Gaya Kepimpinan Pemimpin dan Komitmen Pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor

Gaya Kepimpinan Pemimpin dan Komitmen Pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between leadership styles of the director and commitment level of the subordinate in Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor. The styles of leadership studied are transformational and transactional. The study was also to find out if there were any di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baharudin, Othman
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2004
Subjects:
HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/1141/1/BAHARUDIN_B._OTHMAN.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1141/2/1.BAHARUDIN_B._OTHMAN.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.1141
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
Baharudin, Othman
Gaya Kepimpinan Pemimpin dan Komitmen Pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor
description The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between leadership styles of the director and commitment level of the subordinate in Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor. The styles of leadership studied are transformational and transactional. The study was also to find out if there were any differences in commitment level based on the leadership style of their directors. Besides, the study also to find out if, there were any differences in leadership styles and commitment level based on the demographical characteristics of subordinates i.e gender, categories of age, job level and level of education. A total of 373 subordinate were chosen by simple random sampling and participated in the study The Multifactor Leadership Questionaire (MLQ) was used to measure the leadership style of the directors while An Organizational Commitment Questionaire (OCQ) was used to measure the level of commitment of the subordinate. These two psychometric tools were tested for their relevanve and reliability. The collected data was analyzed by using the t-test, One Way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation and the resulting data were further analyzed using the descriptive statistics and the inferential statistics. The findings of this stuf shows that there is a significant relationship between leadership styles of a director and the level of commitment of subordinates. Based on each dimensions, the result shows charismatic leadership has a high positive significant compared to the other components i.e individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, contingent reward and management-by-exception with the level of commitment of subordinates. The findings also show that there are no significant between leadership styles and levels of commitment of subordinates based on their demographic characteristics.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Baharudin, Othman
author_facet Baharudin, Othman
author_sort Baharudin, Othman
title Gaya Kepimpinan Pemimpin dan Komitmen Pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor
title_short Gaya Kepimpinan Pemimpin dan Komitmen Pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor
title_full Gaya Kepimpinan Pemimpin dan Komitmen Pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor
title_fullStr Gaya Kepimpinan Pemimpin dan Komitmen Pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor
title_full_unstemmed Gaya Kepimpinan Pemimpin dan Komitmen Pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor
title_sort gaya kepimpinan pemimpin dan komitmen pekerja di jabatan agama islam selangor
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Faculty of Business Management
publishDate 2004
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/1141/1/BAHARUDIN_B._OTHMAN.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1141/2/1.BAHARUDIN_B._OTHMAN.pdf
_version_ 1747827080505065472
spelling my-uum-etd.11412013-07-24T12:10:36Z Gaya Kepimpinan Pemimpin dan Komitmen Pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor 2004 Baharudin, Othman Faculty of Business Management Faculty of Business Management HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between leadership styles of the director and commitment level of the subordinate in Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor. The styles of leadership studied are transformational and transactional. The study was also to find out if there were any differences in commitment level based on the leadership style of their directors. Besides, the study also to find out if, there were any differences in leadership styles and commitment level based on the demographical characteristics of subordinates i.e gender, categories of age, job level and level of education. A total of 373 subordinate were chosen by simple random sampling and participated in the study The Multifactor Leadership Questionaire (MLQ) was used to measure the