Prediction Of Musculoskeletal Disorders Cases Associated With Work-Relatedness Of Semiconductor Workers Using Logistic Regression Model

Semiconductor industry is one of the main contributors to the economy of Malaysia. Semiconductor workers are generally exposed to various conditions at work that is likely to contribute to the development of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).Currently, there has been limited studies conducted to iden...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Chai, Fong Ling
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2020
Subjects:	Q Science (General) QA Mathematics
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25410/1/Prediction%20Of%20Musculoskeletal%20Disorders%20Cases%20Associated%20With%20Work-Relatedness%20Of%20Semiconductor%20Workers%20Using%20Logistic%20Regression%20Model.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25410/2/Prediction%20Of%20Musculoskeletal%20Disorders%20Cases%20Associated%20With%20Work-Relatedness%20Of%20Semiconductor%20Workers%20Using%20Logistic%20Regression%20Model.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.25410
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Radin Umar, Radin Zaid
topic	Q Science (General) QA Mathematics
spellingShingle	Q Science (General) QA Mathematics Chai, Fong Ling Prediction Of Musculoskeletal Disorders Cases Associated With Work-Relatedness Of Semiconductor Workers Using Logistic Regression Model
description	Semiconductor industry is one of the main contributors to the economy of Malaysia. Semiconductor workers are generally exposed to various conditions at work that is likely to contribute to the development of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).Currently, there has been limited studies conducted to identify potential MSDs risk factors among semiconductor workers. Besides, there have been little studies categorize semiconductor workers’ exposures of risk factors, and there has been a paucity of predictive model developed to predict the work-relatedness of MSDs. This study was conducted to (i) identify the potential risk factors of MSDs among semiconductor workers; (ii) construct a model in predicting work-relatedness of MSDs diagnoses based on the identified risk factors and investigate the relationship between the identified risk factors and work-related MSDs cases; (iii) validate the developed predictive model and the relationship findings statistically and through face validation by experienced experts in the ergonomic field. Risk factors from the literature searches and 277 work assessment reports of workers diagnosed with MSDs were sorted and compared. A total of 16 predictors were identified from ergonomic risk factors (ERFs), work activities, confounding factors of MSDs, and duration of employment for workers reporting the first musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS). Kurskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance testand Kendall’s tau correlation were conducted to test the significance difference of the risk factors and analyse correlation between identified risk factors and MSDs outcomes. The specific factors identified to have significant effect in predicting work-relatedness of MSDs in the developed model are ERFs such as poor posture, forceful exertion, and static posture and loading; work activities such as lifting and lowering, transferring, pushing and pulling, repairing, preventive maintenance and quality inspection; confounding factors such as age and previous injury history; and the duration of employment in reporting first MSS. Crossvalidation of the developed predictive model was conducted with a new set of test data (n=30), and the accuracy of the prediction model was measured at 86.20%. Thirty experts in the ergonomics field gave promising 80% average rating agreements on the inclusion of identified risk factors and major result findings. Improvements in future research study suggest the inclusion of psychological and environmental factors in work assessments for a more comprehensive prediction process. These outcomes may help practitioners to understand the exposure components contributing to work-relatedness of MSDs cases among semiconductor workers. Ergonomists, safety and health officers, engineers and management employees can utilize this predictive model to predict the potential risk of MSDs cases and guide the process of determining appropriate control measures and future interventions
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Chai, Fong Ling
author_facet	Chai, Fong Ling
author_sort	Chai, Fong Ling
title	Prediction Of Musculoskeletal Disorders Cases Associated With Work-Relatedness Of Semiconductor Workers Using Logistic Regression Model
title_short	Prediction Of Musculoskeletal Disorders Cases Associated With Work-Relatedness Of Semiconductor Workers Using Logistic Regression Model
title_full	Prediction Of Musculoskeletal Disorders Cases Associated With Work-Relatedness Of Semiconductor Workers Using Logistic Regression Model
