The Effect Of Surface Roughness On Tensile Strength Of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite

In composites manufacturing, the surface roughness of the glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) exhibit significant parameter on the mechanical properties of the composite. Thus, in this study, the relationship between the surface roughness and tensile strength due to slip is evaluated. The composit...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Ibrahim, Muhammad Najib
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2019
Subjects:	T Technology (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25490/1/The%20Effect%20Of%20Surface%20Roughness%20On%20Tensile%20Strength%20Of%20Fiberglass%20Reinforced%20Polymer%20Composite.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25490/2/The%20Effect%20Of%20Surface%20Roughness%20On%20Tensile%20Strength%20Of%20Fiberglass%20Reinforced%20Polymer%20Composite.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.25490
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Shamsudin, Zurina
topic	T Technology (General) T Technology (General)
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) T Technology (General) Ibrahim, Muhammad Najib The Effect Of Surface Roughness On Tensile Strength Of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite
description	In composites manufacturing, the surface roughness of the glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) exhibit significant parameter on the mechanical properties of the composite. Thus, in this study, the relationship between the surface roughness and tensile strength due to slip is evaluated. The composite was fabricated by using combination of vacuum compression followed by curing in the autoclave. Set of fiberglass are prepared with different grit size at 400, 600 and 800 at the tab region were tested using tensile test. The parameter is varied by repeating each set of the fiberglass with different frequency of sanding at four (4), eight (8) and twelve (12) times. The effect of the surface roughness using different grit size is analysed using the value tensile strength obtained along with the image produced from optical microscope. At the end of the report, it is expected to obtain optimum surface roughness produced by the grit and the correlation with tensile strength obtained from the tensile testing.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Ibrahim, Muhammad Najib
author_facet	Ibrahim, Muhammad Najib
author_sort	Ibrahim, Muhammad Najib
title	The Effect Of Surface Roughness On Tensile Strength Of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite
title_short	The Effect Of Surface Roughness On Tensile Strength Of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite
title_full	The Effect Of Surface Roughness On Tensile Strength Of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite
title_fullStr	The Effect Of Surface Roughness On Tensile Strength Of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite
title_full_unstemmed	The Effect Of Surface Roughness On Tensile Strength Of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite
title_sort	effect of surface roughness on tensile strength of fiberglass reinforced polymer composite
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate	2019
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25490/1/The%20Effect%20Of%20Surface%20Roughness%20On%20Tensile%20Strength%20Of%20Fiberglass%20Reinforced%20Polymer%20Composite.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25490/2/The%20Effect%20Of%20Surface%20Roughness%20On%20Tensile%20Strength%20Of%20Fiberglass%20Reinforced%20Polymer%20Composite.pdf
_version_	1747834132582367232
spelling	my-utem-ep.254902022-01-06T11:36:07Z The Effect Of Surface Roughness On Tensile Strength Of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite 2019 Ibrahim, Muhammad Najib T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) In composites manufacturing, the surface roughness of the glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) exhibit significant parameter on the mechanical properties of the composite. Thus, in this study, the relationship between the surface roughness and tensile strength due to slip is evaluated. The composite was fabricated by using combination of vacuum compression followed by curing in the autoclave. Set of fiberglass are prepared with different grit size at 400, 600 and 800 at the tab region were tested using tensile test. The parameter is varied by repeating each set of the fiberglass with different frequency of sanding at four (4), eight (8) and twelve (12) times. The effect of the surface roughness using different grit size is analysed using the value tensile strength obtained along with the image produced from optical microscope. At the end of the report, it is expected to obtain optimum surface roughness produced by the grit and the correlation with tensile strength obtained from the tensile testing. 2019 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25490/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25490/1/The%20Effect%20Of%20Surface%20Roughness%20On%20Tensile%20Strength%20Of%20Fiberglass%20Reinforced%20Polymer%20Composite.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25490/2/The%20Effect%20Of%20Surface%20Roughness%20On%20Tensile%20Strength%20Of%20Fiberglass%20Reinforced%20Polymer%20Composite.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=117865 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering Shamsudin, Zurina 1. Al-Qureshi H. A., Klein A. N., and Fredel M. C., 2005. Grain Size and Surface Roughness Effect on the Instability Strains in Sheet Metal Stretching. Process. Technol.,170, 204-210. 2. Amit K.T., 2014. Mechanical Properties Testing of Uni-directional and Bi-directional Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Based Composites. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.2, No.l 1, E-ISSN: 2321-9637. 3. Ayrilmis, C. and Akbulut, B., 2010. Effect of Sanding on Surface Properties of Medium Density Fiberboard MDF. Effect of Sanding on Surface Properties... DRVNA INDUSTRIJA, 61(3), p. 7. 4. Baker, A.A., Callus, P.J., Georgiadis, S., Falzon, P.J., Dutton, S.E. and Leong, K.H., 2002. An Affordable Methodology for Replacing Metallic Aircraft Panels with Advanced Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing,33(5), pp.687-696. 