Comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in Nigeria and Malaysia

Payment is considered as the lifeblood of the construction industry because constructions often involve very large capital outlay and take a considerable time to complete. In Nigeria, over 11,800 capital projects are abandoned as the result of non-payment or delay in payment. The research focused on...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mustapha, Bawa
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2011
Subjects:	TH Building construction
Online Access:	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33748/5/BawaMustaphaMFAB2011.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utm-ep.33748
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-utm-ep.337482018-05-27T08:09:34Z Comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in Nigeria and Malaysia 2011-07 Mustapha, Bawa TH Building construction Payment is considered as the lifeblood of the construction industry because constructions often involve very large capital outlay and take a considerable time to complete. In Nigeria, over 11,800 capital projects are abandoned as the result of non-payment or delay in payment. The research focused on payment issues aimed at identifying the differences in payment method between JCT 2009 and PAM 2006 Standard Forms, invariably recommending ways to improve payment methods in these Standard Forms. JCT 2009 Standard Form is used in Nigeria for both public and private projects while in Malaysia PAM 2006 are used for private projects and JKR 203A (Rev, 2007) is used for government projects. In Nigeria the government standard form was drafted in 1978 for public projects but was abandoned because of its deficiencies. Payment is made through the issuance of interim certificate at interval of 28 days in JCT 2009 standard Form and 21 days in PAM 2006 Standard Form. The Time of honouring interim certificate is 14 days in JCT 2009 Standard Form in PAM 2006 Standard Form is 21 days. In comparing the time of issuance and honouring certificate between PAM 2006 and JCT 2009 standard forms are the same. PAM 2006 Standard Form requires written application as mandatory. Payments on certificates are difficult in most cases because the money most of the time is used for other purpose by the employer. The research found parties to contract are not knowledgeable in construction law in Nigeria. The contractor is entitled to interest on unpaid amount due in interim certificates. The research recommended that the Nigerian government should draft its own Standard Form with, priority to offering the subject of construction law in the school’s curriculum should be emphasised, workshop for contactors on legal position of payment should be organised, interest rate be paid on unpaid amount due, adequate project budget should be made, retention fund should be kept for contractor use. 2011-07 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33748/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33748/5/BawaMustaphaMFAB2011.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment Faculty of Built Environment
institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection	UTM Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	TH Building construction
spellingShingle	TH Building construction Mustapha, Bawa Comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in Nigeria and Malaysia
description	Payment is considered as the lifeblood of the construction industry because constructions often involve very large capital outlay and take a considerable time to complete. In Nigeria, over 11,800 capital projects are abandoned as the result of non-payment or delay in payment. The research focused on payment issues aimed at identifying the differences in payment method between JCT 2009 and PAM 2006 Standard Forms, invariably recommending ways to improve payment methods in these Standard Forms. JCT 2009 Standard Form is used in Nigeria for both public and private projects while in Malaysia PAM 2006 are used for private projects and JKR 203A (Rev, 2007) is used for government projects. In Nigeria the government standard form was drafted in 1978 for public projects but was abandoned because of its deficiencies. Payment is made through the issuance of interim certificate at interval of 28 days in JCT 2009 standard Form and 21 days in PAM 2006 Standard Form. The Time of honouring interim certificate is 14 days in JCT 2009 Standard Form in PAM 2006 Standard Form is 21 days. In comparing the time of issuance and honouring certificate between PAM 2006 and JCT 2009 standard forms are the same. PAM 2006 Standard Form requires written application as mandatory. Payments on certificates are difficult in most cases because the money most of the time is used for other purpose by the employer. The research found parties to contract are not knowledgeable in construction law in Nigeria. The contractor is entitled to interest on unpaid amount due in interim certificates. The research recommended that the Nigerian government should draft its own Standard Form with, priority to offering the subject of construction law in the school’s curriculum should be emphasised, workshop for contactors on legal position of payment should be organised, interest rate be paid on unpaid amount due, adequate project budget should be made, retention fund should be kept for contractor use.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Mustapha, Bawa
author_facet	Mustapha, Bawa
author_sort	Mustapha, Bawa
title	Comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in Nigeria and Malaysia
title_short	Comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in Nigeria and Malaysia
title_full	Comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in Nigeria and Malaysia
title_fullStr	Comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in Nigeria and Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in Nigeria and Malaysia
title_sort	comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in nigeria and malaysia
granting_institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment
granting_department	Faculty of Built Environment
publishDate	2011
url	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33748/5/BawaMustaphaMFAB2011.pdf
_version_	1747816175474049024

Comparison between the standard forms of building contract used in Nigeria and Malaysia

Similar Items