Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness Using Lean Six Sigma In Lube Blending Plant- A Case Study

Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness Using Lean Six Sigma In Lube Blending Plant- A Case Study

Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) is a key indicator to measure operation performance and it has been introduced in Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) whichfocused towards zero breakdown, zero defect and zero incident. Since then, OEE has been evolved to wider application from measuring only sin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tukiran, Mohd Azizi
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25497/1/Improving%20Overall%20Equipment%20Effectiveness%20Using%20Lean%20Six%20Sigma%20In%20Lube%20Blending%20Plant-%20A%20Case%20Study.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25497/2/Improving%20Overall%20Equipment%20Effectiveness%20Using%20Lean%20Six%20Sigma%20In%20Lube%20Blending%20Plant-%20A%20Case%20Study.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.25497
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
topic T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
Tukiran, Mohd Azizi
Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness Using Lean Six Sigma In Lube Blending Plant- A Case Study
description Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) is a key indicator to measure operation performance and it has been introduced in Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) whichfocused towards zero breakdown, zero defect and zero incident. Since then, OEE has been evolved to wider application from measuring only single machine effectiveness to measuring overall global operation effectiveness. Therefore, to stay competitive in current turbulent and ch.allenging business environment, OEE improvement is very crucial with the aim to achieve world class manufacturing (WCM) standard. In this case study, it aims to improve OEE in one of the filling lines in Melaka Lube Blending Plant (MLBP) located in Tangga Batu, Melaka .. In addition, this case study was focused on reducing of planned and unplanned downtime of MLBP Bottle Line 3 (BL3). To achieve that aim, integration of lean manufacturing tools and techniques with six sigma methodology was used. Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) cycle was a framework and lean manufacturing were used as tools and techniques to conduct the improvement activities. In Define, and Measure phase, OEE loss factor has been identified and measured through collecting quantitative and qualitative data. These data were obtained from primary and secondary source. To find the root causes and potential causes of the problem, collected and measured data were analysed in Analyse phase by using cause and effect diagram (CED), and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). To reduce downtimes, single minute exchange die (SMED) was used to reduce changeover process time (planned downtime). While autonomous maintenance (AM) was executed to reduce machine downtime (unplanned downtime). Both improvement activities were carryout in Improve phase. Last phase of this DMAIC cycle is Control phase. Standards works was developed to sustain the improvement activities. In addition, current OEE dashboard was used to control and monitoring OEE performance trend. Hence, by doing that, it helps to identify another improvement activity to further improve the OEE. At the end of this case study, OEE result was re-evaluated and the result was compared with the OEE result before improvement. Hence, OEE was improved from 48.8% to 66.5%.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Tukiran, Mohd Azizi
author_facet Tukiran, Mohd Azizi
author_sort Tukiran, Mohd Azizi
title Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness Using Lean Six Sigma In Lube Blending Plant- A Case Study
title_short Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness Using Lean Six Sigma In Lube Blending Plant- A Case Study
title_full Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness Using Lean Six Sigma In Lube Blending Plant- A Case Study
title_fullStr Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness Using Lean Six Sigma In Lube Blending Plant- A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness Using Lean Six Sigma In Lube Blending Plant- A Case Study
title_sort improving overall equipment effectiveness using lean six sigma in lube blending plant- a case study
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25497/1/Improving%20Overall%20Equipment%20Effectiveness%20Using%20Lean%20Six%20Sigma%20In%20Lube%20Blending%20Plant-%20A%20Case%20Study.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25497/2/Improving%20Overall%20Equipment%20Effectiveness%20Using%20Lean%20Six%20Sigma%20In%20Lube%20Blending%20Plant-%20A%20Case%20Study.pdf
