Simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications

Simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications

Autothermal reforming (ATR) is one of the leading methods for hydrogen production from hydrocarbons. Liquefied petroleum gas, with propane as the main component, is a promising fuel for on-board hydrogen producing systems in fuel cell vehicles and for domestic fuel cell power generation devices. I...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Insiong, Henry
التنسيق: أطروحة
اللغة:English
منشور في: 2006
الموضوعات:
TP Chemical technology
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1449/1/HenryInsiongMFKK2006.pdf
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
id my-utm-ep.1449
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Insiong, Henry
Simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications
description Autothermal reforming (ATR) is one of the leading methods for hydrogen production from hydrocarbons. Liquefied petroleum gas, with propane as the main component, is a promising fuel for on-board hydrogen producing systems in fuel cell vehicles and for domestic fuel cell power generation devices. In this research, autothermal reforming of propane process is studied and operation conditions were optimized using Aspen HYSYS 2004.1 for proton exchange membrane fuel cell application. Furthermore, heat integration process also applied after the existed stream from the ATR reactor. Besides that water gas shift (WGS) which included High Temperature Shift (HTS), Medium Temperature Shift (MTS) and Low Temperature Shift (LTS) reactor, preferential oxidation (PrOx) were used for the clean up system to reduce the concentration of carbon monoxide. Then, optimization for the ATR, WGS and PrOx reactor were done to get the highest hydrogen produced with the lowest CO. Temperature and component’s profile were also investigated for every unit’s operations. Based on the final result, 100 kgmole/hr or propane with the ratio of air and water 1 : 7 : 4.3, produced 41.62% of hydrogen with CO concentration lower than 10 ppm, and 83.14% fuel processor efficiency.
format Thesis
qualification_level other
author Insiong, Henry
author_facet Insiong, Henry
author_sort Insiong, Henry
title Simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications
title_short Simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications
title_full Simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications
title_fullStr Simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications
title_full_unstemmed Simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications
title_sort simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Chemical Engineering Department
granting_department Chemical Engineering Department
publishDate 2006
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1449/1/HenryInsiongMFKK2006.pdf
_version_ 1747814376664989696
spelling my-utm-ep.14492018-02-20T04:38:29Z Simulation and optimization of propane autothermal reformer for fuel cell applications 2006-11 Insiong, Henry TP Chemical technology Autothermal reforming (ATR) is one of the leading methods for hydrogen production from hydrocarbons. Liquefied petroleum gas, with propane as the main component, is a promising fuel for on-board hydrogen producing systems in fuel cell vehicles and for domestic fuel cell power generation devices. In this research, autothermal reforming of propane process is studied and operation conditions were optimized using Aspen HYSYS 2004.1 for proton exchange membrane fuel cell application. Furthermore, heat integration process also applied after the existed stream from the ATR reactor. Besides that water gas shift (WGS) which included High Temperature Shift (HTS), Medium Temperature Shift (MTS) and Low Temperature Shift (LTS) reactor, preferential oxidation (PrOx) were used for the clean up system to reduce the concentration of carbon monoxide. Then, optimization for the ATR, WGS and PrOx reactor were done to get the highest hydrogen produced with the lowest CO. Temperature and component’s profile were also investigated for every unit’s operations. Based on the final result, 100 kgmole/hr or propane with the ratio of air and water 1 : 7 : 4.3, produced 41.62% of hydrogen with CO concentration lower than 10 ppm, and 83.14% fuel processor efficiency. 