Kualiti Jalinan Hubungan Ketua-Subordinat dan Kepuasan Kerja

Research on superior-subordinate relationship quality is still under explored phenomena in Malaysia. This superior-subordinate relationship quality is based on mutually concept is used to investigate the subordinate behavior through job satisfaction. This research is focusing on the perception of s...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Zamani Ahmad, Mansor
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2009
Subjects:	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/1705/1/zamani_ahmad_mansor.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1705/2/1.zamani_ahmad_mansor.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.1705
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
topic	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment
spellingShingle	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment Zamani Ahmad, Mansor Kualiti Jalinan Hubungan Ketua-Subordinat dan Kepuasan Kerja
description	Research on superior-subordinate relationship quality is still under explored phenomena in Malaysia. This superior-subordinate relationship quality is based on mutually concept is used to investigate the subordinate behavior through job satisfaction. This research is focusing on the perception of subordinate on superior-subordinate relationship quality. The purpose of the research is to investigate the relationship between the dimension of superior-subordinate relationship quality consist affect, loyalty, contribution and satisfaction to Administration and Diplomatic Officer (PTD) in Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya. Two hypotheses are advanced;first, there is a relationship between superior-subordinate relationship quality and job satisfaction. Second, there is an effect on superior-subordinate relationship quality to the job satisfaction. 269 respondents from Administration and Diplomatic Officer (PTD) which in grade M 41 at Prime Minister Department, Public Services Department, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Health and Ministry of Housing and Local Government are selected. Two statistical approaches were used to test the hypotheses. First is Pearson Correlations which to test the relationship between two variables and second is Multiple Regression which to test the effect on the superior-subordinate relationship quality to job satisfaction. These two analyses confirmed that there is a positive significant relationship between the dimension of superior-subordinate relationship quality and job satisfaction and confirmed that the factors in superior-subordinate relationship quality have indirect effect on job satisfaction.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Zamani Ahmad, Mansor
author_facet	Zamani Ahmad, Mansor
author_sort	Zamani Ahmad, Mansor
title	Kualiti Jalinan Hubungan Ketua-Subordinat dan Kepuasan Kerja
title_short	Kualiti Jalinan Hubungan Ketua-Subordinat dan Kepuasan Kerja
title_full	Kualiti Jalinan Hubungan Ketua-Subordinat dan Kepuasan Kerja
title_fullStr	Kualiti Jalinan Hubungan Ketua-Subordinat dan Kepuasan Kerja
title_full_unstemmed	Kualiti Jalinan Hubungan Ketua-Subordinat dan Kepuasan Kerja
title_sort	kualiti jalinan hubungan ketua-subordinat dan kepuasan kerja
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Business (COB)
publishDate	2009
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/1705/1/zamani_ahmad_mansor.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1705/2/1.zamani_ahmad_mansor.pdf
_version_	1747827192271732736
spelling	my-uum-etd.17052013-07-24T12:12:52Z Kualiti Jalinan Hubungan Ketua-Subordinat dan Kepuasan Kerja 2009 Zamani Ahmad, Mansor College of Business (COB) College of Business HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management. Employment Research on superior-subordinate relationship quality is still under explored phenomena in Malaysia. This superior-subordinate relationship quality is based on mutually concept is used to investigate the subordinate behavior through job satisfaction. This research is focusing on the perception of subordinate on superior-subordinate relationship quality. The purpose of the research is to investigate the relationship between the dimension of superior-subordinate relationship quality consist affect, loyalty, contribution and satisfaction to Administration and Diplomatic Officer (PTD) in Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya. Two hypotheses are advanced;first, there is a relationship between superior-subordinate relationship quality and job satisfaction. Second, there is an effect on superior-subordinate relationship quality to the job satisfaction. 269 respondents from Administration and Diplomatic Officer (PTD) which in grade M 41 at Prime Minister Department, Public Services Department, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Health and Ministry of Housing and Local Government are selected. Two statistical approaches were used to test the hypotheses. First is Pearson Correlations which to test the relationship between two variables and second is Multiple Regression which to test the effect on the superior-subordinate relationship quality to job satisfaction. These two analyses confirmed that there is a positive significant relationship between the dimension of superior-subordinate relationship quality and job satisfaction and confirmed that the factors in superior-subordinate relationship quality have indirect effect on job satisfaction. 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1705/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1705/1/zamani_ahmad_mansor.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/1705/2/1.zamani_ahmad_mansor.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Asma, A. (1992). The influence of ethnic values on managerial practices in Malaysia. Malaysian Management Review, 27(1), 3-18.Bauer, T.N., Erdogan, B., & Liden, R.C. (2006). A longitudinal study of the moderating role of extraversion: Leader-member exchange,performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 298- 310.Brown, S.P., & Peterson, R.A. (1994). The effect of effort on sales performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 70-80.Conger, J. & Kanungo, R. (1988), Charismatic Leadership: the Elusive Factor in Organizational Effectiveness, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W.J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46 – 78.Davis, W., & Gardner, W. (2004). Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader-member exchange perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 439-465.De Jong, J.P.J., & Den Hartog, D.N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10 (1), 41-64.Dienesch, R.M., & Liden, R.C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634.Dionne, L. (2001). Leader-member exchange (LMX): Level of negotiating latitude and job satisfaction. Unpublished manuscript.Dose, J.J. (1999). The relationship between work values similarity and teammember and leader-member exchange relationships. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practise, 31(1), 20-32.Fontaine, R., & Richardson, S. (2003). Cross-cultural research in Malaysia. Cross Cultural Management, 10(2), 75-89.Goldhaber, G.M. (1992). Komunikasi dalam organisasi. Terjemahan oleh Omardin Hj. Ashaari dan Azahar Raswan Dean Wan Din, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Graen, G.B. (1976). Role-making process within complex organizations. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: and McNally.1201 – 1245. Graen, G.B., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. J.G. Hunt & L.L.Larson (Eds). Leadership frontiers , 143-165, Kent State University Press. Graen, G.B., Novak, M.A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leadermember exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction:Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109 - 131.Graen, G.B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership. Development of Leader-Member Exchange LMX Theory.Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219 – 247.Gruenberg, B. (1980). The happy worker: An analysis of educational and occupational difference in determinats of job satisfaction. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 247-271.Hassan, A.B. (2007). Kualiti jalinan hubungan ketua-subordinat, amalan komunikasi ketua-subordinat dan komitmen terhadap kumpulan:Pendekatan multidimensi. Tesis Phd. UUM.Hassan, A.B., & Rowe, P.A. (2005). Leader-member exchange and superiorsubordinate communication : Cross-country comparison of LMX-7scale. Paper presented at the Engaging the multiple contexts of management :Convergence and divergence of management theory and practice. 19th ANZAM Conference, Canberra.Hassan, A.B., Bakhtiar, M., & Iran, H. (2004). Leader-member exchange and superior-subordinate communication behavior: A case of a Malaysian organization. Malaysian Management Journal, 8(1), 83-93.Hassan, A.B., Che Su, M., & Bakhtiar, M. (2009). LMX quality, supervisory communication and team-oriented commitment: A multilevel analysis approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14 (1), 11-33.Herzberg, F., Mausner, & Snyderman, B. (1959). Motivation to work. New York. Wiley.Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences : Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Hunter, D. (2007). Nonlinear patterns of job satisfaction and age cohorts in an industrial environment. Journal of American Academy of Business, 11,231-238. Ismatilla T. Mardanov, Heischmidt, K, & Henson, A. (2008), Leader-member exchange and job satisfaction bond and predicted employee turnover.Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 159 - 175.Jablin, F.M., & Krone, K.J (1994). Task/work relationship : A life-span perspective. In M.L. Knapp & G.R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 621-675) Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.Jones, M. D. (2006). Which is a better predictor of job performance: Job satisfaction or life satisfaction? Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 8, 20-42.Klieman,R.S., Quinn, J.A., & Harris, K.L. (2000). The influence of employeesupervisor interactions upon job breadth. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(6), 587-605.Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Lee. J. (2004). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(8),655-672.Liden, R.C., & Maslyn, J.M. (1998). Multidimensionality of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment Through Scale Development. Journal of Management, 24 (1), 43 – 72.Liden, R.C., Sparrowe, R.T., Wayne, S.J. (1997). Leader-Member Exchange Theory. The past and Potential for the Future. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management by Gerald Ferris (Ed).Jai Press, Greenwich Ct. 47 – 119. Lim, L. (2001). Work-related values of Malays and Chinese Malaysians.International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(2), 209-226.Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D.Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1297-1349). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Malone, T. (1997), “Is empowerment just a fad? control decision making and IT”, Sloan Management Review, 23-35.Manning, T., & Robertson, B. (2002). The dynamic leader-leadership development beyond the visionary leader. Industrial and Commercial Training, 34(4/5), 137-143.Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Pellegrini, E.K., & Scandura, T.A. (2006). Leader-member exchange,paternalism and delegation in Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), 264-278. Pool, S. W. (1997). The relationship of job satisfaction with substitutes of leadership, leadership behavior, and work motivation. Journal of Psychology, 131, 271-283. Rich, G.A. (1997). The sales manager as a role model: Effects on trust, job satisfaction and performance of sales people. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 25(4), 319-328.Scandura, T.A., & Graen, G.B. (1984) Moderating effects of initial leadermember exchange status on the effects of leadership intervention.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428-436.Sherony, K.M., & Green, S.G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 542-548.Sparowe, R.T. (1994). Empowerment in the hospital industry: An exploration of antecedents and outcomes. Hospitality Research Journal, 17,51 - 73.Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S. & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty managementtheory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. 108. 79-92.Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1981). Effect of partner’s effort and ability on liking for partner after failure on a cooperative task,Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(1), 147-153.Weiss, D.J., Dawis, R.V., England, G.W., & Lofquist, L.H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. University of Minnesota.Wexley, K.N., Alexander, R.A., Greenawalth, J.P., & Couch, M.A. (1980).Attitudinal congruence and similarity as related to interpersonal evaluations in manager subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 320-330.Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in Organizations (4th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ :Prentice Hall,Ch.7. 149 -174.

Kualiti Jalinan Hubungan Ketua-Subordinat dan Kepuasan Kerja

Similar Items