Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigerian Listed Companies

This research examines whether the formation of audit committees and its characteristics are associated with improved financial reporting quality. The sample of the study is the Nigerian listed companies prior to and after the introduction of mandatory audit committee requirements in The Code of Cor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Madakawi, Abdulkadir
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/3145/1/ABDULKADIR_MADAWAKI.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3145/3/ABDULKADIR_MADAWAKI.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.3145
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Amran, Noor Afza
topic HF5001-6182 Business
spellingShingle HF5001-6182 Business
Madakawi, Abdulkadir
Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigerian Listed Companies
description This research examines whether the formation of audit committees and its characteristics are associated with improved financial reporting quality. The sample of the study is the Nigerian listed companies prior to and after the introduction of mandatory audit committee requirements in The Code of Corporate Governance in 2003. The researcher uses an archival data from the annual reports, NSE and SBAInteractive. The model by Dechew and Dichev (2002) was used to measure the earnings quality as proxy for financial reporting quality. The result indicates that there was some evidence that earnings quality significantly reduced in the years after audit committee formation, thus providing some support for the notion that the formation of the audit committee improved financial reporting quality. Second finding shows that there was a weak association between the characteristics of audit committee and improved financial reporting quality. The audit committee independence and expertise are found to significantly associate with improved financial reporting quality. Audit committee meets 4 to 5 times a year and audit committee size consists of 4 members. The result also shows that 70% of the sample firms employed Non-Big 4 auditors. These findings provide evidence on the mandatory audit committee requirement under the NSE listing rules on how the companies respond towards The Code.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Madakawi, Abdulkadir
author_facet Madakawi, Abdulkadir
author_sort Madakawi, Abdulkadir
title Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigerian Listed Companies
title_short Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigerian Listed Companies
title_full Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigerian Listed Companies
title_fullStr Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigerian Listed Companies
title_full_unstemmed Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigerian Listed Companies
title_sort audit committee characteristics and financial reporting quality: evidence from nigerian listed companies
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2012
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/3145/1/ABDULKADIR_MADAWAKI.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3145/3/ABDULKADIR_MADAWAKI.pdf
_version_ 1747827508553711616
spelling my-uum-etd.31452016-04-20T00:26:53Z Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigerian Listed Companies 2012-05 Madakawi, Abdulkadir Amran, Noor Afza Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HF5001-6182 Business This research examines whether the formation of audit committees and its characteristics are associated with improved financial reporting quality. The sample of the study is the Nigerian listed companies prior to and after the introduction of mandatory audit committee requirements in The Code of Corporate Governance in 2003. The researcher uses an archival data from the annual reports, NSE and SBAInteractive. The model by Dechew and Dichev (2002) was used to measure the earnings quality as proxy for financial reporting quality. The result indicates that there was some evidence that earnings quality significantly reduced in the years after audit committee formation, thus providing some support for the notion that the formation of the audit committee improved financial reporting quality. Second finding shows that there was a weak association between the characteristics of audit committee and improved financial reporting quality. The audit committee independence and expertise are found to significantly associate with improved financial reporting quality. Audit committee meets 4 to 5 times a year and audit committee size consists of 4 members. The result also shows that 70% of the sample firms employed Non-Big 4 auditors. These findings provide evidence on the mandatory audit committee requirement under the NSE listing rules on how the companies respond towards The Code. 2012-05 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3145/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3145/1/ABDULKADIR_MADAWAKI.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/3145/3/ABDULKADIR_MADAWAKI.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abbott,L.J,Park,Y. and Parker.S (2000).The effect of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance, 26(11),55-67. Abbott,L.J,Parker,S and Peters,F. (2002).Audit committee characteristics and financial misstatement: A study of the efficacy of certain Blue Ribbon Committee recommendations. Working paper,University of Memphis,Santa Clara University and University of Georgia. Abbott,L.J,Parker,S. and Peters,G.P. (2004)Audit committee characteristics and restatement. Auditing: A journal of practice and theory, 3(1),69-87. Adams,M. (1997).Determinants of audit committee formation in the life insurance industry: New Zealand Evidence. Journal of Business Research, 38(2),123-129. Adegbite,E,Amaeshi,K and Amao,O (2010).Political analysis of shareholders activism in Emergent democracies: a case study of Nigeria. CSGR Working paper 265/10 center for the study of globalization department of politics and international studies University of Warwick. Anderson,R.C,Mansi,S.A, and Reeb,D.M (2004).Board characteristics, accounting report Integrity and the cost of debt.Journal of Accounting and Economics. 37,315-342. Baxter,P and Cotter,J, (2009).The audit committee and earning quality.Accounting and Finance. 49,267-290. Beasly,M (1996).An empirical analysis of the relation between boards of director composition and financial statement fraud.The Accounting Review, 71,443-465. Beasly,M.S,Carcello,J.V,Hermanson,D.R, and Lapides,P.D (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting.Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanism. Accounting Horizons, 14,441-454. Bedard,J,Chtourou,S.M. and Courtteau,L (2004).The effect of audit committee expertise, independence and activity on aggressive earnings management.Auditing:Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol.23(2),13. Blue Ribbon Committee (1999).Report and recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on improving effectiveness of corporate audit committees.New York Stock Exchange and National Association of Securities Dealers. Cadbury Committee (1992).Report of the Committee on the financial aspects of Corporate Governance: A Code of Best Practice. London. Carcello,J.V and Neal,T.L(2000).Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75,453-467. Carcello,J.V.,Hermanson,R.D and Neal,T.L (2002).Disclosure in audit committee charters and reports.Accounting Horizons, 16,291-304. Carcello,J.V.,Hollingsworth,C,W,Klein,A and Neal,T.L (2006).Audit committee financial expertise, competing corporate governance mechanisms and earnings management. Working paper, University of Tennessee and New York University. Castellano,J.F,Roehm,H.A and Vondra,A.A (1989).Audit committee compliance with Tread way Commission Report: A survey. The Ohio CPA Journal, 37-41. Chau,G, and Leung,P (2006).The impact of board composition and family ownership on audit Committee formation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of international Accounting Auditing and Taxation. 15(1),1-15. Cohen,J,Krishnamoorthy,G and Wright,A (2004).The corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, 87-152. Collier,P (1993).Factors affecting the formation of audit committees in major UK listed companies. Accounting and Business Research, 23,421-430. Davidson,R,Xie,B and Xu,W (2004).Market reaction to voluntary announcements of audit Committee appointments: The effect of financial expertise.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(1). Dechow,P.M,Sloan,R,G and Sweeney,A,P (1996).Causes and consequences of earning manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2),1-36. DeFond,M.L,Hann,R.N and Hu,X (2005).Does the market value financial expertise on audit Committees of board of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2),153-193. Dezoort,F.T, and Salterio,S. (2001).The effects of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee member judgments. Auditing: A Journal Theory andPractice. 20(2). Dezoort,F.T,Hermanson,D.R,Archambeault,S and Reed,S.A (2002).Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature.Journal of Accounting Literature. 21,38-75. Dhaliwal,D,Naiker,V and Navissi,F (2010).The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committee. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27,787-827. Eichensher,J.W and Shields,D (1985).Corporate director liability and monitoring preferences.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 4(1),13-31. Eisenberg,T,Sundgren,S and Wells,M.T (1998).Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms.Journal of Financial Economics, 48,35-54. Felo,A.J,Krishnamurthy, and Solieri,S.A (2003).Audit committee characteristics and the Perceived quality of financial reporting: An empirical analysis.Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, State University of New York at Binghamton and University of Scranton. Forker,J.J (1992).Corporate governance and disclosure quality.Accounting and Business Research 22(86),111-124. Goodstein,J,Gautam,K and Boeker,W (1994).The effects of board size and diversity on Strategic change.Strategic Management Journal. 15,241-250. Jensen,M.C, and Meckling,W.H (1976).“Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”. Journal of Financial Economics, 3,305-360. Kajola,S.O. (2008).Corporate governance and firm performance: The case of Nigerian listed firms. European Journal of Economics,Finance and Administrative Science, 14,17-28. Kalbers,L. and Fogerty,T(1993).Audit committee effectiveness :an empirical investigation of the contribution of power.A Journal of Practice and Theory, 12(1),24-49. Kintzele,M.R (1991).The use of audit committee reports in financial reporting. Internal Auditing , Spring,16-24. Krishnan,J (2005).Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis.Accounting Review,80,649-675. Lipton,M and Lorsch,W.J (1992).A modest proposal for improved corporate governance.The business Lawyer, 48,59-77. Lynn,S.A (1985).Audit committee in review. Ohio CPA journal 44(2),9-16. Mangena,M and Pike,R (2005).The effect of audit committee shareholding, financial expertise and size on interim financial disclosures.Accounting and Business Research 35, 327-349. McDaniel,L,Martin,R., and Maines,L (2002).Evaluating financial reporting quality: The effects of financial expertise versus financial literacy.The Accounting Review,.77,139-167. McMullen,D.A and Raghunandan,K. (1996).Enhancing audit committee effectiveness.Journal of Accountancy. 182(2), 79-86. McMullen,D.A. (1996).Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences associated with audit committees.Auditing:A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15, 121-139. Menon,K, and Williams,J.D. (1994).The use of audit committees for monitoring.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13,121-139, Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance.October,2003.Retrieved from. http://sec.gov.ng/files/CCGFORPUBLICCOMPANIES. Olusa,M (2007).Corporate governance vs. Cadbury Nigeria Securities and Exchange Commission Code of corporate governance. Pandit,G.M,Subrahmanyam,V and Conway,G.M (2005).Audit committee reports before and after Sarbanes-Oxley. CPA Journal, 75(10). Pincus,K,Rusbarsky,M and Wong,J. (1989)Voluntary formation of corporate audit committee among NASDAQ firms.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8,239-265. Rezaee,Z and Farmer,L.E (1994).The challenging role of the audit committee. Internal Auditing.Spring, 10-21. Ruzaidah,R, and Takiah,M.I. (2004).The effectiveness of audit committee in monitoring the quality of corporate reporting. Corporate governance: An International Perspective. MICG Publications. Song,J and Windram,B. (2004)Benchmarking audit committee effectiveness in financial reporting.International Journal of Auditing, 8,195-205. Treadway Commission.(1987)Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial reporting. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. New York. Vafeas,N. (1999).Board meeting frequency and firm performance.Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1),113-142. Xie,B,Davidson,W.W and DaDalt,P.J.(2003).Earning management and corporate governance: The role of the board and audit committee.Journal of Corporate Finance 9,295-316. Yermack,D (1996).Higher market valuation of companies with small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics. 40,185-211. Zhang,Y,Zhou,J and Zhou,N (2007).Audit committee quality, auditor independence and Internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(3),300-327.