Measuring Awareness, Readiness And Effectiveness Of Quality Ecosystem At Institut Kemahiran Mara
MQS or Ecosystem Quality Standard is to create ecosystem quality that needs to be met at all Centres of MARA administration including corporate culture, environment conducive to include safety and health elements occupation, security of protection and generating ideas, creativity and innovation amon...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25586/1/Measuring%20Awareness%2C%20Readiness%20And%20Effectiveness%20Of%20Quality%20Ecosystem%20At%20Institut%20Kemahiran%20Mara.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25586/2/Measuring%20Awareness%2C%20Readiness%20And%20Effectiveness%20Of%20Quality%20Ecosystem%20At%20Institut%20Kemahiran%20Mara.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my-utem-ep.25586 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
collection |
UTeM Repository |
language |
English English |
advisor |
Ebrahim, Zuhriah |
topic |
T Technology (General) TS Manufactures |
spellingShingle |
T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Syed Mohamed, Sharifah Syahira Measuring Awareness, Readiness And Effectiveness Of Quality Ecosystem At Institut Kemahiran Mara |
description |
MQS or Ecosystem Quality Standard is to create ecosystem quality that needs to be met at all Centres of MARA administration including corporate culture, environment conducive to include safety and health elements occupation, security of protection and generating ideas, creativity and innovation among employces. All MARA Administration Centres are required to carry out the MQS Certification. Application to obtain new MQS certification or MQS Certificate renewal should be submitted to the MQS Master Committee. Therefore, this project will be measuring awareness, readiness and effectiveness of quality ecosystem at Institut Kemahiran MARA Johor Bahru to fulfil the requirement of MQS certification of MARA. The objectives of this project including to determine the level of awareness and also to analyse the readiness of IKM Johor Bahru employees. The other objectives in this project is to provide an indicator the level of readiness verse the time taken needed to implement MARA Ecosystem Quality Standard (MQS) successfully. The methodology to achieve the all objectives is based on a survey study which is used open and closed ended questionnaire. The results in this project revealed that the questioned asked reach level of awareness at 0 and 1.0 have similar percentage with 39% for objective one. The results in objective two indicate that 63% of question asked reach level of readiness at 1.0 while the results in objective three shows that 76% is delay for level readiness versus time taken needed analysis. As a conclusion, the IKM’s Johor Bahru employee have a good level of readiness on MARA Ecosystem Quality Standard (MQS). However, they need to improved their awareness level on MARA Ecosystem Quality Standard (MQS). The other conclusion is the time taken to implement MQS will be reduced by increment numbers of employees who are ready. |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.) |
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Syed Mohamed, Sharifah Syahira |
author_facet |
Syed Mohamed, Sharifah Syahira |
author_sort |
Syed Mohamed, Sharifah Syahira |
title |
Measuring Awareness, Readiness And Effectiveness Of Quality Ecosystem At Institut Kemahiran Mara |
title_short |
Measuring Awareness, Readiness And Effectiveness Of Quality Ecosystem At Institut Kemahiran Mara |
title_full |
Measuring Awareness, Readiness And Effectiveness Of Quality Ecosystem At Institut Kemahiran Mara |
title_fullStr |
Measuring Awareness, Readiness And Effectiveness Of Quality Ecosystem At Institut Kemahiran Mara |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measuring Awareness, Readiness And Effectiveness Of Quality Ecosystem At Institut Kemahiran Mara |
title_sort |
measuring awareness, readiness and effectiveness of quality ecosystem at institut kemahiran mara |
granting_institution |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
granting_department |
Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25586/1/Measuring%20Awareness%2C%20Readiness%20And%20Effectiveness%20Of%20Quality%20Ecosystem%20At%20Institut%20Kemahiran%20Mara.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25586/2/Measuring%20Awareness%2C%20Readiness%20And%20Effectiveness%20Of%20Quality%20Ecosystem%20At%20Institut%20Kemahiran%20Mara.pdf |
_version_ |
1747834144278183936 |
spelling |
