Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Kajian Perbandingan antara SMKA dengan SMK

This study aims to explore differences in transformational leadership style,transactional leadership style and job satisfaction among teachers in SMKA and SMK.The study also seeks to identify the relationship or correlation between transformational and transactional leadership styles to job satisfac...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Jazmi, Md Isa
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2009
Subjects:	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/1680/1/Jazmi_Bin_Md_Isa.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1680/2/1.Jazmi_Bin_Md_Isa.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.1680
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
topic	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization Jazmi, Md Isa Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Kajian Perbandingan antara SMKA dengan SMK
description	This study aims to explore differences in transformational leadership style,transactional leadership style and job satisfaction among teachers in SMKA and SMK.The study also seeks to identify the relationship or correlation between transformational and transactional leadership styles to job satisfaction of teachers in SMKA and SMK.The tool for measuring transformational leadership was adapted from the MLQ scale(Multi Factor Leadership Questionnaire). Form 5X-Rater (1992). The questionnaire was revised from the MLQ-Form 5 which was formed by Bass in 1985. Poon, June ML (1995) have used this questionnaire as a measuring tool when conducting a study on 103 workers at companies that had been listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Khalid (1997) used questionnaires that have been built by Poon, June ML (1995) and modified it to better fit with the field of education. Tools for measuring transactional leadership were obtained from Bass and Avolio (1995) cited in Felfe (2002), while job satisfaction was measured by teacher questionnaires formed by Speed (1979). The data was collected from 212 respondents covering six schools, namely three SMKAs and three SMKs. Results analysis shows there is no significant difference between transformational leadership and transaction leadership styles of principals in SMKA and SMK. As for test results, the mean score of teacher satisfaction in SMKA is 3.72,while for those in SMK it is 3.35. This indicates that job satisfaction among teachers in SMKA is higher compared to that of SMK. Similarly, there is no significant difference in all subscales of transformational and transactional leadership styles except for that of between SMKA and SMK. Multiple regression analysis shows that there is no independent variables that significantly affect teachers’ job satisfaction and that there is no reliable predictor that affects teachers’ job satisfaction whether in SMKA or SMK. However, the independent variables had a bigger influence in SMKA than in SMK.Overall all the variables have a significant impact on teachers' job satisfaction in both SMKA and SMK.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Jazmi, Md Isa
author_facet	Jazmi, Md Isa
author_sort	Jazmi, Md Isa
title	Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Kajian Perbandingan antara SMKA dengan SMK
title_short	Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Kajian Perbandingan antara SMKA dengan SMK
title_full	Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Kajian Perbandingan antara SMKA dengan SMK
title_fullStr	Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Kajian Perbandingan antara SMKA dengan SMK
title_full_unstemmed	Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Kajian Perbandingan antara SMKA dengan SMK
title_sort	gaya kepimpinan pengetua dan kepuasan kerja guru: kajian perbandingan antara smka dengan smk
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Business (COB)
publishDate	2009
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/1680/1/Jazmi_Bin_Md_Isa.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1680/2/1.Jazmi_Bin_Md_Isa.pdf
_version_	1747827187946356736
spelling	my-uum-etd.16802022-09-11T08:19:32Z Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Kajian Perbandingan antara SMKA dengan SMK 2009 Jazmi, Md Isa College of Business (COB) College of Business LB2801-3095 School administration and organization This study aims to explore differences in transformational leadership style,transactional leadership style and job satisfaction among teachers in SMKA and SMK.The study also seeks to identify the relationship or correlation between transformational and transactional leadership styles to job satisfaction of teachers in SMKA and SMK.The tool for measuring transformational leadership was adapted from the MLQ scale(Multi Factor Leadership Questionnaire). Form 5X-Rater (1992). The questionnaire was revised from the MLQ-Form 5 which was formed by Bass in 1985. Poon, June ML (1995) have used this questionnaire as a measuring tool when conducting a study on 103 workers at companies that had been listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Khalid (1997) used questionnaires