How do learners respond to computer based learning material which has been designed to suit their particular learning style
The development of ICT in education has changed the nature of people's learning. The evolution of Computer Based Learning (CBL) to virtual learning has had a huge effect on learning methodology. Learning theories from behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism have been re-assessed. This...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/7193/1/24p%20RAZALI%20HASSAN.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The development of ICT in education has changed the nature of people's
learning. The evolution of Computer Based Learning (CBL) to virtual learning
has had a huge effect on learning methodology. Learning theories from
behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism have been re-assessed. This
study explored students' feedback and experiences when using CBL
material which has been adapted to particular learning styles. Studies show
that individuals learn in different ways. They have different preferences in
collecting, organizing and delivering information. These differences impact
on learning outcomes. The framework in this study concerns itself with
modal preferences known as the VARK Model. The study focuses on CBL
material which has been designed for learning new software. This learning
material was designed with four different learning routes to appeal to those
with dominant Visual, Aural, Reading and Kinaesthetic preferences
respectively. The learning package was called the MINDs learning system.
Respondents involved were student teachers in two Universities in the UK
and Malaysia. Sixty two respondents agreed to participate interviews and in
trialling courseware. Data was collected through questionnaire, survey,
interview and observation. Quantitative and qualitative data was analysed
descriptively, triangulation of the findings was carried out and conclusions
were drawn. Findings from the study show that learning styles instruments
measure general preferences rather than offering an indication of the
specific context in which learning takes place. Matching learning material
with particular learning styles did not significantly increase motivation,
comprehension or have a major impact on learning. However, learners are
aware of having learning styles and found that learning with suited learning
preferences made them feel more comfortable. Recommendations were put
forward for future research to design and develop a 'new type' of CBL
material which takes into account individual learning preferences. |
---|