Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah

The objectives of the study are to examine the relationship between the students’ learning styles and their achievement in the Communicative Arabic language subject and whether gender plays a role in the strategy chosen. The findings would allow the instructors to plan a more effective learning stra...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Kamsani, Md. Saad
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2012
Subjects:	PJ Semitic
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3285/1/KAMSANI_MD._SAAD.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3285/3/KAMSANI_MD._SAAD.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.3285
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Ahmad Sabri, Ahmad Zaharuddin
topic	PJ Semitic PJ Semitic
spellingShingle	PJ Semitic PJ Semitic Kamsani, Md. Saad Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah
description	The objectives of the study are to examine the relationship between the students’ learning styles and their achievement in the Communicative Arabic language subject and whether gender plays a role in the strategy chosen. The findings would allow the instructors to plan a more effective learning strategy in learning Communicative Arabic Language. This, in turn, would help arrest the decline of students’ achievement in the second language. 174 respondents were selected randomly from the Form Four classes of Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah for this study. The instrument used to measure the students’ learning style preferences is the ‘Inventori Gaya Pembelajaran’ which is adapted from ‘Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire’ by Reid which was constructed in 1987. The conceptual frame work for this study is the Dunn and Dunn Model (1978). The statistical procedures used in this quantitative study are t-test and Pearson correlation analysis, and the results are descriptive and inferential. Analysis of the data was carried out using the SPSS. The findings show that the high achievement group of students in the Communicative Arabic Language has effectively used the auditory learning style than the low achievement group. The preferences of female students for visual, kinesthetic, analytic and reflective learning styles than male students reflects the females’ higher achievement in the subject than the males who have less preferences towards the learning styles mentioned. The Pearson correlation analysis result indicated that many students have problems adapting to auditory learning styles. Finally, the study suggests that students should combine and utilize all the various learning styles element in learning the Communicative Arabic Language subject and apply more relevant techniques through the auditory learning style.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Kamsani, Md. Saad
author_facet	Kamsani, Md. Saad
author_sort	Kamsani, Md. Saad
title	Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah
title_short	Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah
title_full	Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah
title_fullStr	Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah
title_full_unstemmed	Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah
title_sort	hubungan gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran bahasa arab komunikasi di maktab mahmud, alor setar, kedah
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2012
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3285/1/KAMSANI_MD._SAAD.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3285/3/KAMSANI_MD._SAAD.pdf
_version_	1747827538399330304
spelling	my-uum-etd.32852019-11-13T02:39:21Z Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah 2012 Kamsani, Md. Saad Ahmad Sabri, Ahmad Zaharuddin Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences PJ Semitic LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools The objectives of the study are to examine the relationship between the students’ learning styles and their achievement in the Communicative Arabic language subject and whether gender plays a role in the strategy chosen. The findings would allow the instructors to plan a more effective learning strategy in learning Communicative Arabic Language. This, in turn, would help arrest the decline of students’ achievement in the second language. 