaw rate performance. In the sideslip angle performance, the optimized LQI controllers produced 9.5408x10-6rad lower RMSE compared with optimized PID and LQR controllers. As a conclusion, the optimized LQI controller by using PSO has successfully performed as an effective control method to overcome the vehicle lateral stability issues. 2020 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25397/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25397/1/Particle%20Swarm%20Optimization%20Of%20Direct%20Yaw%20Control%20Using%20Linear%20Quadratic%20Integral%20For%20Vehicle%20Stability.pdf text en validuser http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25397/2/Particle%20Swarm%20Optimization%20Of%20Direct%20Yaw%20Control%20Using%20Linear%20Quadratic%20Integral%20For%20Vehicle%20Stability.pdf text en public https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=119685 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Electrical Enginering Ghazali, Rozaimi 1. Aalizadeh, B. and Asnafi, A., 2016. Combination of particle swarm optimization algorithm and artificial neural network to propose an efficient controller for vehicle handling in uncertain road conditions. Neural Computing and Applications, 30(2), pp. 585–593. 2. Adibi-asl, H., Doosthosseini, A. and Taghavipour, A., 2017. Using Adaptive Pole Placement Control Strategy for Active Steering Safety System. International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 11(3), pp. 524–528. 3. Agarwal, S., Mathur, S., Mishra, P., Kumar, V. and Rana, K. P. S., 2015. Online tuning of fractional order PI controller using particle swarm optimization. International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation, ICCCA 2015, pp. 1026–1031. 4. Ahiska, K., Ozgoren, M. K. and Leblebicioglu, M. K., 2018. Autopilot Design for Vehicle Cornering Through Icy Roads. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(3), pp. 1867–1880. 5. Aksjonov, A., Augsburg, K. and Vodovozov, V., 2016. Design and Simulation of the Robust ABS and ESP Fuzzy Logic Controller on the Complex Braking Maneuvers. Applied Sciences, 6(12), pp. 1-18. 6. Alipour, H., Sabahi, M. and Bannae Sharifian, M. B., 2015. Lateral stabilization of a four wheel independent drive electric vehicle on slippery roads. Mechatronics, 30, pp. 275–285. 7. Almselati, A. S. I., Rahmat, R. A. O. K. and Jaafar, O., 2011. An overview of urban transport in Malaysia. Social Sciences, 6(1), pp. 24–33. 8. Amine, S. and Mokhiamar, O., 2019. A study of stability and power consumption of electric vehicles using different modern control strategies. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(3), pp. 827–833. 9. Anwar, S., 2003. A predictive control algorithm for a yaw stability management system. SAE Transactions, pp. 1325–1334. 10. Årzén, K., 1999. A simple event-based PID controller. Proceding. 14th IFAC World Congress, 18, pp. 423–428. 11. Atherton, D., 2012. An Introduction to Nonlinearity in Control Systems. Bookboon. 12. Bächle, T., Graichen, K., Buchholz, M. and Dietmayer, K., 2015. Model predictive control allocation in electric vehicle drive trains. International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), 28(15), pp. 335–340. 13. Blanc, J., 2016. Control Systems Design for Automatic Drive of a Passenger Car in Critical Scenarios, Master Thesis of University of Windsor. 14. Boada, B. L., Boada, M. J. L., Gauchía, A., Olmeda, E. and Díaz, V., 2015. Sideslip angle estimator based on ANFIS for vehicle handling and stability. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29(4), pp. 1473–1481. 15. Boyd, S., Barratt, C. and Norman, S., 1990. Linear Controller Design: Limits of Performance Via Convex Optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(3), pp. 529–574. 16. Canale, M., Fagiano, L., Ferrara, A. and Vecchio, C., 2008. Vehicle yaw control via second-order sliding-mode technique. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(11), pp. 3908–3916. 