Comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system

Merchant ships could, by requirement, be fitted with any two of three different types of fixed fire extinguishing system (FFES); CO2 based, water based and foam based. Each system is quite unique and so as the maintenance and repair cost. Maintenance cost of FFES depends on ship size and type and th...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Othman, Khairizal
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2013
Subjects:	TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Online Access:	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/39744/1/KhairizalOthmanMFKM2013.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utm-ep.39744
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-utm-ep.397442017-09-14T06:42:41Z Comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system 2013-01 Othman, Khairizal TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Merchant ships could, by requirement, be fitted with any two of three different types of fixed fire extinguishing system (FFES); CO2 based, water based and foam based. Each system is quite unique and so as the maintenance and repair cost. Maintenance cost of FFES depends on ship size and type and the major cost categories are labor and material. Maintenance budget to sustain maintenance and repair work on FFES is always given lump sum to the ship’s master and hence it is helpful if the master is provided with indication on how to apportion the budget by FFES type, by system’s category and by system’s components. This research intends to establish these ratios based on data collected from 31,980 DWT chemical tankers with GRT 22,116. Maintenance and repair cost data are split into categories and later further breakdown into components representing the types of works performed on the FFES systems. Probability of occurrence of their average annual values are also estimated using simple Gaussian Method. The result show that for FFES comprising of CO2 and water based system, the CO2 based system will take 7% of the lump sum budget, its labor cost will take 91% and SA CO2 Fixed Fire Sys Cylinder Test Certificate component will take 47.4% of the budgeted sum. For a CO2 and foam system, the CO2 based system will take 6% of the lump sum budget, its labor component will take 93% and PUC0611-Test Fire Pump 12M component will take 25.7%. For water and foam FFES system, water will take 4% of the budgeted sum, labor will take 100% and SA-Foam Analysis component will take 47.6%. 2013-01 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/39744/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/39744/1/KhairizalOthmanMFKM2013.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection	UTM Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle	TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Othman, Khairizal Comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system
description	Merchant ships could, by requirement, be fitted with any two of three different types of fixed fire extinguishing system (FFES); CO2 based, water based and foam based. Each system is quite unique and so as the maintenance and repair cost. Maintenance cost of FFES depends on ship size and type and the major cost categories are labor and material. Maintenance budget to sustain maintenance and repair work on FFES is always given lump sum to the ship’s master and hence it is helpful if the master is provided with indication on how to apportion the budget by FFES type, by system’s category and by system’s components. This research intends to establish these ratios based on data collected from 31,980 DWT chemical tankers with GRT 22,116. Maintenance and repair cost data are split into categories and later further breakdown into components representing the types of works performed on the FFES systems. Probability of occurrence of their average annual values are also estimated using simple Gaussian Method. The result show that for FFES comprising of CO2 and water based system, the CO2 based system will take 7% of the lump sum budget, its labor cost will take 91% and SA CO2 Fixed Fire Sys Cylinder Test Certificate component will take 47.4% of the budgeted sum. For a CO2 and foam system, the CO2 based system will take 6% of the lump sum budget, its labor component will take 93% and PUC0611-Test Fire Pump 12M component will take 25.7%. For water and foam FFES system, water will take 4% of the budgeted sum, labor will take 100% and SA-Foam Analysis component will take 47.6%.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Othman, Khairizal
author_facet	Othman, Khairizal
author_sort	Othman, Khairizal
title	Comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system
title_short	Comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system
title_full	Comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system
title_fullStr	Comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system
title_full_unstemmed	Comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system
title_sort	comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system
granting_institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
granting_department	Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
publishDate	2013
url	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/39744/1/KhairizalOthmanMFKM2013.pdf
_version_	1747816546095333376

Comparative analysis on maintennace and repair cost of different types of shipboard fixed fire extinguishing system

Similar Items