leadership style of the directors while An Organizational Commitment Questionaire (OCQ) was used to measure the level of commitment of the subordinate. These two psychometric tools were tested for their relevanve and reliability. The collected data was analyzed by using the t-test, One Way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation and the resulting data were further analyzed using the descriptive statistics and the inferential statistics. The findings of this stuf shows that there is a significant relationship between leadership styles of a director and the level of commitment of subordinates. Based on each dimensions, the result shows charismatic leadership has a high positive significant compared to the other components i.e individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, contingent reward and management-by-exception with the level of commitment of subordinates. The findings also show that there are no significant between leadership styles and levels of commitment of subordinates based on their demographic characteristics. 2004 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1141/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1141/1/BAHARUDIN_B._OTHMAN.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/1141/2/1.BAHARUDIN_B._OTHMAN.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah Haji Ahmad Badawi, Teks Ucapan Majlis Perdana Perkhidmatan Awam Kelima di INTAN (2004, Januari, 9). INTAN, m.s.12. Abdul Khalid Sameon. (2002). Penelitian Terhadap Nilai Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi di Kalangan Pekerja Kumpulan Sokongan. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Afzalur Rahim, M. dan Mainuddin Afza (1993). Leader Power, Commitment,Satisfaction, Compliance and Propensity to Leave aJob Among U.S. Accounts.The Journal of Social Psychology, 133 (5): 611-625 Adeline Chew Ling (1998). Komunikasi Organisasi dan hubungannya dengan Komitmen Pekerja kepada Organisasinya. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Ahmad Sarji Abdul Hamid (1994). Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia: Satu Peralihan Paradigma. Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara. Ali, A J., dan Azim, A. (1995). Work ethics and loyalty in Canada The Journal of Social Psychology. 135(1): 31-38. Anastasi, A 1986. Involving Concepts of Test Validation. Annual Review of Psychology, 37: 267-280. Anastasi, A 1992. Psychological Testing and Assessment. Ed. 5, New York: McMillan Pub. Co. Inc. Ariffin Haji Zainal. (1987). Teori Dua-Faktor Herzberg: Satu Penilaian Dalam Konteks Malaysia. Majalah Psikologi Bil 8: 71-84. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bass, B.M (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, Free Press New York, NY. Bass, B.M., Avolio, BJ & Atwater, L.(1990). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied Psychology: An International Review.45(1):5-34 Bass, B.M. dan BJ. Avolio. (1993). Transformationnl Leadership : A response to critiques in Leadership theory and research : Perspective and directions,ed. MM.Chemers and R. Ayman, 49-80 San Diego, Calif: Academic Press Bhargava, Shivganesh dan Sinha, Beena (1992). Prediction of Organizational Affectiveness as a Function of Type Organizational Structure. The Journal of Social Psychology 132(2):223-231 . Baron, R.A.(1983). Behavior in Organization. Allyn and Bacon,Inc Bennis, W.G. (1 985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper and Row Buchnan, B.(1974). Building Organizational Commitmen: The Socialization of Managers in Work Organizations. Administrative Science Quarter &, 19:533-546 Carless, S. A.(1998).Assessing the discriminant validity of transformationan leader behaviour as measure by MLQ. Journal of Oc~upational and Organizational Psychology 71:353-358 Chong Ting Ngoh (2002).Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan Terhadap Kepuasan Pekerja dalam Aspek Penyeliaan dun Komitmen Pekerja. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Conger, JA., dan Kanungo, R.(1987).Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Managemet Review, 12:637-647 Cronboach, L.J. (1984). Essentials of Psychology Testing. 4& Ed. New York. Harper & Row Dasar Perancangan Pembangunan Pengukur Kejayaan (2004, Januari,6) Berita Harian,12 Davis, J.A. (1971). Elementary Survey Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Deluge, R.J. (1988). Relationship of transformational and transactional leadership with employee influencing strategies. Group and Organizational Studies, 13(4):456-467. Deluge & Souza, J. (1991). The effects of transformational and transactional leadership styles on influencing behavior of subordinate police officers. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 64:49-55 Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (1997) Kamus Dewan, Edisi Ketiga, Kuala Lumpur Druskat, V.U. (1994). Gender and leadership style: Transformational and transactional leadership in Roman Catholic Chuurch.Leadership Quarterly, 5(2):99-109. Duin Lasig. (2001). Hubungan Di Antara Kepuasan Kerja Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Di Organisasi Pelancongan. Latihan Ilmiah Yang Tidak Diterbitkan, Jabatan Psikologi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Ferris,K.R. & Aranya, N. (1983). A comparison of Two Organizational Commitmen Scales. Personel Psychology, 36: 87-98. Fiedler F.E. (1967). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Dalam Aminuddin Mohd. Yusof (1994). Kepimpinan, Motivasi dan Prestasi (hlm.13). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka Ghiselli, E.E. Haire,M. dan Porter L.W. (1966). Managerial Thinking: An International Study, John Wiley & Sons, New York Dalam Jaafar Muhamad (1992). Asas Pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Goleman, D.(2004). "What Makes a Leader". Harvard Business Review. January. 82-83 Greenberg, J., dan Baron, R. (1995). Behaviour In Organizations (6 th Ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Hassan Ahmad. Membina Sikap Kerja Yang Positif, (1992, Oktober): Dewan Masyarakat. Halim Man (1998). Dinamik dun Infrastruktur; Kepimpinan Menuju Alaf Baru. INTURA Hisham Altalib (1992). Panduan Latihan Bagi Petugas Islam, The National Institute Of Islamic Thought. Kuala Lumpur: Nurin Enterprise. House, R.J. (1971). A path goal-theory of leader eflectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 16:321-339 dalam Koontz, H. & Weihrich, H. 2001. Pengurusan. Penterjemah Mohd. Salmi Mohd. Sohod & Siti Nadzrah Sheikh Omar. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka Hrebiniak. L.G. dan Allutto, J.A. 1972. Personal And Role Related Factors In The Development Of Organizational Commitment Administrative Science Quaterly, 17: 555-572. Hughes Richard L., Ginnett Robert C., dan Curphy Gordon J. (2002). Leadership: Enhancing The Lessons of Experience (4 th Ed.) McGraw-Hill Humphreys, John H. and Eistein, Walter 0 (2003). Nothing new under the sun : transformational leadership from historical perspective. Journal of Management History, Management Decision , Emerald Research, 41/1,85-95 Ismail (2003). Qalam Intura (INTAN). Kepimpinan : "What you can do to improve your leadership", INTAN Cawangan Utara. Kamaruddin Hj. Kachar (1 989). Kepimpinan Professional dalam Pendidikan, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Katz, D., dan R.L. Kahn (1966). The Social Psychology of Organization. New York: Wiley. Kelloway E.K., Barling, J., Kelley, E., Comtois, J. dan Gatien B. (2002). Remote transformational leadership, Leadership & Organizational Journal Development,Emerald Research, 2413, 163-171 Kerlinger, F. (1973). Foundation Of Behavior Researh. New Yo&: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. Kleinmen, G., Siegal, P.H. dan Eckstein (2001). Mentoring and Learning : The case of CPA fms. The Leadership and Organizational Development Journal. 22(1): 22-33. Koontz, H. dan Weihrich, H.(2001). Pengurusan. Penterjemah Mohd. Salmi Mohd. Sohod & Siti Nadzrah Sheikh Omar. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka. Krejcie dan Morgan (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Dalam Umar Sakaran, Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach 31d Edition. New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc. Lee, R dan Wilbur, E. (1985). Age, Education, Job Tenure, Salary, Job Characteristic And Job Satishction. A Multivariate Analysis. Human Relation. 38(8):781-791. Likert, R.(1967). A Program of research on the findamen tal problems of organizational human behavior. Ann arbor, MI: Survey Rese'arh Center, Institute for Social Research. Mason, E.S.(1995). Gender differences in job satisfaction. The Journal of Social Psychology. 135 (2):143-151 Mathiew dan Zajac, M.(1990). "A Review and Meta AnaIysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of 0rganizational Commitment," Psychological Bulletin, 108,175. Mayer, J.P. dan Allan, N.J. (1987). A Longitudinal Analysis of the Early Development and Consequence of Organizational Commitment. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 19:119-225 Mazne Haji Othman. (2000). Penetapan Matlamat, Kepuasan Kerja dun Hubungannya dengan Komitmen Kepada Organisasi di Kalangan Penyarah Maktab Perguruan Ugama Seri Begawan. Latihan Ilmiah Yang Tidak Diterbitkan, Jabatan Psikologi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Mohd. Majid Konting (1990). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Mohamed Sulaiman (1996). Kepimpinan dan Pengurusan Strategik untuk Kecemerlangan Organisasi. Universiti Sains Malaysia Mottaz, C. (1985). The Relative Importance of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Rewards as Determinants of Work Satisfaction, The Sociological Quarterly, 26:365-385. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. & Steers, R.M.