17. Cao, W., Liu, Z., Chang, Y. Szumanowski, A., 2017. Direct Yaw Control of All-Wheel-Independent-Drive Electric Vehicle with Network-Induced Delays through Parameter-Dependent Fuzzy SMC Approach. Mathematical Problem in Engineering, 17, pp. 1–5. 18. Chatterjee, M., Kale, M. and Chaudhari, B., 2019. A dynamic stability control for electric narrow tilting three wheeled vehicle using integrated multivariable controller. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 66, pp. 58–75. 19. Chu, L., Gao, X., Guo, J., Liu, H., Chao, L. and Shang, M., 2012. Coordinated Control of Electronic Stability Program and Active Front Steering. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 12, pp. 1379–1386. 20. Chunyun, F., Hoseinnezhad, R., Hadiashar, A. and Reza, Jazar N., 2015. Direct Yaw Control control for electric and hybrid vehicles with independent motors. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 69(14), pp. 1–24. 21. Dai, P. and Katupitiya, J., 2018. Force control for path following of a 4WS4WD vehicle by the integration of PSO and SMC. Vehicle System Dynamics, 56(11), pp. 1682–1716. 22. Data, S. and Frigerio, F., 2002. Objective evaluation of handling quality. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 216(4), pp. 297–305. 23. De Novellis, L., Sorniotti, A., Gruber, P., Orus, J., Rodriguez Fortun, J.M., Theunissen, J. and De Smeet, J., 2015. Direct Yaw Control control actuated through electric Drivetrains and friction brakes: Theoretical design and experiment assessment. Mechatronics, 26, pp. 1–15. 24. Ding, S., Liu, L. and Zheng, W. X., 2017. Sliding Mode Direct Yaw Control Design for In-Wheel Electric Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(8), pp. 6752–6762. 25. Ding, X. and He, Y., 2012. Application of driver-in-the-loop real-time simulations to the design of SUV differential braking controllers. Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 7506 LNAI, pp. 121–131. 26. Elhefnawy, A., Sharaf, A. ., Ragheb, H. . and Hegazy, S., 2016. Active Vehicle Safety using Integrated Control of Body Roll and Direct Yaw Control. Proceedings of the 17th Int. AMME Conference, pp. 1–19. 27. Elshazly, O., Zyada, Z., Mohamed, A. and Muscato, G., 2015. Optimized control of skid steering mobile robot with slip conditions. IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, AIM, pp. 959–964. 28. Esmailzadeh, E., Goodarzi, A. and Vossoughi, G. R., 2003. Optimal yaw moment control law for improved vehicle handling. Mechatronics, 13(7), pp. 659–675. 29. Fan, Xiaobin and Wang, Feng and Jin, Ke and Xia, Q., 2016. Fuzzy logic control for vehicle stability control system with virtual prototype and experimental research. International Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing, 11(1), pp. 1–22. 30. Fu, C., Hoseinnezhad, R., Bab-Hadiashar, A., and Jazar, R.N., 2015. Direct Yaw Control Control for Electric and Hybrid Vehicle with Independent Motor. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 69(1–4), pp. 1–24. 31. Fujiwara, Y., Shoda, Y. and Adachi, S., 2005. Development Of Obstacle Avoidance System Using Co-Operative Control. International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), 38(1), pp. 170–175. 32. Gao, L., Jin, L., Wang, F., Zheng, Y. and Li, K., 2015. Genetic algorithm-based varying parameter linear quadratic regulator control for four-wheel independent steering vehicle. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7(11), pp. 1–14. 33. Gelmanova, Z.S., Zhabalova, G.G., Sivyakova, G.A., Lelikova, O.N., Onishchenko, O.N., Smailova, A.A., and Kamarova, S.N., 2018. Electric Car. Advantages and Disadvantage, Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 1015(5), pp. 1–5. 34. Ghani, N. M., Sam, Y. M. and Ahmad, A., 2006. Active steering for vehicle system using sliding mode control. 4th IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development, pp. 256–261. 