A Comparison of Performance between TFRC and UDP over a Mobile IP Network

In this project we will study three performance metrics (packet loss, packet delay and jitter) of two different transport layer protocols over a Mobile IP Network. The researcher will be implementing TFRC and UDP in the Mobile IP Network, to identify which protocols could support mobility. Network S...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Al-Zoubi, Malek Mohammed Saleh
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2010
Subjects:	TK6570 Mobile Communication System.
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/1920/1/Malek_Mohammed_Saleh_Al-Zaubi.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1920/2/1.Malek_Mohammed_Saleh_Al-Zaubi.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.1920
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
topic	TK6570 Mobile Communication System.
spellingShingle	TK6570 Mobile Communication System. Al-Zoubi, Malek Mohammed Saleh A Comparison of Performance between TFRC and UDP over a Mobile IP Network
description	In this project we will study three performance metrics (packet loss, packet delay and jitter) of two different transport layer protocols over a Mobile IP Network. The researcher will be implementing TFRC and UDP in the Mobile IP Network, to identify which protocols could support mobility. Network Simulation NS-2 was proposed for implementing previous items and to present and interpret the results.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Al-Zoubi, Malek Mohammed Saleh
author_facet	Al-Zoubi, Malek Mohammed Saleh
author_sort	Al-Zoubi, Malek Mohammed Saleh
title	A Comparison of Performance between TFRC and UDP over a Mobile IP Network
title_short	A Comparison of Performance between TFRC and UDP over a Mobile IP Network
title_full	A Comparison of Performance between TFRC and UDP over a Mobile IP Network
title_fullStr	A Comparison of Performance between TFRC and UDP over a Mobile IP Network
title_full_unstemmed	A Comparison of Performance between TFRC and UDP over a Mobile IP Network
title_sort	comparison of performance between tfrc and udp over a mobile ip network
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Centre for Graduate Studies
publishDate	2010
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/1920/1/Malek_Mohammed_Saleh_Al-Zaubi.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1920/2/1.Malek_Mohammed_Saleh_Al-Zaubi.pdf
_version_	1747827232822263808
spelling	my-uum-etd.19202013-07-24T12:13:43Z A Comparison of Performance between TFRC and UDP over a Mobile IP Network 2010 Al-Zoubi, Malek Mohammed Saleh Centre for Graduate Studies Centre for Graduate Studies TK6570 Mobile Communication System. In this project we will study three performance metrics (packet loss, packet delay and jitter) of two different transport layer protocols over a Mobile IP Network. The researcher will be implementing TFRC and UDP in the Mobile IP Network, to identify which protocols could support mobility. Network Simulation NS-2 was proposed for implementing previous items and to present and interpret the results. 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1920/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1920/1/Malek_Mohammed_Saleh_Al-Zaubi.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/1920/2/1.Malek_Mohammed_Saleh_Al-Zaubi.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Internet world statistics, available at http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm, July 22, 2009.October 14, 2009). Wireless LAN. Available:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_LAN A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications: Cambridge University Press,2005.R. MacManus (September 5, 2007, 10), Future Web Trends,http://www.readwriteweb.com/archive/10_future_web_trends.php (July 22, 2009).M. Handley, et al., "RFC3448 - TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC):Protocol Specification," The Internet Society, pp. 1-24, January 2003.J. Postel, "RFC768 - User Datagram Protocol," USC/InformationnSciences Institute, 28 August 1980.October 18, 2009). What are the advantages of UDP over TCP?Available:http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_advantages_of_UDP_over_TCP.H. ElAarag and A. Moedinger, "IFTP-W: A TCP-Friendly Protocol for Multimedia Applications over Wireless Networks," presented at the 43rd ACM Southeast Conference, 2005.Q. Li, et al., "Jitter Ratio-Based TFRC Scheme in Wireless-Wired Hybrid Network," Digital Telecommunications, 2006. ICDT '06. International Conference, 2006.56 N. Venkataraman, "Inside Mobile IP", available at:http://www.ddj.com/mobile/184406240 July 23, 2009.M. Hassan and R. Jain, "High Performance TCP/IP Networking:Concepts, Issues, and Solutions," Prentice-Hall, 2003.C. T. Bhunia. (February 2009) Internet with Mobile IP. Electronics for you. 