Pendekatan penilaian untuk analisa cerun tanah

Soil Mechanics Theory establishes the current practice of designing a slope by founding the analysis on the ‘c’ and ‘Ø’ values. However, the theory still yields an anomalous result. Although in many real cases the engineer has designed slopes by using factor of safety greater than 1.5, but...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Zainal Abidin, Mohd. Hazreek
格式: Thesis
語言:English
出版: 2006
主題:
在線閱讀:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4794/1/MohdHazreekZainalAbidinMFKA2006.pdf
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
實物特徵
總結:Soil Mechanics Theory establishes the current practice of designing a slope by founding the analysis on the ‘c’ and ‘Ø’ values. However, the theory still yields an anomalous result. Although in many real cases the engineer has designed slopes by using factor of safety greater than 1.5, but the slope failed. These facts prove the designed parameters are still inadequate to prevent slope failure. In this study, The Soil Mechanics Approach (e.g. Conventional Approach) will be compared to The Engineering Geology Approach for analyzing slope stability. The study is carried out for investigating other relevant parameters should be considered in designing a slope. All the required data that was used in both analyses was obtain from site (Gunung Pulai) and laboratory works. The results from both analyses shown that there was a difference in term of stability. The influence of relict joint that has been excluded in Soil Mechanics Approach has been detected as the main factor that cause the result that has been obtain inaccurate. The influence of relict joint is one of the main factors in the analysis of Engineering Geology Approach which gain a better result compared to the Soil Mechanics Approach. Each approaches takes into account different parameters in the analysis that suggest different influence factors affecting slope stability. For this reason, it is better to use both approaches (Soil Mechanics and Engineering Geology) in slope analysis containing relict joint.