(1982). Employee Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover, New York: Academic Press Nahavandi, A. (2000). The Art and Science of Leadership, Ed.2, New Jersey, Prentice Hall Najmi Ahmad (1999). Kertas Seminar Pemantapan Perkhidmatan Hal Ehwal Islam;Harapan Masyarakat Kepada Peranan Peranan Perkhidmatan Hal Ehwal Islam:Masa Kini Dan Akan Datang,1-3 Disember 1999, Malaysia Airlines Academy House, Anjuran Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (JAKIM) Ng Pui Lim. (1998). Kesan Situasi Organik dan Mekanistik e atas hubungan di antara tingkah laku Kepimpinan transformasi dan transaksi dengan kriteria keberkesanan kepimpinan. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Othman bin Mohd. Yunus. (1994). Kesan Tingkah Laku Kepimpinan Transformasi Dan Transaksi Ke Atas Hubungan Di Antara Budaya Organisasi Dengan Jiwa Polis, Prestasi Kerja Dan Tekunan Kerja: Satu Kajian Di Kalangan Anggota Polis Diraja Malaysia . Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Sastera. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Propper, M. dan Zakkai, E. 1994. Transactional, charismatic and transformational leadership: Conditions to their predornonance. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal. 15(6):3-7 Rahimah Hj. Ahmad (1981). The relationship between and among leadership style, school climate, and student achievement in the elementary school principalship in Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur. Disertasi kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti California Selatan. Dipetik daripada Mohd. Rofi bin Yusof (2003),Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan: Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta NegeriTerengganu, m.s 4. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Richardson, R.J., dan S.K.Thayer (1993). The Charisma Factor: How To Develop Your Natural Leadership Abality. Englewood CIiffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Robbins, S.(2000). Gelagat Organisasi. Penterjemah Abdul Razak Ibrahim dan Ainin Sulaiman. Prentice Hall. Romzek, B.S. (1990). Employee investment and commitment: the ties that bind. Public Administration Review, 50, May/Jun,374-382. Samihah Khalil, Razali Mat Zin dan Siti Alida John Abdullah (1999). Aras Komitmen dan Tumpuan Hidup di Kalangan Kakitangan Penguasa Tempatan Kedah,Pengurusan Organisasi Kerja. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Shafiq, A.Alvi, Syed W. Ahmed (1987). Accessing Organizational Commitment In A Developing Country: Pakistan. A Case Study. Human Relations, 40:267-280. Sheldon, M.E.(1971). Investments and Involvements as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to the Organization. Administrative Science Quaeterly 16:143-150 Singer, M.(1990). Implicit Leadership Theory: Are results generalizable from students to professional samples? The Journal of Social Psychology. 130 (3):407-408 Singer, M. dan Inger, A.E. 1990. Situational constraints on transformational versus transactional leadership behavior, subordinates' leadership preference and satisfaction. The Journal of Social Psychology. 130(3):385-396. Smith Peter B dan Mark F. Peterson. (1988). Leadership Organizations and Culture: Sage Publications, London Sondang P. Siagian, (1980). Peranan Staf dalam Manageman, Jakarta: Penerbit PT Gunung Agung. Steers, RM. (1977). Antecedents And Outcomes of Organizational Commitment.Administrative Science Quarterly, 22:46-56 Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature. New York Press. Syed Othman Al-habshi (1989). Islam, Ekonomi dan Pengurusan. Shah Alarn: Hizbi Tatum, B.C., Eberlin, R., Kottraba, C. dan Bradberry,T (2003). Leadership, decision making and organizational justice,Management Decision,Emerald Research,41/10,1006-1016 Thoha, Miftah (1989). Pembinaan Organisasi. Fisipol Universitas Gadjah Mada: CV. Rajawali. Jakarta Tannenbaum, Robert (1958). How To Choose A Leadership Pattern. Harvad Business Review Tichy, N.M. dan De Vanna, M.A.(1986). The Transfirmational Leader. Wiley, New York, NY. Tjosvold, D., Andrews I, R. dan Sreuthers, J. T.(1992). Leadership influence: Goal interdependence and power. The Journal of Social ,Psychology. 132(1):39-50. Wan Azmi Rarnli (1994). Pengurusan Masa Kini. Utusan Publications & Distribution Wan Faridah Akmal ,Noor Azmi dan Ishak (2002). Kepimpinan Transaksi/ Trasformasi dan Ciri Kerja Profesional Teknologi Maklumat Sektor Awam Malaysia, Jurnal Teknologi, UTM http://www.penerbit.utm.my/jurnal/37sirie5.htm dilayar pada 10/04/2004 Yukl, Gary A. (1989). Leadership in Organizations. Ed.2, New Jersey, Prentice Hall Zaharah Hassan (2000). Kepimpinan dan Kemahiran Interpersonal, Pusat Pendidikan Jarak Jauh. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Zarina (2003). Hubungan Di Antara Gaya Kepimpinan Dan Komitmen Pekerja: Satu Kajian Kes Di Uitm Segamat, http://www.johor.uitm.edu.my/upp/hubungangayakepimpinandankomitmen dilayar pada 20/01/2004

Similar Items