title_fullStr	Prediction Of Musculoskeletal Disorders Cases Associated With Work-Relatedness Of Semiconductor Workers Using Logistic Regression Model
title_full_unstemmed	Prediction Of Musculoskeletal Disorders Cases Associated With Work-Relatedness Of Semiconductor Workers Using Logistic Regression Model
title_sort	prediction of musculoskeletal disorders cases associated with work-relatedness of semiconductor workers using logistic regression model
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate	2020
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25410/1/Prediction%20Of%20Musculoskeletal%20Disorders%20Cases%20Associated%20With%20Work-Relatedness%20Of%20Semiconductor%20Workers%20Using%20Logistic%20Regression%20Model.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25410/2/Prediction%20Of%20Musculoskeletal%20Disorders%20Cases%20Associated%20With%20Work-Relatedness%20Of%20Semiconductor%20Workers%20Using%20Logistic%20Regression%20Model.pdf
_version_	1747834121548201984
spelling	my-utem-ep.254102021-12-07T16:18:22Z Prediction Of Musculoskeletal Disorders Cases Associated With Work-Relatedness Of Semiconductor Workers Using Logistic Regression Model 2020 Chai, Fong Ling Q Science (General) QA Mathematics Semiconductor industry is one of the main contributors to the economy of Malaysia. Semiconductor workers are generally exposed to various conditions at work that is likely to contribute to the development of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).Currently, there has been limited studies conducted to identify potential MSDs risk factors among semiconductor workers. Besides, there have been little studies categorize semiconductor workers’ exposures of risk factors, and there has been a paucity of predictive model developed to predict the work-relatedness of MSDs. This study was conducted to (i) identify the potential risk factors of MSDs among semiconductor workers; (ii) construct a model in predicting work-relatedness of MSDs diagnoses based on the identified risk factors and investigate the relationship between the identified risk factors and work-related MSDs cases; (iii) validate the developed predictive model and the relationship findings statistically and through face validation by experienced experts in the ergonomic field. Risk factors from the literature searches and 277 work assessment reports of workers diagnosed with MSDs were sorted and compared. A total of 16 predictors were identified from ergonomic risk factors (ERFs), work activities, confounding factors of MSDs, and duration of employment for workers reporting the first musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS). Kurskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance testand Kendall’s tau correlation were conducted to test the significance difference of the risk factors and analyse correlation between identified risk factors and MSDs outcomes. The specific factors identified to have significant effect in predicting work-relatedness of MSDs in the developed model are ERFs such as poor posture, forceful exertion, and static posture and loading; work activities such as lifting and lowering, transferring, pushing and pulling, repairing, preventive maintenance and quality inspection; confounding factors such as age and previous injury history; and the duration of employment in reporting first MSS. Crossvalidation of the developed predictive model was conducted with a new set of test data (n=30), and the accuracy of the prediction model was measured at 86.20%. Thirty experts in the ergonomics field gave promising 80% average rating agreements on the inclusion of identified risk factors and major result findings. Improvements in future research study suggest the inclusion of psychological and environmental factors in work assessments for a more comprehensive prediction process. These outcomes may help practitioners to understand the exposure components contributing to work-relatedness of MSDs cases among semiconductor workers. Ergonomists, safety and health officers, engineers and management employees can utilize this predictive model to predict the potential risk of MSDs cases and guide the process of determining appropriate control measures and future interventions 2020 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25410/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25410/1/Prediction%20Of%20Musculoskeletal%20Disorders%20Cases%20Associated%20With%20Work-Relatedness%20Of%20Semiconductor%20Workers%20Using%20Logistic%20Regression%20Model.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25410/2/Prediction%20Of%20Musculoskeletal%20Disorders%20Cases%20Associated%20With%20Work-Relatedness%20Of%20Semiconductor%20Workers%20Using%20Logistic%20Regression%20Model.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=119727 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering Radin Umar, Radin Zaid 1. Ahn, D., Kweon, J. H. and Kwon, S., 2013. Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2(1), pp. 2270–2274. