Throughput, Smoothness Analysis of SCTP Over AODV and DSR MANET Routing Protocols

Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is a wireless network of mobile-mobile node that has no fixed routers. In MANET, mobile nodes can communicate via the wireless interface while nodes are moving freely without using the network infrastructure. Each node in addition to functioning as a host, also serves a...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Lubis, Fahrurrozi
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2011
Subjects:	TK5101-6720 Telecommunication
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/2839/1/Fahrurrozi_Lubis.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/2839/2/1.Fahrurrozi_Lubis.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.2839
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Azzali, Fazli Mohd Zaini, Khuzairi
topic	TK5101-6720 Telecommunication
spellingShingle	TK5101-6720 Telecommunication Lubis, Fahrurrozi Throughput, Smoothness Analysis of SCTP Over AODV and DSR MANET Routing Protocols
description	Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is a wireless network of mobile-mobile node that has no fixed routers. In MANET, mobile nodes can communicate via the wireless interface while nodes are moving freely without using the network infrastructure. Each node in addition to functioning as a host, also serves as a router that can receive and forward packets to next the node. Nowadays existence of a new Internet protocol technology, that is, SCTP, the performance in a MANET Routing Protocol is still unknown. The general objective of this research is to analyze and make the comparative performance of Stream Control Transportation Protocol (SCTP) with Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing protocol (DSR) using Network Simulator(NS-2). Specifically, this research (1) to measure the behavior of SCTP in terms of throughput and smoothness and (2) to determine routing protocol in Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) will have significant effect in SCTP. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) issued a new protocol called SCTP; the interaction of SCTP will be investigated through the examination of traffic flows through a number of network topologies. This research use Network Simulator 2 (NS-2), type of the traffic is CBR and packet size is 1000. This performance analysis is over MANET Routing Protocol that enables to analyst the several performance metrics such as Throughput and Smoothness. This topology consists of 16 nodes placed in a 1500m x 1500m rectangle because the researcher uses static topology, consisting of a 4x4 metric with SCTP transport layer and using routing protocol AODV and DSR. The data sent consists of five speeds at 5 m/s, 10 m/s, 15 m/s, 20 m/s, 25 m/s, and then these speeds are used in AODV and DSR simulation. Throughput of SCTP over AODV is highest than DSR and the smoothness of SCTP over DSR is highest than AODV depends on five types of speed. This research it was found that MANET did not have a great impact on the throughput of SCTP. In other words, MANET only amounted to 0-2% impact on the throughput of SCTP. Furthermore, the speed of node movement does not significantly affect the smoothness.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Lubis, Fahrurrozi
author_facet	Lubis, Fahrurrozi
author_sort	Lubis, Fahrurrozi
title	Throughput, Smoothness Analysis of SCTP Over AODV and DSR MANET Routing Protocols
title_short	Throughput, Smoothness Analysis of SCTP Over AODV and DSR MANET Routing Protocols
title_full	Throughput, Smoothness Analysis of SCTP Over AODV and DSR MANET Routing Protocols
title_fullStr	Throughput, Smoothness Analysis of SCTP Over AODV and DSR MANET Routing Protocols
title_full_unstemmed	Throughput, Smoothness Analysis of SCTP Over AODV and DSR MANET Routing Protocols
title_sort	throughput, smoothness analysis of sctp over aodv and dsr manet routing protocols
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate	2011
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/2839/1/Fahrurrozi_Lubis.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/2839/2/1.Fahrurrozi_Lubis.pdf
_version_	1747827441715380224
