A Framework to Study Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Information Technology in Yemen Government

Organizations around the world are looking for the development and keep up to date with emerging technology. Thus, they pay more intention to develop their technology infrastructure to improve productivity, effectiveness, or to adopt e-government. However, in reality, not all companies adopt and use...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Al Haderi, Sami Mohammed Saleh
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2012
Subjects:	T58.5-58.64 Information technology
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3347/1/SAMI_MOHAMMED_SALEH_AL_HADERI.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3347/2/SAMI_MOHAMMED_SALEH_AL_HADERI.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.3347
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Che Razak, Razli Mohd Shamsudin, Faridahwati
topic	T58.5-58.64 Information technology
spellingShingle	T58.5-58.64 Information technology Al Haderi, Sami Mohammed Saleh A Framework to Study Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Information Technology in Yemen Government
description	Organizations around the world are looking for the development and keep up to date with emerging technology. Thus, they pay more intention to develop their technology infrastructure to improve productivity, effectiveness, or to adopt e-government. However, in reality, not all companies adopt and use effectively, or even use, information technology. And in reality, not all employees in organizations accept, adopt, and use effectively, or even use, information technology. When this happens, there is a gap between the ideal and the reality of the actual usage of information technology. As a result, there is need to study and understand the factors affecting the acceptance of technologies. This study aims to test the success of the technology acceptance model in Yemen culture. In addition, This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the acceptance of technology in Yemen public sector. This study developed a framework based on two theories, TAM 2 and UTAUT. In addition, the study added two important factors of organization culture and government support to the key factors in the theory of technology acceptance in order to provide better understanding for the factors influencing the acceptance of information technology among the individual perceptions. survey questionnaire was distributed to 53 government utilities and 357 cases were used in the analysis. Structural Equition Modeling AMOS 18 was used for the analysis of the proposed model, from a total 14 hypothesis, 11 were supported and three hypothesis were rejected. This study provided empirical evidence for the effects of new technology determinants in the government sector. In particular, it has successfully revealed that organization culture, government support, subjective norm, top management support and information quality are important determinants in influencing the adoption of technologies. The findings confirmed the theory of TAM and showed its potential capability in the Middle East, particularly in Yemen.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Al Haderi, Sami Mohammed Saleh
author_facet	Al Haderi, Sami Mohammed Saleh
author_sort	Al Haderi, Sami Mohammed Saleh
title	A Framework to Study Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Information Technology in Yemen Government
title_short	A Framework to Study Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Information Technology in Yemen Government
title_full	A Framework to Study Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Information Technology in Yemen Government
title_fullStr	A Framework to Study Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Information Technology in Yemen Government
title_full_unstemmed	A Framework to Study Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Information Technology in Yemen Government
title_sort	framework to study factors influencing the acceptance of information technology in yemen government
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate	2012
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3347/1/SAMI_MOHAMMED_SALEH_AL_HADERI.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3347/2/SAMI_MOHAMMED_SALEH_AL_HADERI.pdf
_version_	1747827552734412800
spelling	my-uum-etd.33472022-04-10T06:02:11Z A Framework to Study Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Information Technology in Yemen Government 2012 Al Haderi, Sami Mohammed Saleh Che Razak, Razli Mohd Shamsudin, Faridahwati Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business T58.5-58.64 Information technology Organizations around the world are looking for the development and keep up to date with emerging technology. Thus, they pay more intention to develop their technology infrastructure to improve productivity, effectiveness, or to adopt e-government. However, in reality, not all companies adopt and use effectively, or even use, information technology. And in reality, not all employees in organizations accept, adopt, and use effectively, or even use, information technology. When this happens, there is a gap between the ideal and the reality of the actual usage of information