Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods

The last decade has witnessed a dramatic increase in vehicular traffic on roads in developing countries like Malaysia. This has raised additional traffic, augmented axle loads and increased tire pressure on pavements designed for earlier era. In this regard, besides considering increasing the paveme...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Aziz Memon, Naeem
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2006
Subjects:	HE Transportation and Communications
Online Access:	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/1/NaeemAzizMemonMFKA2006.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utm-ep.4984
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-utm-ep.49842018-02-28T06:51:00Z Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods 2006-10-20 Aziz Memon, Naeem HE Transportation and Communications TE Highway engineering. Roads and pavements The last decade has witnessed a dramatic increase in vehicular traffic on roads in developing countries like Malaysia. This has raised additional traffic, augmented axle loads and increased tire pressure on pavements designed for earlier era. In this regard, besides considering increasing the pavement thickness due to the traffic loads, steps must also be taken to extend the pavement life by using different compaction methods such as gyratory laboratory compaction method to have durable mix and better simulate field conditions. However, the main shortcoming of gyratory compaction method is that the gyratory compactor is very costly as seven times more than that of the available Marshall hammer.To overcome that shortcoming, studies have been done to compare both laboratory compaction methods but more are needed to verify different findings according to different conditions and climate. In this research four asphalt concrete mixes asphalt wearing course(ACW)10, ACW14, ACW20 and ACB28 were designed using Marshall mix design to evaluate HMA properties such as density and air voids. Based on the Marshall results, specimens were fabricated to obtain the required number of gyrations that could produce same results in terms of density. Using the equivalent number of gyrations samples were designed using superpave to obtain the optimum bitumen content (OBC). The results indicate that at 75 blows Marshall, the equivalent number of gyrations for ACW10, ACW14, ACW20 and ACB28 are 105, 67, 58 and 107 respectively. The results also suggest that there is no significant difference in OBC except for ACW10, which is 0.6%. This shows that numbers of gyrations obtained are reasonable in comparing with 75 blows Marshall. 2006-10 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/1/NaeemAzizMemonMFKA2006.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering Faculty of Civil Engineering
institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection	UTM Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	HE Transportation and Communications HE Transportation and Communications
spellingShingle	HE Transportation and Communications HE Transportation and Communications Aziz Memon, Naeem Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
description	The last decade has witnessed a dramatic increase in vehicular traffic on roads in developing countries like Malaysia. This has raised additional traffic, augmented axle loads and increased tire pressure on pavements designed for earlier era. In this regard, besides considering increasing the pavement thickness due to the traffic loads, steps must also be taken to extend the pavement life by using different compaction methods such as gyratory laboratory compaction method to have durable mix and better simulate field conditions. However, the main shortcoming of gyratory compaction method is that the gyratory compactor is very costly as seven times more than that of the available Marshall hammer.To overcome that shortcoming, studies have been done to compare both laboratory compaction methods but more are needed to verify different findings according to different conditions and climate. In this research four asphalt concrete mixes asphalt wearing course(ACW)10, ACW14, ACW20 and ACB28 were designed using Marshall mix design to evaluate HMA properties such as density and air voids. Based on the Marshall results, specimens were fabricated to obtain the required number of gyrations that could produce same results in terms of density. Using the equivalent number of gyrations samples were designed using superpave to obtain the optimum bitumen content (OBC). The results indicate that at 75 blows Marshall, the equivalent number of gyrations for ACW10, ACW14, ACW20 and ACB28 are 105, 67, 58 and 107 respectively. The results also suggest that there is no significant difference in OBC except for ACW10, which is 0.6%. This shows that numbers of gyrations obtained are reasonable in comparing with 75 blows Marshall.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Aziz Memon, Naeem
author_facet	Aziz Memon, Naeem
author_sort	Aziz Memon, Naeem
title	Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_short	Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_full	Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_fullStr	Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_sort	comparison between superpave gyratory and marshall laboratory compaction methods
granting_institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering
granting_department	Faculty of Civil Engineering
publishDate	2006
url	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/1/NaeemAzizMemonMFKA2006.pdf
_version_	1747814556381478912

Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods

Similar Items