Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: Analisis Bentuk, Tema, dan Nilai
The topic of this research is “Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: An Analysis on Form, Theme and Value”. The objective of this study is to clarify the form, theme and value contained in the expression of comedy (kombur jenaka) in the Angkola Mandailing language amongst its citizens. The methodology...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Thesis |
| 語言: | eng eng |
| 出版: |
2011
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/3395/1/ROSMAWATI_HARAHAP.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3395/2/1.ROSMAWATI_HARAHAP.pdf |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| id |
my-uum-etd.3395 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| collection |
UUM ETD |
| language |
eng eng |
| advisor |
Abdul Aziz, Abdul Rahman |
| topic |
PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia Africa Oceania |
| spellingShingle |
PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia Africa Oceania Harahap, Rosmawati Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: Analisis Bentuk, Tema, dan Nilai |
| description |
The topic of this research is “Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: An Analysis on Form, Theme and Value”. The objective of this study is to clarify the form, theme and
value contained in the expression of comedy (kombur jenaka) in the Angkola Mandailing language amongst its citizens. The methodology used in this study is qualitative, with observatory and interview techniques. Data is gathered by recording the speed of the expressed dictation with a tape recorder. The researcher listens to the taped recording so as to understand spontaneous conversational utterances in the Angkola Mandailing language. The main data sources are selected several elderly informants residing in the Angkola Mandailing district. Research findings reflected from the comedy (kombur jenaka) expressed by the informants are lingual texts which implicate maxim representation (representative), maxim order (directives), maxim argument and maxim imperative combined with paralingual elements. Maxims which are absorbed in the kombur jenaka conversations consist of direct illocutionary acts, locutionary acts, and perlocutionary acts, which are analysed pragmatically and semantically. Data is analysed by using the pragmatic and structural functional thematic approaches. Legend, humour, anecdotes and puzzles are a form of kombur jenaka. Traditional prose, humour and anecdotes expressed by the informants in the kombur jenaka are in the form of dominant contemporary prose which carries the theme of dumb but smart human characters. Such comedy stories, which are characterized by people with the above mentioned character, carries a symbolic meaning in the Angkola Mandailing society. Meanwhile, transgression on both the speech maxims gives rise to implications on the following two matters: (1) the Angkola Mandailing people are intelligent in expressing their jokes ironically to
entice friends; (2) the Angkola Mandailing people need to ethically adhere to communicative strategies on polite and positive speeches in conversations with respect to their social status. This polite and positive maxim serves as a guide to a harmonious life for the Angkola Mandailing people. Based on the findings of this research, the kombur jenaka is therefore,a comedy discourse, which is effectively used in the daily conversational activities of the Angkola Mandailing people. |
| format |
Thesis |
| qualification_name |
Ph.D. |
| qualification_level |
Doctorate |
| author |
Harahap, Rosmawati |
| author_facet |
Harahap, Rosmawati |
| author_sort |
Harahap, Rosmawati |
| title |
Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: Analisis Bentuk, Tema, dan Nilai |
| title_short |
Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: Analisis Bentuk, Tema, dan Nilai |
| title_full |
Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: Analisis Bentuk, Tema, dan Nilai |
