Learner Satisfaction Towards E-Learning Among Final Year Full Time And Part Time Students In Universiti Utara Malaysia

Learner Satisfaction Towards E-Learning Among Final Year Full Time And Part Time Students In Universiti Utara Malaysia

The purpose of this study was to explore the learner's satisfaction toward e-learning. Moreover, this study also tried to determine whether the dimensions of learner's satisfaction moderate the relationship with knowledge gained. Data were collected from 111 final years students, part ti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ainimazita, Mansor
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2008
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/284/1/Ainimazita_bt_Mansor.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/284/2/Ainimazita_bt_Mansor.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.284
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Ainimazita, Mansor
Learner Satisfaction Towards E-Learning Among Final Year Full Time And Part Time Students In Universiti Utara Malaysia
description The purpose of this study was to explore the learner's satisfaction toward e-learning. Moreover, this study also tried to determine whether the dimensions of learner's satisfaction moderate the relationship with knowledge gained. Data were collected from 111 final years students, part time and full time by using simple random sampling. A questionnaire consisting of 30 questions was administered to the respondents. The study showed that learner's satisfaction dimensions were positively related with e-learning. The study also found out that the dimensions learner's satisfaction influenced toward e-learning with 80.1 percent.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Ainimazita, Mansor
author_facet Ainimazita, Mansor
author_sort Ainimazita, Mansor
title Learner Satisfaction Towards E-Learning Among Final Year Full Time And Part Time Students In Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_short Learner Satisfaction Towards E-Learning Among Final Year Full Time And Part Time Students In Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_full Learner Satisfaction Towards E-Learning Among Final Year Full Time And Part Time Students In Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_fullStr Learner Satisfaction Towards E-Learning Among Final Year Full Time And Part Time Students In Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Learner Satisfaction Towards E-Learning Among Final Year Full Time And Part Time Students In Universiti Utara Malaysia
title_sort learner satisfaction towards e-learning among final year full time and part time students in universiti utara malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Business (COB)
publishDate 2008
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/284/1/Ainimazita_bt_Mansor.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/284/2/Ainimazita_bt_Mansor.pdf
_version_ 1776103603257212928
spelling my-uum-etd.2842023-06-26T03:20:32Z Learner Satisfaction Towards E-Learning Among Final Year Full Time And Part Time Students In Universiti Utara Malaysia 2008-05-15 Ainimazita, Mansor College of Business (COB) Graduate School LB Theory and practice of education The purpose of this study was to explore the learner's satisfaction toward e-learning. Moreover, this study also tried to determine whether the dimensions of learner's satisfaction moderate the relationship with knowledge gained. Data were collected from 111 final years students, part time and full time by using simple random sampling. A questionnaire consisting of 30 questions was administered to the respondents. The study showed that learner's satisfaction dimensions were positively related with e-learning. The study also found out that the dimensions learner's satisfaction influenced toward e-learning with 80.1 percent. 2008-05 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/284/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/284/1/Ainimazita_bt_Mansor.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/284/2/Ainimazita_bt_Mansor.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abrami, P. C., d'Appollonia, S., & Cohen, P. A. (1990). Validity of student ratings of instruction: What we knew and what we do not. Journal of Educational Psychology (82), 219-231. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Alavi, M. (1994, June). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 159-174. Barr, R. B., and Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning - a new paradigm for undergraduate education. In: Bess, J. (Eds.), Foundations of American higher education: ASHE reader series (pp. 323-336). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press. Bates, A. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance learning. New York: Routledge. Chau, H., and Hocevar, D. (1995, Apr.). The effects of number of measured variables on goodness-of-fit in confirmatory factor analysis. ERIC Document No. ED 387516, 1-26. Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., Sun, S. Y., Lin, T. C., and Sun, P. C. (2005). Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions. Computers and Education 45(4), 399- 416. Coffey, M. and Gibbs, G (2001). Research Note: The evaluation of the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education (26:1), 89-93. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science (35), 982- 1003. Delone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information System Research (3:l), 60-95. Doll, W. J. and Torkzadeh, G (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly (12:2), 259-274. Doll, W. J., Xia, W. and Torkzadeh, Q (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the enduser computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly ( 18:4), 453-461. Elissavet, C;. and Economides, A. A. (2003). An evaluation instrument for hypermedia courseware. Educational Technology and Society (6:2), 31-44. El-Tigi, M., and Branch, R. B. ( 1997). Designing for interaction, learner control, and feedback during web-based learning. Educational Technology (37:3), 23-29. Fornell, C. R., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research (1 8), 39-50. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, altitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., and Smaldino, S. E. (1996). Instructional media and technologies for learning (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Huynh, M. Q., Umesh, U. N., and Valacich, J. S. (2003). & learning as an emerging entrepreneurial enterprise in universities and firms. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (l2), 48-68. Joreskog, K. G, and Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL8: Structural equation modeling with the SlMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Lee, Y. K. (2007). Understanding e-learning consumers: The moderating effects of gender and learner diversity. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge (11:1), 223-230. Lee, S., and Lee, Y. H. K. (1991). Effects of learner-control versus program-control strategies on computer-aided learning of chemistry problems: For acquisition or review?. Journal of Educational Psychology (83:4), 491-498. Lee, S., and Wong, S. C. (1989). Adaptive program vs. learner control strategy on computer-aided learning of gravimetric stoichiometry problems. Journal of Research on Computing in Education (21:4), 367-379. Lin B., and Hsieh, C. (2001 ). Web-based teaching and learner control: A research review. Computers and Education (37), 377-386. Liu S. C. (2002). A comparison of faculty and student perceptions of teaching quality at two selected institutions in China and Taiwan. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of South Dakota. Marsh H. W. (1982). SEEQ: a reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology (52), 77-95. Marsh H. W. (1992). A longitudinal perspective of students' evaluations of University Teaching: Ratings of the same teachers over a 13-year period," ERIC Document No. ED353282, Apr., 1-1 8. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research (2), 173-191. McDougall, G H. G, and Levesque, T. (2000). Customer satisfaction with services: Putting perceived value into the equation. The Journal of Services Marketing (14:5), 392-410. McHaney R., Hightower, R. and Pearson, J. (2002). A validation of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument in Taiwan. Information and Management (39), 503-511. Merrill, M. D. (1994). Instructional Design Theory. Educational Technology Publications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Milheim, M. D., and Martin, B. L. ( 1991 ). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction (18:3), 99-105. Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd Cd.). New York,NY: McGraw-Hill. Oliver, R., and Oman, A. (1999). Using online technologies to support problem-based learning: Learners response and perceptions. Australian Journal of Educational Technology ( 15:1), 58-79. Park, 0. ( 1991). Hypermedia: Functional features and research issues. Educational Technology (31:8), 24-31. Piccoli, G, Ahmad, R., and Ives, B. (2001). Web-based learning environments: A rescarch framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly (25:4), 401-426. Pirrong, G, and Lathen, W. (1990). The use of interactive television in business education. Educational Technology, May, 49-54. Pituch K. A, and Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers and Education (47:2), 222-244. Shyu, H. Y, and Brown, S. W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects in procedural learning. International Journal of Instructional Media (19:2), 85-95. Spooner F., Jordan, L., Algozzine, B., and Spooner, M. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and on-campus classes. The Journal of Educational Research (92:3), 132-140. Symonds, W. (2003, June 23). University of Phoenix online: Swift rise. Businessweek Online, www.businessweek.com. Tiene, D., and Ingram, A. (2001 ). Exploring current issues in educational technology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Ting, K. F. (2000). A multilevel perspective on student ratings of instruction: Lessons froni the Chinese experience. Research in Higher Education (41 :5), 637-661. Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information and Management (41), 75-86. Webster, .I. and Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distLince learning. Academy of Management Review (40:6), 1282- 1309. Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and nstructional technologies. In: Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, D. H. Jonassen (ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing (52), 2-22.

Similar Items