174 respondents were selected randomly from the Form Four classes of Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah for this study. The instrument used to measure the students’ learning style preferences is the ‘Inventori Gaya Pembelajaran’ which is adapted from ‘Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire’ by Reid which was constructed in 1987. The conceptual frame work for this study is the Dunn and Dunn Model (1978). The statistical procedures used in this quantitative study are t-test and Pearson correlation analysis, and the results are descriptive and inferential. Analysis of the data was carried out using the SPSS. The findings show that the high achievement group of students in the Communicative Arabic Language has effectively used the auditory learning style than the low achievement group. The preferences of female students for visual, kinesthetic, analytic and reflective learning styles than male students reflects the females’ higher achievement in the subject than the males who have less preferences towards the learning styles mentioned. The Pearson correlation analysis result indicated that many students have problems adapting to auditory learning styles. Finally, the study suggests that students should combine and utilize all the various learning styles element in learning the Communicative Arabic Language subject and apply more relevant techniques through the auditory learning style. 2012 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3285/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3285/1/KAMSANI_MD._SAAD.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/3285/3/KAMSANI_MD._SAAD.pdf text eng public http://sierra.uum.edu.my/record=b1242341~S1 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ab.Halim Mohamad & Mohd Azidan Abdul Jabar (2009). Keberkesanan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama (SMKA). Jurnal KUIS. Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor, 2(1), 17. Ab.Halim Tamuri, Kamarulzaman Abdul Ghani, Zawawi Ismail, Rosli Mokhtar & Zetty Nurzuliana Rashed (2010). Persepsi Guru dan Murid Terhadap Amalan Pengajaran Bahasa Arab Pada Peringkat Sekolah Menengah. Proceedings International Conference On Islamic Education. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, 29 November-1 Disember. A.Rahim Selamat et. al., (1995). Kajian Gaya Belajar Kumpulan Kursus Perguruan Lepasan Ijazah Sesi 1994/95 Institut Perguruan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim Perak.Kertas Kerja dibentangkan di Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan 1995 Anjuran Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. Abd.Rahim Abd.Rashid (1989).Strategi Pengajaran Sejarah KBSM. Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakti. Abdullah Adnan Mohamed (2006).Learning Style Preferences Of First Year Engineering Students In The Esl Classroom. Universiti Malaya. Ahmad Mahdzan Ayob (1985).Kaedah Penyelidikan Sosioekonomi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ainley,J. Elworth G. & Harvey-Beavis,A. (1995). Students Reasons for Choice of Subject. Kertas Kerja Dalam Symposium on Subject in Senior Years of Secondary School, Singapore on November 22, 1995. Amir Hussin Baharuddin (1998). Kaedah Kuantitatif. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Arabi Idid, Syed (1992). Kaedah Penyelidikan Komunikasi dan Sains Sosial. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Archibald,J. (2000). Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. Asiah Haji Parriekutty (1999). Gaya Pembelajaran dan Pencapaian Akademik di Kalangan Pelajar-pelajar Tingkatan Empat Sekolah Menengah Teknik Juaseh, Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan Darul Khusus. Universiti Malaya. Azizi Yahaya & Donald Michael Obih (2010). Hubungan Antara Motivasi, Gaya Pembelajaran dan Iklim Bilik Darjah Terhadap Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. National Seminar Sabah. Babich,A.M., Burdine,P., Allbright,L., & Randol, P. (1975). Centre for Innovative Teaching Experience Learning Styles Instrument. Wichita, KS: Murdock Teacher Center. Baharin Abu, Othman Md. Johan, Syed Mohd Shafeq Syed Mansor, & Haliza Jaafar (2007). Kepelbagaian Gaya Pembelajaran dan Kemahiran Belajar Pelajar. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://www.scribd.com/doc/3932226/ kepelbagaian-gaya-pembelajaran-dan-kemahiran-belajar Balcom,P. (2001). Minimalism and Beyond: Second Language Acquisition for the Twenty-first Century. Second Language Research. 17(3), 306-322. Ballinger,V., & Ballinger,R. (1983). Teaching Foreign Language in Styles: Identifying and Accommodating Learner Needs. In the Foreign Classroom New Techniques. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook. Barbe,W.B., & Swassing,R. (1979). Swassing-Barbe Modality Index, Columbus, HQ Zaner-Bloser Cited Irvine,J.J. dan York,D. (1995). Learning Syles and Culturally Diverse Students. A Literature Review. In Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, ed. James A. Banks. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan. 484–497. Barbe,W.B., & Milone,M.N. (1981). What We Know About Modality Strength. Educational Leadership. 38, 378-380. Biggs,J.B. (2001) The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 71, 133-149. Birdsong,D. (1999). Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bogdan,R.C. & Biklen,S.K. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education : An Introduction to Theory and Method. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Booth,S. (1977). Shakespeare's Sonnets. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Borg,W.R. & Gall,M.D. (1989). Educational Research : An Introduction. (5th ed.), New York: David McKay Company, Inc. Brown,H.D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. (4th Ed.) NewYork: Longman Inc. Bruner,C.E. & Majewski,W.S. (1990). Mildly Handicapped Students Can Succeed With Learning Styles. Educational Leadership. 48, 15-23. Burton,C.B.(1977). Teaching For Individual and Cultural Differences : A Necessary Interaction. Educational Leadership. 34, 6. Canfield,A.A. (1976). Canfield Learning Styles Inventory. Detroit: Humanics Media. Carbo,M. (1980). An Analysis of the Relationship between The Modality Preferences of Kindergarteners and Selected Reading Treatments as They Affect the Learning of a Basic Sight-Word Vocabulary. St. John’s University. Carruthers,S., & Young,A.(1980). Preference of Condition Concerning Time in Learning Environments of Rural Versus City Eight Grade Students. Learning Styles Network Newsletter. Cates,W.M. (1990). Panduan Amali untuk Penyelidikan Pendidikan, terjemahan Syaharom Abdullah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Cavanaugh,D.P. (1981). Student Learning Styles: A Diagnostic/Approach to Instruction. Kappan. 62, 202-203. Cheang,E.K., Amreet,K., & Nik Suria Nik Mohamad (1994). A Survey of the Learning Styles Among the ITM Perlis Students in the Study of the English Language. Presented to Research and Consultancy Centre. Institut Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor. Chua, Yan Piaw (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill Education. Claxton,C.S.,& Murrell,P.H. (1987). Learning Styles: Implications for Improving Educational Practice. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education. Report No.4. Washington D.C.: The George Washington University. Cody,C. (1983). Learning Styles, Including Hemispheric Dominance: A Comparative Study Of Average, Gifted and Highly Gifted Students in Grades Five Through Twelve. Temple University. Cook,V. (1991). Second Language Learning and Second Language Teaching. Edward Arnold, New York. Curry,L. (1990). A Critique of The Research On Learning Styles. Educational Leadership. 50-52. Danesi M. (1988). Neurological Bimodality and Theories Of Language Teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 10, 13-31. Davies,J.A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Della Valle,J. (1984). An Experimental Investigation of the Relationships Between Preference for Modality and the Word Recognition Scores of Seventh Grade Students to Provide Supervisory and Administrative Guidelines for the Organization of Effective Instructional Environments. St. John’s University. DePorter,B. & Hernacki,M. (1992). Quantum Learning. New York: Dell Publishing. Dulay,H.C. & Burt,M.K. Natural Sequences in Child Second Language Acquisition. Language Learning. 24(1974a): 37-53. Dunn,R. (1983). Learning Style and Its Relation to Exceptionally at both Ends of the Spectrum. Exceptional Children. 4(6), 496-506. Dunn,R. (1984). Learning Style: State of the Science. Theory into Practice. 23(1), 11-19. Dunn,R. (1990). Rita Dunn Answers Questions On Learning Styles. Educational Leadership. 48(2), 15-19. Dunn,R. & Price,G.E. (1980). Identifying the Learning Style Characteristics of Gifted Children. Gifted Child Quarterly. 24, 33-36. Dunn,R. & Stevenson,J.M (1997). Teaching Diverse College Students To Study A Learning Style Prescription. College Student Journal. 31(3), 333-339. Dunn,R. & Dunn,K. (1978). Teaching Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: A Practical Approach. Reston, Virginia: Reston Publishing. Dunn,R., & Griggs,S.A. (1995). Multiculturalism and Learning Styles. Westport, CT : Praeger. Dunn,R., & Dunn,K. (1986). The Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model of Instruction. