Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Adoption

Today, the advancement of mobile technologies has provided an opportunity for banking institution in introducing new financial innovations. One of the emerging financial innovations introduced by banking institution is mobile banking. This study adopts a technology acceptance model (TAM) to investig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nur Fariza, Zainol
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/2909/1/Nur_Fariza_Zainol.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/2909/2/1.Nur_Fariza_Zainol.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.2909
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Shafie, Shahril
topic HG Finance
T58.5-58.64 Information technology
spellingShingle HG Finance
T58.5-58.64 Information technology
Nur Fariza, Zainol
Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Adoption
description Today, the advancement of mobile technologies has provided an opportunity for banking institution in introducing new financial innovations. One of the emerging financial innovations introduced by banking institution is mobile banking. This study adopts a technology acceptance model (TAM) to investigate factors that determine an individual’s intention to use mobile banking by bank customers among UUM staff. The additional of TAM includes credibility, self-efficacy, compatibility and normative pressure. A results support construct of TAM and construct of other theories in predicting bank customers’ behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Understanding what influences users to accept mobile banking can be beneficial to banks, system developers and marketing practitioners in developing and marketing mobile banking services that will be acceptable by the target market.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nur Fariza, Zainol
author_facet Nur Fariza, Zainol
author_sort Nur Fariza, Zainol
title Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Adoption
title_short Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Adoption
title_full Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Adoption
title_fullStr Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Adoption
title_full_unstemmed Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Adoption
title_sort factors influencing mobile banking adoption
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/2909/1/Nur_Fariza_Zainol.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/2909/2/1.Nur_Fariza_Zainol.pdf
_version_ 1747827458511470592
spelling my-uum-etd.29092016-04-19T04:19:55Z Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Adoption 2011 Nur Fariza, Zainol Shafie, Shahril Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HG Finance T58.5-58.64 Information technology Today, the advancement of mobile technologies has provided an opportunity for banking institution in introducing new financial innovations. One of the emerging financial innovations introduced by banking institution is mobile banking. This study adopts a technology acceptance model (TAM) to investigate factors that determine an individual’s intention to use mobile banking by bank customers among UUM staff. The additional of TAM includes credibility, self-efficacy, compatibility and normative pressure. A results support construct of TAM and construct of other theories in predicting bank customers’ behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Understanding what influences users to accept mobile banking can be beneficial to banks, system developers and marketing practitioners in developing and marketing mobile banking services that will be acceptable by the target market. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/2909/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/2909/1/Nur_Fariza_Zainol.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/2909/2/1.Nur_Fariza_Zainol.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247. Al-Ashban, A.A., Burney, M.A., 2001. Customer adoption of tele-banking technology: the case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Bank Marketing 19 (5), 191-200. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-301. Amin, H., Hamid, M.R.A., Lada, S., & Anis, Z. (2008). The adoption of mobile banking in Malaysia: The case of Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad (BIMB). International Journal of Business and Society, 9, 43-53. Amin, H., Muhammad, M.Z., Hamid, M.R.A., & Lada, S. (2006). Explaining intention to use SMS banking among Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad (BIMB) customers: Is gender a good indicator? Proceeding of IBBC, 2, 92-101. Ba, S., & Pavlou, P.A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243-268. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. Baraghani, S., N. (2007) Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking. Master Thesis. Tarbiat Modares University of Engineering Department of Industrial Engineering. Chang, P-C (2007), Understanding consumers' behaviour when using a mobile phone as a converged device. Paper presented to 18th Australasian Conference on Information System, Tooboomba, Brisbane. Cheong, J.H., & Park, M.C. (2005). Mobile internet acceptance in Korea. Internet Research, 15(2), 125-140. Chiu, Y.B., Lin, C.P., & Tang, L.L. (2005). Gender differs: Assessing a model of online purchase intentions in e-tail service. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(5), 416-435. Compeau, D.R., & Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. Frambach, R.T. (1993). "An integrated model of organizational adoption and diffusion of innovations." Europe Journal Marketing. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. Davis, F.D. Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Goldsmith, R. E., & Bridges, E. (2000). E-tailing vs. retailing: using attitudes to predict online buying behaviour. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(3), 245-253. Guriting, P., & Ndubisi, N.O. (2006). Borneo online banking: Evaluating customer perceptions and behavioural intention. Management Research News, 29(1/2), 6-15. Jayawardhena, C., & Foley, P. (1998). Overcoming Constraints on Electronic Commerce — Internet Payment Systems. Journal of General Management, 24(2), 19-35. Kohli, K. (2004). SMS in banking. Paladion Knowledge Series, Issue January 2004. [On-line]. Available: http://www.paladion.net/papers/KSeries Secure SMS Banking.pdf Lin, H. H. (2010), An Empirical Investigation of Mobile Banking Adoption: The Effect of Innovation Attributes and Knowledge-Based Trust. International Journal of Information Management. Howcroft, B., Hamilton, R., & Hewer, P. (2002). Consumer attitude and the usage and adoption of home-based banking in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(3), 111- 121 Karjaluoto, H., Mattila, M., & Pento, T. (2002). Factors underlying attitude formation towards online banking in Finland. International Journal of Banking Marketing, 20 (6), 261-272. Kleijnen, M., Wetzels, M., & Ruyter, K. (2004). Consumer acceptance of wireless finance. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8(3), 206-217. Laukkanen, T. (2010). What determines mobile banking non-adoption? University of Eastern Finland, Pedro Cruz, ISG- Business School. Laukkanen, T. & Pasanen, M. (2005) Characterising The Users of Mobile banking: A Distint Group of Online Customers? ANZMAC Conference: Electronic Marketing Lee, K. S. (2007). Factors Influencing the Adoption Behavior of Mobile Banking: A South Korean perspective. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, August 2007, vol. 12, no.2 Lockett, A., Littler, D., 1997. The adoption of direct banking services. Journal of Marketing Management 13 (8), 791-811. Luarn, P., & Lin, H.H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21, 873-891. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86–112. Mattila, M. (2003). Factors affecting the adoption of mobile banking services. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 8 (1). [On-line]. Available at http: http://www.arraydev.com/commerce/JIBC/0306-04.htm Mattila, M., Karjaluoto, H., & Pento, T. (2003). Internet banking adoption among mature customers: early majority or laggards?. Journal of Services Marketing, vol . 17 no. 5, pp . 514 – 528. Mazhar, N. (2006, May 21). Technology Acceptance Model. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from http://ezinearticles.com/?Technology-Acceptance-Model&id=202354 Ndubisi, N. O., Sinti, Q., & Chew, T. M. (2004). Evaluating Internet banking adoption in Malaysia using the decomposed theory of planned behaviour. International Logistics Congress Proceeding, Izmir, December 2-3, 989-1004. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P.E., & Thorbjornsen, H. (2005). Explaining intention to use mobile chat services: Moderating effects of gender. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(5), 247-256. O’Reilly, K., Goode, S., & Hart, D. (2010). Exploring Mobile Commerce Intention: Evidence from Australia. The Australian National University, Australia. Petersen, R.A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 September, 381-391. Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14 (3), 224- 235. Polatoglu, V.N., & Ekin, S. (2001). An empirical investigation of the Turkish consumers’ acceptance of Internet banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(4), 156-165. Qureshi, T. M. (2008). Customer Acceptance of Online Banking in Developing Economies. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, vol. 13, no.1. Ramayah, T., Dahlan, N., Mohamad, O., & Ling, K.P. (2002). The impact of external variables on intention to use internet banking: A preliminary analysis. Proceedings of the MMU International Symposium on Information and Communications Technologies M²USIC’02 ICT: A Catalyst for K- Economy, October 2-3. Ramayah, T., Jantan, M., Noor M.N.M., & Ling, K.P. (2003). Receptiveness internet banking by Malaysian consumers. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 8(2), 1-29. Ratchford, B. T., Talukdar, D., & Lee, M. S. (2001). A model of consumer choice of the internet as an information source. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 7-22. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th Ed.). New York: Free Press. Sathye, M. (1999). Adoption of internet banking by Australian consumers: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(7), 324-334. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. </font> Shadan, A. (2008). Perbankan SMS; Apakah perkhidmatan yang ditawarkan BSN kepada para pelanggannya?. Kosmo, 11 Nov 2008. Shon, T. H., & Swatman, P. M. C. (1998). Identifying effectiveness criteria for Internet payment systems. Internet Research, 8(3), 202-218. Suoranta, M. (2003). Adoption of Mobile Banking In Finland. Studies In Business and Management 28, Doctoral Thesis, Jyva skyla. Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I. & Mohezar, S (2007). An Overview of Mobile Banking Adoption Among the Urban Community. Int. J. Mobile Communications, Vol. 5, No. 2. Tornatzky, L. G, & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: a Meta analysis of findings. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-45. Vellido, A., Lisboa, P. J. G., & Meeham, K. (2000). Quantitative characterization and prediction of on-line purchasing behaviour: a latent variable approach. Internet Journal of Electronic Commerce, (4), 83-104. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342-365. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M.G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions: Gender, social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139. Wang, Y.S., Wang, Y.M., Lin, H.H., & Tang, T.I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501-519. Yu, S. (2009). Factors influencing The Use of Mobile Banking: The Case of SMS-Based Mobile Banking. Auckland University of Technology.