Comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by pile driving analyzer and maintained load test

In Malaysia, Maintained Load Test (MLT) is the most common static load test used for testing of driven reinforced concrete (RC) piles, while Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) is currently the most popular dynamic test method. MLT provides relatively accurate information on ultimate pile capacity and settl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rajasvaran, Kamalendran N.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/5765/1/KamalendranN.RajasvaranMFKA2007.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utm-ep.5765
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-utm-ep.57652018-08-26T11:58:15Z Comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by pile driving analyzer and maintained load test 2007-05 Rajasvaran, Kamalendran N. TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) In Malaysia, Maintained Load Test (MLT) is the most common static load test used for testing of driven reinforced concrete (RC) piles, while Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) is currently the most popular dynamic test method. MLT provides relatively accurate information on ultimate pile capacity and settlement but is costly, time consuming and difficult to carry out. PDA is much more timesaving, less expensive and can be carried out with relative ease, but the results are subject to uncertainties and interpretations of wave stress propagation theories. Results of pile load tests at a hypermarket development were studied and analysed to create a comparison between MLT and PDA. From the study, ultimate pile capacities derived from analysis of PDA were consistently higher than results from MLT. Comparison of pile settlement results for MLT and PDA was observed to be inconsistent. The study also recognises that Davisson’s Method is used to obtain ultimate pile capacity from MLT as it is more conservative compared with other calculation methods. PDA results were observed to be satisfactory in determining ultimate pile capacity, but a coefficient of 0.9 or a 10% reduction is suggested to be applied to values derived from PDA. For future pile testing programs, there is a potential for an increase of PDA tests to be carried out. However, a limited number of MLT must also be carried out to determine accuracy of parameters and soil models used in PDA tests. 2007-05 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/5765/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/5765/1/KamalendranN.RajasvaranMFKA2007.pdf application/pdf en public http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:62107 masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering Faculty of Civil Engineering
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic TA Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
Rajasvaran, Kamalendran N.
Comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by pile driving analyzer and maintained load test
description In Malaysia, Maintained Load Test (MLT) is the most common static load test used for testing of driven reinforced concrete (RC) piles, while Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) is currently the most popular dynamic test method. MLT provides relatively accurate information on ultimate pile capacity and settlement but is costly, time consuming and difficult to carry out. PDA is much more timesaving, less expensive and can be carried out with relative ease, but the results are subject to uncertainties and interpretations of wave stress propagation theories. Results of pile load tests at a hypermarket development were studied and analysed to create a comparison between MLT and PDA. From the study, ultimate pile capacities derived from analysis of PDA were consistently higher than results from MLT. Comparison of pile settlement results for MLT and PDA was observed to be inconsistent. The study also recognises that Davisson’s Method is used to obtain ultimate pile capacity from MLT as it is more conservative compared with other calculation methods. PDA results were observed to be satisfactory in determining ultimate pile capacity, but a coefficient of 0.9 or a 10% reduction is suggested to be applied to values derived from PDA. For future pile testing programs, there is a potential for an increase of PDA tests to be carried out. However, a limited number of MLT must also be carried out to determine accuracy of parameters and soil models used in PDA tests.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Rajasvaran, Kamalendran N.
author_facet Rajasvaran, Kamalendran N.
author_sort Rajasvaran, Kamalendran N.
title Comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by pile driving analyzer and maintained load test
title_short Comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by pile driving analyzer and maintained load test
title_full Comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by pile driving analyzer and maintained load test
title_fullStr Comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by pile driving analyzer and maintained load test
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by pile driving analyzer and maintained load test
title_sort comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by pile driving analyzer and maintained load test
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering
granting_department Faculty of Civil Engineering
publishDate 2007
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/5765/1/KamalendranN.RajasvaranMFKA2007.pdf
_version_ 1747814607360098304