Economic Growth in ASEAN-4 Countries: A Panel Data Analysis

This research studies the impact of economic variables which are foreign direct investment (FDI), openness and gross fixed capital formation to economic growth which indicates using gross domestic product (GDP). Data is collected from 1981 until 2008 using World Development Indicator CD-ROM. This re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nooraini, Saidin
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/3038/1/Nooraini_Saidin.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.3038
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
advisor Hussin, Fauzi
topic HB Economic Theory
spellingShingle HB Economic Theory
Nooraini, Saidin
Economic Growth in ASEAN-4 Countries: A Panel Data Analysis
description This research studies the impact of economic variables which are foreign direct investment (FDI), openness and gross fixed capital formation to economic growth which indicates using gross domestic product (GDP). Data is collected from 1981 until 2008 using World Development Indicator CD-ROM. This research estimates using panel data estimation. In order to test the significance of the variable, this research uses panel unit root test. Result of panel data unit root test shows that all variables in panel unit root test are significant and stationary at first difference 5 percent level of significant. In addition, the impact of variables to GDP is estimated using three panel estimation models which are called pooled model (pooled), fixed effects model (FEM) and random effects model (REM). Result of three particular models in panel estimation give the stationary at 5 percent level of significant for all variables involved. Variable of openness for pooled and random effects model indicate negative relation with GDP. Meanwhile, other variables in all models show positive relation with GDP. Goodness to fit in this research for all models demonstrate high value which 0.74 (pooled), 0.87 (FEM) and 0.73 (REM). Furthermore, Hausman test is employed to this research in order to choose the best model. Result for this test suggests rejecting null hypothesis because of the value of p is 0.00 (p<.05). On other words, rejecting of null hypothesis may conclude that the FEM will apply. Thus, this research describes that all variables are correlated with each other and also have the positive relationship to GDP. Hence, all variables may lead economic growth boost when they are increase whereas FDI becomes the most efficient variable in order to assist economic growth and followed by openness and gross fixed capital formation. Otherwise, the result in Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) which implies in this study as well test all variables stationary at 5 percent level of significant. These shows only gross fixed capital formation is significant to growth and contributes the positive effect to GDP in each ASEAN-4 countries. However, OLS estimation result for Indonesia shows the other variable has significant to growth which is openness; while it gives the negative affect the GDP. Instead of Indonesia, openness is not significant at other ASEAN-4 countries such as Malaysia, Thailand and Philippines. Besides, other variable is FDI also not significant in the case of all ASEAN-4 countries. It means that, openness does not correlated to growth for Malaysia, Thailand and Philippines countries; while FDI is not correlated to growth for all ASEAN-4 countries in this study.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nooraini, Saidin
author_facet Nooraini, Saidin
author_sort Nooraini, Saidin
title Economic Growth in ASEAN-4 Countries: A Panel Data Analysis
title_short Economic Growth in ASEAN-4 Countries: A Panel Data Analysis
title_full Economic Growth in ASEAN-4 Countries: A Panel Data Analysis
title_fullStr Economic Growth in ASEAN-4 Countries: A Panel Data Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Economic Growth in ASEAN-4 Countries: A Panel Data Analysis
title_sort economic growth in asean-4 countries: a panel data analysis
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2012
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/3038/1/Nooraini_Saidin.pdf
_version_ 1747827485884547072
