The Relationship Between Training Environment and Training Effectiveness of PNB, CFA Student

This study attempt to evaluate the training effectiveness provided by external trainer organised by PNB Investment Institute. This study also identify the influencing factors that affect the training effectiveness, that is training environment. Adopted Questionnaires were used for data Collection. O...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Asraf , Abdul Rahman
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2012
Subjects:	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3196/1/ASRAF_ABDUL_RAHMAN.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3196/2/ASRAF_ABDUL_RAHMAN.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.3196
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Idris, Mohmad Amin
topic	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment
spellingShingle	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment Asraf , Abdul Rahman The Relationship Between Training Environment and Training Effectiveness of PNB, CFA Student
description	This study attempt to evaluate the training effectiveness provided by external trainer organised by PNB Investment Institute. This study also identify the influencing factors that affect the training effectiveness, that is training environment. Adopted Questionnaires were used for data Collection. Out of 33 participants, 32 respondents returned their questionnaire, making the responses rate of 97 percent. Data was processed and analyse using SPSS. Appropriate data analysis technique were used, both for descriptive and inferential analysis. Findings show that respondents perceived that training environment provided by PNB Investment Institute are good especially on their ability in task involvement. Findings also revealed that training environment is significantly associated and influenced the training effectiveness. Suggestion for future research was made at the section of this study
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Asraf , Abdul Rahman
author_facet	Asraf , Abdul Rahman
author_sort	Asraf , Abdul Rahman
title	The Relationship Between Training Environment and Training Effectiveness of PNB, CFA Student
title_short	The Relationship Between Training Environment and Training Effectiveness of PNB, CFA Student
title_full	The Relationship Between Training Environment and Training Effectiveness of PNB, CFA Student
title_fullStr	The Relationship Between Training Environment and Training Effectiveness of PNB, CFA Student
title_full_unstemmed	The Relationship Between Training Environment and Training Effectiveness of PNB, CFA Student
title_sort	relationship between training environment and training effectiveness of pnb, cfa student
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate	2012
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3196/1/ASRAF_ABDUL_RAHMAN.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3196/2/ASRAF_ABDUL_RAHMAN.pdf
_version_	1747827518823464960
spelling	my-uum-etd.31962022-04-10T06:31:33Z The Relationship Between Training Environment and Training Effectiveness of PNB, CFA Student 2012-04-20 Asraf , Abdul Rahman Idris, Mohmad Amin Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management. Employment This study attempt to evaluate the training effectiveness provided by external trainer organised by PNB Investment Institute. This study also identify the influencing factors that affect the training effectiveness, that is training environment. Adopted Questionnaires were used for data Collection. Out of 33 participants, 32 respondents returned their questionnaire, making the responses rate of 97 percent. Data was processed and analyse using SPSS. Appropriate data analysis technique were used, both for descriptive and inferential analysis. Findings show that respondents perceived that training environment provided by PNB Investment Institute are good especially on their ability in task involvement. Findings also revealed that training environment is significantly associated and influenced the training effectiveness. Suggestion for future research was made at the section of this study 2012-04 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3196/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3196/1/ASRAF_ABDUL_RAHMAN.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/3196/2/ASRAF_ABDUL_RAHMAN.