_version_ 1747834134104899584
spelling my-utem-ep.254972022-01-06T11:52:52Z Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness Using Lean Six Sigma In Lube Blending Plant- A Case Study 2020 Tukiran, Mohd Azizi T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) is a key indicator to measure operation performance and it has been introduced in Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) whichfocused towards zero breakdown, zero defect and zero incident. Since then, OEE has been evolved to wider application from measuring only single machine effectiveness to measuring overall global operation effectiveness. Therefore, to stay competitive in current turbulent and ch.allenging business environment, OEE improvement is very crucial with the aim to achieve world class manufacturing (WCM) standard. In this case study, it aims to improve OEE in one of the filling lines in Melaka Lube Blending Plant (MLBP) located in Tangga Batu, Melaka .. In addition, this case study was focused on reducing of planned and unplanned downtime of MLBP Bottle Line 3 (BL3). To achieve that aim, integration of lean manufacturing tools and techniques with six sigma methodology was used. Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) cycle was a framework and lean manufacturing were used as tools and techniques to conduct the improvement activities. In Define, and Measure phase, OEE loss factor has been identified and measured through collecting quantitative and qualitative data. These data were obtained from primary and secondary source. To find the root causes and potential causes of the problem, collected and measured data were analysed in Analyse phase by using cause and effect diagram (CED), and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). To reduce downtimes, single minute exchange die (SMED) was used to reduce changeover process time (planned downtime). While autonomous maintenance (AM) was executed to reduce machine downtime (unplanned downtime). Both improvement activities were carryout in Improve phase. Last phase of this DMAIC cycle is Control phase. Standards works was developed to sustain the improvement activities. In addition, current OEE dashboard was used to control and monitoring OEE performance trend. Hence, by doing that, it helps to identify another improvement activity to further improve the OEE. At the end of this case study, OEE result was re-evaluated and the result was compared with the OEE result before improvement. Hence, OEE was improved from 48.8% to 66.5%. 2020 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25497/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25497/1/Improving%20Overall%20Equipment%20Effectiveness%20Using%20Lean%20Six%20Sigma%20In%20Lube%20Blending%20Plant-%20A%20Case%20Study.pdf text en 2025-08-26 validuser http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25497/2/Improving%20Overall%20Equipment%20Effectiveness%20Using%20Lean%20Six%20Sigma%20In%20Lube%20Blending%20Plant-%20A%20Case%20Study.pdf text en 2025-08-26 validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=119125 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering 1. Abualfaraa, W., Salonitis, K., Al-Ashaab, A. & Ala'raj, M., 2020. Lean-Green Manufacturing Practices and Their Link. Sustainability, Volume 12. 2. Aditya, Rawat, A. & Sharma, S. 0., 2018. Optimization and improvement of OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) of CNC turning the machine. International Journal of Advance Research and Development, 3(4), pp. 241-247. 3. Afefy, I. H., 2013. Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance and Overall Equipment Effectiveness Evaluation. International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, 13(1), pp. 69-75. 4. Agarwal, S. et al., 2016. Impact of lean six sigma process improvement methodology on cardiac catheterization laboratory efficiency. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 17(2), pp. 95-101. 5. Ahire, C. P. & Relkar, A. S., 2012. Correlating Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) and Overall Equipment Effectivess. Procedia Engineering, Volume 38, pp. 3482-3486. 6. Ahmad, S., Manaf, N. H. & Islam, R., 2014. Effects of Lean Six Sigma application in healthcare services: a literature review. Reviews on Environmental Health, 28(4), pp. 189-194. 7. Ahuja, I. & Khamba, J., 2008. Total productive maintenance implementation in a manufacturing organisation. Int. J. Productivity and Quality Management,, 3(3), pp. 360-381. 8. Anand, G., T.Ward, P. & V.Tatikondac, M., 2010. Role of explicit and tacit knowledge in Six Sigma projects: An empirical examination of differential project success. Journal of Operations Management, 28(4), pp. 303-315. 