Comparison between carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as alternatives in fluid loss agent

In drilling operation, fluid loss can be defined when high hydro static pressure compared to formation pressure that caused the mud filtrate lost to the permeable formation. Fluid loss agent are used to control the process and avoid potential reservoir damage. Drilling fluid formulation has become i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abd. Mutalibi, Efa Sofea
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85796/1/EfaSofeaAbdMutalibMSChE2018.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utm-ep.85796
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-utm-ep.857962020-07-30T07:34:26Z Comparison between carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as alternatives in fluid loss agent 2018 Abd. Mutalibi, Efa Sofea TP Chemical technology In drilling operation, fluid loss can be defined when high hydro static pressure compared to formation pressure that caused the mud filtrate lost to the permeable formation. Fluid loss agent are used to control the process and avoid potential reservoir damage. Drilling fluid formulation has become important in the effort of obtaining right formulated drilling fluid. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential of Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) additive in water-based drilling fluid as fluid loss agent. Performance of WBM with POFA additive will be compared to basic mud and WBM with Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC) additive as commercial fluid loss agent. There are 10 samples prepared in this project including 1 basic WBM sample, 3 different concentration of POFA mud sample, 3 different concentration of CMC mud sample and 3 different concentration of combined mud sample with 50% CMC 50% POFA additive. The 3 concentrations were tested are 0.5 g, 1.0 g and 1.5 g. The rheological properties;plastic viscosity, yield point and gel strength of all water-based mud samples in this project were analyzed at 75°F and 250 °F temperature. The filtration were tested for both Low Pressure Low Temperature (LPLT) at 75°F with 100 psi pressure and High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) at 250°F with 500 psi to study the fluid loss property on both conditions. Rheology properties in for 75°F temperature showed that POFA has good plastic viscosity within the range but not good in yield point and gel strength reading compared to CMC. For high temperature, POFA showed degradation in the rheological properties. Based on both fluid loss test in LPLT and HPHT, POFA showed recommended result for LPLT condition but it reduces in performance with higher fluid loss at HPHT condition. 2018 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85796/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85796/1/EfaSofeaAbdMutalibMSChE2018.pdf application/pdf en public http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:131658 masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Engineering - School of Chemical & Energy Engineering Faculty of Engineering - School of Chemical & Energy Engineering
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Abd. Mutalibi, Efa Sofea
Comparison between carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as alternatives in fluid loss agent
description In drilling operation, fluid loss can be defined when high hydro static pressure compared to formation pressure that caused the mud filtrate lost to the permeable formation. Fluid loss agent are used to control the process and avoid potential reservoir damage. Drilling fluid formulation has become important in the effort of obtaining right formulated drilling fluid. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential of Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) additive in water-based drilling fluid as fluid loss agent. Performance of WBM with POFA additive will be compared to basic mud and WBM with Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC) additive as commercial fluid loss agent. There are 10 samples prepared in this project including 1 basic WBM sample, 3 different concentration of POFA mud sample, 3 different concentration of CMC mud sample and 3 different concentration of combined mud sample with 50% CMC 50% POFA additive. The 3 concentrations were tested are 0.5 g, 1.0 g and 1.5 g. The rheological properties;plastic viscosity, yield point and gel strength of all water-based mud samples in this project were analyzed at 75°F and 250 °F temperature. The filtration were tested for both Low Pressure Low Temperature (LPLT) at 75°F with 100 psi pressure and High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) at 250°F with 500 psi to study the fluid loss property on both conditions. Rheology properties in for 75°F temperature showed that POFA has good plastic viscosity within the range but not good in yield point and gel strength reading compared to CMC. For high temperature, POFA showed degradation in the rheological properties. Based on both fluid loss test in LPLT and HPHT, POFA showed recommended result for LPLT condition but it reduces in performance with higher fluid loss at HPHT condition.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Abd. Mutalibi, Efa Sofea
author_facet Abd. Mutalibi, Efa Sofea
author_sort Abd. Mutalibi, Efa Sofea
title Comparison between carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as alternatives in fluid loss agent
title_short Comparison between carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as alternatives in fluid loss agent
title_full Comparison between carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as alternatives in fluid loss agent
title_fullStr Comparison between carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as alternatives in fluid loss agent
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as alternatives in fluid loss agent
title_sort comparison between carboxymethyl cellulose (cmc) and palm oil fuel ash (pofa) as alternatives in fluid loss agent
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Engineering - School of Chemical & Energy Engineering
granting_department Faculty of Engineering - School of Chemical & Energy Engineering
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85796/1/EfaSofeaAbdMutalibMSChE2018.pdf
_version_ 1747818457167036416