that have been built by Poon, June ML (1995) and modified it to better fit with the field of education. Tools for measuring transactional leadership were obtained from Bass and Avolio (1995) cited in Felfe (2002), while job satisfaction was measured by teacher questionnaires formed by Speed (1979). The data was collected from 212 respondents covering six schools, namely three SMKAs and three SMKs. Results analysis shows there is no significant difference between transformational leadership and transaction leadership styles of principals in SMKA and SMK. As for test results, the mean score of teacher satisfaction in SMKA is 3.72,while for those in SMK it is 3.35. This indicates that job satisfaction among teachers in SMKA is higher compared to that of SMK. Similarly, there is no significant difference in all subscales of transformational and transactional leadership styles except for that of between SMKA and SMK. Multiple regression analysis shows that there is no independent variables that significantly affect teachers’ job satisfaction and that there is no reliable predictor that affects teachers’ job satisfaction whether in SMKA or SMK. However, the independent variables had a bigger influence in SMKA than in SMK.Overall all the variables have a significant impact on teachers' job satisfaction in both SMKA and SMK. 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1680/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1680/1/Jazmi_Bin_Md_Isa.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/1680/2/1.Jazmi_Bin_Md_Isa.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Aziz Yusuf. (2005). Perubahan dan kepimpinan. Sintok: Penerbitan Universiti Utara Malaysia.Abu Bakar Hashim. (1985). An analysis of job satisfaction among academic staff of university in Malaysia. Disertasi Ph.D. Ohio University.Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah. (1997). Hubungan persepsi kepemimpinan transformasi dengan kepuasan dan komitmen kerja. Laporan praktikum Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan Universiti Sains Malaysia (tidak diterbitkan).Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah. (2002). Kajian mengenai mengganti kepimpinan sebagai moderator terhadap caragaya kepimpinan transformasi. Tesis Ph.D.Universiti Sains Malaysia. Tidak diterbitkan.Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah.(2005). Kesan amalan pengupayaan dalam pengajaran pembelajaran terhadap pertambahan beban dan persekitaran kerja guru. Educational Management and Leadership Journal, Institut Aminuddin Baki, Ministry of Education. Vol. 15, No. 01/2005. pp 19-30. Abdul Kudus, Abu Bakar. (2000). Kepemimpinan Transformasi: Hubungan dengan Kepuasan Kerja dan Motivasi Guru. Tesis Masters. Universiti Utara Malaysia.Abdul Rashid Moten. (2001). Political leadership: A comparative analysis. Kertas kerja Seminar Antarabangsa Kepimpinan Islam, Akademi Pengajian Islam,Universiti Malaya.Abdur Rahman an-Nahlawi. (1995). Pendidikan Islam di rumah, sekolah dan masyarakat. Jakarta: Penerbit Gema Insani.Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (1991). Pengurusan Organisasi, perspektif, pemikiran dan Teori. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Abdul Shukor Abdullah. ( 1995). Membina sekolah berkesan: Aplikasi dasar. Seminar Sekolah Efektif anjuran Kementerian Pendidikan pada 13-14 Julai 1995 di Institut Aminudin Baki.121 Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (2004). Ucap tema: Kepimpinan unggul tonggak bidang pendidikan cemerlang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan Ke 12, pada 6 – 9 Disember 2004, Anjuran Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands, Pahang.Abdullah Nasih Ulwan. (1989). Pendidikan anak-anak dalam Islam. Jilid 1.Singapura: Pustaka Nasional. Agho, A., Mueller, C.Y. dan Price, J. (1993). Determinants of employee job satisfaction: An empirical test of a causal model, Human Relations, 46, 1007-1027.Ahmad Ibrahim Abu Sin. (1991). Pengurusan dalam Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.Al-Mawardi. (1993). Al Ahkam As Sultoniyyah. Kuala Lumpur: Terjemahan Pustaka Salam. Aminuddin Mohd Yusuf. (1990). Kepimpinan: Satu analisa psikologi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Avolio, B. J. dan Bass, B.M. (1988). Transformational and Leadership, Charisma,and Beyond. Emerging Leadership Vistas. J.G. Hunt et al. (eds). Lexington,MA: Lexington Books.Ayob Jantan. (2005). Pengetua Sekolah yang Efektif. Ku professional Publishing Sn Bhd.Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press._________ (1990). Handbook of Leadership. A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press. Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1990). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. Dalam M.M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds), (1993) Leadership Theory and Research (p 49-80). San Diego: Academic Press, Inc. ______________________(1995). Multifactor leadership questionnaire for research,Mind Garden, Palo Alto, Los Angeles.122Bennis, W. & Nanus. B. (1985). Leaders the strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.Blumberg, A. & Greenfield, W. (1980). The effective principal perspective on school leadership. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.Bolman, L.G. , & Deal, T.E. (1992). Leading and Managing: Effect of context, culture and gender. Educational Administration Quartely, 28: 314-329.Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Chen,. Yin Cheong. (1996). A school-based management mechanism for school effectiveness and development. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), m/s 35-61.Conley, S.C., Bacharach, S.B., & Bauer, S.(1989). The school work environment and teacher career dissatisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(1), m/s 58-81.Davis, K. and Newstrom, J.W.(1985). Human Behaviour at work: in Organizational. 7th ed. London: McGraw-Hill.Edmonds, R.R. (1979). Effective school for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, Vol 37, m/s 15-24. Etzioni, A. & Eva(ed). (1964). Social change. New York: Basic Books.Felfe, J. (2002). Transformational Leadership. TU Chemnitz, June 2002 in Chemnitz.Felfe, J. (2005). Transformational leadership and commitment. Research Colloquium of the Department of Psychology at the TU Braunschweig.Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: Mc Graw –Hill.Taylor, F.W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper Bros, (ms. 5-29).123 Gay, L.R. (1996). Educational research competencies for analysis and application,5th edition. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Ghazali Othman. (1979). An Integration of the sources of job satisfaction of Malaysia school teacher. Ph.D Disertasi. Los Angeles: University of California.Greenberg, J. and Baron, R.A. (1997). Behaviour in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Griffith, J. (2004). Relation of principal transformational leadership to school staff job satisfaction, staff turnover and school performance. Journal of Educational Administration, 42,(3), 333-347.Hala tuju pendidikan di Malaysia. (2009, 16 Jun). Utusan malaysia.Hackman, J. R. dan Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Hoppock, R. (1935). Effectiveness and quality of school. In Hoy, W.K., Miskel, C.G.Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. New York:Random House.Hallinger, P. & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement.Vol.9,2 157-191.Halpin, A.W. (1996). Theory and research in administration. New York: Mac Millan Press.Heck, R.H. & Marcoulides, G.A. (1996). School culture and performance: testing the varience of an organizational model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol 7 (1), m/s 76-95.Hipp, K.A. ( 1991). Teacher Efficacy influence of principal leadership behaviour.Paper presented at Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, New York. Hills, P.J. (1982). A dictionary of education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.124 Hoog, J., Olof , J., and Olofsson, A. (2005). Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 595-606.Hollway, W. (1991). Work psychology and orgazational behaviour. Managing the Individual at work. London: Sage.House, R.J. and Dessler,G. (1974). The Path Goal of Leadership: Some Post Hoc and Priori tests. Dalam Hunt, J. G. dan Iarson, L.L. Contigency Approaches to leadership. Southern IIIinois University. Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: Theory research,and practice. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, Inc.Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, C.G. (2001). Education administration: Theory, research and practice. New York: Random House._________________________(2005). Educational Administration theory, research And practice, 7th edition. New York : Mc Graw-Hill, Inc.Hoy, W.K, Tarter, C.J., & Kottkamp, R. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hussein Mahmood. (1993). Kepimpinan dan keberkesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ibnu Khaldun. (1993). Muqaddimah Ibnu Khaldun. Kuala Lumpur: Terjemahan Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Ibrahim Mamat. (1998). Pengetua sekolah menangani isu dan cabaran Kepemimpinan. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn Bhd. Juhari Ali. (1987). Asas Pengurusan(edisi awal). Pulau Pinang: Penerbitan Universiti Sains Malaysia.Kamus Dewan. (2000). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Kamaruddin Haji Kachar. (1989). Pendidikan dan Masyarakat. Kuala Lumpur: Teks Publishing Sdn Bhd.125 Kanungo, R.N. (2001). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders.Canadian Journal of Administrative Science. Dec (2001).Khamis Edin. (1990). Profesionalisme guru besar dan cabaran-cabarannya dalam konteks reformasi pendidikan masakini. Jurnal Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Bil 34/Isu XXXIV, Jun 1990.Khalid Ashari. (1997). Hubungan gaya kepimpinan dan gaya kepemimpinan transformasi pengetua dengan kepuasan dan motivasi. Usul kajian Master Pendidikan Universiti Sains Malaysia. Tidak diterbitkan. Klein, S. & Ritti, R. (1984). Understanding Organisational Behaviour. Kent Publishing Company, boston.Kootkamp, R.B. & Mulhern, J.A., (1987). Teacher expectancy motivation, open to closed climate and pupil control ideology in high schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, Vol 20 (2), Winter 1987, m/s 9-18.Koh, W.L., Steers, R.M., & Terborg, J.R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore.Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 16 p. 3. 19-333.Leithwood, K.A. (1992). The move towards transformational leadership.Educational Leadership, Vol 49 (5), Feb 1992, m/s 8-12.Lim Peng Lai. (1997). Kepimpinan transformasi dan kepuasan kerja guru. Disertasi Sarjana. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia.Lucas, F.C. & Valentine, J.W. (2002). Transformational Leadership : principals, leadership teams, and school culture. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, (New Orleans,LA, April 1-5, 200).Lunenberg, F.C. & Ornstein, A.C. (2000). Educational administration concepts and Practices, 3rd edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.Lunenberg, F.C. ( 2003). Emerging perspectives: The usefulness of the construct of transformational leadership in educational organizations. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration(Sedona, AZ, Aug 5-8, 2003).126 Malaysia. (2007). (Kepimpinan dalam Islam). http://ustaz-Zamri.Com. Dicapai pada 18 Disember 2009.Malaysia. (2009). (Sejarah Penubuhan SMKA dan SMA). www.moe.gov.my.Dicapai pada 3 Mac 2009.Malaysia. (2009). (Peranan pengetua dalam pengurusan sekolah). http://yik.itgo.com.Dicapai pada 5 Mei 2009. Maslow, A.H, (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row Inc.Mohd. Majid Konting (1998). Teacher effectiveness: the beliefs of effective Bahasa Melayu teachers. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 6(1):Mohd Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai : Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Mohd Salleh Abu & Zaidatun Tasir. (2001). Analisis data berkomputer SPSS 10.0 for windows. Kuala Lumpur: Venton Publishing.Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools. Seminar Sekolah Efektif, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Institut Aminuddin Baki,Genting Highland.Moran, M. & Gareis, C. (2004). Principals’ sense of efficacy: Assessing a promising construct. Journal of Educational Administration, 42, 573-583.Musa Mohamed. (2002). Teks ucapan perasmian persidangan pengurusan pendidikan pengetua-pengetua sekolah menengah Malaysia. Kuala Terengganu.Muhamed Sulaiman.(1996). Kepimpinan dan pengurusan strategik untuk kecemerlangan organisasi. Siri syarahan perlantikan professor 1995/bil .5.Universiti Sains Malaysia. Najib Abdul Razak. (1997). Tanpa Perubahan Kita Ketinggalan. Massa, Halaman 24-31.127 Neil, P., Carlisle, K., Knipe, D. a McEwen, A. (2001). Principals in action: an analysis of school leadership, Research in Education, 66, 40-53.Nik Mutasim. (2001). Employee involvement in Malaysia issues and challenges: A case of employee share option scheme, pada 2001, di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Nik Pa, N. A. (2003). Pendidikan Matematik di Malaysia dalam Abad Ke-21:Cabaran dan Harapan. Kuala Lumpur: AND Multi Works.Nunally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: Mc Graw Hill.Othman bin Mohd Yunus (1994). Kesan kepemimpinan transaksi dan transformasi ke atas hubungan antara budaya organisasi dengan jiwa polis, prestasi kerja dan tekanan kerja: Satu kajian di kalangan anggota polis DiRaja Malaysia.Tesis Ph.D yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Owens, R.G. (1995). Organizational Behaviour in Education, 5th edition. Needham Heights. MA : Allyn And Bacon. Patrick, J.E, (1995). Correlation between administrative style and school climate.Illinois: Country of Publications. Pinegar, K.K. (1994). An investigation of the effect of transformational leadership and substitues for leadership upon the job satisfaction of academic proffesionals in higher education. Dissertation Abstracts. DAT- A 55 (6) 142.Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., & Bommer, W.H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviours and subtitudes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviours.Journal of Management, 22, 259-298. Poon, J.M.L. (1995). Effect of perceived transformational leadership behavior of followers satisfaction and motivation: Survey results of Malaysian managers. Journal of Malaysian management review, Jun 1995, Halaman 42-49.Poplin, M.S. (1992). The leaders new role : looking to the growth of teachers.Educational Leadership, Vol 49 (5), Feb 1992, m/s 10-11.128 Powel, Farrar, & Cohen. (1985). The shopping mall high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Premeaux, S.R. (1993). Human Resource Management, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Ramaiah, A.L. (1999). Kepemimpinan pendidikan cabaran masa kini. Petaling Jaya: IBS Buku Sdn Bhd.Rosen, M. (ed), ( 1990). Effective leadership: research and practice in school administration. Alexandria VA : Capitol Publications Inc.Rutherford, W.L. (1985). School principals as effective leaders. Phi Delta Kappan,67 (1), Sept. 1985, m/s 31-34.Sagor, R.D. (1992). Three principals who make a difference. Educational Leadership, Vol 49 (5), Feb 1992, m/s 13-18.Sapie Madani. (2004). Tingkah laku kepimpinan pengetua Sekolah Agama Arab Menengah Perempuan Raja Isteri Pengeran anak Damit Brunei Darussalam.Disertasi Sarjana. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Schaffer, R.H. (1953). Job satisfaction as related to need satisfaction in work.Psychological Monographs,67, (Whole Serial Number 364).Schuster, J.P. (1994). Transforming your leadership style. Leadership. Dalam format CD –ROM, Business Source Elite.Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Why we should seek substitute for leadership. Educational Leadership, 49, 41–45.Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach.New York: John Wiley.Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The Principalship; A Reflective Practice Perspective. 3rd.ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Sergiovanni, T.J. (2001). Ten principles a reflective practice perspectives, 4th edition. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.129 Seyfarth, J.T. (1991). Personnel management for effective schools. Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon.Shahril @ Charil Marzuki. (2000). Ciri-ciri kepimpinan pengetua dan guru besar berkesan yang dapat menghadapi cabaran dan harapan pada abad ke 21.Kertas kerja Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke-9, pada 1-3 Ogos 2000, Institut Aminuddin Baki, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Singh, I, (1984). The effect of headmaster’s leadership on teacher job satisfaction and morale as perceived by teacher in Nepal. Tesis Ph.D. Tidak diterbitkan.Columbia University College. United State of America.Smith, P.C. Kendala, L.M & Hullin, C.L.(1969). The measurement of job satisfaction in work and retirement. A strategy for the study of attitudes, Chicago, Illinois: Rand Mc Nally and Company. _________________________________(1975). The measurement of job satisfaction in work and retirement, Chicago, Illinois: Rand Mc Nally and Company.Smith, R. (1995). Introduction to education: successful school management. London:Cassell. Smith, G. A., Organ, D. W., and Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68,65–663. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research.New York: The Free Press.Sweeney, J. (1982). Research Synthesis On Effective School Leadership, Educational Leadership, Vol 39 (5), Feb 1982, m/s 346-352. Syed Omar Syed Agil. (2009). The Muqaddimah of Ibnu Khaldun- Religion, Human Nature and Economics. Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa, Selangor.Tannenbaum, R., Weshler, I. R., & Massarick, F.(1961). Leadership and organization. New York: McGraw Hill.130 Timm, P. R. & Peterson, B. D. (2000). People at work, human behaviour in organizations. Ed. Ke-5. Ohio: South Western College Publishing.Tichy, M. & Devanna, M. (1986). The Transformational Leader. New York: John Willey.Ubben, G.C. & Hughes, L.W. (1987). The Principle creative leadership for Effective Schools, Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Wahbah Zuhaili (2001). Al-Qiyadah al-’alam al-Islami al-hadir wa al-mustaqbal.Kertas kerja Seminar Antarabangsa Kepimpinan Islam, Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya.Wan Mohd Zahid Wan Mohd Noordin. (1994). Wawasan pendidikan : Agenda pengisian. Kuala Lumpur: Cahaya Pantai Publishing (M) Sdn. Bhd.Weber, G. (1971). Inner-city children can be taught to read: For successful schools. Washington, D.C.: Council for Basic Education.Weichun Zhu, Irene K.H Chew, William D. Spangler. (2005), CEO Transformational Leadership and organizational outcomes : The Mediating Role of Human-Capital-Enhancing Human Resource Management, The Leadership Quartely, Vol 16, m/s 39-52.Wexley, K.N. & Yukl, G.A.(1984). Organizational behavior and personnel Psychology, Illinois: Homewood. Wilson, K. (1982). An Effective School Principal, Educational Leadership, Vol 39(5), Feb 1982, m/s 357-361. Yammarino, F.J. & Bass, B.M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human Relations, Vol. 43 No. 1 p. 975-995.Yong Suan. (2004). Nota Kuliah Statistik Kursus Perguruan M.Ed, Universiti Sains Malaysia.Yukl, G. ( 1989). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice_Hall.131 _______(1989). Managerial leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management, Vol. 15 No. 2 p. 251-289. _______(1994). Leadership in organizations. 3th edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall._______(1999). An evaluation of conceptual weakness in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305. _______(2002). Leadership in organizations. 5th edition, Upper Saddle, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.Zaidatul Akmaliah Lope Pihie. (2001). Perancangan strategik untuk memperkasakan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Pustaka Cipta Sendirian Berhad.Zainal Abidin Che Omar. (1997). Pengaruh kepimpinan transformasi pengetua ke atas komitmen kerja guru. Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor.Zawawi Jahaya. (1999). Kepemimpinan transformasional dan kegemilangan sekolah, Jurnal Pengurusan Dan Kepemimpinan, Penerbitan Institut Aminuddin Baki Dan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, m/s 79-97.

Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Kajian Perbandingan antara SMKA dengan SMK

Similar Items