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.041. 2. Al-maliki, J. Q. and Al-maliki, A. J. Q., 2015. International Journal of Advances in Computer Science and Technology The Processes and Technologies of 3D Printing, International Journal of Advances in Computer Science and Technology, 4(10), pp. 161–165.Available at: http://www.warse.org/IJACST/static/pdf/file/ijacst024102015.pdf. 3. Ali, F. and Maharaj, J., 2014. Influence of some process parameters on build time, material consumption and surface roughness of FDM processed parts: Inferences based on the Taguchi design of experiments, Proceedings of The 2014 IAJC/ISAM Joint International Conference. 4. Arivazhagan, A., Saleem, A., Masood, S. H., Nikzad, M., and Jagadeesh, K. A., 2014. Study of Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modelling Processed, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), 7(3), pp. 304– 312. doi: 10.3844/ajeassp.2014.304.312. 5. Arnold, J. C., Alston, S. and Holder, A., 2009. Void formation due to gas evolution during the recycling of Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene copolymer (ABS) from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), Polymer Degradation and Stability. Elsevier Ltd, 94(4), pp. 693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.12.019. 6. ASTM International, 2003. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics, ASTM International, 08, pp. 46–58. doi: 10.1520/D0638-14.1. 7. ASTM International, 2013. F2792-12a - Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Rapid Manufacturing Association, pp. 10–12. doi: 10.1520/F2792-12A.2. 8. Attaran, M., 2017. The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing, Business Horizons, 60(5), pp. 677–688. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011. 9. Baechler, C., DeVuono, M. and Pearce, J. M., 2013. Distributed recycling of waste polymer into RepRap feedstock, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 19(2), pp. 118–125. doi: 10.1108/13552541311302978. 10. Baek, G. Y., Shin, G. Y., Lee, K.Y. and Shim, D. S., 2019. Mechanical properties of tool steels with high wear resistance via directed energy deposition, Metals, 9(3), pp. 282. doi: 10.3390/met9030282. 11. Bartkowiak, T., Pedersen, D. B., Wang, Z. and Hansen, H.N., 2015. Multi-scale areal curvature analysis of fused deposition surfaces, ASPE 2015 Spring Topical Meeting - Achieving Precision Tolerances in Additive manufacturing, (September). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3677.5441. 12. Basavaraj, C. K. and Vishwas, M., 2016. Studies on Effect of Fused Deposition Modelling Process Parameters on Ultimate Tensile Strength and Dimensional Accuracy of Nylon, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 149(1), p. 012035. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012035. 13. Bourhis, B., 2012. 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution, Business Horizons, 55(2), pp. 155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003. 14. Boschetto, A., Bottini, L. and Veniali, F., 2016. Integration of FDM surface quality modeling with process design, Additive Manufacturing. Elsevier B.V., 12, pp. 334–344. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.008. 15. Bourell, D., Kruth, J. P., Leu, M., Levy, G., Rosen, D., Beese, A. M. and Clare, A., 2017. Materials for additive manufacturing, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. CIRP, 66(2), pp. 659–681. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009. 16. Bourell, D. L., Leu, M. C. and Rosen, D. W., 2009. Identifying the Future of Freeform Processing, The University of Texas at Austin, 5(4), pp. 169-178. doi: 10.1108/13552549910295514. 17. Bourhis, L. F., Hascoet, J., Kerbrat, O. and Mognol, P., 2013. Sustainable manufacturing: Evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69(9–12), pp. 1927–1939. doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5151-2. 18. Campbell, I., Bourell, D. and Gibson, I., 2012. Additive manufacturing: rapid prototyping comes of age, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 18(4), pp. 255–258. doi: 10.1108/13552541211231563. 19. Campbell, R. I., Jee, H. and Kim, Y. S., 2013. Adding product value through additive manufacturing, 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2013, 4 DS75-04, pp. 259–268. Available at: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84897645200&partnerID=40&md5=bcc287efe10114aada9830bdd0a9989d. 20. Cândido, L. H. A., Ferreira, D. B., Kindlein Junior, W., Demori, R. and Mauler, R. S., 2014. Recycling cycle of materials applied to acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene/ policarbonate blends with styrene-butadiene-styrene copolymer addition, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1593(2014), pp. 658–661. doi: 10.1063/1.4873865. 21. Carneiro, O. S., Silva, A. F. and Gomes, R., 2015. Materials and Design Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene, Materials and Design. Elsevier Ltd, 83, pp. 768–776. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053. 