Evaluation on benefits and problems of conventional and BIM based documentation through comparison method

Documentation is an important part in the process of construction. Currently, the conventional documentation method such as Computer Aided Design (CAD) is more commonly used in construction project. New modern approaches like Building Information Modelling- based (BIM-based) help in improvising the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barati, Reza
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33784/5/RezaBaratiMFKA2013.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utm-ep.33784
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-utm-ep.337842017-09-11T01:21:04Z Evaluation on benefits and problems of conventional and BIM based documentation through comparison method 2013-01 Barati, Reza TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Documentation is an important part in the process of construction. Currently, the conventional documentation method such as Computer Aided Design (CAD) is more commonly used in construction project. New modern approaches like Building Information Modelling- based (BIM-based) help in improvising the quality of construction documentation. There are main gaps between conventional-based documentation process (CAD) and BIM-based documentation process including fragmented nature of the software, lack of collaboration and integration between involved parties, considerable amount of missing data and also lack of capability of applicable visualization. This study, therefore, aim to evaluate the benefits of BIM based documentation with the attention to highlight the problems from CAD conventional–based documentation. The objectives used to achieve the aim are by identify the problems of the Conventional–based documentation using CAD, investigate the benefits, compare the differences and evaluate the benefits and problems of the documentation process of between BIM-based and conventional CAD methods. The study is carried out based on questionnaire survey within construction companies in Singapore. The data is analyzed using statistical analysis of average index.The differences between BIM-based documentation and conventional CAD documentation are BIM approach able to create smart 3D model, create 4D model by adding time dimension into the model and 5D model by additional aspect of project cost. In conclusion the benefits of the BIM–based documentation could overcome the majority of the conventional–based documentation’s problems that, except the minor indicators, the main outcomes of project was conformed the hypothesis of the research. 2013-01 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33784/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33784/5/RezaBaratiMFKA2013.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering Faculty of Civil Engineering
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic TA Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
Barati, Reza
Evaluation on benefits and problems of conventional and BIM based documentation through comparison method
description Documentation is an important part in the process of construction. Currently, the conventional documentation method such as Computer Aided Design (CAD) is more commonly used in construction project. New modern approaches like Building Information Modelling- based (BIM-based) help in improvising the quality of construction documentation. There are main gaps between conventional-based documentation process (CAD) and BIM-based documentation process including fragmented nature of the software, lack of collaboration and integration between involved parties, considerable amount of missing data and also lack of capability of applicable visualization. This study, therefore, aim to evaluate the benefits of BIM based documentation with the attention to highlight the problems from CAD conventional–based documentation. The objectives used to achieve the aim are by identify the problems of the Conventional–based documentation using CAD, investigate the benefits, compare the differences and evaluate the benefits and problems of the documentation process of between BIM-based and conventional CAD methods. The study is carried out based on questionnaire survey within construction companies in Singapore. The data is analyzed using statistical analysis of average index.The differences between BIM-based documentation and conventional CAD documentation are BIM approach able to create smart 3D model, create 4D model by adding time dimension into the model and 5D model by additional aspect of project cost. In conclusion the benefits of the BIM–based documentation could overcome the majority of the conventional–based documentation’s problems that, except the minor indicators, the main outcomes of project was conformed the hypothesis of the research.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Barati, Reza
author_facet Barati, Reza
author_sort Barati, Reza
title Evaluation on benefits and problems of conventional and BIM based documentation through comparison method
title_short Evaluation on benefits and problems of conventional and BIM based documentation through comparison method
title_full Evaluation on benefits and problems of conventional and BIM based documentation through comparison method
title_fullStr Evaluation on benefits and problems of conventional and BIM based documentation through comparison method
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation on benefits and problems of conventional and BIM based documentation through comparison method
title_sort evaluation on benefits and problems of conventional and bim based documentation through comparison method
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering
granting_department Faculty of Civil Engineering
publishDate 2013
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33784/5/RezaBaratiMFKA2013.pdf
_version_ 1747816184310398976