Career Incentives, Performance Base Pay, Organizational Benefits Influencing Employee Performance: A Case on Libyan Tobacco Company

This study discusses all the antecedents which influence employee performance in Libyan Tobacco Company Tripoli. The antecedents which are used in this study are career incentive; performance based pay and organizational benefits. This study has distributed 250 questionnaires among the Libyan Tobacc...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Omaro, Wafa Yosef
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2011
Subjects:	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/2783/2/Wafa_Yosef_Omaro.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/2783/3/1.Wafa_Yosef_Omaro.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.2783
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Ahmad, Fais
topic	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment
spellingShingle	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment Omaro, Wafa Yosef Career Incentives, Performance Base Pay, Organizational Benefits Influencing Employee Performance: A Case on Libyan Tobacco Company
description	This study discusses all the antecedents which influence employee performance in Libyan Tobacco Company Tripoli. The antecedents which are used in this study are career incentive; performance based pay and organizational benefits. This study has distributed 250 questionnaires among the Libyan Tobacco company. The questionnaire return was 200 and among them 158 were valid questionnaire, which are used in the analysis. Employee performance in Tobacco Company at Tripoli of Libya defined by the underpinning expectancy theory which is predicated on a belief that individuals will exert effort if they expect it will result in an outcome they value. However, reinforcement theory also posits a direct relationship between a desired target behavior such as performance and its consequences such as pay. The aim of this research is to investigate the influence of career incentives; performance based pay and organizational benefits influencing employee performance in Libyan Tobacco Company. This study has hypothesized that there is a positive relationship of career incentives; performance based pay and organizational benefits with employee performance. The research has been conducted in Libyan Tobacco Company in Tripoli and the questionnaire was distributed among the employees in Libyan Tobacco Company. The study has used frequency, factor analysis, reliability, correlations and regression analysis to analyze the data. The findings have indicated that performance base pay is the best predictor of employee performance.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Omaro, Wafa Yosef
author_facet	Omaro, Wafa Yosef
author_sort	Omaro, Wafa Yosef
title	Career Incentives, Performance Base Pay, Organizational Benefits Influencing Employee Performance: A Case on Libyan Tobacco Company
title_short	Career Incentives, Performance Base Pay, Organizational Benefits Influencing Employee Performance: A Case on Libyan Tobacco Company
title_full	Career Incentives, Performance Base Pay, Organizational Benefits Influencing Employee Performance: A Case on Libyan Tobacco Company
title_fullStr	Career Incentives, Performance Base Pay, Organizational Benefits Influencing Employee Performance: A Case on Libyan Tobacco Company
title_full_unstemmed	Career Incentives, Performance Base Pay, Organizational Benefits Influencing Employee Performance: A Case on Libyan Tobacco Company
title_sort	career incentives, performance base pay, organizational benefits influencing employee performance: a case on libyan tobacco company
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Business (COB)
publishDate	2011
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/2783/2/Wafa_Yosef_Omaro.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/2783/3/1.Wafa_Yosef_Omaro.pdf
_version_	1747827428267393024
spelling	my-uum-etd.27832016-04-19T07:24:40Z Career Incentives, Performance Base Pay, Organizational Benefits Influencing Employee Performance: A Case on Libyan Tobacco Company 2011-06 Omaro, Wafa Yosef Ahmad, Fais College of Business (COB) College of Business HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management. Employment This study discusses all the antecedents which influence employee performance in Libyan Tobacco Company Tripoli. The antecedents which are used in this study are career incentive; performance based pay and organizational benefits. This study has distributed 250 questionnaires among the Libyan Tobacco company. The questionnaire return was 200 and among them 158 were valid questionnaire, which are used in the analysis. Employee performance in Tobacco Company at Tripoli of Libya defined by the underpinning expectancy theory which is predicated on a belief that individuals will exert effort if they expect it will result in an outcome they value. However, reinforcement theory also posits a direct relationship between a desired target behavior such as performance and its consequences such as pay. The aim of this research is to investigate the influence of career incentives; performance based pay and organizational benefits influencing employee performance in Libyan Tobacco Company. This study has hypothesized that there is a positive relationship of career incentives; performance based pay and organizational benefits with employee performance. The research has been conducted in Libyan Tobacco Company in Tripoli and the questionnaire was distributed among the employees in Libyan Tobacco Company. The study has used frequency, factor analysis, reliability, correlations and regression analysis to analyze the data. The findings have indicated that performance base pay is the best predictor of employee performance. 2011-06 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/2783/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/2783/2/Wafa_Yosef_Omaro.