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://www.ethica.dk/doc_uflash/The%20Dunn%20 and%20Dunn%20Learning%20Style%20Model%20of%20 Instruction.htm Dunn, R., Cavanaugh, D., Eberle, B., & Zenhausern, R. (1982). Hemispheric Preference: The Newest Element of Learning Style. The American Biology Teacher. 44(5), 291-294. Dunn,R., Dunn K., & Price,G.E. (1975). Manual: Learning Style Inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems. Dunn,R., Gemake,J., Jalali,F., Zenhausern,R., Quinn,P. & Spiridakis,J. (1990) Cross-Cultural Difference in the Learning Styles of Elementary-Age Students From Four Ethnic Backgrounds. Journal of Muticultural Counseling and Development. 18(2), 68-93. Ewing,N.J. & Yong,F.L. (1992). A Comparative Study of the Learning Style Preferences Among Gifted African-American, Mexican-American, and American-Born Chinese Middle Grade Students. Roeper Review. 14(3), 120-123. Felder, R.M. (1995). Learning Styles. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/ felder/public/Learning_Styles.html Felder, R.M. dan Henriques, E.R. (1995). Learning and Teaching Styles in Foreign and Second Language Education. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 21-21. Ellis,R. (2001). Form-Focused Instruction and Second Language Learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Gagne,R.M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. 4th Edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Gay,L.R. & Airasian,P. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. (7th Edi.) NJ: Perason Education, Inc. Gazilah Mohd Isa (2005). Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Bahasa Arab Komunikasi. Universiti Malaya. Good, T. & Brophy, J. (1987). Looking in Classrooms. New York: Harper and Row. Green,S.B., & Akey,T.M. (1997). Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and Understanding Data. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Gregorc,A.F. (1979). Learning/Teaching Styles: Their Nature and Effects. In J.W. Keefe (Ed.), Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals. Griggs,S.A., & Price,G.E. (1980a) Learning Styles Of Gifted Versus Average Junior High School Students. Kappan. 61, 361. Griggs,S.A., & Price,G.E. (1980b). A Comparison between the Learning Styles of Gifted Versus Average Suburban Junior High School Students. Roeper Review Guild,P.B., & Garger,S. (1985). Marching to Different Drummers. Alexandria, VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Hamid Norni Hamid, Aishah Hasman, Zahriah Hussin & Kamarulzaman Abd. Ghani (2010). Pendekatan Komunikatif Dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Arab Di Malaysia : Pelaksanaan dan Cabaran. Proceedings International Conference On Islamic Education. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, 29 November - 1 Disember. Hamidah Jaafar Sidek (2002). Stail Pembelajaran Pelajar Terhadap Prestasi Akademik di UiTM Kampus Arau. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Hamzah Hassan (1997). Perbandingan Pengajaran Bahasa Arab Tinggi (AALI) dan Bahasa Arab Komunikasi: Satu Kajian Kes di Sekolah Menengah Arab. Universiti Malaya. Hanisah Binti Abdullah (2008). Gaya Pembelajaran dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Tahun Tiga UTM, Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Hansen,H.H. & Heuser,P.M. (1971). Are Sampling Some Principal Design in Frakin, B.J. and Osborne, H.W. (ed) Research Method: Issue an Insight. California: Wadworth Publishing Company, Inc. Hargreaves,D.J. (1996). How Undergraduate Students Learn. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(4), 425-434. Hart,L.A. (1976). The Misconceptions About Learning Disabilities. Principals. 56, 54-57. Hassan Basri Awang Mat Dahan, dan Muhammad Azhar Zailaini (2000). Kurikulum Baru Bahasa Arab Komunikasi dan Bahasa Arab Tinggi Sekolah Menengah. Masalah Pendidikan. 27 . pp. 65-74. ISSN 0126-5024. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi myais.fsktm.um.edu.my/5087/1/5.pdf Haynes,J. (2001). Teach to Students Learning Styles. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://www.everythingesl.net/inservices/ learningstyle.php Helan Nor Abdullah (2004). The Relationships Between Learning Styles, Gender, Overall Academic Achievement and English Language Achievement of Students in A Religious Secondary School. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Hill, J.E. (1976). The Educational Sciences. Bloomfield Hills, MI:Oaklang Community College. Hodges,H. (1982). Madison Prep: Alternatives Through Learning Styles. In Student Learning Styles and Brain Behavior. Reston, VA: National Assocation for Secondary School Principals Hodges,H. (1983). Learning Styles: Rx for Mathaphobia. Arithmetic Teacher. 