| title_fullStr |
Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: Analisis Bentuk, Tema, dan Nilai |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: Analisis Bentuk, Tema, dan Nilai |
| title_sort |
kombur jenaka angkola mandailing: analisis bentuk, tema, dan nilai |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| granting_department |
Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3395/1/ROSMAWATI_HARAHAP.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3395/2/1.ROSMAWATI_HARAHAP.pdf |
| _version_ |
1776103616881360896 |
| spelling |
my-uum-etd.33952023-06-26T00:14:15Z Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: Analisis Bentuk, Tema, dan Nilai 2011-07 Harahap, Rosmawati Abdul Aziz, Abdul Rahman Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania The topic of this research is “Kombur Jenaka Angkola Mandailing: An Analysis on Form, Theme and Value”. The objective of this study is to clarify the form, theme and value contained in the expression of comedy (kombur jenaka) in the Angkola Mandailing language amongst its citizens. The methodology used in this study is qualitative, with observatory and interview techniques. Data is gathered by recording the speed of the expressed dictation with a tape recorder. The researcher listens to the taped recording so as to understand spontaneous conversational utterances in the Angkola Mandailing language. The main data sources are selected several elderly informants residing in the Angkola Mandailing district. Research findings reflected from the comedy (kombur jenaka) expressed by the informants are lingual texts which implicate maxim representation (representative), maxim order (directives), maxim argument and maxim imperative combined with paralingual elements. Maxims which are absorbed in the kombur jenaka conversations consist of direct illocutionary acts, locutionary acts, and perlocutionary acts, which are analysed pragmatically and semantically. Data is analysed by using the pragmatic and structural functional thematic approaches. Legend, humour, anecdotes and puzzles are a form of kombur jenaka. Traditional prose, humour and anecdotes expressed by the informants in the kombur jenaka are in the form of dominant contemporary prose which carries the theme of dumb but smart human characters. Such comedy stories, which are characterized by people with the above mentioned character, carries a symbolic meaning in the Angkola Mandailing society. Meanwhile, transgression on both the speech maxims gives rise to implications on the following two matters: (1) the Angkola Mandailing people are intelligent in expressing their jokes ironically to entice friends; (2) the Angkola Mandailing people need to ethically adhere to communicative strategies on polite and positive speeches in conversations with respect to their social status. This polite and positive maxim serves as a guide to a harmonious life for the Angkola Mandailing people. Based on the findings of this research, the kombur jenaka is therefore,a comedy discourse, which is effectively used in the daily conversational activities of the Angkola Mandailing people. 2011-07 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3395/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3395/1/ROSMAWATI_HARAHAP.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/3395/2/1.ROSMAWATI_HARAHAP.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Marif. (2006).Markusip: Suatu perubahan pola hubungan muda-mudi menuju jenjang perkahwinan di Sipiongot Kecamatan Dolok Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan. Tesis Magister Program Antropologi Sosial Program Pasca Sarjana-Unimed. Medan. Adnan. (2003). Penerapan maksim kesopanan dalam tindaktutur berbahasa Indonesia. Dipetik dari http://www.Digilib.itb.ac. id/gdl.php. Hasibuan, A. Laut. (2001).Persepsi remaja Desa Batang Ayumi Jae Kotamadia Padangsidempuan terhadap ende ungut-ungut. Laporan Penelitian. Medan. Ali, Muhammad. (1993). Riset: Skripsi, tesis dan disertasi. Bandung: Angkasa. Arifin, Muhammad. (1993).Filsafat pendidikan Islam. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. Alan Cruse. (2006). A glosasary semantics and pragmatics. Edinburg: University Press. American Psichological Association. (2011). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th. Ed.) . Washington, DC: Author. Aminuddin. (1985). Semantik pengantar studi tentang makna. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo. Aminuddin. (1990). Sekitar masalah sastra: Beberapa prinsip dan metode penerapannya. Malang: Yayasan Asih Asah Asuh. Aminuddin. (1990). Sekitar masalah sastra: Beberapa prinsip dan metode penerapannya. Malang: Yayasan Asih Asah Asuh. Anas, Sudijono. (2005). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (ed. 1993). Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktek Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Arikunto, Suharsimi (ed. 2002). Prosudur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktek Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Badrulzaman, B. (2006). Persekitaran keluarga dan kesannya terhadap tingkah laku devian remaja di Daerah Pontian, Johor . Fakulti Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Baelz, Peter. (1977). Ethics and belief. London: Sheldon Press. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2006). Sumatera Utara dalam angka. Medan. Brown, P., Stephen C., Levinson, B. (1978).Politeness: Some universal in language usage. Makyun Subuki. (Pentj. 2007) “Mengapa pragmatik perlu dipelajari dalam program studi linguistik? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://tulisanmakyun.blogspot.com/2007/07/linguistik-pragmat ik.html B. Soekarno, Soedomo Hadi. (2005). Pancasila dalam tinjauan historis, yuridis, dan filosofis: Kumpulan rangkuman berbagai karya tulis tentang pendidikan Pancasila sebagai bahan ajar di perguruan tinggi: Solo: Universitas Sebelas Maret Press. Canton, Harvey, G. (1987).Content-area langage instruction. editor Sandra J. Savignon, San Juan, Addison. (1987). Wesley: Publishing Company. Chaniago,S.M., Mukti U.S., Arsyad, Maidar. (1997).Pragmatik : Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2004). Sosiolinguistik suatu pengantar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Creswell, John. W. (2009). Educational research planning, conducting,and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (third ed.). Boston: Pearson. Creswell, John. W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting,and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Cruse, D. Alan. (2000).Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press Danandjaja,J. (1991).Foklor lndonesia, ilmu gosip, dongeng, dan lain-lain. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti. Danandjaja, J. (2008). Jurnal pusat keberbakatan Fakultas Psikologi UI. Edisi Februari 2008, <http:// rosshy77. multiply.com/journal/item/41/jika_abang_menirukan> diakses 12 April 2009. Depdikbud. (2005). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka. Dewan Bahasa. (2007). Kamus bahasa Melayu-kamus-bahasa Inggeris Istilah Malaysia-istilah MABBIM. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa. Denzin, Norman K., Lincoln, Vyonna S. (1998). Part IV “Methods of Collecting and analyzing Empirical Materials”. In Benjamin F. Crabtree & William L.Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative of research. (2nd ). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage. hlm. 355. Denzin, Norman K., Lincolm,Yvonna S. (editors 1994).” Grounded Hermeneutic Research”. In Crabtree & William L. Miller. Handbook of researrch. London: Sage. Denzin, Norman K., Lincolm,Yvonna S. (editors 1994). ”Narrative, content, and semiotic analysis”. In Benjamin F. Crabtree & William L. Miller (Eds). Handbook of research.London: Sage. Denzin, Norman K., Lincoln, Vyonna S. dalam Anssi Perakyla (2005). Part 34. “Menganaalisis percakapan dan teks”. The Sage handbook of qualitative research 2 edisi ketiga. Terjemahan Dariyatno. (2011).Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Edmondson, Willis. (1981). Spoken discourse: A model for analysis, New York: Longman Inc. Foot, Hugh C. (1997). Humor and laughter. The handbook of comunication skills. Hargie, Owen D. W. (2 nd Edited). London: Routledge. 10. 259-282. Frondizi, Risieri. (1963). Penterjemah Cut Ananta Wijaya. Pengntar filsafat nilai. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Ghani, A.,Zulkiple. (2004).“Persoalan nilai dalam penyiaran dari perspektif Islam”. dalam The Malaysian journal of language and communication. Vol.1. hlm. 127-144: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Ghani, Abd., Abdul Rahman A.Z. (2006).Humor dalam pengajaran . Penang Darul Aman: PTS Pendidikan. Gottschalk, Klucholn. (2008). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Jakarta: Penerbit HUP. Grice, Kelly. (1975). Prinsip kerja sama dalam sebuah. interaksi. <http:webcache.googleusercontent.com;search?eryro nggo.wordpres.com>, diakses 10 September 2010. Harahap, Ahmad Bazar. (2007). Kamus moderen bahasa Angkola Mandailing. Jakarta: CV Yanis. Hasan, Abdul Hamid. (1988).Analisis wacana pragmatik, Medan : Penerbit IKIP Medan. Halimah, B.Z. (1998). Analisis tema dan perwatakan cerita jenaka Melayu klasik. dalam Jurnal “Deskription” Pengajian Melayu”: hlm 70-91. http://www.linkpdf.com/download/dl/ cerita-melayu-klasik-pdf Hidayati. (2010). <http://www. eprints.undip.ac.id/5700/. Sastra Indonesia deposited On: 26 Jan. 2010, 16:02 Halliday, M.A.K., Ruqaiya Hassan. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. Hoed. Harahap, M.D. (1986).Adat istiadat Tapanuli Selatan. Jakarta : Grafindo Utama. Harahap, A. Bazar. (2007). . Kamus moderen bahasa Angkola Mandailing: Angkola Jakarta: Forum Komunikasi Masyarakat Tapanuli Selatan dan Mandailing Natal. Harsojo. (1997). Pengantar antropologi, Jakarta: Tulung Agung. Hasbullah. (2005). Dasar-dasar ilmu pendidikan. Jakarta; Raya Grafindo Persada. Hasan, Ali. (2005). Bahan Kuliah : Managemen penelitian: Faculty of business management,UMN Al Washliyah. Medan. Henry Guntur Tarigan. (1987). Pengantar analisis wacana, Bandung: Angkasa. Hoedoro Benny. (1994). “Erotisme dalam bahasa” dalam Lembar Sastra Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta: Fakultas Sastra Universitas Indonesia. Harahap, Nuhayati. (2006). Sastra lisan Angkola Mandailing, Medan, USU. Harahap. Rosmawati (1999). “Kultura” Ende ungut-ungut Angkola Mandailing, Vol. 2, Medan. UMN Alwashliyah. Harahap, Zein. (2001). Buku pusaka warisan marga-marga Tapanuli Selatan turun temurun hasaya ni paradaton, Padang Sidempuan. Haughes, John. (1990). The philosphy of social research. Singapore: Longman. Hawkins, Joice M.. (2008). Kamus dwibahasa. Edisi keempat. Selangor: Oxford Fajar. Ismed Nur. (2005).Konsep humor dalam sastra Melayu. “Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Logat” .Volume 1 Nomor 47-49. Medan: USU Press. Ibrahim, Abd. Syukur. (1993).Kajian tindak tutur. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional. James Hurford, Heasley.B. (1985). Semantics a course book, London: Cambridge University Press. J. Darminta, Sj. (2006).Praksis pendidikan nilai.Yogyakarta : Penerbit Kanisius. Kahl. (1968). dalam Rustam Efendi: Cucupatian Banjar: Analisis struktur, fungsi, dan nilai budaya.Tesis. Universiti Utara Malaysia 2010. Kamus Dwibahasa. (2002). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (2007). Edisi III. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia online. (2012). <http://www.kbbi.web.id> Kattsoff, Louis O. (1953). Pengantar filsafat.Alih bahasa. Design of human behavior. St. Louis educational publisher. dalam Soejono Soemargono.(2007). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Tiara Wacana Yogya. Kempson, Ruth M. (1991). terjemahan Zaiton Ab. Rahman. Teori semantik. Selangor: Dewan Bahasa. Keraf, Gorys. (1983). Komposisi. Ende Flores: Nusa Indah. Keraf, Gorys. (1995). Eksposisi dan deskripsi. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo. Khairul Azman B. Mohd. Suhaimy.(2009).Pemikiran pembangunan berteraskan sistem nilai-budaya: Kajian terhadap pendekatan Dr.Mahathir Mohamad 1981-1986. Tesis. Sintok: COLGIS-UUM. Khairunnisah Syed Ibrahim. (2008). Unsur budaya dalam koleksi terjemahan cerita jenaka bahasa Melayu–bahasa Jerman:Satu analisis. Thesis. Fakulti Bahasa dan Linguistik Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Khairunisah Syed Ibrahim.(2008).<http://dspace.fsktm.um.edu. my/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1812/414/_Thesis.pdf?sequen> Kompas on line. (1990). Humor dan masyarakat kita <http:// www.bing.com/search?q=humour+dan+masyarakat+kita&first=11& FORM=PORE diakses 26 March 2006. Koentjaraningrat. (1990). Penelitian masyarakat. Jakarta : Gramedia. Koentjaraningrat. (2005). Antropologi kebudayaan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT.Gramedia. Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (1984). Kamus linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia. Kushartanti. (2005). Pesona bahasa langkah awal memahami linguistik ‘pragmatik’ Jakarta: Gramedia. Lamuddin, Finoca. (2008).Komposisi bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta : Diksi. Leech, Geoffrey. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik (terjemahan). Penerbit: Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press). Leech, Geoffrey. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. Levinson, S. C. (1993). Pragmatics. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press. Leonard Richard Gay. (2009). Educational reseearch competencies for analysis and applications, nineth edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education International. Lubis, Haris Sutan Harahap, Nurhayati. (2004). Turi-turian Angkola Mandailing: Inventarisasi dan analisis arketipal. Medan: Fakultas Sastra Sumatera Utara. Lubis, Z.A. (2005). Sipirok nasoli. Medan: Porkala. Lyons, John. (ed. I. 1994). Bahasa, makna, konteks.(penerjemah Zahara.A.Ghafur). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa. Makyun, Subuki. (2007). Mengapa pragmatik perlu dipelajari dalam program studi linguistik?. http://tulisanmakyun. blogspot.com/2007/07/linguistikpragmatik.html Mackey, William Francis. (1974).Language teaching analysis. London: Longman. Marzuki. (2002). Metodologi riset.Yogyakarta: BPFE–UII. Martin.R.A. (2007). The psichology of humor: An integrative approach. New York: Elsevier. Akademic Press. Mattew, Milles B.&A., Michael Huberman. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi R. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif: Jakarta: UI. M. Ngalim, Purwanto. (1986).Ilmu pendidikan teoris dan praktis. Bandung: Remaja Karya. Moleong, Lexy J. (1989). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Remadja Rosda Karya. Muhamad Hasan. (2005). Teknik sampling: Handout ‘metod penyelidikan” Medan: UMN Al Washliyah. Muhadjir, Neong. (1996). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin. Mulyana, Rohmat. (2004). Mengartikulasikan pendidikan nilai. Bandung: Alfa Beta. Muradi, Supardy. (1990). Kesusasteraan daripada perspektif semiotik. Selangor: Darul Ehsan. Musbikin. (2007). Cerita jenaka dari Bagdat. Bandung: Rosda Karya. Nasution. Pandapotan. (2005). Adat budaya Mandailing dalam tantangan zaman Medan: Penerbit PORKALA. Muhadjir, Neong. (1996). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin. Neuman W.L. (2000).Sosial research methods, qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.) Boston: Ally and Bacon. Nik Ab. Kadir, Nik Hassan Basri. (2005). Teori bahasa implikasinya terhadap pengajaran tatabahasa. Tanjung Malim: Ampang Press. SDN. BHD. Nunally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill. Nuraini Yusoff, Sahid Teguh Widodo. (2009). ”Nama orang Jawa di tengah gerusan globalisasi”. dalam Prosiding: Relasi lokalitas-globalitas menuju modernitas bahasa Indonesia. Editor. Sunu Catur Budiyono, dkk. Surabaya: Balai Bahasa. hlm. 366-373. Nurgiyantoro, B. (2005).Teori pengkajian fiksi: Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. Oetomo, Dede. (1993).”Pelahiran dan perkembangan analisis wacana” dalam Bambang Kaswanti Purwo (ed). PELBA 6. