Structural design improvement of unmanned aerial vehicle wing

Almost all engineering systems experience strength versus weight conflict of some description. In the case of airplane wing, there are two primary requirements which must be considered during the structural design process: high strength and stiffness, and lower weight. Due to the restricted nature o...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Kanesan, Gunasegaran
格式: Thesis
語言:English
出版: 2014
主題:
在線閱讀:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/53465/25/GunasegaranKanesanMFKM2014.pdf
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
id my-utm-ep.53465
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-utm-ep.534652020-07-15T06:33:47Z Structural design improvement of unmanned aerial vehicle wing 2014-02 Kanesan, Gunasegaran TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Almost all engineering systems experience strength versus weight conflict of some description. In the case of airplane wing, there are two primary requirements which must be considered during the structural design process: high strength and stiffness, and lower weight. Due to the restricted nature of technology in this field, very few design guidelines are available for design improvement of an airplane wing structure to increase its strength-to-weight ratio. The objective of this thesis is to provide guidelines for the improvement of the structural design of a composite unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) wing with respect to weight, strength and bending stiffness, with Aludra MK-01 as a case study. The finite element method was used for the numerical analysis on the structure. Popular commercial finite element software, ABAQUS CAE, was used to model the wing structure. A detailed modelling technique for composite structure and the attachment between structures was presented in this thesis. The wing finite element model was validated using experimental results. The design improvement process on the wing structures was conducted in several modes. The variables used in the process were spar web length, spar shape and spar thicknesses. UAV wing structural weight, bending stiffness and failure index were used as the main criteria in the design improvement process. The variation of these criteria with changes in selected parameters were then plotted to observe the design trends. At the end of the research, the improved web lengths and thicknesses were obtained, as also the best combination of shapes for the spars. During the design improvement process, the failure index was found to be most sensitive towards the changes in the variable parameters compared to structural weight and bending stiffness. The design improvement guidelines presented in this thesis should facilitate the design and analysis of future UAV composite wing structures. 2014-02 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/53465/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/53465/25/GunasegaranKanesanMFKM2014.pdf application/pdf en public http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:86591 masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Kanesan, Gunasegaran
Structural design improvement of unmanned aerial vehicle wing
description Almost all engineering systems experience strength versus weight conflict of some description. In the case of airplane wing, there are two primary requirements which must be considered during the structural design process: high strength and stiffness, and lower weight. Due to the restricted nature of technology in this field, very few design guidelines are available for design improvement of an airplane wing structure to increase its strength-to-weight ratio. The objective of this thesis is to provide guidelines for the improvement of the structural design of a composite unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) wing with respect to weight, strength and bending stiffness, with Aludra MK-01 as a case study. The finite element method was used for the numerical analysis on the structure. Popular commercial finite element software, ABAQUS CAE, was used to model the wing structure. A detailed modelling technique for composite structure and the attachment between structures was presented in this thesis. The wing finite element model was validated using experimental results. The design improvement process on the wing structures was conducted in several modes. The variables used in the process were spar web length, spar shape and spar thicknesses. UAV wing structural weight, bending stiffness and failure index were used as the main criteria in the design improvement process. The variation of these criteria with changes in selected parameters were then plotted to observe the design trends. At the end of the research, the improved web lengths and thicknesses were obtained, as also the best combination of shapes for the spars. During the design improvement process, the failure index was found to be most sensitive towards the changes in the variable parameters compared to structural weight and bending stiffness. The design improvement guidelines presented in this thesis should facilitate the design and analysis of future UAV composite wing structures.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Kanesan, Gunasegaran
author_facet Kanesan, Gunasegaran
author_sort Kanesan, Gunasegaran
title Structural design improvement of unmanned aerial vehicle wing
title_short Structural design improvement of unmanned aerial vehicle wing
title_full Structural design improvement of unmanned aerial vehicle wing
title_fullStr Structural design improvement of unmanned aerial vehicle wing
title_full_unstemmed Structural design improvement of unmanned aerial vehicle wing
title_sort structural design improvement of unmanned aerial vehicle wing
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
granting_department Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
publishDate 2014
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/53465/25/GunasegaranKanesanMFKM2014.pdf
_version_ 1747817561914867712