30(7), 17-20. Honey,P. & Mumford, A. (1986). Using Your Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Pete Honey Publications. Hunt,D.E., Butler,L.F., Noy,J.E., and Rosser,M.E. (1978). Assessing Conceptual Level by the Paragraph Completion Method. Toronto: Ontario Institut for Studies in Education. Hyland,K. (1993). Culture and Learning a Study of the Learning Style Preference of Japanese Students. RELC Journal. 24(2), 69-91 Idris Awang, Dr. Prof. Madya (2001). Kaedah Penyelidikan : Suatu Sorotan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. Intel Multimedia and Publication. Isaac,S. & Michael,W.B. (1981). Handbook Book in Research and Evaluation. (2nd ed.), San Diego: Edits Publishers. Ishak Mohd Rejab, et. al. (1992). Pendidikan Islam Malaysia : Masalah Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Malaysia. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Ismail Muda (1999). Satu Kajian Penguasaan Bahasa Arab di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Pengkalan Chepa. Universiti Malaya. Jacob,C.L. & Ary,D. (1990). Introduction to Research in Education. Orlando: Harcourt Brance College Publishers. Janudin Sardi & Mohd Zaki Abdul Rahman (2009). Persepsi Pelajar Terhadap Pengintegrasian Kemahiran Bahasa Arab Dengan Multimedia. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Teknologi dan Inovasi Pengajaran-Pembelajaran. Universiti Putra Malaysia, 28-29 April. Kagan,J. (1967). Personality and the Learning Process. In Kagan J. (Ed.), Creativity and Learning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 153-163. Kagan,K. dan Kogan,N. (1970). Individual Variation In Cognitive Processes. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology . New York: Wiley. Kamarul Shukri Mat Teh & Mohamed Amin Embi (2009). Korelasi Strategi dan Motivasi Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan. Universiti Sains Malaysia, 24, 109-123. Kamarul Shukri Mat Teh, Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff, Mohamed Amin Embi & Zamri Mahamod (2009) Penggunaan Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Berdasarkan Tahap Pendidikan Ibu Bapa. Proceedings of The International Conference on Languages. UiTM Pulau Pinang, 27-28 Mei. Keefe,J.W. (1979). Learning Style : An Overview In NASSP’s Student Learning Styles : Diagnosing and Prescibing Program. Reston, VA : National Association Of Secondary School Principals Keefe,J.W. (1987). Learning Styles:Theory and Practice. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals. Kolb,D.A. (1974). Organizational Psychology : An Experiential Approach. Prentice-Hall. Kolb,D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Krashen,S. (1973). Lateralization, Language Learning and the Critical Period: Some New Evidence. Language Learning. 23, 63-74. Krashen,S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. New York: Pergamon Press. Krejcie,R.V., & Morgan,D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30, 608. Lantolf,J.P. (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lindelow,J. (1983). The Emerging Science of Individualized Instruction. ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, Eugene: University of Oregon. Likert,R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology. 140, 1–55. Lourdusamy (1994). Perbezaan Gaya Kognitif Individu dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pendidikan. Siri Syarahan Perlantikan Profesor. 1995/Bil. 3. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Lynch, P.K. (1981). An Analysis of the Relationships Among Academic Achievement, Aftendance and the Individual Learning Style Time Preferences of Eleventh and Twelfth Grade Students Identified as Initial or Chronic Truants in a Suburban New York School District. St.John’s University. Maktab Mahmud. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi laman web: http://maahadalorsetar.blogspot.com/ Mann,P.H. (1985). Methods of Social Investigation. Oxford : Basil Blackwell. Mat Taib Pa (2006). Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Malaysia. Universiti Malaya. McCaulley,M.H. & Natter,F.L. (1980). Psychological (Myers-Briggs) Type Differences in Education. Gainsville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Inc. McLoughlin,C. (1999). The Implications Of The Research Literature On Learning Styles For The Design Of Instructional Material. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. 15(3), 222-241. Melton,C.D. (1990). Bridging The Cultural Gap: A Study of Chinese Students Learning Style Preferences. RECL Journal. 21(1), 29 Meriam,S.B. (1998). Case Study Research in Education. A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Miller,C.D., Always,M., & McKinley,D.L. (1987). Effects of Learning Styles and Strategies on Academic Success. Journal of College Student Personnel. 