Pengaruh Gaya Kepimpinan ke Atas Kreativiti Penjawat Awam

This study aims to identify the influence of leadership style on creativity among Administrative & Diplomatic Service (PTD) officers of the ministries/departments in Putrajaya. Three organizations involved are the Ministry of Rural and Regional Development, Prime Minister Department and Public...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Khairul Nizam, Zainon
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/3054/1/Khairul_Nizam_Zainon.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3054/2/1.Khairul_Nizam_Zainon.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.3054
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Jedin, Mohd Haniff
Ariffin, Anuar
topic HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
Khairul Nizam, Zainon
Pengaruh Gaya Kepimpinan ke Atas Kreativiti Penjawat Awam
description This study aims to identify the influence of leadership style on creativity among Administrative & Diplomatic Service (PTD) officers of the ministries/departments in Putrajaya. Three organizations involved are the Ministry of Rural and Regional Development, Prime Minister Department and Public Service Department. The perception of leadership styles were measured using Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) by Bass and Avolio (1995, 2004), which contains three items which are Transformational Leadership Style, Transactional Leadership Style and Laissez-Faire Leadership Style. The creativity of employees was measured using the instruments constructed by Zhou and George (2001). Data collected using questionnaires. A total of 103 respondents consisting of M41 and M44 PTD officers involved in this study. The data collected were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 17. Four statistical types of analysis performed which is Pearson Correlation analysis to see the relationshjp between the variables studied and the Multiple Regression analysis to see the influence between factors involved with the creativity of employees. T test and ANOVA were performed to see the difference level of employee creativity based on demographic factors. Results of the analysis carried out shows the three leadership styles do not have a significant relationship with the creativity of employees. All leadership styles tested in this study have negative relationship with employee creativity except laissez-faire leadership style which has positive relationship. The study also found that all three leadership styles did not significantly influence the creativity of workers and there was no different level of employee creativity based on demographic factors.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Khairul Nizam, Zainon
author_facet Khairul Nizam, Zainon
author_sort Khairul Nizam, Zainon
title Pengaruh Gaya Kepimpinan ke Atas Kreativiti Penjawat Awam
title_short Pengaruh Gaya Kepimpinan ke Atas Kreativiti Penjawat Awam
title_full Pengaruh Gaya Kepimpinan ke Atas Kreativiti Penjawat Awam
title_fullStr Pengaruh Gaya Kepimpinan ke Atas Kreativiti Penjawat Awam
title_full_unstemmed Pengaruh Gaya Kepimpinan ke Atas Kreativiti Penjawat Awam
title_sort pengaruh gaya kepimpinan ke atas kreativiti penjawat awam
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Business (COB)
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/3054/1/Khairul_Nizam_Zainon.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3054/2/1.Khairul_Nizam_Zainon.pdf
_version_ 1747827489386790912
spelling my-uum-etd.30542016-04-19T01:20:58Z Pengaruh Gaya Kepimpinan ke Atas Kreativiti Penjawat Awam 2011 Khairul Nizam, Zainon Jedin, Mohd Haniff Ariffin, Anuar College of Business (COB) College of Business HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management This study aims to identify the influence of leadership style on creativity among Administrative & Diplomatic Service (PTD) officers of the ministries/departments in Putrajaya. Three organizations involved are the Ministry of Rural and Regional Development, Prime Minister Department and Public Service Department. The perception of leadership styles were measured using Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) by Bass and Avolio (1995, 2004), which contains three items which are Transformational Leadership Style, Transactional Leadership Style and Laissez-Faire Leadership Style. The creativity of employees was measured using the instruments constructed by Zhou and George (2001). Data collected using questionnaires. A total of 103 respondents consisting of M41 and M44 PTD officers involved in this study. The data collected were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 17. Four statistical types of analysis performed which is Pearson Correlation analysis to see the relationshjp between the variables studied and the Multiple Regression analysis to see the influence between factors involved with the creativity of employees. T test and ANOVA were performed to see the difference level of employee creativity based on demographic factors. Results of the analysis carried out shows the three leadership styles do not have a significant relationship with the creativity of employees. All leadership styles tested in this study have negative relationship with employee creativity except laissez-faire leadership style which has positive relationship. The study also found that all three leadership styles did not significantly influence the creativity of workers and there was no different level of employee creativity based on demographic factors. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3054/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3054/1/Khairul_Nizam_Zainon.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/3054/2/1.Khairul_Nizam_Zainon.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cumrnings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour, 10, 123- 167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. New York: The Creative Education Foundation. Amabile, T. M. (1 996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westward Press. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76-87. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154- 1184. Amabile, T. M., Schantzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B. dan Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviours and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32. Andrews, F. M., dan Farris, G. F. (1967). Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams. Personnel Psychology, 20, 497-5 15. Andriopoulos, C. (2001). Determinant of organizational creativity. Management Decision, 289-30 1. Baharudin, 0. (2004). Gaya kepimpinan pemimpin dan komitmen pekerja di jabatan agama islam selangor. (Kertas Projek Sarjana Yang Tidak Diterbitkan). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Baharin Abu (2000). Teaching efictiveness and stafS professional development programmes in HEI in Malaysia. Published Doctoral Thesis, The University of Birmingham, UK. Bailyn, L. (1985). Autonomy in the industrial r&d laboratory. Human Resource Management, 24,129- 146. Baron, R. A. (1983). Behavior in organization. Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Basadur, M., Wakabayashi, M., dan Green, S. G. (1990). Individual problem solving style and attitudes toward divergent thinking before and after training. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 22-32. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press. Bass, B. M. dan Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Bass, B. M. dan Avolio, B. J. (1995). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. Bass, B. M. dan Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range of leadership development: Manual for multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden. Bass, B. M. dan Avolio, B. J. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J. & Atwater, L. (1990). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45(1), 5-34. Blake, R. dan Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing. Blunt, P. (1988). Cultural consequences for organisation change in a South-East Asian state: Brunei. Academy of Management Executive, 2(3), 235-240. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row. Carmeli, A. (2005). The relationship between organizational culture and withdrawal intentions and behaviour. International Journal of Manpower, 26(2), 95-1 77. Carson, P. P., dan Carson, K. D. (1993). Managing creativity enhancement through goal-setting and feedback. Journal of Creative Behavior, 27, 3645. Chen, C. H., Li, H. H., dan Tang, Y. Y. (2007). Transformational leadership and creativity: Exploring the mediating effects of creative and intrinsic motivation. Department of Business Administration. Proceedings of 13th Asia Pacific Management Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 684-694. Choi, J. N. (2007). Group composition and employee creative behaviour in a Korean electronics company: Distinct effects of relational demography and group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 21 3-234. Clapp, J. D., & Beck, J. G. (2009). Understanding the relationship between PTSD and social support: The role of negative network orientation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47,237- 244. Cohen,J., and P.Cohen. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, (2"d ed.) Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Curnming, L. L. dan Oldham, G. R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: Managing work context for the high potential employee. California Management Review, 40(1), 22-38. Deci, E.L. dan Ryan, R.M. (1985). lntrinsic motivation and self-determination. (1 st ed.). USA: Springer. Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1 037. Deci, E.L., Connell, J.P. and Ryan, R.M. (1989). Self determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580-590. Evanisko, M. J. dan Kimberly, J. R. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689-7 13. Feurer, R, Chaharbaghi, K & Wagin, J. (1996). Developing creative teams for operational excellence. lnternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(1), 5- 18. Fiedler, F. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Field A.P (2006). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed). London: Sage Gan, W. Y. (1998). Creativity and creative perception among female bachelor of education students at the university of malaya. M.Ed., Dissertation, University Of Malaya. Gardner, C. (1990). On leadership. New York: The Free Press George, D and Mallery, P, (2005). SPSS for windows step-by-step: A simple guide and reference George, J. M. dan Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,5 13-524. Gronhaug, K, dan Kaufman, G. (Eds.), (1988). Innovation: A cross disciplinary perspective. Oslo, Nonveian University Press. Guido Liichters & Sayan Chakrabarty (2006). Multicollinearity Detection Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(5), 1 - 12 Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ: Guide to improving intelligence and creativity. Buffalo, New York: Creative Education Foundation. Gumusluoglu, L. Dan Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62,461-473. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R.E. dan Tathan, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey Canada: Pearson Prentice Hall. Hersey, P. dan Blanchard, K. (1984). The management of organizational behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International diflerences in workrelated values, London: Sage Publications. Inam, U. H., Ahmad, A., Muhammad, U. A., Syed, T. H., Tahir, M. Q. dan Abdul, Q. (2010). Mediation role of employee engagement in creative work process on the relationship of transformational leadership and employee creativity. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 25,94-99. Ismail, Z. M. (1988). HRD practices for managers in selected corporations in Malaysia, (Tesis PhD Yang Tidak Diterbitkan). The George Washington University, Washington. Jaussi, K.S. dan Dionne, S.D. (2003). Leading for creativity: the role of unconventional leader behaviour. Leadership Quarterly, 14(4/5), 475-98. Joo, B. K. (2007). The impact of contextual and personal characteristics on employee creativity in Korean firms. Published Doctoral Thesis. University of Minnesota. Kahai, S.S., Sosik, J.J. dan Avolio, B.J. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. Leadership Quarterly, 14(4/5), 499-524. Kanfer, R. dan Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive-abilities - An integrative aptitude treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 657-690. Katz, D. dan Kahn, R. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley . Khatena, J. (1992). Gifted: challenge and response for education. Illinois: Peacock Publication. Kimberly, J. R. dan Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-7 13. Jaskyte, K. dan Kisieliene, A. (2006). Determinants of Employee Creativity: A Survey of Lithuanian Nonprofit Organizations. International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University, 1 7,133- 14 1. Koontz, H. dan Weihrich, H. (1988). Management. (8th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Kouzes, J. M. dan Posner, B. Z. (1993). Hope precedes creative works. Executive Excellence, 10(9), 8-9. Kumar, N. dan Raduan, C. R. (2010). Examining the link between Islamic work ethic and innovation capability. Journal of Management Development, 29(1), 79-93. Leech et al. (2005); Marcoulides & Hershberger, (1 997), SPSSfor Intermediate Stahhks: Use and Implementation. Locke, E. A. dan Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. The American Psychologist, 57: 705- 715. McGrath, J. E. (1962). Leadership behaviour: Some requirements for leadership training. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Civil Service Commission. Mohamed, S. (1998). Kepimpinan dan pengurusan strategik untuk kecemerlangan organisasi. (Siri Syarahan Perlantikan Profesor 1995lBil. 5). Universiti Sains Malaysia. Mohd. Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mintzberg, H., (1989). Mintzberg on management: inside our strange world of organizations. New York: MacMillan. Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resources Management Review. 10(3), 3 13-35 1. Mumford, M. D., Hunter, S. T., Eubanks, D. L., Bedell, K. E., & Murphy, S. T. (2007). Developing leaders for creative efforts: A domain-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 402-4 17. Nahavandi, A. (1997). The art and science of leadership. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. dan Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied linear regression models, (3rd ed). USA: IRWIN Book Team. Noorsyimazurah, A. (2008). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kreativiti penjawat awam. (Kertas Projek Sarjana Yang Tidak Diterbitkan). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Nually. (1978). SPSS 13.0 guide to data analysis. New Jersey USA: Prentice Hall. Inc. p75. O'Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31(4), 9-25. Oldham, G.R. and Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academic Management Journal, 39, 607-634. Palaniappan, A. K. (1994). A study of creativity and academic achievement among form four students. Pd. D Thesis. University Malaya. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 12 (2nd Ed.). Open University Press. Porter, J. H. dan Hamm, R. J. (1986). Statistics: Application for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: BrooksICole Publishing Co. Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D. dan Teach, R. J. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behaviour on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behaviour Human Decision Process, 55, 120- 15 1. Rhodes, J. M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappa, 42, 302-310 Richards, D. (1991). Flying against the wind? Culture and management developmennt in South East Asia. Journal of Management Development, 10(6), 7-2 I . Sallehudin, M. K. (2008). Persepsi terhadap gaya kepimpinan dun hubungannya dengan motivasi pekerja. (Kertas Projek Sarjana Yang Tidak Diterbitkan). Universiti Utwa Malaysia. Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. Organizational dynamics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schein, E. (1999). The corporate culture survival guide: Sense and nonsence about culture change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schneider, B. (1983). Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. In L. L. Cumrnings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 5, 1-31. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Scott, S. G. dan Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37,580-607. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business, a skill- building approach, (4th ed.), John Wiley and Sons Inc. Shin, S. J. dan Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46,703-7 14. Sulaiman, A. (2007). Persepsi gaya kepimpinan transformasi terhadap kepuasan kerja. (Kertas Projek Sarjana Yang Tidak Diterbitkan). Universiti Utwa Malaysia. Stodgill, R. M. (1974), Individual behaviour and group achievement. New York: Oxford [Jniversity Press. Terborg, J. R. (1981). Interactional psychology and research on human behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 6, 569-576. Thomas, S. K. dan Wahju, A. R. (2007). Kepimpinan transformasional dan pengaruhnya terhadap kepuasan atas kualitas kehidupan kerja, kornitmen organisasi dan perilaku ekstra peran: studi pada guru-guru smu di kota surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahan, 98( l), 49-6 1. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M. dan Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52,59 1-620. Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. (pp. 43-75). New York: Cambridge University Press. Totrakarntrakul, R. dan Yan, J. S. (2008). Leadership influencing organisational creativity - the case of IKEA (Kertas Projek Sarjana Yang Diterbitkan). University of Kalmar, Sweden. Uru, F. 0. dan Yozgat, U. (2009). Creativity for gaining and sustaining competitive advantage: The role of leadership styles. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 6, 136-157. Wang, Y. dan Casirnir, G. (2007). How leaders' attitude may enhance organizational creativity: Evidence from a chinese study. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 229-238. Wang, P. dan Rode, J.C. (2010).Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations (1) 24 Weisberg, R. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: W.H. Freeman. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., dan Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-32 1. Yoes, A. (2007). Persepsi gaya kepimpinan dun komitmen kerja di pasukan 93 batalion kor perkhidmatan diraja. (Kertas Projek Sarjana Y ang Tidak Diterbitkan). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Yong, L. (1986). A study of creativity and its correlates. (Unpublished Ph.D Thesis). University Malaya. Yong, L. (1989). Creativity: a study of malaysian students. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: Cordia Publications. Yong, L. (1993). Characteristic of malaysian business executives with the creative classical profile pattern. innovation. Learning 2001. Carlson Learning Company Journal. Zaharah, H. (2004). Tingkahlaku dun gaya kepimpinan akademik wanita di sebuah universiti awam. (Tesis Doktor Falsafah Yang Tidak Diterbitkan). Universiti Putra Malaysia. Zaini Ujang (20 10). Budaya inovasi: Prasyarat model baru ekonomi. Skudai: UTM Press. Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83,26 1-276. Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworker is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback and creative personality. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 4 13-422. Zhou, J. dan George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44,682-696.