spelling	my-uum-etd.28392016-04-27T04:34:05Z Throughput, Smoothness Analysis of SCTP Over AODV and DSR MANET Routing Protocols 2011-06 Lubis, Fahrurrozi Azzali, Fazli Mohd Zaini, Khuzairi College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences TK5101-6720 Telecommunication Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is a wireless network of mobile-mobile node that has no fixed routers. In MANET, mobile nodes can communicate via the wireless interface while nodes are moving freely without using the network infrastructure. Each node in addition to functioning as a host, also serves as a router that can receive and forward packets to next the node. Nowadays existence of a new Internet protocol technology, that is, SCTP, the performance in a MANET Routing Protocol is still unknown. The general objective of this research is to analyze and make the comparative performance of Stream Control Transportation Protocol (SCTP) with Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing protocol (DSR) using Network Simulator(NS-2). Specifically, this research (1) to measure the behavior of SCTP in terms of throughput and smoothness and (2) to determine routing protocol in Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) will have significant effect in SCTP. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) issued a new protocol called SCTP; the interaction of SCTP will be investigated through the examination of traffic flows through a number of network topologies. This research use Network Simulator 2 (NS-2), type of the traffic is CBR and packet size is 1000. This performance analysis is over MANET Routing Protocol that enables to analyst the several performance metrics such as Throughput and Smoothness. This topology consists of 16 nodes placed in a 1500m x 1500m rectangle because the researcher uses static topology, consisting of a 4x4 metric with SCTP transport layer and using routing protocol AODV and DSR. The data sent consists of five speeds at 5 m/s, 10 m/s, 15 m/s, 20 m/s, 25 m/s, and then these speeds are used in AODV and DSR simulation. Throughput of SCTP over AODV is highest than DSR and the smoothness of SCTP over DSR is highest than AODV depends on five types of speed. This research it was found that MANET did not have a great impact on the throughput of SCTP. In other words, MANET only amounted to 0-2% impact on the throughput of SCTP. Furthermore, the speed of node movement does not significantly affect the smoothness. 2011-06 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/2839/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/2839/1/Fahrurrozi_Lubis.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/2839/2/1.Fahrurrozi_Lubis.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia [1] Asodi, S., Ganesh, S.V., Seshadri, E., Singh, P.K., “Evaluation of transport layer protocols for voice transmission in various network scenarios”, Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies, 2009. ICADIWT '09. Second International Conference on the, pp. 238, 2009 [2] Tomar, G.S. & Chaurasia, B.K., “Modified Stream Control Transmission Protocol over Broadband High Latency Networks”, Modeling & Simulation, 2008. AICMS 08. Second Asia International Conference on, pp. 174-179, 2008 [3] Ahmed, I., Yasuo, O., Masanori, K., “Improving performance of SCTP over broadband high latency networks”, Local Computer Networks, 2003. LCN '03. Proceedings. 28th Annual IEEE International Conference on, pp. 644-645, 2003 [4] Pascal Lorenz, Petre Dini. . Networking-ICN 2005. 4th International Conference on Networking, Reunion Island, France, Proceedings, 2005 [5] V. Jayesh, Rane , N. Nitin Kumbhar , S. Kedar Sovani – “Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) on FreeBSD”, India-Pune: Pune Institute of Computer Technology-Affiliated to University of Pune, 2002.p.4. [6] Mcclellan, A. Stanley, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P, internet: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2003/0235151.html, 12/25/2003 [18/03/2010]. 61 [7] Fang, L. Yie,” A Novel Network Mobility Scheme Using SIP and SCTP for Multimedia Applications”, International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering (mue 2008), 2008 . pp.564-569 [8] Jan, F., Mathieu, B., Meddour, D.