9. Anderssona, C. & Bellgranb, M., 2015. On the complexity of using perfonnance measures: Enhancing sustained production improvement capability by combining OEE and productivity. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Volume 35, pp. 144-154. 10. Arafeh, M., 2015. Combining Lean Concepts & Tools with the DMAIC Framework to Improve Processes and Reduce Waste. American Journal of Operations Research, Volume 5, pp. 209-211. 11. ASQ, 2019. In the Analyze phase. [Online]Available at: https://asq.org/guality-resources/dmaic [Accessed 10 12 2019]. 12. Basu, R., 2009. Implementing Six Sigma and Lean: A Practical Guideto Tools and Techniques. 1st ed. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd. 13. Becker, J., Borst, J. & van der Veen, A., 2015. Improving the overall equipment effectiveness in high-mix-low-volume manufacturing environments. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Volume 64, pp. 419-422. 14. Bluvband, Z. & Grabov, P., 2009. Expanded FMEA (EFMEA). s.l., Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 15. Bonse, M. & Chowdhury, 0., 2016. PIMS Global Lubricants & Greases Supply Chain Benchmarking: An Introduction, London: Malik London PIMS Associates Limited. 16. Braglia, M., Frosolini, M. & Zammori, F., 2009. Overall equipment effectiveness of a manufacturing line (OEEML): An integrated approach to assess systems perfonnance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(1), pp. 8-29. 17. British Standard Institute, 2019. British Standard Institute. [Online] Available at: https://www.bsigroup.com/en-MY/Lean-Six-Sigma/ [Accessed 24 8 2019]. 18. Cesarotti, V., Giuiusa, A. & Intron, V., 2013. Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness for Manufacturing System Design. In: M. M. Schiraldi, ed. Operations Management. Rejika, Croatia: InTech, pp. 51-80. 19. Chand, G. & Shirvani, B., 2003. Implementation of TPM in cellular manufacture. Journal a/Materials Processing Technology, Volume 103, pp. 149-154. 20. Chiarini, A., 2015. Improvement of OEE perfonnance using a Lean Six Sigma approach: An Italian manufacturing case study. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 16(4), pp. 416-433. 21. Chong, K. E. & Goh, G. G., 2015. Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Through the Six Sigma Methodology in a Semiconductor finn: A Case Study. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Volume 2015, pp. 833-837. 22. Ciarapica, M. B. F. E., Sanctis, I. D., Mazzuto, G. & Paciarotti, C., 2015. A Changeover Time Reduction through an integration of Jean practices: a case study from phannaceutical sector. Assembly Automation, 35(1), pp. 22-34. 23. Doggett, M., 2006. Root Cause Analysis: A Framework for Tool Selection. Quality Management Journal • January 2006. 24. Doshi, J. & Desai, D., 2017. Application of failure mode & effect analysis (FMEA) for continuous quality improvement - multiple case studies in automobile SMEs. International Journal for Quality Research, 11 (2), pp. 345-360. 25. Dudek, M., 2016. Generation of the world class manufacturing systems. Zakopane, Poland, s.n. 26. Duran, 0., Capaldo, A. & Acevedo, P. A. D., 2018. Sustainable Overall Throughputability Effectiveness (S.O.T.E.) as a Metric for Production Systems. Sustainability, 10(2), p. 362. 27. Fam, S. et al., 2018. Lean Manufacturing and Overall Equipment Efficiency (OEE) in Paper Manufacturing and Paper Products Industry. Journal of Advanced Manufactruing Technology, 12(1), pp. 461-474. 28. Felice, F. D., Petrillo, A. & Monfreda, S., 2013. Improving Operations Performance with World Class Manufacturing Technique: A Case in Automotive Industry. In: M. Schiraldi, ed. Operations Management. London: IntechOpen Limited, pp. 1-31. 29. Fourie, H., 2016. Improvement in the overall efficiency of mining equipment: a case study. The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallugy, Volume 116, pp. 275-281. 30. Gandhi, M. K. & Singh, A. K., 2016. Reduction of Setup Time by Implementation of SMED Methodology. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(9), pp. 390- 393. 31. Gawdzinsk, K., 2011. Application of the Pareto chart and Ishikawa diagram for the identification of major defects in metal composite castings. Archives of Foundry Engineering, 11(2), pp. 23-28. 32. George, M. L., 2002. Lean Six Sigma: Combining Six Sigma Quality with Lean Production Speed. !st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. 33. Ghaleb, A. A., El-Sharief, M.A. & El-Sebaie, M. G., 2017. Implementation of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Techniques in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to Enhance Productivity. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Volume 14, pp. 14- 22. 34. Gitlow, H., Oppenheim, A. & Oppenheim, R., 1995. Quality Management: Tools and Method/or Improvement. 2nd ed. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill. 35. Guariente, P. et al., 2017. Implementing autonomous maintenance in an automotive components manufacturer. Procedia Manufacturing, Volume 13, pp. 1128-1134. 36. Gupta, A. K. & Garg, R. K., 2012. OEE Improvement by TPM Implementation: A Case Study. International Journal of IT. Engineering and Applied Sciences Research , 1 (I). 37. Haughey, D., 2019. Pareto Analysis Step by Step. [Online] Available at: https://www .projectsmart.co. uk/pareto-analysis-step-by-step.php [Accessed 7 12 2019]. 38. Hedmana, R., Subramaniyanb, M. & Almstriima, P ., 2017. Analysis of Critical Factors for Automatic Measurement ofOEE. Procedia CIRP, Volume 57, pp. 128-133. 39. Helmold, M. & Samara, W., 2019. Progress in Performance Management: Industry Insights and Case Studies on Principles, Application Tools, and Practice. s.l.:Springer. 40. Huang, S. H. et al., 2003. Manufacturing productivity improvement using effectiveness metrics and simulation analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 41(3), pp. 513-527. 41. Iannone, R. & Nenni, M. E., 2013. Managing OEE to Optimize Factory Performance. In: M. Schiraldi, ed. Operations Management. s.l.:IntechOpen. 42. Indrawati, S. & Ridwansyah, M., 2015. Manufacturing Continuous Improvement Using Lean Six Sigma: An Iron Ores Industry Case Application. Procedia Manufacturing, Volume 4, pp. 528-534. 43. Institute, K., 2019. Kaizen Institute. [Online]Available at: https://www.kaizen.com/knowledge-center/smed.html.[Accessed 1 12 2019]. 44. Ivancic, 1998. Development of Maintenance in Modern Production. s.l., Euromaintenance. 45. Jha, C. & Singh, A., 2016. Study of Total Productive Maintenance: A Case Study Of OEE Improvement In Automobile Industry, Benefits And Barriers In TPM Implementation. International Journal For Technological Research In Engineering , 3(9), pp. 2400-2406. 46. JIPM, 2019. Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance. [Online] Available at: https://www.jipm.or.jp/en/[Accessed 2142019]. 47. Katsuya, H., 1994. Seven Tools for Quality Control. 1st ed. Kuala Lumpur: Ikeda Shinichi & Associates. 48. Kocik, M. J., 2017. PDCA cycle as a part of continuous improvement in the production company- a case study. Production Engineering Archives, Volume 14, pp. 19-22. 49. Koning, H. d. et al., 2011. Lean Six Sigma in Healthcare. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 28(2), pp. 4-11. 50. Kumar, R., 2014. Research Methodology: A step by step guide for beginners. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publication. 51. Kumar, T. V., Parthasarathi, M., Manojkumar, S. & Selvaprakaskh, S., 2016. Lean Six Sigma Approach to Improve Overall Equipment Effectiveness Performance: A Case Study in the Indian Small Manufacturing Finn. International Journal for Innovative Research In Multidisciplinmy Field, 2(12), pp. 122-129. 52. L.DelliFrain, J., II, J. R. L. & Nembhard, I. M., 2010. Assessing the Evidence of Six Sigma and Lean in the Health Care Industry. Quality Management in Health Care, 19(3), pp. 211-225. 53. Lanza, G. et al., 2013. Measuring Global Production Effectiveness. Procedia CIRP, Volume 7, pp. 31-36. 54. Mahajana, M., Chistopher, K. B., Harshan & HC, S. P., 2019. Implementation of Lean techniques for Sustainable workflow process in Indian motor manufacturing unit. Procedia Manufacturing, Volume 35, pp. 1196-1204. 55. Miiinea, M., Du\a, L., Patic, P. C. & Caciula, I., 2010. A Method to Optimize the Overall Equipment Effectiveness. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 43(17), pp. 237-241. 56. Manzouri, M., Ab-Rahman, M., Zain, C. & Jamsari, E., 2014. Increasing Production and Eliminating Waste through Lean Tools and Techniques for Halal Food Companies. Sustainability, Volume 6, pp. 9179-9204. 57. Merriam-Webster, 2019. Meriam Webster. [Online]Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/ [Accessed 5 12 2019]. 58. Min, C. S., Ahmad, R., Kamaruddin, S. & Azid, I. A., 2011. Development of autonomous maintenance implementation framework for semiconductor industries. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 9(3), pp. 268-297. MLBP, 2018a. MLBP WCM KP! Report, Tangga Batu, Melaka: Melaka Lube Blending Plant. 59. MLBP, 2018b. GEE Result 20i8, Melaka: Melaka Lube Blending Plant. 60. Morais, V. R., Sousa, S. D. & Lopes, !., 2015. implementation of a Lean Six Sigma Project in a Production Line. London, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering . 61. Mugwindiri, K. & Mbohwa, C., 2013. Availability Performance Improvement by Using Autonomous Maintenance - The Case of a Developing Country, Zimbabwe. London, World Congress Qn Engineering 2013 . 