Construing contract clause : the literal rule

In drafting a contract, contracting parties will negotiate terms of their contract and subsequently translate them in writing. It is very important to ensure the words used effectively reflect their true intentions. This is because the law cases relating to ambiguous terms in contracts would allow t...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Chai, Siaw Hiong
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2012
Subjects:	TH Building construction
Online Access:	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/34594/1/ChaiSiawHiongMFAB2013.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utm-ep.34594
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-utm-ep.345942018-04-12T05:36:23Z Construing contract clause : the literal rule 2012-09 Chai, Siaw Hiong TH Building construction In drafting a contract, contracting parties will negotiate terms of their contract and subsequently translate them in writing. It is very important to ensure the words used effectively reflect their true intentions. This is because the law cases relating to ambiguous terms in contracts would allow the courts to construe the word base on their opinion. The disagreements and differing opinions by the parties as to the true construction of particular terms frequently happened in construction industry. There are many approaches that judge use to construing construction contract clauses, such as Literal Rule, Golden Rule, Mischief Rule, Purposive Rule, Contra Proferentem Rule and etc. The courts use those rules to the ambiguous express terms to resolve the ambiguity or inconsistency or discrepancy. Literal Rule is the oldest of the rules of construction and is still used today. As there is always the danger that a particular interpretation may be the equivalent of making law, some judges prefer to adhere to the law's literal wording. However, there some criticism against the use of Literal Rule which the rule rests on the erroneous assumption that words has a fixed meaning. In fact, words are imprecise, leading judges to impose their own prejudices to determine the meaning of a statute. The objective of this study is to identity suitability of using Literal Rule in interpretation approach in construction industry. The law cases that been analyzed was under “Pay When Paid”, “Performance Bond” and “Termination” clauses. The finding of this study stated that, not all the construction clauses are suitable to be construed using Literal Rule approach. 2012-09 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/34594/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/34594/1/ChaiSiawHiongMFAB2013.pdf application/pdf en public http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:70644?site_name=Restricted Repository masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment Faculty of Built Environment
institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection	UTM Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	TH Building construction
spellingShingle	TH Building construction Chai, Siaw Hiong Construing contract clause : the literal rule
description	In drafting a contract, contracting parties will negotiate terms of their contract and subsequently translate them in writing. It is very important to ensure the words used effectively reflect their true intentions. This is because the law cases relating to ambiguous terms in contracts would allow the courts to construe the word base on their opinion. The disagreements and differing opinions by the parties as to the true construction of particular terms frequently happened in construction industry. There are many approaches that judge use to construing construction contract clauses, such as Literal Rule, Golden Rule, Mischief Rule, Purposive Rule, Contra Proferentem Rule and etc. The courts use those rules to the ambiguous express terms to resolve the ambiguity or inconsistency or discrepancy. Literal Rule is the oldest of the rules of construction and is still used today. As there is always the danger that a particular interpretation may be the equivalent of making law, some judges prefer to adhere to the law's literal wording. However, there some criticism against the use of Literal Rule which the rule rests on the erroneous assumption that words has a fixed meaning. In fact, words are imprecise, leading judges to impose their own prejudices to determine the meaning of a statute. The objective of this study is to identity suitability of using Literal Rule in interpretation approach in construction industry. The law cases that been analyzed was under “Pay When Paid”, “Performance Bond” and “Termination” clauses. The finding of this study stated that, not all the construction clauses are suitable to be construed using Literal Rule approach.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Chai, Siaw Hiong
author_facet	Chai, Siaw Hiong
author_sort	Chai, Siaw Hiong
title	Construing contract clause : the literal rule
title_short	Construing contract clause : the literal rule
title_full	Construing contract clause : the literal rule
title_fullStr	Construing contract clause : the literal rule
title_full_unstemmed	Construing contract clause : the literal rule
title_sort	construing contract clause : the literal rule
granting_institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment
granting_department	Faculty of Built Environment
publishDate	2012
url	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/34594/1/ChaiSiawHiongMFAB2013.pdf
_version_	1747816212468858880

Construing contract clause : the literal rule

Similar Items