-E., “A monitoring tool for Wireless Multihop Mesh Networks”, Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2008. NOMS 2008. IEEE, 2008. pp. 587 [9] L. Chi and Z. Hao, “A Simulation and Research of Routing Protocol for Ad hoc Mobile Networks“, International Conference on Information Acquisition, 2006, pp. 16 – 21 [10] Eshak, N., Baba, M.D., “Improving TCP performance in mobile ad hoc networks”, Communications, 2003. APCC 2003. The 9th Asia-Pacific Conference on, 2003, pp 580 [11] Chu.H, etall., “Counteract SYN flooding using second chance packet filtering”, ICUIMC '09 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, 2009, pp. 216-220 [12] Allman, M., and Falk, A. “On the Effective Evaluation of TCP”. ACM Computer Communication Review, 1999, pp 59 – 70 [13] H. ELAARAG, “Improving TCP Performance over Mobile Networks”, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2002, p. 357–374. [14] J. Postel. “Transmission control protocol”. IETF RFC 793 Standard, 1981. 62 [15] Sangheon, P., Sungyong, A., Yanghee. C., Seungmo. C., “Wireless TCP model for short-lived flows”, Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Spring. The 57th IEEE Semiannual, 2003, pp. 1725 [16] K. Thompson, G. J. Miller, and R. Wilder. “Wide-area internet patterns and characteristics”. IEEE Network, 11(6):10_23, November/December 1999 [17] Jingyi, H., Chan, S., “TCP and UDP performance for Internet over optical packet-switched networks ”, Communications, 2003. ICC '03. IEEE International Conference on, 2003, pp. 1350-1354 [18] O. Riva, Analysis of Internet Transport Service Performance with Active Queue Management in a QoS-enabled network, A PhD Thesis, University of Helsinki, 2003. [19] Kurose, J., and Ross, K. (2005). Networking: A Top-Down Approach Featuring the Internet (3 Ed.). [20] V. Ramachandran and S. Nandi, “Detecting ARP spoofing: An Active Technique,” 2010. Lecturer Note in Computer Science 2803. [Online]. Pp. 239- 250 Available at http:www.springlink.com/index/1421371736251342.pdf [21] J. Postel, "RFC768 - User Datagram Protocol," USC/Information Sciences Institute, 28 August 1980.] [22] B. A. Forouzan TCP/IP: Protocol suite, 1st Edition. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, 2000 63 [23] G. Fairhurst, “The User Datagram Protocol (UDP),” November 2008. [Online]. Available at http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry/eg3567/inetpages/ udp.html [24] C. Hedrik, “Routing Information Protocol,” RFC:1058, Network Working Group, Rutgers University, June 1988 [25] E. Bibbs, B. Matt and X. Tang, “Comparison of SNMP version 1, 2 and 3,” ICTN 4600-001, April 2006. [Online]. Available at http:// www.infosecwrittes. com/text_resources/pdf/SNMP_BMatt.pdf [26] H. Richards, “Understanding DHCP,” Tech Support Alert, September 1997 [Online]. Available at http://www.techsupportalert.com/pdf/c04102.pdf [27] M. Manzor Morshed and M. Habibur Rahman , “Performance Evaluation of DSDV and AODV Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks”, New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (NISS), 2010 4th International Conference on, 2010, pp 399 – 403. [28] A. Dainotti, S. Loreto, A. Pescape and G. Ventre, “Sctp performance evaluation over heterogeneous networks,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience - Performance Analysis and Enhancements of Wireless Networks, 2007, pp 392-395. [29] S. Lundstrom and D. Hassellof, “SCTP-Performance and Security,” Course: 2G1305 Interneworking, May 2005. [Online]. Available at http://www.ict.kth.se/courses/IK1550/Sample-pappers/SCTP_Lundstrom_- Hassellof_2g1305.pdf 64 [30] R.Rajamani, S. Kumar, and N. Gupta, “Sctp versus TCP: Comparing the performance of Transport Protocols for web traffic”, University of Wisconsin Madison, 2002. [31]P.Amer,R.Stewart, Copyright C Internet Society 2005, intenet: http://www.isoc.org/briefings/017/ [Nov 20.2010] [32] P. Natarajan, F. baker, P. D. Amer and J. T. Leighton, “SCTP: What, Why, and How,” Internet Computing, IEEE, vol. 13no. 5, pp.81-85, Sept.-Oct. 2009. [33] D. Nagamali and J. Kwang Lee, “Performance of SCTP over high speed Wide Area,” Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, 2004. [34] Armando L. Caro, JR. , Janardhan R. Iyengar, Paul D. Amer, Gerard J. Heinz, Randall R. Steward, “Using SCTP multihoming for fault tolerance and load balancing”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, v.32 n.3, p.23. [35] P. Stalvig. “Introduction to the Stream Control Transmission (SCTP): The next generation of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)”, F5 Networks Inc, Oct 2007. (Online). Available at http://www. f5.com/pdf/white-papers/sctpintroduction- wp.pdf [36] Ladha, S., Amer, P.D., “Improving file transfers using SCTP multistreaming”, Performance, Computing, and Communications, 2004 IEEE International Conference on, 2004, pp. 513 65 [37] Nurul Islam, Md., Kara, A, “Throughput Analysis of SCTP over a Multihomed Association”, Computer and Information Technology, 2006. CIT '06. The Sixth IEEE International Conference on, 2006, pp. 110 [38] R. Stewart et al. (2000). “Stream Control Transmission Protocol”. IETF RFC 2960 (standards track). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2960.txt. [39] Jizeng Wang; Shengcai Zhang; Fan Chen; “Modeling and Verification of SCTP Association Management Based on Colored Petri Nets ”, Computing, Communication, Control, and Management, 2008. CCCM '08. ISECS International Colloquium on, 2008, pp. 379-383 [40] JongChoul Yim; Byungsun Lee, “An auto-recovery method of SCTP association between media gateway controller and signaling gateway”, Advanced Communication Technology, 2004. The 6th International Conference on , 2004, pp. 838-841. [41] Larsson, T. and Hedman, N., Routing Protocol In Wireless Ad-hoc Networks A Simulation Study, Master Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Stockholm, 1998. [42] Cisco., Internetworking Technology Handbook, 4th Edition, Cisco systems. Inc., Cisco Press, 2004. [43] S. Khelifa and Z. Mekkakia, “An Energy Multi-path AODV Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Mobile Networks ,“ I/V Communications and Mobile Network (ISVC), 2010 5th International Symposium on , 2010, pp 1-4. 66 [44] C Perkins, E. Belding-Royer and S. Das., Ad-hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. RFC 3561, IETF Network Working Group, July, 2003 [45] N. Surayati, “Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV & DSR” International Journal of Computer Science and Network 262 Security, VOL.9 No.7, 2009 [46] D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz, ―Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks, Mobile Computing, Chapter 5, pp. 153-181, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, [47] David B. Johnson , David A. Maltz, and Yih -Chun Hu, The Dynamic source routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks (DSR),internet-Draft, draft-ietfmanets dsr- 08.txt,February24 2003. [48] Liu Yujun; Han Lincheng, “The research on an AODV-BRL to increase reliability and reduce routing overhead in MANET”, Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM), 2010 International Conference on, 2010, pp. 214- 217. [49] Somnuk, H., Lerwatechakul, M, “Multi-hop AODV-2T”, Intelligent Ubiquitous Computing and Education, 2009 International Symposium on, 2009, pp. 214-217. [50] Aissani, M., Fenouche, M., Sadour, H., Mellouk, A., “Ant-DSR: Cache Maintenance Based Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks”, Telecommunications, 2007. AICT 2007. The Third Advanced International Conference on , 2007, pp. 35 67 [51] Deru, M., & Torcellini, P. Performance Metrics Research-Project – Final Report. Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2005). [52] Bradner, S., & McQuaid, J. (1999). Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices. RFC 2544 , 4 [53] J.F Kurose and K.W.Ross, Computer Networking: A top Down Approach, 5 ed. Boston, MA: Person Addison-Wesley, 2009 [54] [Demichelis, C., & Chimento, P. IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM). RFC 3393 , 2002. Pp. 6-13. [55] Nahm, K., Helmy, A., dan Jay Kuo, C.,” TCP over Multihop 802.11 Networks: Issues and Performance Enhancement”, Proceeding of ACM MobiHoc ’05, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA, 2005, pp. 277-287. [56] Ashwini Kumar, Lillykutty Jacob, AL Ananda, “SCTP vs TCP : Performance Comparison in MANETs”, Local Computer Networks, 2004. 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on , 2004, pp. 431-432. [57] P. Navaratnam, N. Akhtar, R. Tafazolli, “On the performance of DCCP in wireless mesh networks”, Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Mobility management and wireless access, 2006, pp. 144-147 [58] Joe, I., YAN, S, “SCTP Throughput Improvement with Best Load Sharing based on Multihoming”, Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC, 2009, pp. 1-5. 68 [59] Kuhl, M., Kistner, J., Costantini, K., Sudit, M, “Cyber attack modeling and simulation for network security analysis. 39th conference on Winter simulation by ACM”, 2007, pp. 1-9 [60] E. Altman and T. Jimenez, “NS Simulator for Beginners”, vol.2009, 2003, pp. 1-146. [61] Hassan, M., Fahmy, S., Wu, J., Aziz, A.,”, chapter 4 page: – by Pearson Education, Inc, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River,, NJ07458. In M. a. Hassan, High Performance TCP/IP Networking, 2004, pp. 76-79.

Throughput, Smoothness Analysis of SCTP Over AODV and DSR MANET Routing Protocols

Similar Items