22. Castoro, M., 2013. Impact of Laser Power and Build Orientation on the Mechanical Properties of Selectively Laser Sintered Parts, The National Conference On Undergraduate Research. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/msoe/files/resources/castoropaper.pdf. 23. Chen, J., Qiu, Q., Han, Y. and Lau, D., 2019. Piezoelectric materials for sustainable building structures: Fundamentals and applications, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier Ltd, 101(January 2018), pp. 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.038. 24. Chin Fei, N, Mehat, N. M., Kamaruddin, S. and Ariff, Z. M., 2013. Improving the Performance of Reprocessed ABS Products from the Manufacturing Perspective via the Taguchi Method, International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 2013, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2013/824562. 25. Cruz Sanchez, F. A., Boudaoud, H., Hoppe, S. and Camargo, M., 2017. Polymer recycling in an open-source additive manufacturing context: Mechanical issues, Additive Manufacturing. Elsevier B.V., 17, pp. 87–105. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.013. 26. Dawoud, M., Taha, I. and Ebeid, S. J., 2016. Mechanical behaviour of ABS: An experimental study using FDM and injection moulding techniques, Journal of Manufacturing Processes. The Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 21, pp. 39–45. 27. Dudek, P., 2013. FDM 3D printing technology in manufacturing composite elements, Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 58(4), pp. 1415–1418. doi: 10.2478/amm-2013-0186. 28. Faludi, J., Bayley, C., Bhogal, S. and Iribarne, M., 2015. Comparing environmental impacts of additive manufacturing vs traditional machining via life-cycle assessment, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(1), pp. 14–33. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-07-2013-0067. 29. Farzadi, A. Solati-Hashjin, M., Asadi-Eydivand, M., and Osman, N. A. A., 2014. Effect of layer thickness and printing orientation on mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed porous samples for bone tissue engineering, PLoS ONE, 9(9), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108252. 30. Fiedor, P., Ortyl, J., 2020. A new approach to micromachining: High precision and innovative additive manufacturing solutions based on photopolymerization technology, Material, 13(13), pp. 1-25. doi: 10.3390/ma13132951. 31. Ford, S., Despeisse, M., 2016. Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges, Journal of cleaner production, 137, pp.1573-1587. 32. Freitas, D., Almeida, H. A., Bartolo, H. and Bartolo, P. J., 2016. Sustainability in extrusion-based additive manufacturing technologies, Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 1(1–2), pp. 65–78. doi: 10.1007/s40964-016-0007-6. 33. Friel, R. J. and Harris, R. A., 2013. Ultrasonic additive manufacturing A hybrid production process for novel functional products, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier B.V., 6(1), pp. 35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.004. 34. Gao, W. Zhang, Y., Ramanujan, D., Ramani, K., Chen, Y., Williams, C. B., Zavattieri, P. D., 2015. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering, CAD Computer Aided Design. Elsevier Ltd, 69, pp. 65–89. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001. 35. Gibson, I., Rosen, D. and Stucker, B., 2015. Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing, second edition, Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing, Second Edition. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3. 36. Górski, F., Wichniarek, R., Kuczko, W., Zawadzki, P. and Buń, P., 2015. Strength of ABS Parts Produced by Fused Deposition Modelling Technology – A Critical Orientation Problem, Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 9(26), pp. 12–19. doi: 10.12913/22998624/2359. 37. Grigore, M., 2017. Methods of Recycling, Properties and Applications of Recycled Thermoplastic Polymers, Recycling, 2(4), pp. 24. doi: 10.3390/recycling2040024. 38. Gusella, V. and Marsili, R., 2002. Comparison between Accelerometer and Laser Vibrometer to Measure Traffic Excited Vibrations on Bridges, Shock and Vibration, 9(1-2), pp. 11-18. doi: 10.1155/2002/968509. 39. Hamad, K., Kaseem, M. and Deri, F., 2013. Recycling of waste from polymer materials: An overview of the recent works, Polymer Degradation and Stability. Elsevier Ltd, 98(12), pp. 2801–2812. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.09.025. 40. Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R. and Kosior, E., 2009. Plastics recycling: challenges and opportunities, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), pp. 2115–2126. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0311. 41. Huang, S. H., Liu, P., Mokasdar, A. and Hou, L., 2013. Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: A literature review, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67(5–8), pp. 1191–1203. doi: 10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5. 