spelling my-uum-etd.30382022-10-17T04:15:05Z Economic Growth in ASEAN-4 Countries: A Panel Data Analysis 2012-02 Nooraini, Saidin Hussin, Fauzi Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HB Economic Theory This research studies the impact of economic variables which are foreign direct investment (FDI), openness and gross fixed capital formation to economic growth which indicates using gross domestic product (GDP). Data is collected from 1981 until 2008 using World Development Indicator CD-ROM. This research estimates using panel data estimation. In order to test the significance of the variable, this research uses panel unit root test. Result of panel data unit root test shows that all variables in panel unit root test are significant and stationary at first difference 5 percent level of significant. In addition, the impact of variables to GDP is estimated using three panel estimation models which are called pooled model (pooled), fixed effects model (FEM) and random effects model (REM). Result of three particular models in panel estimation give the stationary at 5 percent level of significant for all variables involved. Variable of openness for pooled and random effects model indicate negative relation with GDP. Meanwhile, other variables in all models show positive relation with GDP. Goodness to fit in this research for all models demonstrate high value which 0.74 (pooled), 0.87 (FEM) and 0.73 (REM). Furthermore, Hausman test is employed to this research in order to choose the best model. Result for this test suggests rejecting null hypothesis because of the value of p is 0.00 (p<.05). On other words, rejecting of null hypothesis may conclude that the FEM will apply. Thus, this research describes that all variables are correlated with each other and also have the positive relationship to GDP. Hence, all variables may lead economic growth boost when they are increase whereas FDI becomes the most efficient variable in order to assist economic growth and followed by openness and gross fixed capital formation. Otherwise, the result in Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) which implies in this study as well test all variables stationary at 5 percent level of significant. These shows only gross fixed capital formation is significant to growth and contributes the positive effect to GDP in each ASEAN-4 countries. However, OLS estimation result for Indonesia shows the other variable has significant to growth which is openness; while it gives the negative affect the GDP. Instead of Indonesia, openness is not significant at other ASEAN-4 countries such as Malaysia, Thailand and Philippines. Besides, other variable is FDI also not significant in the case of all ASEAN-4 countries. It means that, openness does not correlated to growth for Malaysia, Thailand and Philippines countries; while FDI is not correlated to growth for all ASEAN-4 countries in this study. 2012-02 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3038/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3038/1/Nooraini_Saidin.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Adhikary, B. K. (2011). FDI, trade openness, capital formation, and economic growth in Bangladesh: A lingkage analysis. International Journal of Economics And Finance, 6(1). Retrieved from www.ccsenet.org/ijbm Agbetsiafa, D. K. (2010). Regional integration, trade openness, and economic growth: Causality evidence from UEMOA countries. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 9(10). Aizenman, J. & Noy, I. (2009). Endogenous financial and trade openness. Review of Development Economics, 13(2), 175-189. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2008.00488.x Akbar, A. (2007, 12 September). Ekonomi positif bukan ‘propaganda’ Pertumbuhan kukuh bukti pencapaian cemerlang kepimpinan Abdullah. Berita Harian, hal.11. Andraz, J. M. & Rodrigues, P. M. M. (2009). What causes economic growth in Portugal: Export or inward FDI?. Journal of Economics Studies, 37(3). 267-286. Retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com/0144-3585.htm Anthony, O. and Peter, N. (2011). Foreign private investment, capital formation and economic growth in Nigeria: a two stage least square approach. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. Artis, M. J. (1984). Macroeconomics. Walton Street: Oxford University Press. Asid, R. (2010). Economic growth analyses under the TRIPS transitions: Evidence from selected cross-country samples. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(3). Azam, M. (2010). An empirical analysis of the impacts of exports and foreign direct investment on economic growth in South Asia. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2(7) Baltagi, B.H. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chamhuri, S., Surtahman, K. H., & Norshamliza, C. (2005). Ekonomi Malaysia (edisi keenam). Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan: Pearson Longman. Chen, B. and Feng, Y. (2000) Determinants of economic growth in China: Private enterprise, education, and Openness. China Economic Review, 11, 1-15 Chimobi, O. P. (2010). The causal relationship among financial development, trade openness and economic growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics And Finance, 2(2). Retrieved from www.ccsenet.org/ijef ClockBackward, (2009). Ordinary least squares linear regression: flaws, problems and pitfalls. Retrieved on 12th February 2012 from http://www.clockbackward.com/2009/06/18/ordinary-least-squares-linear-regression-flaws-problems-and-pitfalls/ Ekanayake, E. M. & Sussan, A. P. (2010). The role of U.S trade with North African Nations and its impact on economic growth. Competition Forum 8(2). Euromonitor International. Retrieved 3rd November 2011 from www.portal.euromonitor.com.eserv.uum.edu.my/Portal/Pages/Search/SearchResultsList.aspx External Indicator. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.epu.gov.my Fauzi (2009). Impak pelaburan dan perbelanjaan kerajaan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi: Kajian kes negara-negara di Malaysia 1980-2005. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Sciene University of Malaysia, Pulau Pinang. Fuller N. (1991). Principle of Economics. Tudor Publishing Gill, I., Kharas, H., Bhattasali, D., Brahmbhatt, M., Datt, G., Haddad, M. Mountfield, E., Tatacu, R., Vostroknutova, E. (2007). An East Asian Renaissance Ideas of Economic Growth. Washington: The World Bank. Gray, M. (2002). Foreign direct investment and recovery in Indonesia : Recent events and their impact. IPA Backgrounder 14(2). Growth Rate. Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Key_Indicators/2009/pdf/Key-Indicators-2009.pdf Gujarati, D. N. (3rd Ed.). (2006). Essentials of Econometrics. Singapore: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. Harris, D., Harvey, D. I., Leybourne, S. J., & Sakkas, N. D. (2008). Local asymptotic power of the Im-Pesaran-Shin panel unit root test and the impact of initial observations. Granger Centre Discussion Paper. No. 08/02. Hassan, Asan Ali Golam. (2004). Growth, Structural Change and Regional Inequity in Malaysia. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Hazirah, N. (2011). The influence of macroeconomic indicators on economic growth in Malaysia.Unpublished master’s thesis, Northern University of Malaysia , Sintok, Kedah. Hermes, N. and Lensink, R. (2003). Foreign direct investment, financial development and economic growth. Journal of Development Studies. 38. Hoang, T. T., Wiboonchutikula, P., & Tubtimtong, B. (2010). Does foreign direct investment promote economic growth in Vietnam?. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 27(3). 295-311. doi: 10.1355/ae27-3d Hu, Z. F. and Khan, M. S. (1997). Why is China growing so fast? IMF Staff Papers. 44 (1). Karlsson, S. and Lothgren, M. (2000). On the power and interpretation of panel unit root tests. Economic Letters, 66(249-255) Leitao, N. C. (2010). Foreign direct investment: The Canadian experience. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(4). Maddala, G. S. (1994). Econometric Methods and Application Volume I. England: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Malaysian Quality of Life (1999). Income and distribution. Retrieved from http://www.epu.gov.my/html/themes/epu/images/common/pdf/MQLI99_6.Income_and_distribution.pdf Mandilaras, A. & Popper, H. (2009). Capital flows, capitalization, and openness in emerging East Asian economies. Review of International Economics, 17(4), 734-750. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2009.00843.x Pernia, E. M. & Quising, P. F. (2003). Economic openness and regional development in the Philippines. ERD Working Paper No.34. Peterson, W. C. (4th Ed.). (1978). Income, Employment, and Economic Growth. Canada: George J. McLeod Limited, Toronto. Philippines Overview. (2011). Retrieved from www.worldbank.org Propelling Malaysia Towards Becoming A High-income Developed Nation. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.etp.pemandu.gov.my Ramasamy, B. (2008). Foreign direct investment under uncertainty: Lessons for Malaysia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 8. Seetanah, B., Ramessur, S. T. & Rojid, S. (2008). Financial development and economic growth: New evidence from a sample of island economies. Journal of Economics Studies, 36(2). 124-134. Retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com/014-3585.htm Seetanah, B. & Rojid, S. (2011). Analysing the sources of economic growth in Africa using growth a accounting and a panel VAR approach. 367-390. Shabri, A. M. & Said, M. (2010). Re-examining the finance-growth nexus in Malaysia and Indonesia. The IUP Journal of Applied Finance. 16(5). Thangavelu, S. M. & Owyong, D. T. (2003). The impact of export growth and scale economies on productivity in Singapore’s manufacturing industries. Journal of Economics Studies, 30(6). 623-535. doi: 10.1108/01443580310504471 Verbeek, M. (3rd Ed.). (2008). A Guide to Modern Econometrics. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Vidyattama Y. (2007). The determinants of provincial growth in Indonesia during 1983-2003. Retrieved from http://www.degit.ifw-kiel.de/papers/degit_12/C012_044.pdf Wahid, A. N. M., Sawkut, R., Seetanah, B. (2009). Determinant of foreign direct investments (FDI): Lessons from the African economies. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 9 (1). Retrieved from http://www.na-businesspress.com/JABE/WahidWeb.pdf Weil, D. V. (2005). Economic growth (1st ed.). United States of America: Addison-Wilsey. Yu, Q. (1998). Capital investment, international trade and economic growth in China: evidence in the 1980-90s. China Economic Review. 9(1).