35. Guo, H. B., Liu, Y. G., Liu, G. R. and Li, H. R., 2008. Cascade control of a hydraulically driven 6-DOF parallel robot manipulator based on a sliding mode. Control Engineering Practice, 16(9), pp. 1055–1068. 36. Guo, J., Luo, Y., Li, K. and Dai, Y., 2018. Coordinated path-following and Direct Yaw Control of autonomous electric vehicles with sideslip angle estimation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 105, pp. 183–199. 37. Gustafsson, J., 2017. Investigation of Active Anti-Roll Bars and Development of Control Algorithm Harshit Agrawal, Master Thesis of Chalmers University Of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden. 38. Harris, C. J. and Read, A. B., 1988. Knowledge Based Fuzzy Motion Control of Autonomous Vehicles. International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), 21(13), pp. 139–144. 39. Hedrick, J Karl and Girard, A., 2005. Control of nonlinear dynamic systems: Theory and applications. Controllability and Observability of Nonlinear Systems, Berkeley CA: University California. 40. Hirche, B. and Ayalew, B., 2016. A Fuzzy Inference System for Understeer/Oversteer Detection Towards Model-Free Stability Control. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems, 9(2), pp. 1–8. 41. Ho, M. L., Chan, P. T., Rad, A. B., Shirazi, M. and Cina, M., 2012. A novel fused neural network controller for lateral control of autonomous vehicles. Applied Soft Computing, 12(11), pp. 3514–3525. 42. Hori, Y., 2004. Future vehicle driven by electricity and control - Research on four-wheel-motored “UOT Electric March II”. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 51(5), pp. 954–962. 43. Horiuchi, S., Okada, K. and Nohtomi, S., 1999. Improvement of vehicle handling by nonlinear integrated control of four wheel steering and four wheel torque. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan JSAE Review, 20(4), pp. 459–464. 44. Huang, G., Yuan, X., Shi, K. and Wu, X., 2019. A BP-PID controller-based multi-model control system for lateral stability of distributed drive electric vehicle. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 356(13), pp. 7290–7311. 45. Hung, N. J. and Yazdanifard, R., 2015. The Study of Vehicle Safety Aspects Influencing Malaysian Urban Consumer Car Purchasing Behaviour. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 2(28), pp. 913–924. 46. Hussien, S.Y.S., Jaafar, H.I., Ghazali, R., and Razif, N.R.A., 2015. The Effect of auto-tuned method in PID and PD control scheme for gantry crane system. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), 4(6), pp. 121–125. 47. ISO/DIS 3888-1. 2000. Road Vehicles-Test Procedure for a Severe Lane Change Manoeuvre.International Organization for Standardization Geneva. 48. ISO 7401: 2003. 2003. Road vehicles-lateral transient response test methods-open-loop test methods. International Organization for Standardization Geneva. 49. Ivanov, V., Savitski, D., Orus, J., Fortun, J. M. R., Sorniotti, A. and Gruber, P., 2015. All-wheel-drive electric vehicle with on-board motors: Experimental validation of the motion control systems. IECON 2015 - 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 1729–1734. 50. Jin, L., Xie, X., Shen, C., Wang, F., Wang, F., Ji, S., Guan, X., 2017. Study on electronic stability program control strategy based on the fuzzy logical and genetic optimization method. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(5), pp. 1–13. 51. Jin, X., Yin, G. and Wang, J., 2017. Robust fuzzy control for vehicle lateral dynamic stability via Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy approach. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 5574–5579. 52. Kanarachos, S., and Spentzas, K. N., 2003. A new “min-max” Hamiltonian method for computing optimal obstacle avoidance trajectories of vehicles. WSEAS Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 2(3), pp. 511–516. 