my-utem-ep.255862022-01-06T14:42:06Z Measuring Awareness, Readiness And Effectiveness Of Quality Ecosystem At Institut Kemahiran Mara 2019 Syed Mohamed, Sharifah Syahira T Technology (General) TS Manufactures MQS or Ecosystem Quality Standard is to create ecosystem quality that needs to be met at all Centres of MARA administration including corporate culture, environment conducive to include safety and health elements occupation, security of protection and generating ideas, creativity and innovation among employces. All MARA Administration Centres are required to carry out the MQS Certification. Application to obtain new MQS certification or MQS Certificate renewal should be submitted to the MQS Master Committee. Therefore, this project will be measuring awareness, readiness and effectiveness of quality ecosystem at Institut Kemahiran MARA Johor Bahru to fulfil the requirement of MQS certification of MARA. The objectives of this project including to determine the level of awareness and also to analyse the readiness of IKM Johor Bahru employees. The other objectives in this project is to provide an indicator the level of readiness verse the time taken needed to implement MARA Ecosystem Quality Standard (MQS) successfully. The methodology to achieve the all objectives is based on a survey study which is used open and closed ended questionnaire. The results in this project revealed that the questioned asked reach level of awareness at 0 and 1.0 have similar percentage with 39% for objective one. The results in objective two indicate that 63% of question asked reach level of readiness at 1.0 while the results in objective three shows that 76% is delay for level readiness versus time taken needed analysis. As a conclusion, the IKM’s Johor Bahru employee have a good level of readiness on MARA Ecosystem Quality Standard (MQS). However, they need to improved their awareness level on MARA Ecosystem Quality Standard (MQS). The other conclusion is the time taken to implement MQS will be reduced by increment numbers of employees who are ready. 2019 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25586/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25586/1/Measuring%20Awareness%2C%20Readiness%20And%20Effectiveness%20Of%20Quality%20Ecosystem%20At%20Institut%20Kemahiran%20Mara.pdf text en 2024-11 validuser http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25586/2/Measuring%20Awareness%2C%20Readiness%20And%20Effectiveness%20Of%20Quality%20Ecosystem%20At%20Institut%20Kemahiran%20Mara.pdf text en 2024-11 validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=117877 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering Ebrahim, Zuhriah 1. Ahmed A.R. Al‐Nakeeb, Trefor Williams, Peter Hibberd, Stuart Gronow, (1998) "Measuring the effectiveness of quality assurance systems in the construction industry", Property Management, Vol. 16 Issue: 4, pp.222-228 2. Aminah Abdul Kadir. 2017. Manual MARA Ecosytem Quality System. Edition April 1/2017. Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. and Tight, M. (1996). How to research. Buckingham: Open University Press. 3. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present:Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848 Bryan, Lewis MA, Linnan LA. Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Res. 2015;24:292–305. 4. Chin, K. S., Choi, T. W. (2003). Construction in Hong Kong: Success Factors for ISO 9000 Implementation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129 (6): 599-609. Chini, A. and H. Valdez. 2003. ISO 9000 and the U.S. construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering ASCE 19 (2):69-77. 5. Chung, H. W. ed. 1999. Understanding quality assurance in construction: A practical guide to ISO 9000 for contractors. London : E&FN Spon. New York : Routledge. 6. Datuk Ibrahim Ahmad. 2017. Surat Pekeliling Am Mara Bil. 3/2017 Mara Ecosystem Quality Standard (MQS). Bil. MARA :UUM/SPA/001 7. Dr. James O. Westgard.2009. Iso-2: Iso 9001:2000 And Quality Management Systems. Erosa V. E., and Arroyo, P. (2003). Analysis of the Business Capacity (Readiness) for the alignment of bases of data between client-provider. Organizational Readiness Analysis for data base alignment among clients and Information Policy Bulletin. Number 5. National Institute of Informatics and Geography. INEGI. Mexico. : 17-49 8. Ford J. K., Foster-Fishman P. (2012). “Organizational development and change: linking research from the profit, nonprofit, and public sectors,” in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology Vol. 2 ed. Kozlowski S. W. J., editor. (Oxford: Oxford library of psychology; ), 956–992 9. Fotopoulos, C. V., E. L. Psomas and F. K. Vouzas. 