Comparative study between Malaysian and Nigerian formal low cost housing policy issues
The current housing policies of Malaysia and Nigeria do not highlight on the af- fordability of formal low cost houses (FLCH). Low income earners do not have sufficient income to buy food and meet basic necessities like clothing, rent, fuel, utilities, transport, communications, medical expenses,...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1965/1/24p%20MOHAMMAD%20YAHAYA%20UBALE.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1965/2/MOHAMMAD%20YAHAYA%20UBALE%20WATERMARK.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The current housing policies of Malaysia and Nigeria do not highlight on the af-
fordability of formal low cost houses (FLCH). Low income earners do not have
sufficient income to buy food and meet basic necessities like clothing, rent, fuel,
utilities, transport, communications, medical expenses, education, and on a broader
sense, housing. The objectives of this study were (i) to investigate FLCH afforda-
bility elements in the current housing policies of Malaysia and Nigeria; (ii) to com-
pare the FLCH affordability elements in Malaysia and Nigeria; (iii) to study the re-
lationship among the FLCH affordability elements in Malaysia and Nigeria; and
(iv) to accomplish a sustainable FLCH affordability policy for the LIGs. The meth-
odologies employed include descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and the t-test.
The study found that there are no laws, rules or guidelines regulating the affairs of
FLCH. The design does not reflect user need; it did not conform to their culture,
family background and size. No provisions for public participation are provided in
the policy documents. FLCH are located in the same neighbourhood with medium
and high cost houses in Batu Pahat Malaysia and enjoy all facilities, utilities and
services there. The situation is not the same in Bauchi town, where FLCH are lo-
cated separately at the peripheries outside of the town trekking distances which re-
pel beneficiaries because of the awkward location. Residents in Batu Pahat have
higher earnings, less number of dependants than those at Bauchi who have higher
number of dependants and lower income level. This study recommends that design,
location, participation, highlight on affordability and family issues have prominent
impact on affordability and hence be incorporated in policy documents. It can
therefore be resolve that FLCH in Batu Pahat, are affordable while those in Bauchi
are not affordable. Conclusively, these affordability elements should be upheld to
ensure sustainable FLCH affordability policy for the low income groups. The
physical and socio-economic elements are the catalyst in the housing provision as-
pect. These elements can bridge the wide fissure being the basic features, essentials
and the fundamentals of a good policy. |
|---|