Judicial interpretations on abritrator's misconduct
Arbitration is a method of private, binding and enforceable dispute resolution. A neutral third party called arbitrator renders an award after hearing testimony and argument from each party. Therefore, the qualification of the arbitrator is important to render a valid award. Under the Arbitration Ac...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Wong, Kok Hoa |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/36273/5/WongKokHoaMFAB2010.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Judicial interpretations on “error of law on the face of arbitration award”
by: Yap, Poy Yee
Published: (2010) -
Judicial interpretation of the high court in application of the security for costs
by: Tham, Yoon Fah
Published: (2012) -
Judicial interpretations of the term ‘Lump Sum’ in construction contract
by: Mohamad Ali, Norwati
Published: (2009) -
Setting aside an award: arbitrator’s misconduct
by: Lee, See Kim
Published: (2012) -
What constitutes income in the context of section 4 income tax act 1967 and judicial interpretations
by: Anuradha, Narasamuloo
Published: (2013)