E-Garage Sales Using Social Networks Sites Under Web 2.0 Technology.

Social Networks sites connect people for various social and but yet many SNSs lack the orientation of professional purposes on the other hand most of e-business applications today do not concern about the emotional connections among people, which has a bad effect on the business process, This study...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Taher, Alhusain Mohamed Ahmed
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2008
Subjects:	T Technology (General)
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/163/1/Alhusain_Mohamed_Ahmed_Taher.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/163/2/Alhusain_Mohamed_Ahmed_Taher.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.163
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
topic	T Technology (General)
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) Taher, Alhusain Mohamed Ahmed E-Garage Sales Using Social Networks Sites Under Web 2.0 Technology.
description	Social Networks sites connect people for various social and but yet many SNSs lack the orientation of professional purposes on the other hand most of e-business applications today do not concern about the emotional connections among people, which has a bad effect on the business process, This study attempts to introduce garage-sales social network site that has a "Meaningful objectives" which is Customer to Customer (C2C) e-business activities, in the context of the right tool which is Web 2.0 technology. The developed e-garage sales site was evaluated through an online survey; the results showed that the users found the application useful.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Taher, Alhusain Mohamed Ahmed
author_facet	Taher, Alhusain Mohamed Ahmed
author_sort	Taher, Alhusain Mohamed Ahmed
title	E-Garage Sales Using Social Networks Sites Under Web 2.0 Technology.
title_short	E-Garage Sales Using Social Networks Sites Under Web 2.0 Technology.
title_full	E-Garage Sales Using Social Networks Sites Under Web 2.0 Technology.
title_fullStr	E-Garage Sales Using Social Networks Sites Under Web 2.0 Technology.
title_full_unstemmed	E-Garage Sales Using Social Networks Sites Under Web 2.0 Technology.
title_sort	e-garage sales using social networks sites under web 2.0 technology.
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate	2008
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/163/1/Alhusain_Mohamed_Ahmed_Taher.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/163/2/Alhusain_Mohamed_Ahmed_Taher.pdf
_version_	1747826850663497728
spelling	my-uum-etd.1632013-07-24T12:05:52Z E-Garage Sales Using Social Networks Sites Under Web 2.0 Technology. 2008-06-15 Taher, Alhusain Mohamed Ahmed College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Faculty of Information Technology T Technology (General) Social Networks sites connect people for various social and but yet many SNSs lack the orientation of professional purposes on the other hand most of e-business applications today do not concern about the emotional connections among people, which has a bad effect on the business process, This study attempts to introduce garage-sales social network site that has a "Meaningful objectives" which is Customer to Customer (C2C) e-business activities, in the context of the right tool which is Web 2.0 technology. The developed e-garage sales site was evaluated through an online survey; the results showed that the users found the application useful. 2008-06 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/163/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/163/1/Alhusain_Mohamed_Ahmed_Taher.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/163/2/Alhusain_Mohamed_Ahmed_Taher.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Anderson , P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Retrieved January 12,2008 from http:// www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tswbO701b.pdf Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. , 13, 113-123. Ba, S., & Pavlou, p. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart, 26(3), 243-267. Babar, M. A,, Winkler, D., & Biffl, S. (2007). Evaluating the Usefulness and Ease of Use of a Groupware Tool for the Software Architecture Evaluation Process. Paper presented at the Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2007. ESEM 2007. First International Symposium Madrid, Spain. Bapna, R., Goes, P., & Gupta, A. (2003). Analysis and design of business-to-consumer online auctions. Management Sci, 49(1), 85- 101. Beth, T., Borcherding, M., & Klein, B. (1994). Valuation of Trust in Open Networks. Paper presented at the Computer Security ESORICS'94, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Bockstedt, J., & Huat Goh, K. (2007). The Importance of Discretionary Attributes in C2C e-commerce: an Empirical Investigation [Electronic Version]. Retrieved March 17,2008 from http://ids.csom.umn.edu/faculty/phds/jbocksted/publications/BG_ISR_2OO7.pdf Bottazzi, D., Montanari, R., & Toninelli, A. (2007). Context-Aware Middleware for Anytime, Anywhere Social Networks. Intelligent Systems 22(5), 23-32 Boyd, d. (2004). Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vienna, Austria. Boyd, d., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231 - 242. Bradley, P. (2007). How to User Web 2.0 in your Library. London: Facet Publishing. Breslin, J., & Decker, S. (2007). The Future of Social Networks on the Internet: The Need for Semantics. IEEE Internet Computing 11(6), 86 - 90 Clemons, E., Grass, J., & Woda, S. (2007). buysafe: Creating and profiting from the Bonded Seller Advantage. Paper presented at the System Sci, Hawaii CMS. (2005). Selecting a Development Approach. Retrieved January 4,2008 from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SystemLifecycleFramework/Downloads/SelectingDevelopmentApproach.pdf Connalen, J. (2002). Building Web Applications with UML Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. Davis, I. (2005). Talis, Web 2.0 and All That. Retrieved January 4, 2008 from http:// internetalchemy.org/2OO5/O7/talis-web-2O-and-all-that Dellarocas, C., & Wood, C. A. (2006). The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias: Robert H. Smith School. Gao,J.,& Yang,Y.(2007).Study on Trust Model Based on Field Theory in C2C Market. Paper presented at the Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference on Shanghai, China. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis (5th Edition ed.): Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ Guangyao, C. (2007). Research on the Recommending Method used in C2C Online Trading Paper presented at the International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology. Gui, X. W., Kai Xu, Wen. (2007). Market Pattern and Trend Analysis of China C2C E-Commerce. Paper presented at the Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference Shanghai, China. Huber, G., Zeti, P., & Leszczyc, L. Minimum prices and product valuations in auctions. Marketing Sci(3), 115-141. Hummer, W., Lehner, W., & Wedekind, H. (2002). Contracting in the days of eBusiness. ACMSIGMOD Record, 31(I), 31-36. iReseachCoLtd., (2006). China Online Shopping Research Report. Shanghai iResearch Co., Ltd, 2007. Jamali, M., & Abolhassani, H. (2007). Different Aspects of Social Network Analysis. Paper presented at the Web Intelligence, 2006. WI 2006. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Hong Kong. Kauffman, R. J., & Wood, C. A. Doing their bidding: An empirical examination of factors that affect a buyer's utility in Internet auctions. . Information Tech. and Mgt, 7(3), 171-190. Kim, J. K. (2005). Factors Influencing Consumers' Apparel Purchasing Intention in the C2C E-Commerce Market [Electronic Version]. Retrieved March 12 , 2008 from cehs07.unl.edu/cehsabstracts/docs/JeeYoung%2OKim% 2OAbstract.pdf. Lewis, G., & Weigert, A.(1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985. Li, Q. L., Zhongying (2007). Research on Chinese C2C E-Business Institutional Trust Mechanism: Case Study on Taobao and Ebay(cn). Paper presented at the Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference on Shanghai, China McKnight, D., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res,13(3),334-359. Nunamaker, J. F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D.(1991). Systems development in information systems research. J. Manage. Inf Syst, 7(3), 89-106. Ramaswarni, S. N., & Strader, T. J. (2002). THE VALUE OF SELLER TRUST WORTHINESS IN C2C ONLINE MARKETS. COMMUNICATIONSOF THE ACM, 45(12).1312-1324 Rha, J. Y., Heilig, J., Emst, S., Widdows, R., Haugtvedt, C., & Hooker, N. H. (2001). Product and firm quality signaling in e-business: Interstices for smaller businesses. J. Bus. Entrepreneurship(l3), 57-70. Rosenblum, D. (2007). What Anyone Can Know: The Privacy Risks of Social Networking Sites. Security & Privacy Magazine, lEEE 5(3), 40 - 49 Roth C, Alvin, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2002). Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the Internet. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1093- 1103. Secker, J. (2004). Electronic resources in the virtual learning environment: a guide for librarians: Chandos: Oxford. Simonson , I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J. Marketing Res, 29(3), 281. Sinclair, J. T. (2005). eBay: The Smart Way. New York: AMACOM, AMA Publications. Smith, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2001). Customer decision making at an internet Shopbot: Brand still matters. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(4), 541-558. Staab, S., Mike, P., Golbeck, J., Li Ding Finin, T., Joshi, A., Nowak, A., et al. (2005). Social networks applied. Intelligent Systems, IEEE [IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 20(1), 80-93. Strader , T., & Ramaswami , J. (2002). The value of seller trustworthiness in C2C online markets. Commun. ACM 45(I2), 45-49. Strader, T., & Shaw, M. (1999). Consumer cost differences for traditional and Internet markets. Internet Research 9(2), 82-92. Tedeshi, B. (2004). Social Networks: Will Users Pay To Get Friends? Retrieved January 10,2007, from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9403E3DF1 73AF93AA35751COA9629C8B63 Tversky , A., & Kahneman, D. (2005). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science(185),1124-1131. Vergano, D. (2006,25th June 2006). On eBay, it pays to snipe. USAToday. Vaidyanathan, G., Sabbaghi, A., & Bargellini, M. (2005). USER ACCEPTANCE OF DIGITAL LIBRARY : AN EMPIRICAL EXPLORATION OF INDIVISUAL AND SYSTEM COMPONENTS. Issues in Information Systems, VI(2), 279-284. Yang, S. J. H., Zhang, J., & Chen, I. Y. L. (2007). Web 2.0 Services for Identifying Communities of Practice through Social Networks. Paper presented at the Services Computing, 2007. SCC 2007. IEEE International Conference on Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Zhang, W., Liu, L., & Zhu, Y. (2005). A Computational Trust Model for C2C Auctions. Paper presented at the Services Systems and Services Management, 2005. Proceedings of ICSSSM '05.2005 International Conference

E-Garage Sales Using Social Networks Sites Under Web 2.0 Technology.

Similar Items