53. Kanarachos, S., and Spentzas, K. N., 2002. A nonlinear control for the yaw stabilization of vehicles. Conference JUMV for Automotive Engineering for Intelligent Vehicle Systems, pp. 1–6. 54. Kanchwala, H. and Bordons, C., 2016. Improving Handling Performance of an Electric Vehicle Using Model Predictive Control, (No. 2015-01-0082). SAE Technical Paper. 55. Kanchwala, H., Wideberg, J., Alba, C. B. and Marcos, D. 2015. Control of an independent 4WD electric vehicle by DYC method. International Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing, 10(2), pp. 168–184. 56. Kanghyun, N., 2015. Design of an adaptive sliding mode controller for robust yaw stabilisation of in-wheel-motor-driven electric vehicles. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 67(1), pp. 98–113. 57. Kareem, A., 2003. Review of global menace of road accidents with special reference to malaysia- a social perspective. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences : MJMS, 10(2), pp. 31–39. 58. Karnopp, D., 1986. Theoretical Limitations in Active Vehicle Suspensions. Vehicle System Dynamics, 15(1), pp. 41–54. 59. Katsuyama, E., 2013. Decoupled 3D moment control using in-wheel motors. Vehicle System Dynamics, 51(1), pp. 18–31. 60. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. C., 1997. A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation, 5, pp. 4104–4108. 61. Kim, D. K. D., Hwang, S. H. S. and Kim, H. K. H., 2008. Vehicle Stability Enhancement of Four-Wheel-Drive Hybrid Electric Vehicle Using Rear Motor Control. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(2), pp. 727–735. 62. Kim, H., Lee, S. and Hedrick, J. K., 2015. Active yaw control for handling performance improvement by using traction force. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 16(3), pp. 457–464. 63. Kin, K., Yano, O. and Urabe, H., 2003. Enhancements in vehicle stability and steerability with slip control. Society of Automotive Engineer of Japan (JSAE) Review, 24(1), pp. 71–79. 64. Kinsey, J., 2010. The Advantages of an Electronically Controlled Limited Slip Differential. SAE Technical Paper Series, (No. 2004-01-0861), pp. 1–11. 65. Kusuma, D. H., Ali, M. and Sutantra, N., 2016. The comparison of optimization for active steering control on vehicle using PID controller based on artificial intelligence techniques. 2016 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (ISemantic), pp. 18–22. 66. Kwak, Byunghak and Park, Y., 2001. Robust vehicle stability controller based on multiple sliding mode control. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Transactions, pp. 514–520. 67. Lakehal-ayat, M. and Diop, S., 2000. Yaw rate control for a cornering 4WD vehicle. Proceedings of the 14th International Sysmposium of Mathematical Theory of Network and System, pp. 1–5. 68. Lawes, J., 2014. Car Brakes: A Guide to Upgrading, Repair and Maintenance, Crowood. 69. Lei, Z., Yu, L., Ning, P., Xiaoxue, L. and Jian, S., 2014. Vehicle Direct Yaw Control control based on tire cornering stiffness estimation. ASME 2014 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 1–8. 70. Li, H. M., Wang, X. B., Song, S. B., and Li, H., 2016. Vehicle Control Strategies Analysis Based on PID and Fuzzy Logic Control. Procedia Engineering, 137, pp. 234–243. 71. Li, L., Lu, Y., Wang, R. and Chen, J., 2016. A 3-Dimentional Dynamics Control Framework of Vehicle Lateral Stability and Rollover Prevention via Active Braking with MPC. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(4), pp. 3389–3401. 72. Li, S., Zhao, L. and Yang, C., 2015. Co-Simulation Study for Fuzzy ESP Control Strategy on Vehicle. The Open Mechanical Engineering Journal, 8(1), pp. 682–688. 73. Liebemann, E. K., Meder, K., Schuh, J. and Nenninger, G., 2004. Safety and Performance Enhancement: The Bosch Electronic Stability Control (ESP). SAE Convergence International Congress & Exposition On Transportation Electronics, pp. 1–9. 74. Lu, S.-B., Li, Y.-N., Choi, S.