Termination for convenience by employer in construction contract

Termination for convenience clauses is now present in many construction contracts. This clause essentially allows an employer to terminate the contract for his own convenience without having to specify the default that the contractor has committed. Contrary to termination for default where the power...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lau, Siew Soon
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78668/1/LauSiewSoonMFAB2017.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utm-ep.78668
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-utm-ep.786682018-08-29T07:35:46Z Termination for convenience by employer in construction contract 2017-06 Lau, Siew Soon TH Building construction Termination for convenience clauses is now present in many construction contracts. This clause essentially allows an employer to terminate the contract for his own convenience without having to specify the default that the contractor has committed. Contrary to termination for default where the power to terminate the contract rests on the contractual determination or common law termination, the invocation of the termination for convenience clause is biased towards the employer where the unilateral power to exercise the such clause rests on the employer. This may subject to clear abuse of discretion by the employer if the clause is improperly exercised and may lead to disastrous consequences if such termination results in wrongful termination. Limitations on the rights to terminate for convenience are necessary to ensure that the termination process is lawful and valid. This research study is conducted for the purpose to identify potential issues that prohibits the employer to terminate for convenience. Analysis of eleven (11) cases from Commonwealth countries are done to meet the research objective. In general, termination for convenience clause shall comply with the existing contractual terms for the entitlement of absolute right of termination exercisable by the employer. Further to that, the contract provisions shall specify the limit of the damages claimable by the contractor in any event of termination for employer’s convenience. The employer shall also act in good faith when exercising his discretion to comply with the validity of termination for convenience. Lastly, termination for convenience clause should not be read together with variation clause to omit the balance of the works. Hence, condition precedents are important to be specified to further enhance the duties and obligations of the parties involved in the agreement prior to termination for employer’s convenience for the fairness of contract. 2017-06 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78668/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78668/1/LauSiewSoonMFAB2017.pdf application/pdf en public http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:110492 masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment Faculty of Built Environment
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic TH Building construction
spellingShingle TH Building construction
Lau, Siew Soon
Termination for convenience by employer in construction contract
description Termination for convenience clauses is now present in many construction contracts. This clause essentially allows an employer to terminate the contract for his own convenience without having to specify the default that the contractor has committed. Contrary to termination for default where the power to terminate the contract rests on the contractual determination or common law termination, the invocation of the termination for convenience clause is biased towards the employer where the unilateral power to exercise the such clause rests on the employer. This may subject to clear abuse of discretion by the employer if the clause is improperly exercised and may lead to disastrous consequences if such termination results in wrongful termination. Limitations on the rights to terminate for convenience are necessary to ensure that the termination process is lawful and valid. This research study is conducted for the purpose to identify potential issues that prohibits the employer to terminate for convenience. Analysis of eleven (11) cases from Commonwealth countries are done to meet the research objective. In general, termination for convenience clause shall comply with the existing contractual terms for the entitlement of absolute right of termination exercisable by the employer. Further to that, the contract provisions shall specify the limit of the damages claimable by the contractor in any event of termination for employer’s convenience. The employer shall also act in good faith when exercising his discretion to comply with the validity of termination for convenience. Lastly, termination for convenience clause should not be read together with variation clause to omit the balance of the works. Hence, condition precedents are important to be specified to further enhance the duties and obligations of the parties involved in the agreement prior to termination for employer’s convenience for the fairness of contract.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Lau, Siew Soon
author_facet Lau, Siew Soon
author_sort Lau, Siew Soon
title Termination for convenience by employer in construction contract
title_short Termination for convenience by employer in construction contract
title_full Termination for convenience by employer in construction contract
title_fullStr Termination for convenience by employer in construction contract
title_full_unstemmed Termination for convenience by employer in construction contract
title_sort termination for convenience by employer in construction contract
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment
granting_department Faculty of Built Environment
publishDate 2017
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78668/1/LauSiewSoonMFAB2017.pdf
_version_ 1747818042047332352