42. Huda, A. H. N. F., Ascroft, H. and Barnes, S., 2016. Machinability Study of Ultrasonic Assisted Machining (UAM) of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) with Multifaceted Tool, Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., 46, pp. 488–491. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.041. 43. ISO/ASTM52900-15, 2015. Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing – General Principles – Terminology, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. 44. Jadhav, V. S. and Wankhade R. S., 2017. A Reviw: Fused Deposition Modeling - A Rapid Prototyping Process, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(9), pp. 5-9. 45. Jasiuk, I. Abueidda, D. W., Kozuch, C., Pang, S., Su, F. Y., and McKittrick, J., 2018. An Overview on Additive Manufacturing of Polymers, Jom. Springer US, 70(3), pp. 275–283. doi: 10.1007/s11837-017-2730-y. 46. Jin, Y., Wan, Y. Zhang, B. and Liu, Z., 2017. Modeling of the chemical finishing process for polylactic acid parts in fused deposition modeling and investigation of its tensile properties, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Elsevier B.V., 240, pp. 233–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.003. 47. Kathryn, M., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R. I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A. and Martina, F., 2016. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. CIRP, 65(2), pp. 737–760. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004. 48. Kathryn, M. and Ian, R., 2016. Constraints Institutional Repository Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities and considerations, CIRP Annals, 65(2), pp. 737–760. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004. 49. Kelly, G. S., Just Jr. M. S., Advani, S. G. and Gillespie Jr, J. W., 2014. Energy and bond strength development during ultrasonic consolidation, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Elsevier B.V., 214(8), pp. 1665–1672. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.03.010. 50. Kitamura, T. and Ohtani, K., 2015. Non-contact measurement of facial surface vibration patterns during singing by scanning laser Doppler vibrometer, Frontiers in Psychology, 6(NOV), pp. 1–8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01682. 51. Leary, M., Merli, L., Torti, F., Mazur, M. and Brandt, M., 2014. Optimal topology for additive manufacture: A method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures, Materials and Design. Elsevier Ltd, 63, pp. 678–690. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.015. 52. Lederle, F., Meyer, F., Brunotte, G., Kaldun, C. and Hubner. E. G., 2016. Improved mechanical properties of 3D-printed parts by fused deposition modeling processed under the exclusion of oxygen, Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 1(1–2), pp. 3–7. doi: 10.1007/s40964-016-0010-y. 53. Lemu, H. G. and Gebisa, A. W., 2017. Design for manufacturing to design for Additive Manufacturing: Analysis of implications design product Design for Engineering manufacturing to for design for optimality Additive Manufacturing : sust, Procedia Manufacturing. Elsevier B.V., 13, pp. 724–731. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.120. 54. Li, G., Zhao, J., Wu, W., Jiang, J., Wang, B., Jiang, H. and Fuh, J. Y. H., 2018. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on mechanical properties of 3D printing non-crystalline and semi-crystalline polymers, Materials, 11(5), p. 286. doi: 10.3390/ma11050826. 55. Li, G., Zhao, J. and Jiang, J., 2018. Ultrasonic strengthening improves tensile mechanical performance of fused deposition modeling 3D printing, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 96(5–8), pp. 2747–2755. doi: 10.1007/s00170-018-1789-0. 56. Li, N., Li, Y. and Liu, S., 2016. Rapid prototyping of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites by 3D printing, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Elsevier B.V., 238, pp. 218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.025. 57. Liang H., David, R., Strano, G. and Sasan, D., 2010. Enhancing the sustainability of additive manufacturing, 5th International Conference on Responsive Manufacturing, pp. 390–395. doi: 10.1049/cp.2010.0462. 58. Liu, J., Cao, B. and Yang, J., 2018. Modelling intermetallic phase growth during high-power ultrasonic welding of copper and aluminum, Journal of Manufacturing Processes. Elsevier, 35(August), pp. 595–603. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.008. 59. Low, Z. X., Chua, Y., Ray, B., Mattia, D., Ian, S. M. and Patterson, D. A., 2017. Perspective on 3D printing of separation membranes and comparison to related unconventional fabrication techniques, Journal of Membrane Science. Elsevier, 523(October 2016), pp. 596–613. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.006. 60. Marsili, R., Evangelisti, P. and Rossi, G. , 2001. Vibration Measurements on an Ultrasonic Transducer by a Laser Doppler Vibrometer: Comparison Between Velocity and Displacement Measurements, Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference, 1(June), pp. 731-733. 