-B., Zheng, L. and Seong, M.S., 2011. Integrated control on MR vehicle suspension system associated with braking and steering control. Vehicle System Dynamics, 49(1–2), pp. 361–380. 75. Malkapure, H. G. and Chidambaram, M., 2014. Comparison of Two Methods of Incorporating an Integral Action in Linear Quadratic Regulator. International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) Proceedings Volumes 47(1), pp. 55–61. 76. Manning, W. J. and Crolla, D.A., 2007. A review of yaw rate and sideslip controllers for passenger vehicles. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 29(2), pp. 117–135. 77. Mclean, C. R., Jones, A. T. and Bureau, N., 1986. A Proposed Hierarchical Control Model for Automated Mandacturing Systems, Journal of Manufacturing System 5(1), pp. 15–25. 78. Metzler, M., Tavernini, D., Sorniotti, A. and Gruber, P., 2019. Explicit non-linear model predictive control for vehicle stability control. 9th International Munich Chassis Symposium 2018, pp. 733–752. 79. Miao, P., Liu, G., Zhang, D., Jiang, Y., Zhang, H. and Zhou, H., 2014. Sideslip angle soft-sensor based on neural network left inversion for multi-wheel independently driven electric vehicles. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, (61273154), pp. 2171–2175. 80. Murata, S., 2012. Innovation by in-wheel-motor drive unit. Vehicle System Dynamics, 50(6), pp. 807–830. 81. Mustafa, M. N., 2010. Overview of Current Road Safety Situation in Malaysia. Highways Planning Unit, Roaf Safety Section, Ministry of Work, pp. 5–9. 82. Mutoh, N., Hayano, Y., Yahagi, H. and Takita, K. 2007. Electric braking control methods for electric vehicles with independently driven front and rear wheels. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 54(2), pp. 1168–1176. 83. Nagai, M. and Wang, Y., 1996. Electric Vehicle Related Technologies. Motion Control of Electric Vehicles by Distribution Control of Traction Forces. IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications, 116(3), pp. 279–284. 84. Oreh, S. H. T., Kazemi, R. and Esmaeili, N., 2014. A new Direct Yaw Control control with lateral forces effect consideration. International Journal of Automotive Engineering, 4(3), pp. 769–791. 85. Park, K., 2002. Controller design for improving lateral vehicle dynamic stability. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan (JSAE) Review, 22(4), pp. 481–486. 86. Poli, R., Kennedy, J. and Blackwell, T., 2007. Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intelligence, 1(1), pp. 33–57. 87. Qian, H., Xu, G., Yan, J., Lam, T. L., Xu, Y. and Xu, K., 2010. Energy management for four-wheel independent driving vehicle. IEEE/RSJ 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2010 - Conference Proceedings, pp. 5532–5537. 88. Rajamani, R., 2012. Vehicle Dynamics and Control. Springer Science & Business Media. 89. Ren, B., Zhao, H., Deng, W. and Chen, H., 2015. Model predictive control allocation for stability improvement of four-wheel drive electric vehicles in critical driving condition. IET Control Theory & Applications, 9(18), pp. 2688–2696. 90. Rudin, B., Christina, M., and Burns, P. C., 2007. The secret of electronic stability control (ESC). Proceedings of the Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference XVII, pp. 3–6. 91. Sawase, K. and Sano, Y., 1999. Application of active yaw control to vehicle dynamics by utilizing driving/breaking force. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan (JSAE) Review, 20(2), pp. 289–295. 92. Shibahata, Y. and Tomari, T., 2006. Direct Yaw Control vectoring, Auto Technology, 6(3) pp. 34–38. 93. Shino, M., Miyamoto, N., Wang, Y.-Q. and Nagai, M., 2000. Traction control of electric vehicles considering vehicle stability. 6th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control Proceedings, pp. 311–316. 94. Siong, H. C., 2008. Urban Governance and Rapid Urbanization Issues in Malaysia. Jurnal Alam, 13(4), pp. 1–24. 