2006-11 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1449/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1449/1/HenryInsiongMFKK2006.pdf application/pdf en public other Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Chemical Engineering Department Chemical Engineering Department Aartun, I., Silberova, B., Venvik, H., Pfeifer, P., Gorke, O., Schubert, K. and Holmen, A. (2005). “Hydrogen Production from Propane in Rh-impregnated Metallic Microchannel Reactors and Alumina Foams.� Catalysis Today 105: 469–478. Aartun, I., Venvik, H. J., Holmen, A., Pfeifer, P., Gorke, O. and Schubert, K. (2005). “Temperature Profiles and Residence Time Effects During Catalytic Partial Oxidation and Oxidative Steam Reforming of Propane in Metallic Microchannel Reactors.� Catalysis Today 110: 98–107. Aartun, I., Gjervan, T., Venvik, H., Gorke, O., Pfeifer, P., Fathi, M., Holmena, A. and Schubert, K. (2004). “Catalytic Conversion of Propane to Hydrogen in Microstructured Reactors.� Chemical Engineering Journal 101: 93–99. Agrel, J., Birgersson, H., Boutonnet, M., Melian-Cabrera, I., Navarro, R.M. and Fierro, J. L. G. (2003). “Production of Hydrogen from Methanol over Cu/ZnO Catalysts Promoted by ZrO2 and Al2O3.� Journal of Catalysis 219: 389–403. Aspen HYSYS 2004.1 Documentation (April 2005), Aspen Technology Inc., Ten Canal Park Cambridge, MA 02141-2201, USA. Avcı, A. K., Trimm, D. L., Aksoylu, A. E. and Onsan, Z. I. (2004). “Hydrogen Production by Steam Reforming of n-butane Over Supported Ni and Pt-Ni Catalysts.� Applied Catalysis A: General 258: 235–240. Avcı, A. K., Trimm, D. L. and Onsan, Z. I. (2002). “Quantitative Investigation of Catalytic Natural Gas Conversion for Hydrogen Fuel Cell Applications.� Chemical Engineering Journal 90: 77–87. Avcı, A. K., Onsan, Z. I. and. Trimm, D. L (2001). “On-board Fuel Conversion for Hydrogen Fuel Cells: Comparison of Different Fuels by Computer Simulations.� Applied Catalysis A. General 216: 243–256. Basile, A., Gallucci, F. and Paturzo, L. (2005). “Hydrogen Production from Methanol by Oxidative Steam Reforming Carried Out in a Membrane Reactor.� Catalysis Today 104: 251–259. Caglayan, B. S., Avcı, A. K., Onsan, Z. I. and Aksoylu, A. E. (2005). “Production of Hydrogen over Bimetallic Pt–Ni/d-Al2O3 I. Indirect Partial Oxidation of Propane.� Applied Catalysis A: General 280: 181–188. Cavallaro, S., Chiodo, V., Vitaa, A. and Freni, S. (2003). “Hydrogen Production by Auto-thermal Reforming of Ethanol on Rh/Al2O3 Catalyst.� Journal of Power Sources 123: 10–16. Cavallaro, S., Mondello, N. and Freni, S. (2001). “Hydrogen Produced from Ethanol for Internal Reforming Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell.� Journal of Power Sources 102: 198–204. Chen, Z. and Elnashaie, S.S.E.H. (2004). “Steady-state Modelling and Bifurcation Behaviour of Circulating Fluidized Bed Membrane Reformer–Regenerator for the Production of Hydrogen for Fuel Cells from Heptane.� Chemical Engineering Science 59: 3965–3979. Chris Spilsbury, Air Products PLC, Hydrogen Production Workshop, University of Glamorgan, ‘Hydrogen Production, Supply and Distribution’, 14 February 2001. Dagaut, P. and Nicolle, A. (2005). “Experimental and Detailed Kinetic Modelling Study of Hydrogen-Enriched Natural Gas Blend Oxidation over Extended Temperature and Equivalence Ratio Ranges.� Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 30: 2631–2638. Dehertog, W. J. H. and Fromen, G. F. (1999). “A Catalytic Route for Aromatics Production from LPG.� Applied Catalysis A: General 189: 63–75. Deshmukh, S. R. and Vlachos, D. G., (2005). “Effect of Flow Configuration on the Operation of Coupled Combustor/Reformer Microdevices for Hydrogen Production.� Chemical Engineering Science 60: 5718–5728. Espinal, J. F., Mondragon, F. and Truong, T. N. (2005). “Mechanisms for Methane and Ethane Formation in the Reaction of Hydrogen with Carbonaceous Materials.� Carbon 43: 1820–1827. Ersoz, A., Olgun, H. and Ozdogan, S. (2006). “Reforming Options for Hydrogen Production from Fossil Fuels for PEM Fuel Cells.� Journal of Power Sources 154: 67–73. Ersoz, A., Olgun, H., Ozdogan, S., Gungora, S., Akguna, F. and Tırıs, M. (2003). “Autothermal Reforming as a Hydrocarbon Fuel Processing Option for PEM Fuel Cell.� Journal of Power Sources 118: 384–392. Fernandez, E. O., Rusten, H. K., Jakobsen, H. A., Ronning, M., Holmen, A. and Chen, D. (2005). “Sorption Enhanced Hydrogen Production by Steam Methane Reforming using Li2ZrO3 as Sorbent: Sorption Kinetics and Reactor Simulation.� Catalysis Today 106: 41–46. Freni, S., Cavallaro, S., Mondello, N., Spadaro, L. and Frusteri, F. (2003). “Production of Hydrogen for MC Fuel Cell by Steam Reforming of Ethanol over MgO Supported Ni and Co Catalysts.� Catalysis Communications 4: 259–268. Haussinger, B., Kiwi, M. L. and Renken, A. (2003). “Mathematical Modelling of the Unsteady state oxidation of Nickel Catalysts.� Applied Catalysis A: General 58: 234–247. Hey, K. L., Kalk, T., Mahlendorf, F., Niemzig, O., Trautman, A. and Roes, J. (2000). “Portable PEFC Generator with Propane as Fuel.� Journal of Power Sources 86: 166–172. Hoang, D. L. and Chan, S. H. (2004). “Modelling of a Catalytic Autothermal Methane Reformer for Fuel Cell Application.� Applied Catalysis A: General 268: 207–216. Hohlein, B., Andrian, S. V., Grube, T. and Menzer, R. (2000). “Critical Assessment of Power Trains with Fuel-Cell Systems and Different Fuels.� Journal of Power Sources 86: 243–249. Kamaruddin, H., Norazana,. I., Kamarul, A. I. and Arshad,. A. (2005). “Simulation Of Hydrogen Production for Mobile Fuel Cell Applications Via Autothermal Reforming of Methane.� Putrajaya, Malaysia: 540-548. Karagiannakis, G., Kokkofitis, C., Zisekas, S. and Stoukides, M. (2005). “Catalytic and Electrocatalytic Production of H2 from Propane Decomposition over Pt and Pd in a Proton-Conducting Membrane-Reactor.� Catalysis Today 104: 219–224. Laosiripojana, N. and Assabumrungrat, S. (2005). “Hydrogen Production from Steam and Autothermal Reforming of LPG over High Surface Area Ceri.� Journal of Power Sources 178: 56-63. Lenz, B. and Aicher, T. (2005). “Catalytic Aututhermal Reforming of Jet Fuel.� Power Sources 149: 44-52. Liguras, D. K., Kondarides, D. I. and Verykios, X. E. (2003). “Production of Hydrogen for Fuel Cells by Steam Reforming of Ethanol over Supported Noble Metal Catalysts.� Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 43: 345–354. Liu, Z. W., Jun, K. W., Roh, H. S. and. Park, S. E. (2002). “Hydrogen Production for Fuel Cells Through Methane Reforming at Low Temperatures.� Journal of Power Sources 111: 283-287. Lee, D. K., Baek, I. H. and Yoon, W. L. (2004). “Modelling and Simulation for the Methane Steam Reforming Enhanced by in Situ CO2 Removal Utilizing the CaO Carbonation for H2 Production.� Chemical Engineering Science 59: 931–942 Mattos, L.V. and Noronha, F. B. (2005). “Hydrogen Production for Fuel Cell Applications by Ethanol Partial Oxidation on Pt/CeO2 Catalysts: the Effect of the Reaction Conditions and Reaction Mechanism.� Journal of Catalysis 233: 453–463. Minutillo, M. (2005). “On-board Fuel Processor Modelling for Hydrogen-Enriched Gasoline Fuelled Engine.