Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure
To manage and organize large data is imperative in order to formulate the data analysis and data processing efficiency. Thus, to handle large data becomes highly enviable, whilst, it is premised that the sorting techniques eliminate ambiguities with less effort. Therefore, this study investigates th...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Thesis |
| 語言: | English English English |
| 出版: |
2016
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/1/24p%20ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/2/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20COPYRIGHT%20DECLARATION.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/3/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20WATERMARK.pdf |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| id |
my-uthm-ep.926 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| spelling |
my-uthm-ep.9262021-09-09T06:01:05Z Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure 2016-03 Naser Frak, Anwar QA75-76.95 Calculating machines To manage and organize large data is imperative in order to formulate the data analysis and data processing efficiency. Thus, to handle large data becomes highly enviable, whilst, it is premised that the sorting techniques eliminate ambiguities with less effort. Therefore, this study investigates the functionality of a set of sorting techniques to observe which technique to provide better efficiency in terms of sorting data. Therefore, five types of sorting techniques of static data structure, namely: Bubble, Insertion, Selection in group O (n2) complexity and Merge, Quick in group O (n log n) complexity using the C++ programming language have been used. Each sorting technique was tested on four groups between 100 and 30000 of dataset. To validate the performance of sorting techniques, three performance metrics which are time complexity, execution time (run time) and size of dataset were used. All experimental setups were accomplished using simple linear regression where experimental results illustrate that Quick sort is more efficiency than Merge Insertion, Selection and Bubble sort based on run time and size of data using array and Selection sort is more efficient than Bubble and Insertion in large data size using array. In addition, Bubble, Insertion and Selection have good performance for small data size using array while Merge and Quick sort have good performance in large data size using array and sorting technique with good behavior O (n log n) more efficient rather than sorting technique with bad behavior is O (n2) using array. 2016-03 Thesis http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/ http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/1/24p%20ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK.pdf text en public http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/2/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20COPYRIGHT%20DECLARATION.pdf text en staffonly http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/3/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20WATERMARK.pdf text en validuser mphil masters Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology |
| institution |
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia |
| collection |
UTHM Institutional Repository |
| language |
English English English |
| topic |
QA75-76.95 Calculating machines |
| spellingShingle |
QA75-76.95 Calculating machines Naser Frak, Anwar Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
| description |
To manage and organize large data is imperative in order to formulate the data analysis and data processing efficiency. Thus, to handle large data becomes highly enviable, whilst, it is premised that the sorting techniques eliminate ambiguities with less effort. Therefore, this study investigates the functionality of a set of sorting techniques to observe which technique to provide better efficiency in terms of sorting data. Therefore, five types of sorting techniques of static data structure, namely: Bubble, Insertion, Selection in group O (n2) complexity and Merge, Quick in group O (n log n) complexity using the C++ programming language have been used. Each sorting technique was tested on four groups between 100 and 30000 of dataset. To validate the performance of sorting techniques, three performance metrics which are time complexity, execution time (run time) and size of dataset were used. All experimental setups were accomplished using simple linear regression where experimental results illustrate that Quick sort is more efficiency than Merge Insertion, Selection and Bubble sort based on run time and size of data using array and Selection sort is more efficient than Bubble and Insertion in large data size using array. In addition, Bubble, Insertion and Selection have good performance for small data size using array while Merge and Quick sort have good performance in large data size using array and sorting technique with good behavior O (n log n) more efficient rather than sorting technique with bad behavior is O (n2) using array. |
| format |
Thesis |
| qualification_name |
Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.) |
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Naser Frak, Anwar |
| author_facet |
Naser Frak, Anwar |
| author_sort |
Naser Frak, Anwar |
| title |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
| title_short |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
| title_full |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
| title_sort |
comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia |
| granting_department |
Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/1/24p%20ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/2/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20COPYRIGHT%20DECLARATION.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/3/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20WATERMARK.pdf |
| _version_ |
1747830715553153024 |