5. Benard Q., Fois M. and Grisel M., 2005. Peel Ply Surface Treatment for Composite Assemblies: Chemistry and Morphology Effects. Composites- Part A,Vol. 36, p. 1562-1568. 6. Biswas, Bamali., 2017. Growth Defects in CrN/NbN Coatings Deposited by HIPIMS/UBM techniques. 7. Botelho, E.C., Silva, R.A., Pardini, L.C. and Rezende, M.C., 2006. A Review on the Development and Properties of Continuous Fiber/Epoxy/Aluminum Hybrid Composites for Aircraft Structures. Materials Research, 9(3), pp.247-256. 8. Campbell, 2010. Structural Composite materials, ASM International. Caton M. J., Jones J. W., Mayer H., Stanzl S. and Allison J. E., 2003. Demonstration of an Endurance Limit in 319 Aluminum. Chemistry and Materials Science, Vol. 34, No. l, pp. 33-40. 9. Designing an Experiment, [online] Available at: https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/18/getting-started/designing-an-experiment [Accessed: 11 June 2019]. 10. Ding, Y.Q., Yan, Y and Mcllhagger, R., 1995. Effect of Impact and Fatigue Loads on The Strength of Plain Weave Carbon-Epoxy Composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 55(2), pp.58-62. 11. Donghwan, C. and Suk, H. Y., 2004. Effects of Fiber Surface Treatment and Sizing on The Dynamic Mechanical and Interfacial Properties of Carbon/ Nylon 6 Composite. Carbon Science, Vol. 5, No.l, pp.1-5. 12. Eksi S. and Genel K., 2016. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Unidirectional and Woven Carbon, Glass and Aramid Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Vol. 132. 13. EN 2747:1998, Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastics, Tensile testing. How to Correctly Interpret P Values, [online] Available at: https://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics-2/how-to-correctly-interpret-pvalues [Accessed: 11 June 2019]. 14. Interpret All Statistics and Graphs For One-Way ANOVA. [online] Available at: https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab-express/l/help-and-how-to/modelingstatistics/anova/how-to/one-way-anova/interpret-the-results/all-statistics-and-graphs/ [Accessed: 11 June 2019]. 15. Kim J.K. and Lee D.G., 2004. Adhesion Characteristics of Plasma Surface Treated Carbon Fiber - Epoxy Composite with respect to Release Films Used during Demolding. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 18, p. 473-494. 16. Linqi Zhuang, Ramesh Talreja, Janis Vama, 2016. Tensile Failure of Unidirectional Composites from A Local Fracture Plane. Composites Science and Technology, 133 119-127. 17. Mahato K. K., Biswal M., Rathore D. K., Prusty R. K., Dutta K. and Ray B. C., 2016. Effect of Loading Rate on Tensile Properties and Failure Behavior of Glass Fiber/Epoxy Composite. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 115. 18. Mead, R., Gilmour, S. G., and Mead A., 2012. Statistical Principles for The Design of Experiments. Applications to Real Experiments, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 36. 19. Menezes, P. L., Kishore and Kailas, S. V., 2006. Chapter 14 Studies on Friction and Transfer Layer Using Inclined Scratch. Tribology and Interface Engineering Series. Elsevier Masson SAS. 20. Monica J. Emerson, Vedrana A. Dahl, Knut Conradsen, Lars P. Mikkelsen, Anders B. Dahl, 2018. A Multimodal Data-Set of A Unidirectional Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite, Volume 18, June 2018, Pages 1388-1393. 21. Montgomery, D. C., 2017. Design and Analysis Of Experiments. 22. Nikhil V Nayak, 2014. Composite Materials in Aerospace Applications International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. Volume 4, Issue 9, September 2014 1 ISSN 2250-3153. 23. Niem P.I.F., Lau T.L. and Kwan K.M., 2005. The Effect of Surface Characteristics ofPolymeric Materials on The Strength Of Bonded Joints. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 10 p. 361-372. 24. Niinomi, M., 2010. Fatigue Failure of Metallic Biomaterials, Metals for BiomedicalDevices. Woodhead Publishing Limited. 25. Pupurs A., Varna J., 2013. Energy Release Rate Based Fiber/Matrix Debond Growth in Fatigue. Part I: Self-Similar Crack Growth, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct.,20 (4) 276-287. 26. Purslow D., 1981. Some Fundamental Aspects of Composites Fractography. Composites, 12 (4) 241-247. 27. Qian C., Westphal T. and Nijssen R.P.L., 2013. Micro-Mechanical Fatigue Modellingof Unidirectional Glass Fbre Reinforced Polymer Composites. Comput. Mater. Sci.,69 62-72. 28. Rai, A. et al. 2013. Evaluation of Milling Parameters on Fiberglass to Reduce the Surface Roughness. 2(2), pp. 435-441. 29. Roizard X., Wery M. and Kirmann J., 2002. Effects of Alkaline Etching on The Surface Roughness of A Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composite. Composite Structures,Vol. 56, p. 223-228. 30. Schwartz, M.M., 1997. Composite Materials: Properties, Non-destructive Testing and Repair. Vol. 1. 31. Sivasankaran S., Harisagar P. T., Saminathan E., Siddharth S. and Sasikumar P., 2014. Effect of Process Parameters in Surface Roughness During Turning of GFRP Pipes Using PCD Insert Tool. Rocedia Engineerin, 97, 64 - 71. 32. Somayeh Safi, Ali Zadhoush, Mahmood Masoomi, 2014. Effects of Chemical Surface Pretreatment on Tensile Properties of a Single Glass Fiber and the Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composite. Textile Engineering Department, 84156-83111. 33. Tomlinson, S. E., Lewis, R. and Carre, M. J., 2007. Review of The Frictional Properties of Finger-Object Contact When Gripping. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, PartJ: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 221(8), pp. 841-850. 34. Wahid, Z., Latiff, A. I. and Ahmad, K., 2018. Application of One-Way ANOVA In Completely Randomized Experiments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 949(1). 35. West T D, 2001. Enhancement to the bond between advanced composite materials and steel for bridge rehabilitation (CCM report 2001-04). Newark: DE, USA, University of Delaware Center Composite Materials, University of Delaware, pp. 226. 36. Wisnom M.R. and Green D., 1995. Tensile Failure Due to Interaction Between Fibre Breaks. Composites 26, (7) 499- 508.

The Effect Of Surface Roughness On Tensile Strength Of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite

Similar Items