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Palmer R., Fill. (terjemahan Rakesarasin edisi Bahasa Melayu . 1989). Semantik. Penang: USM Press Publications. Peter. (1981 dalam Armen Lubis). Mandailing ilam accross borders. Journal of Sout Est Asia.Taiwan. P.Brown & Levinson S.C. (1978). Politeness: Some universal in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge Uneversity Press. Pradopo, Rahmad Djoko. (1987). Pengkajian puisi: Analisis strata norma dan analisis struktural dan semiotik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Press. Pradopo, Rahmad Djoko. (1995).Beberapa teori sastra, metode kritik, dan penerapannya. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Purba, Antilan. (2004). Kompetensi komunikatif lisan dosen: kajian linguistik. “Jurnal ilmiah ilmu bahasa”. Medan: Program Pascasarjana USU. Tahun. 1 Nomor 1. Purwanto, Ngalim. (1997).Ilmu pendidikan teoritis dan praktis.Cet.IX. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya. Nababan, P.W.J. (1986). Sosiolinguistik suatu pengantar. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Nababan, P.W.J. (1987).Pragmatik. Jakarta: P2LPTK Depdikbud. Richard, Jack. (1975). Tentang percakapan (Terjemahan Ismari). Surabaya: Airlangga University Press. Ridwan Mas, Ahmad. (1979). Pornografi dalam pers Indonesia. Jakarta: Dewan Pers. Ritonga, Abdurrahman. (2006). Turi-turian ni halak Sipirok banggo-banggo halilian. Medan: Badan Pepustakaan Dan Arsip Daerah. Ritonga. Parlaungan. (2005). Upacara adat perkawinan di Tapanuli Selatan. Medan: Bartong Jaya. Richard, Jack. (1975). Editor Paul Portner and Barbara H.Partee (2002) 147. Tentang percakapan. (Terjemahan Ismari) . Surabaya: Air Langga Press. Ritonga, Abdurrahman. (2006). Turi-turian ni halak Sipirok banggo-banggo halilian. Medan: Badan Pepustakaan dan Arsip Daerah. Robert Johnson W. (2005). Foundation (Health e-Technologies initiative program. Boston: University Medical Campus. Rohana Yusof. (2004). Penyelidikan sains sosial. Pahang Darul Makmur: PTS Publications & Distributors SDN. Bhd. Rustam Efendi. (2010).Cucupatian Banjar: analisis struktur, fungsi, dan nilai. PhD.Thesis. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Rustono. (1998). Asosiasi pornografi dalam wacana humor. Tesis. FIB Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta: UI Press. Rustono. (2001). Implikatur percakapan sebagai penunjang pengungkapan humor di dalam wacana humor verbal lisan berbahasa Indonesia”. Disertasi Jakarta. UI Studies V. l2, 2/2005. Santoso, Eunice. (1999). Let’s learn English learn while you smile, Jakarta: Pustaka Tangga. Sariah. (2009). ”Ekspresi bahasa komik dalam perspektitif budaya”. dalam Prosiding: Relasi lokalitas-globalitas menuju modernitas bahasa Indonesia. editor Sunu Catur Budiyono, dkk. Surabaya: Balai Bahasa. hlm.116-121. Scott, Wilbur S. (1966). Five approaches of literary criticism. Third printing. New York: The Macmillan Company. Selian, Salamuddin, Nita Nasution. (2003).”Pragmatik dalam tatabahasa fungsional.” Journal langue: Jurnal bahasa dan sastra. Tahun ke 1, Nomor 1. Medan: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra. Kopertis Wil. I NAD Sumut. Sibarani, Robert. (2008).Budaya etnik Sumatera Utara. Medan : Hotel Madani. Sikana, Mana. (1966). Proses penulisan kreatif. Malay Literature.Singapura: Terbitan. EDN Media Singapura. Sivachandra Sundara Raja. (2002). Pemikiran dan penulisan ilmiah. Klang: Utusan Publications & Disteributors Sdn Bhd. Soekanto, Soerjono. (1982). Sosiologi suatu pengantar. Jakarta: UI Press. Sudjiman, Panuti. (1999) Kamus sastra. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Sugiyono. (2008). Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Bandung. CV.Alfabeta. Suherli. (2011).Menulis karangan ilmiah kajian dan penuntun dalam menyusun karya tulis ilmiah. Suka Maju Depok: Arya Duta. Sumanto, Soejono. (1990)Nartosabdo kehadirannya dalam dunia pedalangan sebuah biografi." tesis S-2 Program Studi Sejarah Jurusan Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada. Surahmad, Winarno.(1985).Pengantar penelitian ilmiah, dasar metode dan teknik. Bandung: Tarsito. Surakhmad, Winarno. (1991). Pengantar penelitian ilmiah dasar metode dan teknik. Cetakan ke-3. Bandung: Tarsito. Suseno. (2007 Cetakan I dan 2008 cetakan II ). Sosiologi. Jakarta: Penerbit Grafindo Pratama. Suyasa, P.T.Y.S. (2010). Identifikasi jenis humor: Lucu, lucu, dan lucu. Tesis. Fakultas Psikologi Tarumanegara. Suyitno. (1986).Sastra, tata nilai, dan eksistensi. Yogyakarta: Anindita. Suwito. (1982).Sosiolinguistik teori dan problema. Surakarta : Henary Offset. Swift (2007). Journal to Stella (25 februari 1712-13. Tajuk rencana. (1991). Kompas online, hlm.1: Humor dan masyarakat kita. Syamsuddin A.R. (1992). Studi wacana: Teori analisis pengajaran. Bandung: Mimbar Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni. Syaifullah. (2001). Kejawen: Jurnal kebudayaan.Yogyakarta: Gadjahmada Press. Syukur, Ibrahim. (1993). Kajian tindak tutur. Surabaya: Penerbit Usaha Nasional. Tengku Sylvana Sinar. (2005). Analisis wacana pada siswa sekolah rendah: kemahiran mengarang bebas..Medan: USU Press. Tengku Sylvana Sinar. (2003). Teori dan analisis wacana: Pendekatan sistemik fungsional. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press. Teuw,A. (1987). Sastra dan ilmu sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya. Teeuw,A. (1993).Khazanah sastera Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Teuw,A. (1991). Membaca dan menilai sastra: Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Teuw,A. (1994).Indonesia antara kelisanan dan keberaksaraan . Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya. Tim Penyusun. (1997). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia (Edisi Kedua) Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Tilaar, H.A.R. (2002). Membenahi pendidikan nasional. Cet. II. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. T.Q. Budaya. (1999).Pokok-pokok antropologi budaya. Jakarta : Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. (2002). Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI. Uzey. (2009).“Macam-macam Nilai”.Dalam http://uzey.blogspot. com/2009/09/pengertian-nilai. diakses pada tanggal 22 Januari 2012. Veatch, Thomas C. (1998). <http://www.digilib.id.com.PDF. 28-03-2006. Wijana, I Dewa Putu. (1995). Wacana kartun dalam bahasa Indonesia.”Disertasi” Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta. Wijana, I Dewa Putu (1996).Dasar-dasar pragmatik. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi. Wuri, Soedjatmico. (1992). Aspek linguistik dan sosio- kultural di dalam humor. dalam Bambang Kaswanti Purwo. (2007). PELBA 5. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Zakaria, Shukri. (2007). Thesis and dissertation. analisis nilai-nilai murni: Suatu kajian terhadap novel panas salju (KOMSAS tingkatan tiga). Kuala Lumpur: Pustaka Bahasa & Linguistik. <http://www.linkpdf.com/download/dl/cerita-melayu-klasik%20 asik-.pdf%3e> <http://www.linkpdf.com/download/dl/cerita-melayu-klasikasik -.pdf> diakses 21 Juni 2010: hlm. 70-91).> <http://wahyudipoday.blogspot.com/2009/12/kritik-sastra. html> <http://www.skripsi agustin. tarikh 09 Mai,2006.> <http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/tipe_jurnal.php.> <http://www.scribd.com/doc/79758234/Giuseppe-Verdi.> <http://www.docstoc.com/docs/25994242/skripsi-analisis-pragmatik> <http://www.scribd.com/doc/7100623/volume-2.> <http://www.scribd.com/doc/42932779/jurnal-logat> Medan, April 2006> <http://www.media.mit.edu/gnl/discourse/summaries/byhh.html> <http://www.4shared.com/office/LqpqoFHY/Discourse_Analysis_ by_Gillian_.html> <http://www.media.mit.edu/gnl/discourse/summaries/byhh.html> <http://kajiankomunikasi.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/1020/> <http://www.://durrotun-nihayah.blogspot.com/> |