108-114.B. Mitchell. (November 9, 2009, What Are the Benefits of Networking? Available: http://compnetworking.about.com/cs/wireless/f/whywirelesslan.htm D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication:Cambridge University Press, 2005. S. McEvoy, Microsoft Windows Media Player for Windows XP handbook: Microsoft Press, 2001.A. i. Research. (February 16, 2006, Accustream Research: Internet video up by 50% in ’05 to over 17.9 billion streams served. Available: http://www.accustreamrearch.com/news/feb-16-06.html. A. E. Grant and J. H. Meadows, Communication Technology Update:Focal Press is an imprint of Elsevier, 2006. J. Kristoff, "The Trouble with UDP scanning” presented at the 14th Annual Computer Security Incident Handling Conference, Hawaii, USA,March 11, 2002.S. Floyd and K. Fall, “Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the Internet,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 7, no. 4,pp. 458-472, August 1999.H. ElAarag and M. Bassiouni, “An Internet Friendly Transport Protocol for continuous media over best effort networks,” Int. J. of Communication Systems, John Wiley and Sons, 2002,15:881-898.J. Widmer, R. Denda, and M. Mauve., “A survey on TCP Friendly congestion control,” IEEE Network, vol. 15, pp. 28-37, May 2001.Gu, Y., Hong, X., Mazzuco, M, and Grossman, R. (2005). SABUL: A high performance data transfer protocol. Available at:http://www.rgrossman.com/pdf/sabul-hpdtp-11-02.pdf.He, J. and Gary-Chan, S. H. (2004). TCP and UDP performance for Internet over optical packet-switched networks. Journal of Computer Networks, 45, 505-521.A. A. Akintola, et al., "Performance Modeling of UDP over IP-Based Wireline and Wireless Networks,"Informing Science and Information Technology, vol. 3, 2006.Song Cen, Pamela C. Cosman and Geoffrey M. Voelker, "End-to-End Differentiation of Congestion", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking(TON), Volume 11 Issue 5, October 2003 Page(s):703- 717 Wu E.H, Mei-Zhen Chen; "JTCP: Jitter-based TCP for heterogeneous wireless networks", Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on What? Volume 22, Issue 4, May 2004, Page(s):757- 766 T. Janevski and I. Petrov, "Analysis of Mobile IP for NS-2," presented at the 16th Telecommunications forum TELFOR Serbia, Belgrade 2008. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/, last accessed in October 2009. C. Perkins, “IP Mobility Support for IPv4”, IETF RFC 3344, August 2002. Claudio.E. Palazzi et al., “High Mobility in a Realistic Wireless Environment: a Mobile IP Handoff Model for NS-2”, Trident Com 2007.J. F.Kurose, et al., Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach. Greg Tobin, 2008.G. Almes, et al., "RFC2680-A One-way Packet Loss Metric for IPPM," Network Working Group, September 1999."Monitoring Your IP Telephony," NetworkNEC Unified Solutions, 2004.G. Almes, et al., "RFC2681-A Round-trip Delay Metric for IPPM,"Network Working Group, September 1999.C. Demichelis and P. Chimento, "RFC3393-IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)," Network Working Group,November 2002.E. Weingartner, et al., "A performance comparison of recent network simulators," presented at the Communications, 2009. ICC '09. IEEE International Conference on, 14-18 June 2009.A. Varga and R. Hornig. An overview of the OMNeT++ simulation environment. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques for Communications,Networks and Systems (SIMUTools 2008’), March 2008.R. Barr, Z. J. Haas, and R. van Renesse. JiST: an efficient approach to simulation using virtual machines. Softw. Pract. Exper, 35(6):539–576,2005.P. Levis, N. Lee, M. Welsh, and D. Culler. TOSSIM: accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2003), 2003.Mattsson and Nils-Erik, A DCCP module for ns-2, 2004-05-05.M. Greis. (2009). Tutorial for the Network Simulator "ns". Available:http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/tutorial/ns.html T. Issariyakul and E. Hossain, Introduction to Network Simulator NS2:Springer, 2009. Malek. J., 2004. Trace graph. Wroclaw University of Technology,Poland. http://www.geocities.comtracegraph.html (accessed on Sept.2009)E. Kamen and B. Heck. (November 23, 2009). Fundamentals of Signals and Systems Using Matlab. Available:http://users.ece.gatech.edu/bonnie/book/TUTORIAL/tutorial.html Lysis. November 23, 2009). Calculate Packet Loss Ratio. Available:http://www.ehow.com/how_5108799_calculate-packet-loss-ratio.html November 23, 2009). ITU-T Recommendations. Available:http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/publications/recs.html(2007-11, November 23, 2009). Y.1540: Internet protocol data communication service - IP packet transfer and availability performance parameters. Available: http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.1540-200711-I/en

A Comparison of Performance between TFRC and UDP over a Mobile IP Network

Similar Items