95. Song, L. and He, Y., 2016. The Design of SUV Anti Rollover Controller Based on Driver-in-the-Loop Real-Time Simulations. International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Springer, pp. 509–519. 96. Strassberger, M. and Guldner, J., 2004. Bmw–s Dynamic Drive: An Active Stabilizer Bar System. IEEE Control Systems, 24(4), pp. 28–29. 97. Syed Hussien, S. Y., Jaafar, H. I., Ghazali, R. and Abdul Razif, N. R., 2015. The effects of auto-tuned method in PID and PD control scheme for gantry crane system. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), (6), pp. 121–125. 98. Tsitsiklis, J. N., Bertsekas, D. P., Athans, M. and Science, C., 1984. Distributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 31(January), pp. 803–812. 99. Van Zanten, A. T., 2010. Bosch ESP Systems: 5 Years of Experience. SAE Technical Paper Series, pp. 428–436. 100. Van Zanten, A. T., Erhardt, R. and Pfaff, G., 2010. VDC, The Vehicle Dynamics Control System of Bosch. SAE Technical Paper Series, pp. 1419–1436. 101. Vinter, R., 2010. Optimal Control. Springer Science & Business Media. 102. Wang, Z., Montanaro, U., Fallah, S., Sorniotti, A. and Lenzo, B., 2018. A gain scheduled robust linear quadratic regulator for vehicle Direct Yaw Control Control. Mechatronics, Elsevier, 51, pp. 31–45. 103. Werner H. S., Hans, P.N.A., Michael H.N.S., Jan, P.C.; and Matthias A. B., 2012. Drive train for a vehicle with connectable secondary axle, U.S. Patent 8,215,440. 104. Wu, S., Zhu, E., Qin, M., Ren, H. and Lei, Z., 2008. Control of four-wheel-steering vehicle using GA fuzzy neural network. Proceedings - International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, ICICTA 2008, 1, pp. 869–873. 105. Xin, X., Zheng, H., Xu, H. and Qin, G., 2014. Control strategies for four in-wheel driven electric vehicles when motor drive systems fail. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 885–890. 106. Yang, X., 2010. Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms, Luniver press. 107. Yoshida, H., Shinohara, S. and Nagai, M., 2008. Lane change steering manoeuvre using model predictive control theory. Vehicle System Dynamics, 46(1), pp. 669–681. 108. Yoshioka, T., Adachi, T., Butsuen, T., Okazaki, H. and Mochizuki, H., 1999. Application of sliding-mode theory to Direct Yaw Control. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan (JSAE) Review, 20(4), pp. 523–529. 109. Zhai, L., Sun, T. and Wang, J., 2016. Electronic Stability Control Based on Motor Driving and Braking Torque Distribution for a Four In-Wheel Motor Drive Electric Vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(6), pp. 4726–4739. 110. Zhao. J., and Wong. P. K., Xie. Z., Ma. X., and Hua. X., 2019. Design And Control Of An Automotive Variable Hydraulic Damper Using Cuckoo Search Optimized Pid Method. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 20(1), pp. 51–63. 111. Zhao, J., Luo, J. Q., Wu, J., Deng, W. W. and Zhu, B., 2013. Optimal Distribution Strategy for Vehicle Active Yaw Moment Using Bio-Inspired Computing. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 461, pp. 961–966. 112. Zhao, J., Wong, P. K., Ma, X. and Xie, Z., 2017. Chassis integrated control for active suspension, active front steering and Direct Yaw Control systems using hierarchical strategy. Vehicle System Dynamics, 55(1), pp. 72–103. 113. Zheng, H., 2010. Research on Vehicle stability Control Algorithm for Direct Yaw Control Control, 3rd International Conference on Computer and Electrical Enginnering, pp. 545–549. 114. Zhu, S. and He, Y., 2017. A driver-adaptive stability control strategy for sport utility vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics, 55(8), pp. 1206–1240. 115. Zhu, S. and He, Y., 2014. Design of SUV differential braking controller considering the interactions of driver and control system. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp. 14–20.

Particle Swarm Optimization Of Direct Yaw Control Using Linear Quadratic Integral For Vehicle Stability

Similar Items