31, 147-154. Misnan Jemali (1999). Hubungan Antara Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Bahasa Arab Komunikasi Sekolah Menengah Rendah Di Negeri Perak. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Mitchell,R. & Myles,F. (1998). Second Language Learning Theories. London: Arnold. Mohd Majid Konting (1990). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Nawi Ab. Rahman (1998). Kaedah Statistik. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Mohd Nor Ihkasan & Hazwani Sapar (2007). Gaya Pembelajaran di Kalangan Pelajar-Pelajar Sarjana Muda Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional di Universiti Tun Hussein Onn. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Institut Perguruan Batu Lintang. Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, 5-6 September. Mohd Rizuan Abd. Rasip (2002). Strategi Pengajaran Bahasa Arab di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama (SMKA) dan Sekolah Menengah Agama Persekutuan (SMAP) di Malaysia. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Mohd Safarin Nordin & Diyana Abdul Razak (2010). Tahap Kemahiran Visualisasi dan Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar-Pelajar Daerah Johor Bahru Dalam Mata Pelajaran Lukisan Kejuruteraan. Seminar Majlis Dekan-Dekan Pendidikan IPTA. Bahagian Teknologi Pendidikan, Bahagian Pengurusan Guru dan Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, 2-3 Ogos. Mohd Salleh Abu & Zaidatun Tafsir (2001). Pengenalan Kepada Analisis Data Berkomputer SPSS 10.0 for Windows. Kuala Lumpur: Venton Publishing. Mohd Zaidi Mohd Zain (2006). Metodologi Pengajian Bahasa Arab : Kajian di Sekolah Agama Raudah al-Nazirin, Jerimbong, Jeli, Kelantan. Universiti Malaya. Mutchler,J.F., Turner,J.H., & Williams,D.D. (1987). The Performance of Female Versus Male Accounting Students, Issues in Accounting Education. 2(1), 103-110. Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff & Kamarulzaman Ab. Ghani (2008), Penggunaan Alat Bantu Mengajar dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Kemahiran Mendengar Bahasa Arab. Jurnal Teknologi. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 49(E), 141-154. Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff, Zamri Mahamod & Kamarulzaman Ab.Ghani (2008), Motivasi Pembelajaran Kemahiran Mendengar Bahasa Arab dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia. Universiti Sains Malaysia, 33, 3-11. Nohayati Sa'adah Che Abdul Razak (2008). Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar Kejuruteraan di Universiti Tun Hussein Onn. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Norasyidkin Ithnin (2011). Hubungan di antara Jantina dan Gaya Pembelajaran Terhadap Pencapaian Murid Dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematik. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Norlia T. Goolamally (2000). Hubungan di antara Gaya Belajar Dengan Pencapaian Matematik dan Pencapaian Akademik di Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Universiti Malaya. Nor Effendy Ahmad Sokri, Mohamad Syukri Abdul Rahman, Muhammad Haron Husaini, Ismail Omar, Mohamed Fairooz Mohd Fathillah & Yuszaimi Muslil (2010). Motivasi di Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Sebagai Bahasa Kedua. Proceedings International Conference On Islamic Education. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, 29 November - 1 Disember. Nor Fairuz Hayati Amir (2009) Hubungan Antara Gaya Pembelajaran Terhadap Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Kejuruteraan Dalam Subjek Berkaitan Grafik Kejuruteraan Berkomputer. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Nunally (1969). Reliability Value. In Imam Ghozali (Ed.), Application of Multivariate Amalysis with SPSS Programme, 140. (Diterjemah). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip. Orsak,L. (1990). Learning Style Versus the Rip Van Winkle Syndrome. Educational Leadership. 48(2), 19-21. Orstein,N. & Thompson,R. (1976). The Amazing Brain. U.S.A.: Stanford University. Oxford, R. et. al., (1992). Language Learning Styles: Research and Practical Considerations for Teaching in the Multicultural Tertiary ESL / EFL Classroom. System. Paragon Learning Style Inventory (2000). Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://www.oswego.edu/plsi/ Oxford,R., & Lavine,R. (1991). Teacher-Student Style Wars in the Language Classroom: Research Insights Suggestions. ADFL Bulletin. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://www.adfl.org/bulletin/V23N2/232038.HTM Pask,G. (1988). Learning Strategies, Teaching Strategies and Conceptual or Learning Style. In R.R.Schmenck (Ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. New York: Plenum Press . Pedoman Transliterasi Huruf Arab ke Huruf Rumi (1992). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Perrin,J. (1984). An Experimental Investigation of the Relationships Among the Llearning Style Sociological Preferences of Gifted and Normal Primary Children, Selected Instructional Strategies, Attitude and Achievement In Problem Solving and Word Recognition. St. John’s University Perrin,J. (1990). The Learning Styles Project for Potential Dropout. Educational Leadership. 48(2), 23-24 Piaget,J. (1963). The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge, New York. Pizzo,J. (1981). An Investigation of the Relationship Between Selected Acoustic Environments and Sound, an Element of Learning Style, as They Affect Sixth Grade Student’s Reading Achievement and Attitudes. St. John’s University. Pizzo,J. (1983). Breaking the Sound Barrier - Classrooms Letters and Learning Style Set : Research Information for Teachers. New Zealand : New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Portal Rasmi Bahagian Pendidikan Islam. Pengenalan SMKA. Diperolehi pada Disember 12, 2011 menerusi http://bpi.edu.my/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=122&Itemid=20&lang=bm Price,G.E. et. al., (1977). Summary of Research on Learning Style Based on the Learning Style. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. 4-8 April. Reid,J. (1987). The Perceptual Learning Style Preferences of ESL Students. TESOL Quarterly. 21(2), 87 – 111. Reid,J. (Ed). (1995). Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Reid.J. (1984). Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://lookingahead.heinle.com/filing/l-styles. htm Renzulli. J. & Smith, L.H. (1978). Learning Styles Inventory. Monsfield Centre, CT: Creative Learning Press. Restak, R.M. (1979). The Other Difference Between Boys and Girls. In J.W.Keefe (Ed.), Student Learning Styles : Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary Principals. Robiah Hamid (1996). Stail Belajar : Satu Kajian di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah.Universiti Malaya. Rosmaria Abdullah (2006). Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Murid Tingkatan Empat di Sebuah Sekolah Menengah (FELDA) Daerah Bentong, Pahang. Universiti Malaya. Rosni Samah (2009). Isu Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Malaysia. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. Rusniza Mohammad (1998). Kemahiran pengajaran bahasa Arab: Satu Kajian Khusus di Sekolah-Sekolah Agama Negeri Kelantan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Sarena Abdul Karim (2003). Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Tingkatan Empat di Dua Buah Sekolah Di Negeri Sembilan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Laporan PSM. Tidak diterbitkan. Schmek,R.R. (1998). Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. New York: Plenum Press. Sedlack R.G., & Stanley, J. (1992), Social Research : Theory and Methods. Boston U.S.A.: Allyn and Bacon. Selmen, I. (1987). Improving Study Skills. London: Hadder and Stoughton. Sery Sohair Abdel Moneim (1990). Satu Tinjauan Tentang Masalah-masalah Pengajaran Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Di Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Agama Di Malaysia. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Shareena Mohd. Hashim. (1995). Learning Style Preferences of Malay ESP Learners : A Case Study of Learner Variables and Exposure Among University of Malaya Students. University of Malaya. Sharifah Fatimah Wan Jamel (2002). Pengaruh Guru Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab: Satu Kajian Kes. Universiti Malaya. Sharmiza Ahmad (2003). Pengajian Bahasa Arab di Sekolah Menengah Agama Rakyat : Suatu Kajian Tentang Keberkesanannya di Kalangan Pelajar di Daerah Yan Kedah. Universiti Malaya. Shaughnessy,M.F. (1998). An Interview with Rita Dunn About Learning Styles. Clearing House. 71(3), 141-145. Sheldon,E.R., & Jannes,D. (1976). Commentary: Complexity of Sex Comparisons. In S. Messick and Associates (Eds.), Individuality in Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Shoebottom,P. (2007). ESL site - Webmaster. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://esl.fis.edu/info/infofiles/master.htm Siti Ikbal Sheikh Salleh (2006). Masalah Penguasaan Pertuturan Bahasa Arab di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Agama di Selangor. Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Malaysia. Universiti Malaya. Soloman,B.A., & Felder,R.M. (1992). Index of Learning Styles Questionaire. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ ilsweb.html Spiridakis, J. N.(1983). Learning Styles and the Bilingual Child : Diagnostic Approches. Learning Styles Network Newsletter. 4(2), 6. Stebbins,C. (1995). Culture-Specific Perceptual Learning Style Preferences of Post Secondary Students of English As a Second Language. Dalam J.M.Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles In The ESL/EFL Classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. 109-117 Sternberg,J.R (1994). Theory and Assesment at the Interface Between Intelligence and Personality. In Intelligence and Personality. Sternberg J.R., & Ruzgis,P. (Edi.), New York: Cambridge University Press. Sulaiman Ngah Razali (1996). Analisis Data Dalam Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Tanenbaum,R. (1982). An Investigation Of The Relationships Between Selected Instructional Techniques and Identified Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Styles As Evidenced Among High School Students Enrolled in Studies of Nutrition. St. John's University. Torkelson,K. (1995). Learning Styles and ITA Training. Dalam J.M Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles In The ESL/EFL Classroom. Boston: Heinle and Heinle. 134-148. Tyson,T. (1989) Grade Performance in Introductory Accounting Courses : Why Female Students Outperform Males. Issues in Accounting Education. 4(1), 153-160. Wan Roslan Wan Ali (2004). Kepelbagaian Gaya Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Agama Negeri Sembilan Darul Khusus. Universiti Kebangsaaan Malaysia. Van Dalen,D.B. (1993). Memahami Penyelidikan Pendidikan : Satu Pengenalan. (ed. ke 4), terjemahan Abdul Fatah Abd. Malik dan Mohd Majid Konting. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. Virostko,J. (1983). An Analysis of the Relationships Among Student Academic Achievement in Mathematics and Reading. Assigned Instruction Schedules and the Learning Style Time Preferences of a New York Suburbun School's Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Grade Students. St. John's University. Wheeler,R. (1980). Alternative to Failure : Teaching Reading According to Student's Perceptual Strengths. Kappa Delta Pi Record. 17(2), 59-63. Wheeler,R. (1983). An Investigation of the Degree of Academic Achievement Evidenced When Second Grade, Learning Disabled Students’ Perceptual Strengths Are Matched and Mismatched with Complementary Sensory Approaches to Beginning Reading Instruction. St. John’s University. Whitefield,D. (1995). Learning Styles-Great Minds Don't Think Alike!, In Summers,L. (Ed). A Focus on Learning. 271-275. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Teaching learning Forum, Edith Cowan University, Feb 1995. Perth: Edith Cowan University. Diperolehi pada Disember 27, 2009 menerusi http://otl.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1995/ whitefield.html Willing, (K. (1989). Teaching How to Learn. Sydney, Australia: National Center for English Teaching and Research. Macquarie University. Witkin H.A., and Goodenough,D.R. (1981). Cognitive Styles: Essence and Origins. Field Dependence and Field Independence. New York: International Universities Press. Witkin, H.A. (1976). Cognitive Styles in Academic Performance and in Teacher Student Relations. In S. Messick and Associates (Eds.), Individuality In Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Yahaya Mahamood (1992). Statistik Inferensi Untuk Sains Tingkah Laku. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Yusoff Ismail (1982). A Study of the Relationships Between Achievement Motivation and Learning Styles of a Group of Malaysian Students Attending Northern Illinois University. Northern Illinois University. Zalizan Mohd Jelas (2003). Kajian Oleh Pakar Pendidik Menemui Empat Faktor Utama. Berita Harian. Mukasurat 11. Zamani Ibrahim (2007). Hubungan Antara Gaya Pengajaran Guru Dengan Sikap Pelajar Terhadap bahasa Arab. Universiti Kebangsaaan Malaysia. Zawawi Ismail, Ab Halim Tamuri, Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff & Mohd Ala-Uddin Othman (2011). Teknik Pengajaran Kemahiran Bertutur Bahasa Arab di SMKA di Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 11(2), 67-82. Zubaidah Begam Mohamed Zakaria (2007). Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Akademik : Tinjauan di Kalangan Pelajar-Pelajar Sarjana Muda Pendidikan Tahun Pertama, UTM, Skudai, Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Zubaidah Ahmad Ishak (1999). Perhubungan Antara Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Akademik. Universiti Malaya.

Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi di Maktab Mahmud, Alor Setar, Kedah

Similar Items