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/2783/3/1.Wafa_Yosef_Omaro.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ashkanasy, N.M., Wilderom, C.P.M, & Peterson, M.F. (Eds.) (2000). ‘The Handbook of Organizational Culture & Climate, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, . Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance: In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Christopher Pass, (2003)., “Long-term incentives schemes, executive remuneration and corporate performance : An Empirical Study.” Corporate Governance. Vol.3. No.4.pp, 18-37. MCP UP Publication Ltd. Dalita Balassanian and Kanni Wignaraja, (2006)., “Incentive System :Incentive, Motivation, And Development Performance.” A Conference by United Nations Developmental Programs (UNDP) Capacity Development Resource. Pg 1-25. Ehrenberg, Ronald G., and George T. Milkovich. (1987).“Compensation and Firm Performance.” In Morris Kleiner et al., eds., Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 87-122. Erling Barth, Bernt Bratsberg, Torbjørn Hægel and Oddbjørn Raaum, (2008)., “Who pays for performance?” International Journal of Manpower Vol. 29 No. 1.pp. 8-29.Emerald Group Publishing Limited Grossman, Sanford J., and Oliver D. Hart. 1983. “An Analysis of Principal –Agent Problem.” Econometrica, Vol. 51, No.1 (January), pp. 7-46. Hartman, D.B., & Weil,R. (1997). Developing a performance pay plan for teachers: A process, not event. Submitted to American Federation of Teacher Research Department Published in 2005. Hart, Oliver, and Bengt Holstrom, (1987)., “The Theory of Contracts.” In Truman F. Bewley, ed., Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Heckman, James, Carolyn Heinrich, and Jeffrey Smith. (1997)., Assessing the Performance of Performance Standards in Public Bureaucracies. American Economic Review 87(2): 389-95. James L. Perry, Trent Engbers &So Yun Jun (2009).,“Back to the Future? Performance-Related Pay, Empirical Research, and the Perils of Persistence.” PAR The premier journal of Public administration. Vol 69. Issue. Number 1. John M. Abowd, (1990)., “Does Performance-Based Managerial Compensation Affect Corporate Performance?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, Special Issue by Cornell University (Feb., 1990), pp. 52S-73S. Larker, David F. (1983)., “the Association Between Performance Plan Adoption and Corporate Capital Invenstment.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.5 (April), pp. 3-30. Mike Mondello &Joel Maxcy, (2009)., “The impact of salary dispersion and performance bonuses in NFL organizations.” Management Decision Vol. 47 No. 1, 2009. pp. 110-123.Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Matsumura, E. M., & Shin, J. Y. (2004). An Empirical Analysis of a Relative Performance-Based Incentive Plan: Evidence from a Postal Service. Madison: Department of Accounting and Information Systems School of Business University of Wisconsin-Madison. Mark J. Hooper & David Newlands. (2009). Performance Management: Survey Evidence of Appraisal and Evaluation from Libyan Corporations. Published by Lille Economic and Management (LEM). 16, 1-26. Nandanwar, M., Sumis, & Nandanwar, L. (2010). Intervening factors affecting the relationship between incentives and employee motivation: a case study of pharmaceutical manufacturing organisation in Navi Mumbai. Journal of Business Excellence , 1 (2), 06-11. James kai-sing kung & Shuo chen. (2011). The Tragedy of the Nomenklatura: Career Incentives and Political Radicalism during China’s Great Leap Famine. American Political Science Review. 105 (1), 27-45. Marc Robinson, (2007)., “Performance Information for Performance Budgeting.” International Monetary Fund. Palgrave MacMillan-IMF. Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes & Traci Mach, (2003)., “Performance pay and fringe benefits Work incentives or compensating wage differentials?” International Journal of Manpower Vol. 24 No. 6, 2003. pp. 672-698. MCB UP Limited. Richard Belfield and David Marsden, (2003)., “Performance pay, monitoring environments, and establishment performance.” International Journal of ManpowerVol. 24 No. 4, 2003.pp. 452-471.MCB UP Limited. Ronald J. Hartman, Elaine M. Kurtz & Elizabeth K. Moser, (1994). Incentive Programs to Improve Transit Employee Performance. National Academy Press. Washington,D.C.pp.1-42. Rynes, S. L., Colbert, A., & Brown, K. G. (2002). HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management, 41, 149–174. Sara L. Rynes, Barry Gerhart, and Kathleen A. Minette. (2004). The Importance of Pay in Employee Motivation: Discrepancies Between What People Say and What they do. Human Resource Management, 43(4), 381–394. Schuler, R. S. and Rogovsky N. (1998) 'Understanding compensation practice variation across firms: the impact of national culture', Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1):159-77. Stefan Beiner, Markus M. Schmid & Gabrielle Wanzenried, (2009)., “Product Market Competition, Managerial Incentives and Firm Valuation.” European Financial Management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Sullivan, arthur; Steven M. Sheffrin (2003). Economics: Principles in action. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458: Pearson Prentice Hall. pp. 31. V. Arumugam, Hiaw Wei Chang & Keng-Boon Ooi and Pei-Lee The, (2009)., "Self-assessment of TQM practices: a case analysis." The TQM Journal Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 46-58. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Vicente Cuñat & Maria Guadalupe, (2005)., “How Does Product Market Competition Shape Incentive Contracts?” Journal of the European Economic Association September 2005 3(5):1058–1082.The European Economic Association.

Career Incentives, Performance Base Pay, Organizational Benefits Influencing Employee Performance: A Case on Libyan Tobacco Company

Similar Items