Blended chitosan and poly (vinyl alcohol) membranes for the prevaporation of methanol and methyl tert-butyl ether
In this research project, blended chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) membranes were produced by mixing PVA and chitosan solutions. Chitosan (CS) was first dissolved in acetic acid aqueous solution before PVA solution was added. The mixture was then cured at room temperature. The modified composit...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/18181/1/NorhaslinaMohdSakriMFKM2009.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this research project, blended chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) membranes
were produced by mixing PVA and chitosan solutions. Chitosan (CS) was first
dissolved in acetic acid aqueous solution before PVA solution was added. The mixture
was then cured at room temperature. The modified composite membrane was prepared
by coating the mixture of chitosan and PVA solution onto the porous polysulfone
membrane by the solution casting technique. The porous polysulfone substrate was
prepared via phase inversion process from a casting solution containing 12 wt%
polysulfone, 11 wt% polyethylene glycol and 77 wt% N,N- dimethylacetamide. The
weight percent of chitosan in the membrane was varied from 20 wt. % to 100 wt. %
while the membrane thickness was in the range of 15-30 μm. The unmodified and
modified composite membranes with PVA were used in pervaporation separation of
methanol/methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) mixture. The swelling degree and the total
flux increased with increasing chitosan content in the membranes. 30 wt. % of methanol
(MeOH) in feed was chose since it gave the optimal overall pervaporation characteristics
in terms of flux and separation factor. The membrane containing chitosan 20 wt. % to
40 wt. % performed the best. At operating temperature of 50 oC for 20 wt % to 40 wt %
of chitosan, the fluxes obtained are at 52.28 g/m2.hr and 66.92 g/m2.hr with the
separation factors of 81.00 and 53.22 respectively. The effect of temperature on flux
followed the Arrhenius relationship. The membrane showed excellent performance for
separation of MeOH/MTBE mixture when the quantity of MeOH in feed is small. It is a
very suitable process for the recovery purpose in order to remove excess MeOH in the
MTBE system. |
---|