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Alliger, G.M. and Janak, E.A. (1989), “Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: 30 years later”, Personnel Psychology, Vol.42 No.2, pp.331-342. Ang,B,L. (1997), Training the Local Workforce. Management Time, News Straits Time, January 28, pp. 8. Bartam,S, & Gibson,B. (2000) The Training Needs Analysis Toolkit, 2nd ed. Amherst,MA: HRD Press, Inc. Beardwell, I, Holden, L and Claydon, T (2003) ‘Human Resource Management–A Contemporary Perspective’, Pitman 658.3/HUM Beeker,H.S., Geer,B. Hughes,E.C. (1968).Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life, New York, Wiley. Belasco, J.A., and Trice, H.M.,(1975). Unanticipated of Training. In Kirkpatrick,D.L., (ed). Evaluating Training Program. Washington ASTD Inc. pp.66-71. Broad,M.L,. and Newstrom,J,W., (1992),Transfer of Training, USA, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc. pp.243-236. Brophy,J. (1987). Synthesis of Research on Strategies for Motivating Students to Learn, Educational Leadership, October. Brown,K.G., & Gerhardt,M.W. (2002).Formative evaluation: An integrative practice model and case study. Personnel Psychology, Vol.55, pp.951-984. Campbell,J.P., Dunnette,M.D., Lawler,E.E. & Weick, K.R., Jr, (1970) Managerial behaviour, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Chapados,J.T., Renfrow,D., and Hochheiser,L.I.(1987). Four Principles of Training, Training and Development Journal, December, pp.63-66. Cherrington,D.J. (1995). The Management of Human Resource, 4th Ed., New Jersey,Prentice Hall, pp. 319-321 Clements,C. , Wagner,R.J., and Roland,C.C. (1995). The ins and Guts of Experiential Training, Training and Development Journal, February, pp.52-56. Dahlgren,L.O. (1978). Qualitative Difference in Conception of Basic Principles in Economics. Paper presented in 4th International Conference on Higher Education, Lancester, England, September Flippo, E.B. (1976). Principles of Personnel Management 4th Ed, New York, McGraw Hill, pp.209-211. Ford,J.K. and Steve W.J. Kozlowski (1997), Improving training effectiveness in work organizations Georgenson, D.L., (1982). The Problem of Transfer Call for Partnership.Training and Development Journal, Vol.36, No.10, pp.75-78. Gunderson, E.K.E. & Sells, S,B. (1975). Organizational and environmental factors in health and personnel effectiveness: I. Introduction. (Research Report No.75-8) San Diego: Naval Health Research Center. Goldstein, I.L.,& Ford, J.K. (2002). Training in organizations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group. Goldstein, I.L., and Gilliam,P.(1990). Training System Issues in Year 2000, American Psychologist, February, pp.15-25 Gupta,K. (1999).A Practical Guide to Needs Assessment. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer. Hamblin,A.C. (1974). Educational and Control of Training, New York, McGraw Hill, pp.6-12 Handy,C., Gordon,C., Gow,C. and Randlesome,C. (1988).Making Managers, USA, Pittman Publishing Co. pp. 41-42 Insel, R., & Moos, R.H. (1974). Work Environment Scale. Palo Alto, CA: CPP Insel, P.M. and Moos, R.H. (1974a). Psychological environments. Am. Psychol. 29, 179-188. Insel,P.M. and Moss,R.H, (1975). Health and the Social Environment. Lexington, Mas.; D.C. Heath. Junaidah, Hashim (2006). Training in Organisations. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Prentice-Hall Johannesson,R.E. (1973).Some problems in the measurement of organizational climate. Organization Behaviour. Hum. Perf. 10,118-144. Kember,D. and Leong, Doris,Y.P. (1998). Influences upon Students’ Perception of Workload. Educational Psychology, Vol.18, No.2. Kember,D. and Ng Sandra (1996). An Examination of Inter-relationship between Workload, Study Time, Learning Approaches and Academic Outcomes.Studies in Higher Education, Vol.21, Issue 3. Kirkpatrick,D. (1959a). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, Vol.13, pp.3-9. Kirkpatrick,D. (1959b). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 2-learning. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, Vol.13, pp.21-26. Kirkpatrick,D. (1960a). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 3-behavior, Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, Vol.14, pp.13-18. Kirkpatrick,D. (1960b). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 4-Results, Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, Vol.14, pp.28-32 Kirkpatrick,D. (1998). Evaluating training. programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Kirkpatrick,D.L. “Evaluation of Training.” In R.L. Craig (ed), Training and Development Handbook. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill,1976. Koehorst,P. and Verhoeven,W. (1986a). Effectiveness and Efficiency in Industrial Training, Part 1: Source of Ineffectiveness and Inefficiency, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol.10, No.