62. Mustafa, A. 0. Z., 2014. Implementation of Six Sigma in Service Industry. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, Volume 10, pp. 77-86. 63. Muthiah, K. M. & Huang, S. H., 2007. Overall throughput effectiveness (OTE) metric for factory-level perfonnance monitoring and bottleneck detection. international Journal of Production Research, Volume 45, pp. 4753-4769. 64. Nakajima, S., 1988. Introduction to TPM !st ed. Cambridge MA.: Productivity Press. 65. Ngadiman, Y. b., Russin, B. b. & Majid, I. b. A., 2013. Exploring The Overall Equipment Effectiveness (GEE) Jn An Industrial Manufacturing Plant. Melaka, Proceedings The 2nd International Conference On Global Optimization and Its Applications 2013 . 66. Ng, K. & Chong, K., 2018. A Framework for Improving Manufacturing Overall Equipment Effectiveness. Journal of Advanced Mamifacturing Technology, 12(2), pp. 383-400. 67. Ng, K., Chong, K. E. & Goh, G. G., 2015. Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Through the Six Sigma Methodology in a Semiconductor finn: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE IEEM, Volume 2015, pp. 833-837. 68. Obara, S., 2019. Lean Enterprise Institute. [Online] Available at: https://www.lean.org/search/?sc=STANDARDIZED+WORK (Accessed 6 12 2019]. 69. Oliveira, J., Sa, J. & Fernandes, A., 2017. Continuous improvement through "Lean Tools": An application in a mechanical company. Procedia Mamifacturing, Volume 13, pp. 1082-1089. 70. Pandey, A., Malviya, S. & Jain, S., 2019. Implemented the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) by the techniques of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) in MSE's- A case study. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 5(1 ), pp. 503-511. 71. Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS), 2018. Annual Report 2017, Kuala Lumpur: Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS). 72. Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS), 2019. Annual Report 2018 - Energising Growth, Kuala Lumpur: Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS). 73. Petronas, 2017. PETRONAS Strategises Business Expansion to Capture India's Growth , Kuala Lumpur: Petronas Media Releases . 74. Productivity Press Development Team, 1999. DEE.for Operators: Overall Equipment Effectiveness. I st ed. s.l.:Taylor & Francis. 75. Puvanasvaran, A., Mei, C. & Alagendran, V., 2013. Overall Equipment Efficiency Improvement Using Time Study in an Aerospace Industry. Procedia Engineering, Volume 68, pp. 271-277. 76. Puvanasvaran, P., Kim, C. Y. & Siang, T. Y., 2012. Overall Equipment Efficiency (Dee) Improvement Through Integrating Quality Tool: Case Study. Melaka, International Conference on Design and Concurrent Engineering . 77. Rahman, M. et al., 2019. Decision making of single-minute exchange of die (SMED) in setup improvement through a simulation approach. Sendai, International Conference on Design and Concurrent Engineering 2019 & Manufacturing Systems Conference 2019. 78. Ramachandra, G., Srinivas, T., Prashanth, P. & Raghavendra, J., 2016. OEE-A Tool to Measure the Effectiveness of TPM Implementation in Industries - A Review. Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering, 1 (12), pp. 92-96. 79. Raouf, A., 1994. Improving Capital Productivity through Maintenance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(7), pp. 44-52. 80. Rastogi, A., 2018. Grey Campus. [Online]Available at: https://www.greycampus.com/blog/guality-management/a-briefintroduction-to-lean-and-six -si gma-and-1 ean-six-sigma[Accessed IO 9 2019]. 81. Rimawan, E. & lrawan, A., 2017. Analysis of Calculation Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) in the Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) PC 200-8 Excavator Grab and Magnet Type Case Study in Cakratunggal Steel Mills Company. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(1 ). 82. Scott, D. & Pisa, R., 1998. Can overall factory effectiveness prolong Moore's Law?. Solid State Technology, 41(3), pp. 75-84. 83. Shah, M. K., Deshpande, V. & Patil, R., 2017. Case study: Application of Lean tools for Improving Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) & Productivity in panel shop of heavy Fabrication Industry. Gujarat, G H Patel College of Engineering & Technology. 84. Shell Global, 2019. Shell Global. [Online]Available at: https://s08.staticshell. com/content/dam/royaldutchshell/documents/businessfunction/ lubricants/corporate/shell-lubricants-tco-manufacturing-paper.pdf [Accessed 12 11 2019]. 85. Shingo, S., 1983. A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. !st ed. Tokyo: Japan Managem~nt Association. 