� International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30: 1483–1490. Mizuno, T., Matsumura, Y., Nakajima, T. and Mishima, S. (2003). “Effect of Support on Catalytic Properties of Rh Catalysts for Steam Reforming of 2-Propanol.� International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 28: 1393–1399. Newson, E. and Truong, T. B. (2001). “Low-temperature Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Hydrocarbons (C1–C10) for Hydrogen Production.� International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 28: 1379–1386. Otsuka, K., Shigeta, Y. and Takenaka, S. (2002). “Production of Hydrogen from Gasoline Range Alkanes with Reduced CO2 Emission.� International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 27: 11–18. Reed R. M., (1995), “The Commercial Production of Pure Hydrogen from Hydrocarbons & Steam�. American Institute of Chemical Engineers: 453-461 Resini, C., Delgado, L. M. C. H., Vargase, M. A. L., Alemany, L. J., Rianic, P., Berardinelli, S., Marazzac, R. and Busca, G. (2006). “Production of Hydrogen by Steam Reforming of C3 Organics over Pd–Cu/ γ -Al2O3 Catalyst.� International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31: 13–19. Resini, C., Delgado, L. M. C. H., Arrighi, L., Alemany, L. J., Marazza, R. and Busca, G. (2005). “Propene versus propane steam reforming for hydrogen production over Pd-based and Ni-based catalysts.� Catalysis Communications 6: 441–445. Richard, M. F. and Ronald, W. R. (2000). “ Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes.� 3rd edition. USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 15 and 53. Silberova, B., Venvik, H. J., Walmsley, J. C. and Holmen, A. (2005). “Small-scale Hydrogen Production from Propane.� Catalysis Today 100: 457–462. Silberova, B., Venvik, H. J. and Holmen, A. (2005). “Production of Hydrogen by Short Contact Time Partial Oxidation and Oxidative Steam Reforming of Propane.� Catalysis Today 99: 69–76. Silberova, B., Fathi, M. and Holmen, A. (2004). “Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane and Propane at Short Contact Time.� Applied Catalysis A: General 276: 17–28. Smet, C. R. H., Croon, M. H. J. M., Berger, R. J., Marin, G. B. and Schouten, J. C. (2001). “Design of Adiabatic Fixed-Bed Reactors for the Partial Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas. Application to Production of Methanol and Hydrogen-for-Fuel-Cells.� Chemical Engineering Science 56: 4849–4861. Sun, J., Qiua, X. P., Wuc, F. and Zhu, W. T. (2005). “H2 from Steam Reforming of Ethanol at Low Temperature over Ni/Y2O3, Ni/La2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 Catalysts for Fuel-Cell Application.� International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30: 437–445. Suzuki, T., Iwanami, H. I. and Yoshinari, T. (2000). “Steam Reforming of Kerosene on Ru/Al2O3 Catalyst to Yield Hydrogen.� International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 25: 119-126. Todorova, S. and Su, B. L. (2004). “Effects of Acidity and Combination of Ga and Pt on Catalytic Behaviour of Ga-Pt Modified ZSM-5 Catalysts in Benzene Alkylation with Pure Propane.� Catalysis Today 93–95: 417–424. Wang, Y. N. and Rodrigues A. E. (2005). “Hydrogen Production from Steam Methane Reforming Coupled with in Situ CO2 Capture: Conceptual Parametric Study.� Fuel 84: 1778–1789. Wang, Y. H. and Zhang, J. C. (2005). “Hydrogen Production on Ni–Pd–Ce/g-Al2O3 Catalyst by Partial Oxidation and Steam Reforming of Hydrocarbons for Potential Application in Fuel Cells.� Fuel 84: 1926–1932. Wang, Y., Shah, N. and Huffman, G. P. (2005). “Simultaneous Production of Hydrogen and Carbon Nanostructures by Decomposition of Propane and Cyclohexane over Alumina Supported Binary Catalysts.� Catalysis Today 99: 359–364.

مواد مشابهة