(3), pp.20-22 Koehorst,P, and Verhoeven,W. (1986b). Effectiveness and Efficiency in Industrial Training, Part 2: Popular Measures for Importing Effectiveness Refuted. Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol.10, No.(4), pp.7-10. Koehorst,P, and Verhoeven,W. (1986b). Effectiveness and Efficiency in Industrial Training, Part 3: How to Improve Effectiveness. Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol.10, No.(5), pp.11-16 Kozlowski,S.W., Brown,K. Weissbein,D., Cannon-Bowers,J., & Sales,E.(2000).A multilevel approach to training effectiveness: Enhancing horizontal and vertical transfer. In K. Klein, & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.),Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations,San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. Kriger,K., Ford,J.K., & Salas,E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training Evaluation.Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.78 No.2, pp.311-328. Lawrie,J. (1988). Are Employee Using what They Learn. Personnel Journal, Vol.67, No.4, pp.95-97 Lee S.H., & Pershing,J.A. (1999). Effective reaction in evaluating training programs. Performance Improvement, Vol. 38, No.3, pp. 32-39. Longenecker (2007).The training practices of results-oriented leaders, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 9, Issue 7, pp.361-367 Miner,J.B., and Crane,D.P.(1995).Human Resource Management: The Strategic Perspective, New York, Harper Collins College Publishers, pp. 390 Moos,R.H. (1994b). Work environment scale manual (3rd, ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Moos,R.H. (1973).Conceptualizations of human environments. Am. Psychol. 28,652-665. Noe,R.A. (2002). Employee Training and Development. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. Noe,R.A. (2002). Employee Training and Development (2nd ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Noe,RA, Hollenbeck,JR, Gerhart,B & Wright,P M (2006), Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage, 5th edn, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York Nunnally,J.C., & Bernstein,I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Phillips (1987). Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Method. Houston, Texas, Gulf Publishing Co. pp. 4; 39-41; 68-69 Ramsden,P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education, London, Routlege. Randall,L.K. (1975). Evaluation: A Training Dilemma, In Kirkpatrick, D.L., (ed). Evaluating Training Program. Washington ASTD Inc. pp.186-190. Richard F.B., Richard S.N., Evelyn G., and Newell H.B.(1976). Assessing the Psychosocial Characteristics of Occupational Training Environments.Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 49, pp.85-92 Rosner,R. (1999, May). Training is the answer but what was the question? Workforce, 78,42-50. Salas,E. & Cannon-Bowers,J.A. (1997).Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Sekaran,U. (1992). Research Method for Business: a Skills Building Approach, 2nd Ed., USA, John Wiley Inc. Sharma,D.S. (1997). Accounting Students’ Learning Conception, Approaches to Learning, and the Influence of Learning-Teaching Context on Approaches to Learning, Accounting Education, Vol.6, No.2. Sims,R.R. (1993).Evaluating Public Sector Training Program. Public Personnel Management, Vol.22, No.4, pp.591-605. Switzer and Kleiner (1996).New Development in Training Teams Affectively. Training for Quality, Vol.4, Issue I, pp.12-17 Synder,B.R. (1971).The Hidden Curriculum, New York, Knopf. Tan,T. (1995),Training Program to be Part of Corporate Culture. Management Times, News Straits Time,April 18, pp.12 Tannenbaum,S.I., & Yukl, G. (1992).Training and development in work organizations. Tessmer,M. (1995/1996). Formative multi-media evaluation, Training Research Journal, Vol.I, pp.127-149. Torrington,D and Hall,L (2002)‘Human Resource Management’, Prentice Hall 658.3/TOR Tovey, MD (1997), Training in Australia Design Delivery Evaluation Management,Prentice-Hall of Australia Pty Ltd, Sydney Wooten,T.C. (1998).Factors Influencing Student Learning in Introductory Accounting Classes:A comparison of Traditional and Nontraditional Students, Issues in Accounting Education, Vol.13, No.2. Zikmund, W.G., Babin, B.J., Carr, J.C., & Griffin, M. (2010). Business Research Methods. Canada: Nelson Education, Ltd.

The Relationship Between Training Environment and Training Effectiveness of PNB, CFA Student

Similar Items