Usability Testing for Learnability and Efficiency on UUM Digital Library System

The interest in using the Website in the classroom as part of the learning environment increase dramatically. Website provides an efficient and fast access for users to get information and senrice. Digital library is a website that serving worldwide users and become widely accepted. Although the dig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Asna Khairun, Abdul Rahman
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/2932/1/Asna_Khairun_Abdul_Rahman.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/2932/2/Asna_Khairun_Abdul_Rahman.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.2932
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Abdullah, Mohd Syazwan
topic Z665 Library Science
Information Science
T58.5-58.64 Information technology
spellingShingle Z665 Library Science
Information Science
T58.5-58.64 Information technology
Asna Khairun, Abdul Rahman
Usability Testing for Learnability and Efficiency on UUM Digital Library System
description The interest in using the Website in the classroom as part of the learning environment increase dramatically. Website provides an efficient and fast access for users to get information and senrice. Digital library is a website that serving worldwide users and become widely accepted. Although the digital library system increasingly used, there are a number of users complaining about usability of digital library. The usability test of digital library system is one of the key features for its success. This project focuses to look into usability of digital library system in University Utara Malaysia (UUM). Learnability and efficiency are usability attributes that has been chosen for this project. Usability testing on qualitative and quantitative data collection had been applied for this project. Tasks on performance measure and questionnaires had been distributed to respondents for quantitative and qualitative data collection. The results from quantitative and qualitative data collection showed that the system is easy to use and to learn.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Asna Khairun, Abdul Rahman
author_facet Asna Khairun, Abdul Rahman
author_sort Asna Khairun, Abdul Rahman
title Usability Testing for Learnability and Efficiency on UUM Digital Library System
title_short Usability Testing for Learnability and Efficiency on UUM Digital Library System
title_full Usability Testing for Learnability and Efficiency on UUM Digital Library System
title_fullStr Usability Testing for Learnability and Efficiency on UUM Digital Library System
title_full_unstemmed Usability Testing for Learnability and Efficiency on UUM Digital Library System
title_sort usability testing for learnability and efficiency on uum digital library system
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate 2012
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/2932/1/Asna_Khairun_Abdul_Rahman.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/2932/2/Asna_Khairun_Abdul_Rahman.pdf
_version_ 1747827464078360576
spelling my-uum-etd.29322022-04-10T06:31:10Z Usability Testing for Learnability and Efficiency on UUM Digital Library System 2012-01 Asna Khairun, Abdul Rahman Abdullah, Mohd Syazwan Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Z665 Library Science. Information Science T58.5-58.64 Information technology The interest in using the Website in the classroom as part of the learning environment increase dramatically. Website provides an efficient and fast access for users to get information and senrice. Digital library is a website that serving worldwide users and become widely accepted. Although the digital library system increasingly used, there are a number of users complaining about usability of digital library. The usability test of digital library system is one of the key features for its success. This project focuses to look into usability of digital library system in University Utara Malaysia (UUM). Learnability and efficiency are usability attributes that has been chosen for this project. Usability testing on qualitative and quantitative data collection had been applied for this project. Tasks on performance measure and questionnaires had been distributed to respondents for quantitative and qualitative data collection. The results from quantitative and qualitative data collection showed that the system is easy to use and to learn. 2012-01 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/2932/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/2932/1/Asna_Khairun_Abdul_Rahman.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/2932/2/Asna_Khairun_Abdul_Rahman.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Arms & William Y. (2000). Digital Libraries. United States: The MIT Press. Barnum, C. (2002). Usability Testing and Research. New York: Longman. Bartek, V. & Cheatham, D (2003). ''Experience Remote Usability Testing, Part 2: Examine the Benejits and downside of Remote Usability Testing". Retrieved December 2011, from http://www.mendeley.com~~eat~h~~perience-remote-usability-testing-part- 2examine-benefits-downsideremote-~~abili~testing/ Bates, M. J., Wilde, D. N. & Siemed (1995). S. Research Practices of Humanities Scholars In an Online Environment. The Getty Mine Searching Project Report No. 3. Library and Information Science Research 17 (1995), pp. 540. Battleson et al. (2001). Usability testing of an academic library Web site: A case shrdy, The Journal of Academic Librarimrsh@, Vol. 27(3), pp. 188- 198. Ben D. Harper & Kent L. Norman (1 993). Improving User Satisfaction: The Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction Version 5.5. Retrieved October, 201 1, hm http:/flap.umd.edu/quis/publication~1993.pdf Blandford, A. E., Stelmaszewska & H. & Bryan-Kinas (2001). N. Use of multiple digital libraries: a case study. In In. JCD. ACM Press (2001). pp. 179-1 88. B o r v (2000). C. L. Fmm Gutenberg to the global information inhtructure: Access to ijonnation in the networked World Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Branaghan, R. (1 999). Testing, One-Twwmree: Fundamentals of Usability Testing, Retrieved December, 20 1 1, hmhttp://www.brana~cdh-utestinghtm. Buchanan, S., Salako, A. (2009). Evaluating the usability and uselfrlness ofa digital library. Library Review, 58(9), pp. 638-65 1 Carol Smith (2006). Multiple Cultures, Multiple Intelligences: Applying Cognitive Theoy to Usability ofDigita1 Libraries. Libri, 2006, vol. 56, pp. 227-238. Chin, J. P., Diehl, VA, & Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proceedings ofthe SIGCHI confernce on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 21 3-21 8. Conyer, M. (1995). User and usability testing-how it should be undertaken? Australian Journal ofE&cational Technology, 1 1 (2), pp. 38-5 1. Retrieved September, 20 1 1, hm http~/www.ascilite.org.aU/ajetlajet.htm Corgan, T., & Waiters, N. J. (1 994). Usability testing: what are we learning? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Davis. F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quaterly, 1133)- pp. 3 19-340. Retrieved September, 20 1 1, h m http://www.cba.hawaii.Wchi~mar~704/Davis-TAM1989.pdf Deddens Marcia (2002). Overview of integrated library systems. Retrieved December 20 1 1, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/Ii~~EC0210. p df Dumas Joseph S.& Redish Janice (1999). A practical Guide to Usability Testing. UK, US: Intellect Ltd Ebling, M. R & John, B.E. (2000). On the contributions of different empirical data in usability testing. Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, method, and techniques. Retrieved October, 20 1 1, from http://portal.acrn.org/ Faulher, C (1 998). i%e Essence of Human-Computer Interaction. United States of America: Prentice Hall. Garrett, J. R. & Lyons, P.A. (1993). Toward an electronic copyright management system. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 44(8), pp. 468-73. Gore, P. & Hirsh, S.G. (2003), "Plmningyour way to a more usable web site''. Online, Vol. 27, pp. 20-7. Graneheim U. H. & Lundman B. (2003). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, pmcedum and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Department of Nursing, Umea University, Umea 90 187, Sweden 24,105- 1 12. Retrieved December, 20 1 1, fiom http://www.emeraldinsi&t.com.eserv.u~ Hootman & Robert C. (1992). Manual on descriptive analysis testing for sensory evaluation. Baltimore: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication-Data. IS0 924 1 - 1 1, (1 998), Ergonomics requirements for ofice work with visual display terminals (VDTs): Part I I-Guidance on usability. Retrieved October, 20 1 1, from http://www.it.uu.se/edu/co~omepage/acsdlvt09/ISOI p9a2r4t 11 . pdf 53 Krippendorff Klaus (2004). Content Analysis: An introduction to its methodology. United States: Sage Publications Inc. Larry L. Constantine & Lucy A. D. Lockwood (1 999). Sofiarefor Use. Addison Wesley Reading MA. Lazar, Feng & Hochheiser (2009). Research fithod in Human Computer Interaction. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Lesk Michael (1 997). Practical Digital Libraries: Books, Bytes & Bucb. United States of America: Morgan h u f m aP~ub lishers, Inc. Liu Fang (2008). Usability Evaluations on Websites. School of Art &Design, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, pp. 14 1. Lucy A. Tedd & Andrew Large (2005). Digital Libraries: Principles and Practice in a Global Environment. Germany K. G. Sam Verlag GmbH. Maurer, D. (2004). What is usability? Retrieved September, 201 1, h m www.steptwo.com.au/pa~cCwhatis usability Muller Tristan (201 1). How to choose a fke and open source integrated library system. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives. Vol. 27, pp. 57-78. Retrieved December, 201 1, fiom h u t p : / / w w w . e m e r a l d i n s i ~ ~ c o m . e s e ~ . u ~ Nielsen Jakob (1 993). Usability Engineering. United States: Academic Press. Norlin Elaina & Winters CM (2002). Usability Testing for Library Web Sites. Chicago and London: American Library Association. Oppenheim, Charles & Smithson, David. (1999). What is the hybrid Libra* Journal of Information Science. Vol. 25, pp. 97-1 12. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction Design: Beyond humancomputer interaction. Publishing House of Electronics IndtLFtry, translated by Xiaohui Liu, Jing Zhang, pp. 224-301. Prescott, J., & CrichtonM. (1999). Usability testing a quick, cheap and effective method. heedings of the 276h annual ACM SIGUCCS cor&erence on User services: Mile high expectations. Retrieved September, 201 1, fiom http://delivery.acm.orgl Rubin Je&y & Chisnell Dana (2008). Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan. Design, and Coruhrct Eflective Tests. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Senapathi, M. (2005). A Framework for the Evaluation of CASE Tool Learnability in Educational Environments. Journal of Information Technology Education. Vol. 4, pp. 61-84. Shackel & Simon J. Richardson (1984). Human Factors for informatics Usability. &tian: Cambridge University Press. WWWebster Dictionary, (1 999). Meriam - Webster. Retrieved October, 201 1, from http://www.m-w.com.