61. Mohamed, O. A., Masood, S. H. and Bhowmik, J. L., 2017. Process parameter optimization of viscoelastic properties of FDM manufactured parts using response surface methodology, 62. Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd, 4(8), pp. 8250–8259. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.167. 63. Mohammed, M., Das, A., Gomez-Kervin, E., Wilson, D. and Gibson, I., 2017. EcoPrinting: Investigation the use of 100 % recycled Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) for Additive Manufacturing, Solid Freefrom Fabrication Symposium, pp. 532-542. 64. Moroni, G., Syam, W. P. and Petrò, S., 2015. Functionality-based part orientation for additive manufacturing, Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., 36, pp. 217–222. 65. Murugan, S., 2016. Development of Plastic Filament Extruder for 3D, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering, 4(11), pp. 32–35. 66. Nguyen, J., Park, S. and Rosen, D., 2013. Heuristic Optimization Method for Cellular Structure Design of Light Weight Components, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 14(6), pp. 1071–1078. 67. Nikzad, M., Masood, S. H. and Sbarski, I., 2011. Thermo-mechanical properties of a highly filled polymeric composites for Fused Deposition Modeling, Materials and Design. Elsevier Ltd, 32(6), pp. 3448–3456. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.056. 68. Noort, R. Van and Cam, C. A. D., 2011. The future of dental devices is digital, Dental Materials. The Academy of Dental Materials, 28(1), pp. 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014. 69. Paris, H., Hossein, M., Eric, C., Meseau, M., and Ituarte, I. F., 2016. Comparative environmental impacts of additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 65(1), pp. 29–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.036. 70. Pearce, J. M., 2014. Life Cycle Analysis of Distributed Recycling of Post-consumer High Density Polyethylene for 3-D Printing Filament, Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, pp. 90-96. 71. Peng, A. T., Kellens, K., Tang, R., Chen, C. and Chen, G., (2018). Sc, Additive Manufacturing. Elsevier B.V., (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.022. 72. Petrovic, V., Gonzalez, J., Ferrando, J., Puchades, J. and Grinan, L., 2011. Additive layered manufacturing: Sectors of industrial application shown through case studies, International Journal of Production Research, 49(4), pp. 1061–1079. doi: 10.1080/00207540903479786. 73. Prakash, K. S., Nancharaih, T. and Rao, V. V. S., 2018. Additive Manufacturing Techniques in Manufacturing -An Overview, Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(2), pp. 3873–3882. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.642. 74. Preumont, A., 2018. Electromagnetic and piezoelectric transducers, Solid Mechanics and its Applications, 246, pp. 47–66. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-72296-2_3. 75. Rahman, H., John, T. D., Sivadasan, M. and Singh, N. K., 2018. Investigation on the Scale Factor applicable to ABS based FDM Additive Manufacturing, Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd, 5(1), pp. 1640–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.258. 76. Raju, G., Sharma, M. L. and Meena, M. L., 2014. Recent Methods for Optimization of Plastic Extrusion Process: A Literature Review, International Journal of Advanced Mechanical Engineering, 4(6), pp. 583–588. 77. Ravi, P., Shiakolas, P. S. and Dnyaneshwar, A., 2017. Analyzing the Effects of Temperature, Nozzle-Bed Distance, and Their Interactions on the Width of Fused Deposition Modeled Struts Using Statistical Techniques Toward Precision Scaffold Fabrication, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 139(7), p. 071007. doi: 10.1115/1.4035963. 78. Rüsenberg, S., Josupeit, S. and Schmid, H. J., 2014. A Method to Characterize the Quality of a Polymer Laser Sintering Process, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2014. doi: 10.1155/2014/185374. 79. Ruzzene, M., Jeong, S. M., Michaels, T. E., Michaels, J. E. and Mi, B., 2005. Simulation and measurement of ultrasonic waves in elastic plates using laser vibrometry. AIP Conference Proceedings, 760, pp. 172–179. doi: 10.1063/1.1916675. 80. Sawyer, S. F., 2009. Analysis of Variance: The Fundamental Concepts, Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, 17(2), pp. 27E-38E. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.2.27e. 81. Singh Bual, G. and Kumar, P., 2014. Methods to Improve Surface Finish of Parts Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling, Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2(3), pp. 51–55. doi: 10.13189/mst.2014.020301. 82. Song, R. and Telenko, C., 2016. Material Waste of Commercial FDM Printers under Realstic Conditions, Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, (2015), pp. 1217–1229. 