86. Shingo, S., 1996. Quick Changeover for Operators The SMED System. !st ed. New York: Productivity Press. 87. Shirose, K. et al., 1996. Autonomous Maintenance for Operators. !st ed. New York: The Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance. 88. Shirose, K. & Nakajima, S., 1996. TPMfor Supervisors. I st ed. New York: Productivity Press. 89. Simoes, A. & Tenera, A., 2010. Improving setup time in a Press Line-Application of the SMED methodology. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 43(17), pp. 297-302. 90. Sisodiya, P. S., Patel, M. & Bansod, V., 2014. A Literature Review on Overall Equipment Effectiveness. International Journal Of Research Jn Aeronautical And Mechanical, 2(2), pp. 35-42. 91. Soewardi, H. & Wulandari, S. A., 2019. Analysis of Machine Maintenance Processes by using FMEA. Materials Science and Engineering, 528(1). 92. Sohal, A., Olhager, J., O'Neill, P. & Prajogo, D., 2010. Implementation of OEE - Issues and challenges. Competitive and sustainable manufacturing products and services, pp. 1-8. 93. Sokovic, M., Pavletic, D. & Pipan, K. K., 2010. Quality Improvement Methodologies - PDCA Cycle, RADAR Matrix, DMAIC and DFSS. Journal of Achievement in Materials and Manufacturing Engineerig, 43(1), pp. 476-483. 94. Son, N. T., Rashid, S. H. A., Nguyen, N. D. & Nakano, M., 2010. Using the Value Stream Mapping and Overall Equipment Effectiveness to Improve Productivity: A Literature Review. Y ogyakarta, s.n. 95. Sousa, E. et al., 2018. Applying SMED methodology in cork stopper production. Procedia Manufacturing, Volume 17, pp. 611-622. 96. Sowmya, K. & Chetan, N., 2016. A Review on Effective Utilization of Resources Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness by Reducing Six Big Losses. IJSRSET, 2(1 ). 97. Sundara, R., A.N.Balajib & SatheeshKumar, R., 2014. A Review on Lean Manufacturing Implementation Techniques. Procedia Engineering, Volume 97, pp. 1875-1885. 98. Sutherland, J. & Bennett, B., 2007. The Seven Deadly Wastes of Logistics: Applying Toyota Production System Principles to Create Logistics Value, Bethlehem: Lehigh University Center for Value Chain Research . 99. Suzuki, T., 1994. TPM in Process Industries. 1st ed. New York: Productivity Press. 100. Tenera, A. & Pinto, L. C., 2014. A Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Project Management Improvement Model. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 119, pp. 912- 920. 101. The Borneo Post, 2017. Petronas aims to be top five player in global lubricants, Kuching: The Borneo Post. 102. Thomas, A. J., Francis, M., Fisher, R. & Byard, P., 2016. Implementing Lean Six Sigma to Overcome the Production Challenges in an Aerospace Company. Production Planning & Control, 27(7). 103. Treville, S. d. et al., 2014. Valuing lead time. Journal of Operations Management, Volume 32, pp. 337-346. 104. Una], Z. B., 2016. Failure mode and effect analysis: An application in jeans production process. 65(30-34). 105. UNDP, 2020. United Nations Development Programme. [Online] Available at: https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-developmentgoals/ background/[Accessed 28 6 2020]. 106. Vairagkar, A. S. & Sonawane, S., 2015. Improving Production Perfonnance with Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE). International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 4(2), pp. 700-704. 107. Valles, A., Sanchez, J., Noriega, S. & Nunez, B. G., 2009. Implementation of Six Sigma in a Manufacturing Process: A Case Study. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 16(3), pp. 171-181. 108. Wang, T.-Y. & Pan, H.-C., 2011. Improving the OEE and UPH data quality by Automated Data Collection for the semiconductor assembly industry. Expert System with Application, 38(5), pp. 5764-5773. 109. Womack, J.P. & Jones, D. T., 2003. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Revised and Updated. 2nd ed. New York: SIMON & SCHUSTER. 110. Wudhikarn, R., 2011. Overall Weighting Equipment Effectiveness. s.l., IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. 111. Wudhikarn, R.,-2012. Improving overall equipment cost loss adding cost of quality. International Journal of Production Research, 50(12), pp. 3434-3449. 112. Wudhikarn, R., Manopiniwes, W. & Smithikul, C., 2009. Developing Overall Equipment Cost Loss Indicator. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, Volume 66, pp. 557-567. 113. Yahya, S., Nadarajah, E. & Sambasivan, M., 2005. Autonomous Maintenance - An Effective Shop-Floor Tool to Improve Productivity. Journal Of Technology Management And Entrepreneurship, 3(2), pp. 89-105. 114. Youssouf, A., Rachid, C. & Ion, V., 2014. Contribution to the Optimization of Strategy of Maintenance by Lean Six Sigma. Physics Procedia, Volume 55, pp. 512-518.

Similar Items