A Study of Relationship Between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Manufacturing Performance

A Study of Relationship Between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Manufacturing Performance

Most organizations production is based on machine – human system. The dependable of production system on machine has increased drastically with the increase of automation. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) practices which are top mana...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nor Hafida, Hamzah
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
TS155-194 Production management
Operations management
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/2805/1/Nor_Hafida_Hamzah.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.2805
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
advisor Ibrahim, Amlus
topic TS155-194 Production management
Operations management
spellingShingle TS155-194 Production management
Operations management
Nor Hafida, Hamzah
A Study of Relationship Between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Manufacturing Performance
description Most organizations production is based on machine – human system. The dependable of production system on machine has increased drastically with the increase of automation. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) practices which are top management leadership, information system focus, employee involvement, and autonomous and planned maintenance with manufacturing performance. A total of 100 questionnaires were circulated to various manufacturing industries in Northern regions of Malaysia such as Kedah, Penang, and Perak. However, only 95 questionnaires were returned and usable for analysis. The correlation and multiple regression analysis were performed to test the hypotheses of the study. The findings indicated of the four (4) components of TPM, only employee involvement was not significantly related to manufacturing performance. This was aligned with the results shown in multiple regression analysis. In addition, the effectiveness of production is relying on skills level, management, and maintenance of equipment efficiently. The implications were discussed and recommendations for the future research were also addressed.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nor Hafida, Hamzah
author_facet Nor Hafida, Hamzah
author_sort Nor Hafida, Hamzah
title A Study of Relationship Between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Manufacturing Performance
title_short A Study of Relationship Between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Manufacturing Performance
title_full A Study of Relationship Between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Manufacturing Performance
title_fullStr A Study of Relationship Between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Manufacturing Performance
title_full_unstemmed A Study of Relationship Between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Manufacturing Performance
title_sort study of relationship between total productive maintenance (tpm) and manufacturing performance
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/2805/1/Nor_Hafida_Hamzah.pdf
_version_ 1783729366336798720
spelling my-uum-etd.28052023-08-20T01:06:46Z A Study of Relationship Between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Manufacturing Performance 2011 Nor Hafida, Hamzah Ibrahim, Amlus Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business TS155-194 Production management. Operations management Most organizations production is based on machine – human system. The dependable of production system on machine has increased drastically with the increase of automation. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) practices which are top management leadership, information system focus, employee involvement, and autonomous and planned maintenance with manufacturing performance. A total of 100 questionnaires were circulated to various manufacturing industries in Northern regions of Malaysia such as Kedah, Penang, and Perak. However, only 95 questionnaires were returned and usable for analysis. The correlation and multiple regression analysis were performed to test the hypotheses of the study. The findings indicated of the four (4) components of TPM, only employee involvement was not significantly related to manufacturing performance. This was aligned with the results shown in multiple regression analysis. In addition, the effectiveness of production is relying on skills level, management, and maintenance of equipment efficiently. The implications were discussed and recommendations for the future research were also addressed. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/2805/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/2805/1/Nor_Hafida_Hamzah.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Bamber, C.J., Sharp, J.M. & Hides, M.T. (1999), ‘‘Factors affecting successful implementation of total productive maintenance: a UK manufacturing case study perspective’’, Journal of Quality Engineering, 5(3), 162-81. Brah SA, Chong W-K. (2004). Relationship between total productive maintenance and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 42(12), 2383–2401. Brah, S. A., Tee, S. S. L. & Rao, B. M., (2002). Relationship between TQM and performance of Singapore companies. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 19, 356–379. Castro, J., Kolp, M., & Mylopoulos, J. (2002). Towards Requirements-Driven Information Systems Engineering: The Tropos Project. Journal of Information Systems, 27, 365-389. Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2000). Applied Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Sydney: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Cheng, T. C. E. & Podolsky, S. (1996). Just-In-Time Manufacturing: An Introduction (2nd Ed.). London: Chapman and Hall. Cua, K. O., McKone, K. E., & Schroeder, R. G. (2001). Relationship between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19(6),675-94. Dal, B., Tugwell, P. & Great banks, R. (2000). Overall equipment effectiveness as a measure of operational improvement, a practical analysis. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(12), 1488-1502. Davis, R. K. (1995). Productivity Improvements Through TPM: The Philosophy and Application of Total Productive maintenance, Prentice Hall: UK Dunsmuir, A. & Williams, L. (1992). How to do social research. Sociology in action series. London: Collins Educational. EPU. (2006). Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006-2010. Putrajaya: Prime Minister’s Department. FMM. (2006). FMM Directory 2006: Malaysian Industries-supplying the world with competitive products and services. Kuala Lumpur: Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers. Fredendall, L. D., Patterson, J. W., Kennedy, W. J. & Griffin, T. (1997). Maintenance: Modeling Its Strategic Impact, Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(4), 440-453. Fu, -K. W. (2006). Evaluating the Efficiency of Implementing Total Productive Maintenance. Total Quality Management, 17(5), 655-667. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Ghauri, P. & Gronhaug, K. (2002). Research methods in business studies: A practical guide. Prentice Hall. Halim, M. L., & Ramayah, T. (2010). Maintenance strategy in Malaysian manufacturing companies: A total productive maintenance (TPM) approach. Business Strategy Series, 11(6), 387-396. Hill, M.G. (2009). Concise Encyclopedia of Science and Technology.(5th Ed.) New York: Mc-Graw Hill Companies Inc. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Kutucuoglu, K.Y., Hamali, J., Irani, Z. & Sharp, J.M. (2001), ‘‘A framework for managing maintenance using performance measurement systems’’, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 173-94. McKone, K. E., Schroeder, R. G. & Cua, K. O., (1999). Total productive maintenance: a contextual view. Journal of Operations Management, 17, 123–144. McKone, K.E., Schroeder, R. G., & Cua, K. O. (2001). The impact of total productive maintenance practices on manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 39-58. Meyer, B. (2004). Total Productive Maintenance in the Paint Shop. Industrial Paint & Powder, 80, 48. Monthly Manufacturing Statistic, (2011). Department of Statistics Malaysia. Retrieved 20 March 2011 from http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=845%3A-performance-in-february-2011-1-sales-value-the-sales-value-of-the-manufacturing-sector-in-february-2011-continu&catid=73%3Amonthly-manufacturing-statistics-malaysia&lang=en Nakajima, S. (1988), TPM – An Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press: Cambridge, MA. Nakajima, S.(1989). TPM Development Program-Implementing Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press: New York, NY. One, Y.S., Muhamad, J. & Ramayah, T. (2005). Implementing Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) in Malaysian Manufacturing Organisation: An Operational Strategy Study. The ICFAI Journal of Operations Management, IV(2), 53-62. Powell, T. C., (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16,15–37. Ramayah, T., Jantan, M. & Hassan, M. M. (2002). Change management and implementation of total productive maintenance: an exploratory study of Malaysian manufacturing companies. Utara Management Review,3(1),35-49. Rich, N. (1997). The anatomy of Japanese maintenance performance. Lean Enterprise Research Centre. Working paper series Cardiff Business School. Rich, N. (1999). Total productive maintenance: The lean approach. Tudor Business Publishing. Schonberger, R. J. (1987). World Class Manufacturing Casebook: Implementing JIT and TQC. New York: The Free Press. Schroeder, R.G. (1993). Operations management: Decision making in the operations function. (4th ed). McGraw-Hill: New York. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. (4th ed.), John Wiley & Sons. Inc. Suzuki, T., (1992), New Directions for TPM. Productivity Press: Cambridge, MA. Tajiri, M., & Gotoh, F., (1992). TPM Implementation: A Japanese Approach. McGraw-Hill: New York. Takahashi, Y., & Osada, T., (1990). TPM: Total Productive Maintenance. Asian Productivity Organization: Tokyo, Japan. Tarek, M. K. (2000). Management of Technology. The key to competitiveness and wealth creation. McGraw Hill: Singapore. Todd,J.(1995).World-class manufacturing. McGraw-Hill:London Tsang, A. H. C. & Chan, P. K. (2000). TPM Implementation in China: A Case Study, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17(2), 144-157. Tsuchiya, S., (1992). Quality Maintenance: Zero Defects Through Equipment Management. Productivity Press: Cambridge, MA. Ward, P.T., Duray, R., Leong, G.K., & Sum, C.C. (1995). Business environment, operations strategy and performance: an empirical study of Singapore manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 13, 99-115. Wireman, T. (1991). Total productive maintenance: An American Approach. Industrial Press Inc.: New York. Zikmund, W. (2000). Business Research Methods, (6th ed), The Dryden Press: Harcourt College Publishers.

Similar Items