83. Spangenberg, J. H., 2013. Design for sustainability (DfS): Interface of sustainable production and consumption, Handbook of Sustainable Engineering. Elsevier Ltd, 18(15), pp. 575–595. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8939-8_63. 84. Spoerk, M., Joarmin, G., Janak, S., Stephen, S. and Holzer, C., 2018. Effect of the printing bed temperature on the adhesion of parts produced by fused filament fabrication, Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 47(1), pp. 17–24. doi: 10.1080/14658011.2017.1399531. 85. Tang, Y., Mak, K. and Zhao, Y. F., 2016. A framework to reduce product environmental impact through design optimization for additive manufacturing, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 137, pp. 1560–1572. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.037. 86. Thompson, M. K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T. and Fadel, G., 2016. Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. CIRP, 65(2), pp. 737–760. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004. 87. Tofail, S. A. M., Koumoulos, E. P., Bandyopadhyay, A., Bose, S., O'Donoghue, L. and Charitidis, C., 2017. Additive manufacturing: Scientific and technological challenges, 88. market uptake and opportunities, Materials Today, 21(1), pp. 22–37. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001. 89. Tofangchi, A., Han, P., Izquierdo, J., Iyengar, A. and Hsu, K., 2019. Effect of Ultrasonic Vibration on Interlayer Adhesion in Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printed ABS, Polymers, 11(2), pp. 315. doi: 10.3390/polym11020315. 90. Tran, N., Nguyen, V., Ngo, A. and Nguyen, V., 2017. Study on the Effect of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Process Parameters on the Printed Part Quality, International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 7(12), pp. 71–77. 91. Tronvoll, S., Welo, T. and Elvenum, W., 2018. The Effect of Voids on Structural Properties of Fused Deposition Modelled Parts: A Probabilistic Approach, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 97(9-12), pp. 3607-3618. 92. Uchino, K., 2003. Introduction to Piezoelectric Actuators and Transducers, International Center for Actuators and Transducers, Pennsylvania State University, pp. 40. 93. Verma, A. and Rai, R., 2017. Sustainability-induced dual-level optimization of additive manufacturing process, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88(5–8), pp. 1945– 1959. 94. Vishwakarma, S., Pandey, P. and Gupta, N., 2017. Characteristic of ABS Material: A review, Journal of Research in Mechanical Engineering, 3(5), pp. 13-16. 95. Vishwas, M. and Basavaraj, C. K., 2017. Studies on Optimizing Process Parameters of Fused Deposition Modelling Technology for ABS, Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd, 4(10), pp. 10994–11003. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.08.057. 96. Wang, N., Dou, W., Jiang, C., Hao, S., Zhou, D., Huang, X. and Cao, X., 2019. Tactile sensor from self-chargeable piezoelectric supercapacitor, Nano Energy. Elsevier Ltd, 56, pp. 868–874. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.065. 97. Wong, K. V. and Hernandez, A., 2012. A Review of Additive Manufacturing, ISRN Mechanical Engineering, 2012, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.5402/2012/208760. 98. Wu, W., Jiang, J., Jiang, H., Liu, W., Li, G., Wang, B., Tang, M. and Zhao, J., 2018. Improving bending and dynamic mechanics performance of 3D printing through ultrasonic strengthening, Materials Letters, 220, pp. 317–320. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.048. 99. Wu, W., Jiang, J., Jiang, H., Liu, W., Li, G., Wang, B., Tang, M. and Zhao, J., 2015. Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS, Materials, 8(9), pp. 5834–5846. doi: 10.3390/ma8095271. 100. Yang, S., Tang, Y. and Zhao, Y. F., 2016. Assembly-level design for additive manufacturing: Issues and benchmark, Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 2A-2016(August). doi: 10.1115/DETC2016-59565. 101. Zhang, P., 2010. Field Elements of Industrial Control System. First Edit, Advanced Industrial Control Technology, pp. 73-116. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4377-7807-6.10003-8. 102. Zhao, L., Lee, V. K., Yoo, S., Dai, G. and Intes, X., 2012. The integration of 3-D cell printing and mesoscopic fluorescence molecular tomography of vascular constructs within thick hydrogel scaffolds, Biomaterials. Elsevier Ltd, 33(21), pp. 5325–5332. 103. Zheng, L., Chen, W. and Huo, D., 2020. Review of vibration devices for vibration assisted machining, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 108(5-6), pp. 1631-1651. doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-05483-8. 104. Zipser, L. and Franke, H., 2004. Laser-scanning vibrometry for ultrasonic transducer development, Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical, 110(1–3), pp. 264–268. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2003.10.051.

Prediction Of Musculoskeletal Disorders Cases Associated With Work-Relatedness Of Semiconductor Workers Using Logistic Regression Model

Similar Items