Performance modelling of refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration cycle

The simulation model based on the actual vapor compression cycle is performed in order to evaluate the performance of 14 refrigerants in terms of first law and second law efficiency. A 10% pressure drop is modelled in both the condenser and evaporator. The refrigerants that have been evaluated inclu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Basharie, Siti Mariam
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11529/1/SitiMariamBasharieMFKM2005.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utm-ep.11529
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic TD Environmental technology
Sanitary engineering
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TD Environmental technology
Sanitary engineering
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Basharie, Siti Mariam
Performance modelling of refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration cycle
description The simulation model based on the actual vapor compression cycle is performed in order to evaluate the performance of 14 refrigerants in terms of first law and second law efficiency. A 10% pressure drop is modelled in both the condenser and evaporator. The refrigerants that have been evaluated include R12, R22, R502, and their alternatives R134A, R401A, R401B, R402A, R402B, R404A, R407C, R410A, R408A, R409A, and R507. Effects of evaporating and condensing temperature on the COP, second law efficiency and irreversibility have been studied. The evaluation results show that R401A, R401B, and R409A are predicted as the best replacements for R12. R410A is predicted as the best alternative for R22, while R402B, R407C, and R408A are the best alternatives for R502 in terms of COP and second law efficiency. The results of actual cycle model show better predictions than that obtained with the ideal cycle model.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Basharie, Siti Mariam
author_facet Basharie, Siti Mariam
author_sort Basharie, Siti Mariam
title Performance modelling of refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration cycle
title_short Performance modelling of refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration cycle
title_full Performance modelling of refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration cycle
title_fullStr Performance modelling of refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration cycle
title_full_unstemmed Performance modelling of refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration cycle
title_sort performance modelling of refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration cycle
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
granting_department Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
publishDate 2005
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11529/1/SitiMariamBasharieMFKM2005.pdf
_version_ 1747814867976323072
spelling my-utm-ep.115292018-09-19T05:07:22Z Performance modelling of refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration cycle 2005-11 Basharie, Siti Mariam TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery The simulation model based on the actual vapor compression cycle is performed in order to evaluate the performance of 14 refrigerants in terms of first law and second law efficiency. A 10% pressure drop is modelled in both the condenser and evaporator. The refrigerants that have been evaluated include R12, R22, R502, and their alternatives R134A, R401A, R401B, R402A, R402B, R404A, R407C, R410A, R408A, R409A, and R507. Effects of evaporating and condensing temperature on the COP, second law efficiency and irreversibility have been studied. The evaluation results show that R401A, R401B, and R409A are predicted as the best replacements for R12. R410A is predicted as the best alternative for R22, while R402B, R407C, and R408A are the best alternatives for R502 in terms of COP and second law efficiency. The results of actual cycle model show better predictions than that obtained with the ideal cycle model. 2005-11 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11529/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11529/1/SitiMariamBasharieMFKM2005.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering [1] ASHRAE Handbook 2001. [2] David Wylie, P.E. and Davenport, J.W. (1996). “New Refrigerants For Air Conditioning And Refrigeration System.” The Fairmont Press, Inc. [3] Vaisman, I.B. (1998). “Computational Comparison Of R22 And R407C Air Conditioners With Rotary Vane Compressor.” Proceedings Of The 1998 International Refrigeration Conference at Purdue.19-24 [4] Yana Motta, S.F. and Domanski, P.A. (2000). “Performance Of R22 And Its Alternatives Working At High Outdoor Temperature.” Eighth International Refrigeration Conference at Purdue University.47-54 [5] Spatz, M.W. and Yana Motta, S.F. (2004). “An Evaluation Of Option For Replacing HCFC22 In Medium Temperature Refrigeration Systems.” International Journal of Refrigeration 27. 475-483 [6] Stegou-Sagia, A., and Paigigiannis, N. (2005). “Evaluation Of Mixture Efficiency In Refrigerating Systems.” Energy Conversion And Management 46. 2787-2802 [7] Sia Chee Keong (2004). “Non CFC Refrigerants, First And Second Law Effciencies.” Master dissertation. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. [8] Domanski, P.A.and McLinden, M.O. (1990). “A Simplified Cycle Simulation Model For The Performance Rating of Refrigerants and Refrigerant Mixtures.” 1990 USNC/IIR – Purdue Refrigeration Conference.466-475 [9] Jung, D.S. and Radermacher, R. (1990). “Performance Evaluation Of Pure And Mixed Refrigerants In Domestic Refrigerators : Drop-in Replacement Of R12” 1990 USNC/IIR – Purdue Refrigeration Conference. 177-189 [10] http://www.nist.gov [11] Cengel Y. A. and Boles M.A. (2004). “ Thermodynamics An Engineering Approach.” 4th Ed. WCB/ McGraw-Hill International. [12] Abd. Rahim Mat Sarip (2004). “Kajian Analitikal Dan Eksperimental Pemampat Bilah Berputar.” Technical Report. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Unpublished. [13] NIST REFPROP Version 6.0. [14] http://www.dupont.com/suva/ [15] McLinden, M.O. (1990). “Optimum Refrigerants For Non-Ideal Cycles : An Analysis Employing Corresponding States” 1990 USNC/IIR – Purdue Refrigeration Conference. 69-79 [16] Xu, X. and Clodic, D. (1992). “Exergy Analysis on a Vapor Compression Refrigerating System Using R12, R134A and R290 as Refrigerants” Proceedings Of The 1992 International Refrigeration Conference at Purdue. 233-240 [17] Chen, Q.Y. and Prasad, R.C. (1999). “Simulation of a Vapor-Compression Refrigeration Cycles using HFC134A and CFC12” Journal of International Community Heat Mass Transfer. Vol. 26, No. 4, 513-521. [18] Wan Choong Meng (2003). “The Exergy Analysis of a Refrigeration Plant” Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. [19] Recep Yumrutas, Mehmet Kunduz and Mehmet Kanoglu. (2002). “Exergy Analysis of Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems.” Exergy, an International Journal 2. 266–272