Analisa Model Senibina Generik bagi Komponen Perundingan Kandungan dalam Sistem e-Pembelajaran

Analisa Model Senibina Generik bagi Komponen Perundingan Kandungan dalam Sistem e-Pembelajaran

E-learning is a variation method in a popularly known online learning. With the advancement in e-learning, it is popularly used among the system developer either in learning or commercial purposes. However, the advancement is not in line with the development of e-learning system that is critical in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Siti Salmah, Md Kassim
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2006
Subjects:
QA76 Computer software
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/1859/1/Siti_Salmah_Binti_Md._Kassim_-__Analisa_model_senibina__generik_bagi_komponen_perundingan_kandungan_dalam_sistem_e-pembelajaran.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1859/2/Siti_Salmah_Binti_Md._Kassim_-__Analisa_model_senibina__generik_bagi_komponen_perundingan_kandungan_dalam_sistem_e-pembelajaran.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.1859
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic QA76 Computer software
spellingShingle QA76 Computer software
Siti Salmah, Md Kassim
Analisa Model Senibina Generik bagi Komponen Perundingan Kandungan dalam Sistem e-Pembelajaran
description E-learning is a variation method in a popularly known online learning. With the advancement in e-learning, it is popularly used among the system developer either in learning or commercial purposes. However, the advancement is not in line with the development of e-learning system that is critical in providing architecture to represent the interaction between the typical components involved in the whole system. This research gives an insight on basic architecture component that involve in the content negotiation process of e-learning. Architectural assessment is conducted to see the needs involved in content negotiation process in e-learning. ATAM method is chosen to analyze the content negotiation needs in e-learning system. The identified quality attributes in this method are the security, functionality, variability, modifiability, performance and reliability. The results of this analysis will help in developing content negotiation process for e-learning system.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Siti Salmah, Md Kassim
author_facet Siti Salmah, Md Kassim
author_sort Siti Salmah, Md Kassim
title Analisa Model Senibina Generik bagi Komponen Perundingan Kandungan dalam Sistem e-Pembelajaran
title_short Analisa Model Senibina Generik bagi Komponen Perundingan Kandungan dalam Sistem e-Pembelajaran
title_full Analisa Model Senibina Generik bagi Komponen Perundingan Kandungan dalam Sistem e-Pembelajaran
title_fullStr Analisa Model Senibina Generik bagi Komponen Perundingan Kandungan dalam Sistem e-Pembelajaran
title_full_unstemmed Analisa Model Senibina Generik bagi Komponen Perundingan Kandungan dalam Sistem e-Pembelajaran
title_sort analisa model senibina generik bagi komponen perundingan kandungan dalam sistem e-pembelajaran
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Centre for Graduate Studies
publishDate 2006
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/1859/1/Siti_Salmah_Binti_Md._Kassim_-__Analisa_model_senibina__generik_bagi_komponen_perundingan_kandungan_dalam_sistem_e-pembelajaran.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1859/2/Siti_Salmah_Binti_Md._Kassim_-__Analisa_model_senibina__generik_bagi_komponen_perundingan_kandungan_dalam_sistem_e-pembelajaran.pdf
_version_ 1747827219657392128
spelling my-uum-etd.18592013-07-24T12:13:27Z Analisa Model Senibina Generik bagi Komponen Perundingan Kandungan dalam Sistem e-Pembelajaran 2006 Siti Salmah, Md Kassim Centre for Graduate Studies Centre for Graduate Studies QA76 Computer software E-learning is a variation method in a popularly known online learning. With the advancement in e-learning, it is popularly used among the system developer either in learning or commercial purposes. However, the advancement is not in line with the development of e-learning system that is critical in providing architecture to represent the interaction between the typical components involved in the whole system. This research gives an insight on basic architecture component that involve in the content negotiation process of e-learning. Architectural assessment is conducted to see the needs involved in content negotiation process in e-learning. ATAM method is chosen to analyze the content negotiation needs in e-learning system. The identified quality attributes in this method are the security, functionality, variability, modifiability, performance and reliability. The results of this analysis will help in developing content negotiation process for e-learning system. 2006 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1859/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1859/1/Siti_Salmah_Binti_Md._Kassim_-__Analisa_model_senibina__generik_bagi_komponen_perundingan_kandungan_dalam_sistem_e-pembelajaran.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/1859/2/Siti_Salmah_Binti_Md._Kassim_-__Analisa_model_senibina__generik_bagi_komponen_perundingan_kandungan_dalam_sistem_e-pembelajaran.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ajhoun,R.,Benkiran, A.M, and Adelkader,M.A.(2000). Framework for Adaptive and Cooperative Learning for the 1nternet:SMART Learning. Internet Society 's 10th Annual INET Conference July. Ambe,N., & Vizeacoumar,F. (2002). Evaluation of Two Architecture using the Architecture Trade of Analysis Method (ATAM). Technical Report, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Berlanga,A., & Garcia,F. (2004). An Adaptive Meta-model for E-Learning,International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia, Spain. Barbacci, M.R., Carriere, S.J., Feiler, P.H., Kazman,R., Klein,M.H., Lipson, M.H.,Longstaff,T. A., & Weinstock, C. B.