2010. Investigating Total Quality Management practice‟s inter-relationships in ISO 9001:2000 certified organisations. Total Quality Management 21 (5, May 2010):503–515. 10. Herscovitch L, Meyer JP: Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002, 87: 474-487. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474. 11. Hornung, S. and Rousseau, D. M. (2007). Active on the job – proactive in change: How autonomy at work contributes to employee support for organizational change.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 401-426. 12. Hoyle, D. 2007. Quality Management Essentials, Oxford: Elsevier Limited. Kam, C. W. and S. L. Tang. 1997. Development and implementation of quality assurance in public construction works in Singapore and Hong Kong. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 14 (9):909–28. 13. Kosslyn, S. M., & Rosenberg, R. S. (2001). Psychology: The Brain, the Person, the World. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Lecklin, O. 2006. Quality as a Business Success Factor, 5th Ed., Helsinki: Talentum Media Oy and Olli Lecklin. 14. Lee, T. F. (2006). ISO 9001 Quality Management System in construction – tendering procedure. Degree dissertation. Johor: University Technology of Malaysia. 15. Lordsleem, A. J., C. Duarte and B. J. Barkokébas. 2010. Performance indicators of the companies quality management systems with ISO 9001 certification. In CIB 2010 World Congress | 10 -13 May 2010 edited by P. Barrett, D. Amaratunga, R. Haigh and K. Keraminiyage. Salford Quays – United Kingdom. 16. Madsen SR, Miller D, John CR: Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference?. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2005, 16: 213-233. 10.1002/hrdq.1134. 17. Madsen SR, Miller D, John CR: Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference?. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2005, 16: 213-233. 10.1002/hrdq.1134. McCornac, D. C. 2006. The implementation of ISO 9000 in Vietnam: Case studies from the footwear industry. International Business & Economics Research Journal 5 (2):77-86. http://www.cluteinstituteonlinejournals.com/PDFs/2006230.pdf (accessed February 22, 2010). 18. Oztas, A., S. S. Güzelsoy and M. Tekinkus. 2007. Development of quality matrix to measure the effectiveness of quality management systems in Turkish construction industry. Building and Environment 42 (3):1219-1228. 19. Rafferty, A. E., & Simons, R. H. (2006). An Examination of the Antecedents of Readiness for Fine-Tuning and Corporate Transformation Changes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(3), 325-350. doi: 10.1007/s10869-005-9013-2 20. Susan Ciochetto, Bureau of the Census; Barbara A. Haley, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development1Susan Ciochetto, Bureau of the Census, Center for Survey Methods Research, Washington, How Do You Measure "Awareness"? Experiences With The Lead-Based Paint Survey.D.C. 20233-9150 Thorpe, B. and P. Sumner. 2004. Quality management in construction. England: Gower Publishing Limited. 21. Toneatto, T. (2002). A metacognitive therapy for anxiety disorders: Buddhist psychology applied. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 72-78. Tricker, R. 2008. ISO 9001:2000 for small business. Third edition ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. International Organization for Standardization. 2013. Available: www.iso.org/iso/qmp_2012.pdf (Accessed 1 February 2015) 22. Turk, A. M. 2006. ISO 9000 in construction: An examination of its application in Turkey. Building and Environment 41 (4):501-511. 23. Vakola, M. (2013). Multilevel Readiness to Organizational Change: A Conceptual Approach. Jornal of Change Management, 3(1), 96-109. 24. Vianna, S. 2007. The upcoming “changes” to ISO 9001:2008: Based on ISO 9001 DIS. http://nelsonlascanoa.wikispaces.com/file/view/The+upcoming+changes+to+ISO+9001_2008%5B1%5D.pdf (accessed February 3, 2012). 25. Wahid, R. A., J. Corner and P.-L. Tan. 2011. ISO 9000 maintenance in service organisations: Tales from two companies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 28 (7):735-757. Watson, P. and T. Howarth. 2011. Construction quality management. New York: Spon Press. 26. Weiner BJ, Lewis MA, Linnan LA: Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Res. 2009, 24: 292-305. 10.1093/her/cyn019. 27. Zink, K.J. (1998) Total Quality Management as a Holistic Management Concept. Springer |