technology. As a result, there is need to study and understand the factors affecting the acceptance of technologies. This study aims to test the success of the technology acceptance model in Yemen culture. In addition, This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the acceptance of technology in Yemen public sector. This study developed a framework based on two theories, TAM 2 and UTAUT. In addition, the study added two important factors of organization culture and government support to the key factors in the theory of technology acceptance in order to provide better understanding for the factors influencing the acceptance of information technology among the individual perceptions. survey questionnaire was distributed to 53 government utilities and 357 cases were used in the analysis. Structural Equition Modeling AMOS 18 was used for the analysis of the proposed model, from a total 14 hypothesis, 11 were supported and three hypothesis were rejected. This study provided empirical evidence for the effects of new technology determinants in the government sector. In particular, it has successfully revealed that organization culture, government support, subjective norm, top management support and information quality are important determinants in influencing the adoption of technologies. The findings confirmed the theory of TAM and showed its potential capability in the Middle East, particularly in Yemen. 2012 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3347/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3347/1/SAMI_MOHAMMED_SALEH_AL_HADERI.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/3347/2/SAMI_MOHAMMED_SALEH_AL_HADERI.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah Saeed Bani Ali, Frank T. Anbari, & Money,W.H. (2008). Impact of organizational and project factors on acceptance and usage of project management software and perceived project success. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 5-33. Abdullah Saeed Bani Ali, & Money,W.H. (2005, 03-06 Jan. 2005). A Study of Project Management System Acceptance. Paper presented at the the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Hawaii. Agarwal,R. (2000). Individual acceptance of information technologies. Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future through the past, 85-104. Agarwal,R., & Karahanna,E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. Mis Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. Ahna,T., Ryub, S., & Hana.,I. (2007). The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information & Management, 44(3), 263-275. Aiman-Smith,l., & Green,s.G. (2002). Implementing new manufacturing technology: The related effects of technology characteristics and user learning activities. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 421-430. Ajiferuke,I., & Olatokun,W. (2005). Information Technology usage in Nigeria. Encyclopaedia of Information Science and technology by Pour-Khosrow, Mehdi. London: Idea group reference, 3, 1508-1512 pp. Ajjan,H., & Hartshorne,R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80. Ajzen,I. (2002).Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 1-107. Alan Bryman, & Bell,E. (2003). Business research methods. United state-new yark: Oxford University Press. Al-Gahtani,S. (2004). Computer Technology Acceptance Success Factors in Saudi Arabia: An Explorator. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 7(1), 57-69. Ali,J.M.H. (2004). Information technology in the middle east. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 7(1), 1-4. Almutairi,H. (2007). Is the 'Technology Acceptance Model' Universally Applicable?: The Case of the kuwaiti ministries. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 10, 57-80 Alsohybe,N.T. (2007). The implementation of e-government in the Republic of Yemen: An empirical evaluation of the technical and organizational readiness. Unpublished Dissertation, University Microfilms International, P. O. Box 1764, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA, United States-- Minnesota. Andrew Burton-Jones, & Hubona,G.S. (2005). Individual Differences and Usage Behavior: Revisiting a Technology Acceptance Model Assumption. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 58-77. Antonis C. Stylianou, & Jackson,P.J. (2007). A comparative examination of individualdifferences and beliefs on technology usage: Gauging the role of IT. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47(4), 11-18. Attaran,M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between information technology and business process reengineering. Information & Management, 41(5), 585-596. Aversano,N. (2005). Technology rejection of Mobile Telephones Unpublished Doctor of Management Program, Case Western Reserve Universty United States. Bassam Hasan, & Ali,J. (2006). The impact of general and system-specific self-efficacy on computer training learning and reactions. Academy of Information and Management Sciences, 9(1), 23-38. Berisha-Namani,M. (2009).The role of information technology in small and medium sized enterprises in Kosova. Paper presented at the Fulbright Academy 2009 Conference Small Places Can Change the World Retrieved from: http://www.fulbrightacademy.org/file_depot/0-10000000/200003 0000/21647/folder/82430/Berisha+Paper+IT+in+SMEs+in+Kosovo. pdf Besley,T., & Burgess,R. (2002). The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India. [journal]. the quarterly journal of economica, 117(4), 1415- 1451. Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan, Charles H. Apigian,T.S. Ragu-Nathan, & Tu,Q. (2004). A path analytic study of the effect of top management support for information systems performance. omega, 32(6), 459-471. Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan, C.H.A., T.S.Ragu-Nathan,Qiang Tu. (2004). A path analytic study of the effect of top management support for information systems performance. Omega, 32(6), 459-471 Bo Xiao, & Benbasat,I. (2007). E-Commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 137-209. Boo Young Chung, Mirosław J. Skibniewski, Henry C. Lucas Jr., & Kwak,Y.H. (2008). Analyzing enterprise resource planning system implementation success factors in the engineering–construction industry. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 22(6), 373–382. Brien,J.A.O. (2008). Introduction to Information System: Irwin McGraw Hill ,, Galgotia Publication.vol4,Pages 160, 269-272. Brown,I.T.J. (2002). Individual and technology factors affecting perceived ease of use of web-based learning technologies in developing country. The electronic lournal on information system in developing country, EJISDC (2002), 9(5), 1-15. Byrne,B.M. (2010). structural equation modeling with AMOS (2 ed. Vol. 16). united state of america: taylor, francis group, 16(2), 1-230. Byung Gon Kim, Soon Chang Park, & Lee,K.J. (2008). A structural equation modeling of the Internet acceptance in Korea. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(4), 425-432. Chang,P.V.-C. (2004).The validity of an extended technology acceptance model (TAM) for predicting internet/portal usage Unpublished A Master’s paper for the M.S. in I.S. degree, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina. CHAU,P.Y.K. (2001). Influence of Computer Attitude and Self-Efficacy on IT Usage Behavior. Journal of End User Computing, 11(1), 26-28. Claes Fornell, & Larcker,D.F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388 Cohen,J. (2003). the unusually useful web book (1/E ed. Vol.1). united state of america: new riders. Dadayan,L., & Ferro,E. (2005). When Technology Meets the Mind: A Comparative Study of the Technology Acceptance Model Electronic Government. In M.Wimmer, R.Traunmüller, Å. Grönlund & K.Andersen (Eds.), (Vol.3591, pp.137-144): Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. Dale W. Jorgenson, Kevin J. Stiroh, Robert J. Gordon, & Sichel,D.E. (2000). Raising the speed limit: US economic growth in the information age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2000(1(2000)), 125-235 Daniel M.Cable, & DeRue,D.S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. . Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884. Daniel Robey, & Marie-claude Boudreau. (1999). Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 167-185. Darsono,L.I. (2005). examining information technology acceptance. [journal]. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 7(2), 155-178. Davis,F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. Dinesh Mirchandani, & Motwani,J. (2001). End-user perceptions of ERP systems: a case study of an international automotive supplier. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 1(4), 416-424. Donald R. Cooper, & Schindler,P.S. (2003).Business Research Methods (7th ed. Vol. 3). united state: McGraw Hill International Edition. Dutta,S., & Mia,I. (2006-2007). The Global Information Technology Report 2006-2007 (Vol. 6th ): Palgrave Macmillan 2007 Eric T.G. Wang, & Chen,J.H.F. (2006). Effects of internal support and consultant quality on the consulting process and ERP system quality. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 1029-1041 Erik Brynjolfsson, & Yang,S. (1996). Information technology and productivity: a review of the literature. Advances in computers, 43(c), 179-214. Frazer,K.A., Ballinger,D.G., Cox,D.R., Hinds,D.A., Stuve, L.L., Gibbs,R.A., et al. (2007). A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature, 449(7164), 851-861. Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi, & Warshaw,P.R. (1989). acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi, & Warshaw,P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. Goeke,R.J. (2006). An examination of the effects of experience, expertise, and perceived flexibility on data warehouse use. Unpublished Dissertations, Kent State University, United States -- Ohio. Golafshani,N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Test, 8(4), 10. Grandon,E.E., & Pearson,J.M. (2004). Electronic commerce adoption: An empirical study of small and medium US businesses. Information & Management, 42(1), 197-216. Guido Vonk, Stan Geertman, & Schot,P. (2007). New Technologies Stuck in Old Hierarchies: The Diffusion of Geo-Information Technologies in dutch public organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 745-756. Gupta,B., Dasgupta,S., & Schot,P. (2008). Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 140-154. Hair,J.F., Black,W.C., Babin,B.J., & Anderson,R.E. (2010). multivariate data analysis,7/E (7th ed.). upper saddle river, : Prentice Hall , 7th, pp816. Harry Bouwman,B.v.d.h., Wijngaert,L.v.d., & dijk,J.v. (2002) . information & communication technology in organizations: adoption, implementation, use and effects (Vol. 1). california: SAGE publications Inc, vol 1, pp 1-219. Haslina Mohd, Sharifah-Mastura Syed-Mohamad, & Zaini,B.J. (2005). Correlation between information quality, user acceptance and doctor's attitude of EMR System ICOQSIA 2005, 6-8 December, Penang, Malaysia, 1-6 http://health-informatics.kk.usm.my/pdf/ICOQSIA.pdf. Hoepfl,M.C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education 9(1). HORZELLA,Å. (2005). Beyond IT and productivity. [Dissertation]. Linkoping Studies in Science and Technology, 005/EIS-45(45). Hu,P., Chau,P., & Sheng,O. (2002).Adoption of telemedicine technology by health care organizations: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 12(3), 179-221. Hwan-Joo Seo, Young Soo Lee, & Oh,J.H. (2009). Does ICT investment widen the growth gap? Telecommunications Policy, 33(8), 422-431 I.Watanabe, & M.Nodu. (2004, 03 September 2004). A genetic algorithm for optimizing switching sequence of service restoration in distribution systems. Paper presented at the Evolutionary Computation. CEC2004. , Tokyo, Japan. Ian Phau, J.S., Gan. (2000). The Effects Of Technological And Individual Characteristics On Flow Experience An Agenda Of Hypotheses. [An Agenda of Hypotheses]. School of Marketing Curtin University of Technology & Surrey European Business School, 981–984. Ian Phau,J.S.G. (2000). effects of technology and individual characteristics on flow experience. Paper presented at the Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge. Icek Ajzen, & Fishbein,M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European review of social psychology, 11(1), 1-33 IInge M.. Klloppiing, & McKiinney, E. (2004). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task-Technology Fit Model to Consumer E-commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 22(1), 35-47. Inge M. Klopping, & Earl McKinney,J. (2006). Practice Makes a Difference:Experience and E-Commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 24(1), 25-37. Irene Mia, & Dutta,S. (2007-2008). The Global Information Technology Report 2007-2008: Fostering Innovation Through Networked Readiness. France Palgrave Macmillan. Jen-Her Wu, Wen-Shen Shen, Li-Min Lin, Robert A. Greenes, & Bates,D.W. (2008). Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(2), 123-129. Juergen Biener, Andrea M. Hodge, Joel R. Hayes, Cynthia A. Volkert, Luis A. Zepeda-Ruiz, Alex V. Hamza, et al. (2006). Size effects on the mechanical behavior of nanoporous Au. Nano Lett, 6(10), 2379-2382. Kamel Rouibah, Hosny I. Hamdy, & Majed Z. Al-Enezi. (2009). Effect of management support, training, and user involvement on system usage and satisfaction in Kuwait. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(3), 338-356. Khawaja A. Saeed, & Abdinnour-Helm, S. (2008). Examining the effects of information system characteristics and perceived usefulness on post adoption usage of information systems. Information & Management, 45(6), 376-386. Kiraz,E., & Ozdemir,D. (2006). The Relationship between Educational Ideologies and Technology Acceptance in Pre-service Teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 152-165 retrived from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=110.151.151.109.6185&rep=rep6181&type= pdf. Kwan,R., & Wang,F.L. (2009). Hybrid Learning(ICHL2009). Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Hybrid Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cityu.edu.hk/~ ichl2009/ICHL2009_Local.pdf. Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah, & Salam,A.F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41(6), 731-745. Ledyard R Tucker, & Lewis,C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38(1), 1-10. Lester (Les) A. Singletary, Asli Yagmur Akbulut, & Houston, A.L. (2002). Innovative software use after mandatory adoption Paper presented at the Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, united state of America. Lisa Seymour, Wadzanai Makanya, & Berrangé,S. (2007, April 11-13, 2007). End-Users’ Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: An Investigation of Antecedents. Paper presented at the the 6th Annual ISOnEworld Conference, Las Vegas, NV April 11-13, 2007. Louise K. Schaper, & Pervan,G.P. (2004). A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. [Information Technology in Health Care: Sociotechnical Approaches ]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(Supplement 1), S212-S221. Lucy Dadayan, & Ferro,E. (2005). When technology meets the mind: A comparative study of the technology acceptance model. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/ arkj2m8pu7mrvvr7/. Lynda Aiman-Smith, & Green,S.G. (2002). Implementing New Manufacturing Technology: The Related Effects of Technology Characteristics and User Learning Activities. [journal]. The Academy of Management Journal, 25(2), 421-430 M.Lynne Markus, C.T., Paul C. van Fenema (2000). Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations. [Magazine] . Communications of the ACM 43(4). Marieke de Mooij, & Hofstede,G. (2002). Convergence and divergence in consumer behavior: implications for international retailing. Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 61-69 Martin Fishbein, & Ajzen,I. (1975).Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. london, england: Addison-Wesley Pub (Sd) (June 1975) Martin Neil Baily, Robert J. Gordon, William D. Nordhaus, & Romer,D. (1988). The productivity slowdown, measurement issues, and the explosion of computer power. [journal]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988(2), 347-431. Matthew S. Eastin, & LaRose,R. (2000). Internet Self Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(1), http://jcmc.india na.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html. Merchant,S. (2007). Exploring the Influence of Cultural Values on the Acceptance of Information Technology: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (Vol. 4). santa rosa, california 95409 USA: information science press. Mike W. Chiasson, & Lovato,C.Y. (2001). Factors influencing the formation of a user's perceptions and use of a DSS software innovation. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 16-35. Gong M. , Xu Y., Yu Y. (2004). An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 1-365. Ministry of civil,i. (2008). The Number of Employees according to the government unites. Mohamad Noorman Masrek,N.S.A.K., & Hussein,R. (2007). Investigating corporate intranet effectiveness: a conceptual framework. Information Management & Computer Security, 15(3), 168-183. Yi M.Y., Hwang Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431- 449. Rackoff N. , Wiseman C. , & Ullrich,W.A. (1985).Information Systems for Competitive Advantage: Implementation of a Planning Process. MIS Quarterly, 9, 10. Norman Au,W.T. Eric Ngai, & T.C. Edwin Cheng. (2008). Extending the understanding of end user Information systems satisfaction Formation: An Equitable Needs fulfillment Model Approach. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 43-66. Nov,O., & Ye,C. (2008).Personality and technology acceptance : Personal innovativeness in IT, openness and resistance to change. Paper presented at the the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=4439 153 Olatz Lopez-Fernandez, & Rodriguez-Illera,J.L. (2008). Investigating university students’ adaptation to a digital learner course portfolio. Computers & Education, 52(3), 608- 616. Raaij,E.M.v., & Schepers,J.J.L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838-852. Rajiv Kishore, & McLean,E.R. (2001). Thw role of personal innovativeness and self-efficacy in Information technology acceptance: an extension of TAM with notions of risk Paper presented at the Twenty-Second International Conference on Information Systems, New york. Ramazan Yalcinkaya,B.A., M.S. (2007). Police officers' adoprion of information technology: a case study of the turkish POLNET system. Unpublished Dissertation, Univesity of North Texas, North Texas. Randall E. Schumacker, & Lomax,R.G. (2004). a brginner's guide to structural equation modeling (Vol. 2nd): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2nd, 1-499. Raúl Medina Moraa,T.W., Rodrigo Floresa, Fernando Floresa. (1993). The action workflow approach to workflow management technology. [journal]. The Information Society 9(4), 391-404 Raykov,T. (2001).Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54(2), 315–323. Ritu Agarwal,j.p. (1999). are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technology? Decision sciences, 30(2), 361-390. Roland Traunmuller,K.L. (2002).electronic government. Paper presented at the First International Conference, EGOV 2002, Aix-en-Provence, France, September 2-5, 2002., Berlin. Schepers,J., & Wetzels,M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90- 103. Schrodt,P. (2002). The relationship between organizational identification andorganizational culture: Employee perceptions of culture and identification in a retailsales organization’. Communication Studies, 53(3), 189-202. Sekaran,U. (2006). reseach methods for business, a skill-building approch (4 ed. Vol. 4). new Delhi, fourth edition, 4th, pp 450: john wiley & sons, Inc. Sharp,J.H. (2006). Development, Extension, and Application: A Review of the Technology Acceptance Model. information system education journal, 5(9), 1-10. Shih,Y.-Y., & Huang,S.-S. (2009). The actual usage of erp systems: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 41(3), 263-276. Simmons,B.A. (2000). international law and state behavior: commitment and compliance in international menyary affairs. [journal]. The American Political Science Review, 94(4), 819 -835. Sircar,S., Turnbow,J.L., & .,B.B. (2000). A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. [Journal]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 69-97. Sliuzas,R. (1999). information requirements planning management functions processes supported extensive data collection analysis capacity Paper presented at the ESF/N- Aerus Annual workshop, Leuven-Brussels, 23-26 May, 2001. Retrieved from http://www.naerus.net/venezia/ or http://www.n-aerus.net/web/sat/workshops/2001/paper/sliuzas. pdf. Smith,D.P. (2008). Models of Successful Adoption and Implementation for IT Projects in the Public Sector. Unpublished Dissertation, Walden University, United States. srinivasan,A. (1985). alternativemeasures of system effectiveness: associations and implications. mis quarterly , 9(3), 243-253. Staples,D.S., Wong,I., & Seddon,P.B. (2002). Having expectations of information systems benefits that match received benefits: does it really matter? Information & Management, 40(2), 115-131. Starr,S.H. (2005). The Challenges Associated with Achieving Interoperability in Support of Net-Centric Operations. Paper presented at the the 10thCommand and Control Research and TechnologySymposium. Retrieved from http://handle.dtic. mil/100.2/ADA463978 SungPark, Marita A.O'Brien, Kelly E.Caine, Wendy A.Rogers, Arthur D.Fisk, KoertsVan Ittersum, et al. (2006, 2006-01-01) . Acceptance of Computer Technology: Understanding the User and the Organizational Characteristics. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, Macroergonomics Suzanne Rivard, Louis Raymond, & Verreault, D. (2006). Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance. Journal of strategic information systems, 15(1) , 29-50. Tae Goo Kim,J.H.L., Rob Law. (2007). An empirical examination of the acceptance behaviour of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model. Tourism Management, 29(2), 500-513. Tang,S.-M. (2000). An impact factor model of Intranet adoption: an exploratory and empirical research. The Journal of Systems & Software, 51(3), 157-173. Taracan,E., Varol,E.S., & Toker,B. (2010). A Study on the acceptance of information technologies from the perspectives of the acadimicians in turkey. Ege Academic Review, 10(3), 791-812. Teo,T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312. Tero Pikkarainen, Kari Pikkarainen, Heikki Karjaluoto, & Pahnila,S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 14(3), 224-235. Thomas Patrick Hayes. (2006). AN examination of the factors that influence an auditor's decision to use AID in their assessment of management fraud Unpublished Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of North Texas, Denton, Texas. Tony Ahn, Seewon Ryu, & Han,I. (2007). The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information & Management, 44(3), 263-275 Vathanophas,V., Nattapon Krittayaphongphun, & Chalalai Klomsiri. (2008). Technology acceptance toward e-government initiative in Royal Thai Navy. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(4), 256-282. Visawanath Venkatesh, & Speier,C. (2000). Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(6), 991-1006. Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, & Davis,F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology toward a unified view MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. VJswanath Venkatesh, & Morris,M.G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop ask for directions? gender,social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139. W.H.Loo, P.H.P.Y., S.C.Chong. (2009). User acceptance of Malaysian government multipurpose smartcard applications. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2009)(2), 358–367. Watson,R.T. (2007). Global text (Vol. 2). USA: The worldwide community of IS academics. William G. Chismar, & Wiley-Patton,S. (2003). Does the Extended Technology Acceptance Model Apply to Physicians. Paper presented at the IEEE, Hawaii. William G. Chismar, & Wiley-Patton,S. (2003, 2003). Does the Extended Technology Acceptance Model Apply to Physicians, hicss. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(HICSS'03) , vol 6, pp 1-160, Big Island, Hawaii William Lewis, Ritu Agarwal, & V.Sambamurthy. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 657-678. Xin Li, Traci J.Hess, Anna L.McNab, & Yu,Y. (2009). Culture and acceptance of global web sites: a cross-country study of the effects of national cultural values on acceptance of a personal web portal. ACM SIGMIS Database, 40(4), 49-74. Yang, H.-d., & Yoo,Y. (2004). It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, 38(1), 19-31. YANG,H.-H. (2007). The effect of technology acceptance on undergraduate students' usage of WEBCT as a collabrative tool Unpublished A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy, the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida, Florida. Ya-Yueh Shih, & Fang,K. (2006). Effects of network quality attributes on customer adoption intentions of Internet Banking. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 17(1), 61-77. Yeniyurt,S., & Townsend,J.D. (2003). Does culture explain acceptance of new products in a country?: An empirical investigation. International Marketing Review, 20(4), 377- 396. Yi,M.Y., & Hwang,Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431- 449. Yoon,C. (2009). The effects of national culture values on consumer acceptance of e-commerce: Online shoppers in China. Information & Management, 46(5), 294-301. Zakour,A.B. (2004). Cultural differences and information technology acceptance. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems, united state. Zakour,A.B. (2008). Cultural differences and Information technology acceptance Paper presented at the the 7th Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems. \(http://www.smallbusinessbible.org/advan_disadvan_informati ontechnology.html # 3/4/2009). https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ym.html or (CIA-The Central Intelligence Agency, 2005)

A Framework to Study Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Information Technology in Yemen Government

Similar Items