(1998). Steps in an Architecture Trade off Analysis Method: Quality Attribute Models and Analysis. Technical Report, Carneige Mellon University, Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania. Barbacci, M.R., Ellison, R.J., Weinstock,C.B., & Good, W.G. (2000). Quality Attribute Workshop Participants Handbook. Special Report CMU/SEI-2000-SR-01. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Bass,L., Clements, P., & Kazman,R. (2003). Software Architecture in Practice:Second Edition. Addison Wesley Professional. Bordegoni, M., Faconti,G., Maybury,M.T., Rist,T., Ruggieri,S., Trahanias,P., & Wilson,M. (1997). A Standard Reference Model for Intelligent Multimedia Presentation System. Computer Standards & Interfaces. German. 18(6-7), ms.477-496. Botta,F. (2000). An Authoring Tool for Building Flexible On-line Courses using XML, XML Europe '00, Paris. Brailsford T.J., Choo B.S., Davies P.M.C ., Moore.A., Stewart C.D., & Zakaria M.R. (2001). Towards a Framework to Effective Web-based Distributed Learning. l0th International World Wide Web Conference. Hong Kong. Brusilovsky, P., & Nijhavan, H. (2002). A Framework for Adaptive E-Learning Based on Distributed Re usable Learning Activities. In: M. Driscoll and T. C. Reeves(eds) Proceedings of World Conference on E-learning, E-Learn 2000. Montreal, Canada, ms.154-161. Carchilo,V., Longheu,A., & Milgeri,M. (2002). Adaptive Formative Paths in a Web based Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. Italy. 5(4), ms.64-75. Cardoso,H.L, Schaefer,M., & Oliveria, E. (1999). A Multi-Agent System for Electronic Commerce including Adaptive Strategic Behaviors. Portuguese Conference on . Artificial Intelligent. Evora, Portugal. ms.252-266. Clements,P., Kazman,R., & Klein,M. (2001). Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies (19-42). Reading, Massachusetts. Addison Wesley Longman Inc. Collier,G.(2002).e Learning Application Infrastructure. White Paper, Sun Micro systems, USA. Collier,G., & Robson,R. (2002). e Learning Interoperability Standards. White Paper, Sun Microsystems, USA. Conde,A., Moreira,A., Neves,L., & Ramos,F. (2002). Management of e-learning Environments:Some issues and Research Clues. Proceeding of the IASTED (International Conference Applied Informatics). Dallas, Texas, USA. Cowie,A.P.(1989).0xford Advanced Learner's Dictionary 4th Edition. Oxford University Press,Walton Street,Oxford. Dagger,D., Wade,V.P., & Conlan, 0. (2003). A Framework for Developing Adaptive 'Personalized e learning. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate. Washington D.C Dahn, I. (2001). Software Interoperability Problems and E-Learning. 2nd International LeGE-WG Workshop on E-Learning and Grid Technology : A Fundamental Challenge for Europe. Paris, France. Eriksson,M. (2003). An Introduction to Software Product Line Development, Proceedings of Umea's Seventh Student Conference in Computing Science, UMINF 03.05,ISSN-0348-0542. ms.(26-37). Ferber,S., Heidl,P., & Lutz,P. (2002). Reviewing Product Line Architectures: Experience Report of ATAM in an Automotive Context. 4th International Workshop on Software Product-Family Engineering, Bilbao, Spain. ms.364-382. Garlan, D & Shaw, M. (1996). Software Architecture. Prentice Hall. USA. Henry,P. (2001). E-learning Technology, Content and Services. Education + Training. 43(4), ms.249-255. Jones, L.G., & Lattanze,A.J. (2001). Using Architecture Trade off Analysis Method to Evaluate a Wargame Simulation System. Technical Report. Carneige Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Kazman, R., Klein, M., & Clements, P. (2000). ATAM:Analysis Trade off Architecture Method. Technical Report. Carneige Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Lander,S.E., Nagendra,M.V., & Lesser,V.R. (1996). Retrieval and Reasoning in Distributed Case Bases. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image, Special Issue on Digital Libraries. 7(I), ms.74-87. Lemlouma,T., & Layaida,N. (2003).Adapted Content Delivery for Different Contexts, Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT). Orlando,Florida. ms.190-197. Lemlouma,T., & Layaida,N. (2001). The Negotiation of Multimedia Content Services in Heterogeneous Environment. MMM 2001: the 8th International Conference on Multimedia Modeling, CWI. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Lemlouma,T., & Layaida,N. (2002). W3C Workshop on Device Independent Authoring Techniques. St. Leon-Rot University, Germany. Lenon,J., Liu,H., & Maurer,H. (2002). HWONS: A Hyperwave Online Negotiation System. Journal of University Computer Science. 8(4), ms.573-577. Liu, X., El Saddik, A., & Georganas,D.N. (2003). An Implementable Architecture Of An E-Learning System. In Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Ng,M.H., Armstrong,R., Hall, W., & Maier, P. (2002). JointZone:An Adaptive Web-Based Learning Application. Technical Report. University Of Southampton,United Kingdom. Pennanen, P., & Alatalo, T. (2001). Leiki - A Platform for Personalized Content Targeting. In Proceedings of ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. Denmark. Pinheiro,M.K., Lima,J.V., Edelweiss,N., Layida.N., & Lemouma.T. (2002). An Open E-Learning Authoring Environment. Spezielles Seminar in WS 2002/2003-E-Learning. France. Rosenberg,M.J.(2000). E-learning Strategies for Delivery Knowledge In the Digitization USA. McGraw Hill. Sampson,D., Karagiannidis,C., & Cardinali,F.(2002). An Architecture for Web-based e-Learning Promoting Re-usable Adaptive Educational e-Content. Educational Technology & Society .5(4). ms.27-37. Sommerville, I. (1995). Software Engineering 5th Edition. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Edinburgh Gate, England. Specht, M., & Reinhard.0.(1998): ACE - Adaptive Courseware Environment. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 4 (l).ms. 141-161. Valencia,L.P.S.,Sanz.J.LC., & Ruboi.C.G. (1999). Using XML in A Tele-educational Tool, XML Europe '99, Granada Conference Proceedings.ms. 188-189.

Similar Items