Exploring the Factors Related to Job Turnover in Learning Organization: A Case of it Workers in Sohar University of Oman

This study examined the relationships of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, supervisory commitment, and job turnover among public sector engineers in Oman. Questionnaires were adopted, pilot-tested, and used in assessing job satisfaction, organizational commitment, supervisory commitment,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alhatmi, Salam Saif
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/1696/1/SALAM_SAIF_ALHATMI.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1696/2/1.SALAM_SAIF_ALHATMI.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.1696
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
spellingShingle HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
Alhatmi, Salam Saif
Exploring the Factors Related to Job Turnover in Learning Organization: A Case of it Workers in Sohar University of Oman
description This study examined the relationships of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, supervisory commitment, and job turnover among public sector engineers in Oman. Questionnaires were adopted, pilot-tested, and used in assessing job satisfaction, organizational commitment, supervisory commitment,and turnover intention. Pearson correlation and One-way ANOVA are conducted for the data analysis. Findings showed that the respondents were satisfied with their pay (mean=3.60), nature of work (mean=3.44), and supervision (mean=3.40). The result also revealed that turnover intention is significantly inversely associated with job satisfaction, organizational commitment and supervisory commitment. The overall job satisfaction had the highest negative significant correlation with turn over intention (r = -0.473); satisfaction with pay (r = -0.179; p < 0.01), with nature of work (r = -0.170) and with supervisor (r = -0.160; p < 0.01). It was also found out that statistically, organizational commitment was significantly and negatively correlated to turnover intention (r = -0.182; p < 0.01); and supervisory commitment is also negatively correlated to turnover intention (r = -0.164). This study provides guidelines for supervisors to better understand how to reduce employee turnover, increase job satisfaction, organizational commitment and supervisor commitment. Some implications of these results for practice and research are also discussed.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Alhatmi, Salam Saif
author_facet Alhatmi, Salam Saif
author_sort Alhatmi, Salam Saif
title Exploring the Factors Related to Job Turnover in Learning Organization: A Case of it Workers in Sohar University of Oman
title_short Exploring the Factors Related to Job Turnover in Learning Organization: A Case of it Workers in Sohar University of Oman
title_full Exploring the Factors Related to Job Turnover in Learning Organization: A Case of it Workers in Sohar University of Oman
title_fullStr Exploring the Factors Related to Job Turnover in Learning Organization: A Case of it Workers in Sohar University of Oman
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Factors Related to Job Turnover in Learning Organization: A Case of it Workers in Sohar University of Oman
title_sort exploring the factors related to job turnover in learning organization: a case of it workers in sohar university of oman
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Business (COB)
publishDate 2009
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/1696/1/SALAM_SAIF_ALHATMI.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1696/2/1.SALAM_SAIF_ALHATMI.pdf
_version_ 1747827190772269056
spelling my-uum-etd.16962022-04-21T03:23:14Z Exploring the Factors Related to Job Turnover in Learning Organization: A Case of it Workers in Sohar University of Oman 2009 Alhatmi, Salam Saif College of Business (COB) College of Business HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management. Employment This study examined the relationships of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, supervisory commitment, and job turnover among public sector engineers in Oman. Questionnaires were adopted, pilot-tested, and used in assessing job satisfaction, organizational commitment, supervisory commitment,and turnover intention. Pearson correlation and One-way ANOVA are conducted for the data analysis. Findings showed that the respondents were satisfied with their pay (mean=3.60), nature of work (mean=3.44), and supervision (mean=3.40). The result also revealed that turnover intention is significantly inversely associated with job satisfaction, organizational commitment and supervisory commitment. The overall job satisfaction had the highest negative significant correlation with turn over intention (r = -0.473); satisfaction with pay (r = -0.179; p < 0.01), with nature of work (r = -0.170) and with supervisor (r = -0.160; p < 0.01). It was also found out that statistically, organizational commitment was significantly and negatively correlated to turnover intention (r = -0.182; p < 0.01); and supervisory commitment is also negatively correlated to turnover intention (r = -0.164). This study provides guidelines for supervisors to better understand how to reduce employee turnover, increase job satisfaction, organizational commitment and supervisor commitment. Some implications of these results for practice and research are also discussed. 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1696/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1696/1/SALAM_SAIF_ALHATMI.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/1696/2/1.SALAM_SAIF_ALHATMI.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Aaron Cohen (2000). The relationship between commitment forms and work outcomes: A comparison of three models. Human Relations, 53,387-418.Abbasi, Sami M. & Hollman, Kenneth W., (2000). Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Management, 29, 333-342.Abraham Carmeli, Anat Freund (2004). Work Commitment, Job Satisfaction,and Job Performance : An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 7, 289-309. Allen, N.J., Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.Bolon, D, S (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior among hospital employees: A multidimensional analysis involving job and organizational commitment. Hospital and Health Services Administration, 42(2), 221-241.Breukelen, Wim V., Vlist, Rene V.D. & Steensma, Herman, (2004). Voluntary employee turnover: combining variables from the 'traditional' turnover literature with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 893-914.8 3 Christian Vandenberghe, Kathleen Bentein & Florence Stinglhamber, (2002).Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group:Antecedents and outcomes.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 47-71.Cotton, J and Tuttle, J (1986). Employee Turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implication for research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 55-70.Cranny, C.J., Smith, R.C. & Stone, E.F. (1992). Job satisfaction: How people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance.New York.Lexington. Dam, Karen V., (2005). Employee attitudes toward job changes: an application and extension of Rusbult and Farrell's investment model.of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 253-269.Dunham, R.B., Grube, J.A., Castaneda, M.B. (1994). Organizational commitment: the utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 370-80.Elangovan, A.R., (2001). Causal ordering of stress, satisfaction and commitment, and intention to quit: a structural equation analysis. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 22, 159- 16.Fernando Jaramillo, Fernando, Nixon, Robert and Sams, Doreen, (2005).The effect of law enforcement stress on organizational commitment.International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28, 321-336.8 4 Fields, D, Dingham, M.E., Roman, P.M., & Blum, T.C. (2005). Exploring predictors of alternative job changes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 63-82. Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I (1975). Belief, attitudes, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison – Wesley.Gregerson, H.B. (1993). Multiple commitments at work and extra-role behavior during three stages of organizational tenure. Journal of Business Research, 26, 31-47 Herzberg, F. (1973). Motivation: Management of success. Elkorage Village, Illinois: Advanced System Inc.Igharia, I. & Greenhaus, J. (1992). The career advancement prospects of managers and professionals. Decision Sciences, 23, 478-500.Kalliath, T.J. & Beck, A. (2001). Is the path to burnout and turnover paved by a lack of supervisory support: a structural equation test, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 30, 72-8. Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J.W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence, New York; Wiley. Kowlowsky, M. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of job satisfaction, commitment and intention to leave. Applied Psychology: An International Review,40, 405-415. Lucy Firth, David J. Mellor, Kathleen A. Moore and Claude Loquet, (2004).How can managers reduce employee intention to quit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 17- 187. 8 5 Maertz, C.P. and Campion, M.A., (1998). 25 years of voluntary turnover research: A review and critique. International review of industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13, 49-81.Mathieu. J & Zajac, D, (1990). A review of meta-analysis of the antecedent correlates and consequences of organizational commitment.Psychological Bulletin, 108, 196-204 Mellor, D. J., Moore, K. A., Loquet, Claude. (2004). How can managers reduce employee intention to quit. Journal of Managerial Psychology,19, 170-187. Meyer, J. & Allen, N. (1991). A three conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.Meyer, J.P. and Allen, N.J (1984). Testing the “Side-Bet Theory’ of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17, 289-298.Meyer, J.P. & Allen, N.J (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory,research and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Meyer, J.P., & Herscovitch, L (2001). Commitment in workplace: Toward a general model, Human Research Management Review, 11, 299-326.Mobley, W.H. (1997). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology,62, 237-240.8 6 Moore. K.A. (2002). Hospital restructuring: impact on nurses mediated by social support and a perception of challenge, Journal of Health and Human Services Administration Morrow, P.C. (1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment.Greenwich, CT. JAI Pres.Munn, E.K., Barber, C.E. and Fritz, J.J. (1981). Factors affecting the professional well being of child life specialists. Children’s Health Care,25, 17-91.Rahim, M. & Psenicka, C. (1996). A structural equation model of stress, locus of control, social support, psychiatric symptoms, and propensity to leave a job. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 69-84.Randall, D.M. & Cote (1991). J.A.Interrelationships of work commitment constructs. Work and Occupation, 18, 194-211.Roznowski, M.& Hulin, C. (1992). The scientific merit of valid measures of general constructs with special reference to job satisfaction and job withdrawal. In C.J. Cranny, P.C. Smith and E.F. Stone (Eds.). Job Satisfaction: How People feel about their jobs and how it effects their performance. New York: Lexington Books.Sarminah Samad (2006). Predicting Turnover Intentions: The Case of Malaysian Government Doctors. Journal of American of Business Cambridge, 8, 113-119. Simmons, Elzbieta Sikorsa, (2005). Predictors of Organizational commitment among staff in assisted living. The Gerontologist, 45, 196 -205.8 7 Smith, M & Brough, P. (2003). Personnel recruitment and selection.Melbourne: Oxford University Pres.Tett, R.B., & Meyer, J.P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment,turnover intentions and turnover: Path analyses based on metaanalytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259-294.Vanderberg, R.J & Nelson, J.B. (1999). Disaggregating the motives underlying turnover intentions. When do intentions predict turnover behavior? Human Relations: 52, 1313-1336.Zaccaro, S.J. & Dobbins, G.H (1989). Contrasting group and organizational commitment: Evidence for differences among multilevel attachments.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 267-73.