Secession as an Expression of the Right to Self-Determination in International Law : A Critical Analysis of the Kosovo Independence
This study examines the twin principles of self- determination and secession in international law, using the Kosovo secession as a case study, with a view to making a finding whether there is an international law right to secession and whether the Kosovo secession was legal in international law. It...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | eng eng |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/3397/1/EFEVWERHAN_DAVID_IGHOJOHWEGBA.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3397/2/1.EFEVWERHAN_DAVID_IGHOJOHWEGBA.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my-uum-etd.3397 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
collection |
UUM ETD |
language |
eng eng |
advisor |
Ahmad, Rusniah Mohd Sani, Mohd Azizuddin |
topic |
JX International law |
spellingShingle |
JX International law Ighojohwegba, Efevwerhan David Secession as an Expression of the Right to Self-Determination in International Law : A Critical Analysis of the Kosovo Independence |
description |
This study examines the twin principles of self- determination and secession in international law, using the Kosovo secession as a case study, with a view to making a finding whether there is an international law right to secession and whether the Kosovo secession was legal in international law. It also examines the concept of “people” as the beneficiaries of self-determination with a view to proposing a functional and acceptable definition of “people”. The study also does a comprehensive analysis of the ICJ Ruling on the Kosovo independence which was delivered in July 2010, while this research was still in its advance stages. The study does a comprehensive factual and legal analysis of previous secession cases in resolving the issues above and has concluded that there is no general international law right to secession. This study is purely a doctrinal legal and library-based research. The only reliable way to do these is by enumerating the established rules and analyzing them in the light of the facts of the case study. It however reveals that in exceptional circumstances, secession will be recognized as a remedial solution to self-determination disputes. Other circumstances in which secession is either supported or opposed in international law are also listed. It also proposes a functional definition of “people” and opined that the Kosovo secession comes within the scope of a remedial secession. Finally, the study has made recommendations towards containing the oft violent crisis engendered by secessionist conflicts. The findings and recommendations will be very useful to policy makers, stakeholders in international law, legal advisors as well as secessionist groups. They will help in putting secessionist claims in their proper perspectives thus, eliminating or at least reducing needless violence and bloodshed associated with such conflicts. |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
Ph.D. |
qualification_level |
Doctorate |
author |
Ighojohwegba, Efevwerhan David |
author_facet |
Ighojohwegba, Efevwerhan David |
author_sort |
Ighojohwegba, Efevwerhan David |
title |
Secession as an Expression of the Right to Self-Determination in International Law : A Critical Analysis of the Kosovo Independence |
title_short |
Secession as an Expression of the Right to Self-Determination in International Law : A Critical Analysis of the Kosovo Independence |
title_full |
Secession as an Expression of the Right to Self-Determination in International Law : A Critical Analysis of the Kosovo Independence |
title_fullStr |
Secession as an Expression of the Right to Self-Determination in International Law : A Critical Analysis of the Kosovo Independence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Secession as an Expression of the Right to Self-Determination in International Law : A Critical Analysis of the Kosovo Independence |
title_sort |
secession as an expression of the right to self-determination in international law : a critical analysis of the kosovo independence |
granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
granting_department |
Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3397/1/EFEVWERHAN_DAVID_IGHOJOHWEGBA.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/3397/2/1.EFEVWERHAN_DAVID_IGHOJOHWEGBA.pdf |
_version_ |
1747827563783258112 |
spelling |
my-uum-etd.33972016-04-26T02:40:14Z Secession as an Expression of the Right to Self-Determination in International Law : A Critical Analysis of the Kosovo Independence 2011 Ighojohwegba, Efevwerhan David Ahmad, Rusniah Mohd Sani, Mohd Azizuddin Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government JX International law This study examines the twin principles of self- determination and secession in international law, using the Kosovo secession as a case study, with a view to making a finding whether there is an international law right to secession and whether the Kosovo secession was legal in international law. It also examines the concept of “people” as the beneficiaries of self-determination with a view to proposing a functional and acceptable definition of “people”. The study also does a comprehensive analysis of the ICJ Ruling on the Kosovo independence which was delivered in July 2010, while this research was still in its advance stages. The study does a comprehensive factual and legal analysis of previous secession cases in resolving the issues above and has concluded that there is no general international law right to secession. This study is purely a doctrinal legal and library-based research. The only reliable way to do these is by enumerating the established rules and analyzing them in the light of the facts of the case study. It however reveals that in exceptional circumstances, secession will be recognized as a remedial solution to self-determination disputes. Other circumstances in which secession is either supported or opposed in international law are also listed. It also proposes a functional definition of “people” and opined that the Kosovo secession comes within the scope of a remedial secession. Finally, the study has made recommendations towards containing the oft violent crisis engendered by secessionist conflicts. The findings and recommendations will be very useful to policy makers, stakeholders in international law, legal advisors as well as secessionist groups. They will help in putting secessionist claims in their proper perspectives thus, eliminating or at least reducing needless violence and bloodshed associated with such conflicts. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3397/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3397/1/EFEVWERHAN_DAVID_IGHOJOHWEGBA.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/3397/2/1.EFEVWERHAN_DAVID_IGHOJOHWEGBA.pdf application/pdf eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia “Thawing a Frozen Conflict: Legal Aspects of the Separatist Crisis in Moldova”, The Record, Vol. 61, No. 2 (2006) 196 (Publication of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York) available at http://www.abcny.org/Publications/ record/vol_61_2.pdf last visited February 26, 2009 Abi-Saab, G., “Conclusion”, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.), Secession: International Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 470 Abulof, U., “‘Small Peoples’: The Existential Uncertainty of Ethno-national Communities”, International Studies Quarterly (2009) 53, p. 227 Addo, M.K., “Political Self-Determination Within the Context of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights”, 32 Journal of African Law (1988) 182 Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law, (7th ed.), New York, Routledge, 1997 Alfredsson, G., “The Right of Self-Determination and Indigenous Peoples”, in Tomuschat, C., (ed.), Modern Law of Self-Determination, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993, p. 41 Archaeological Study Bible, New International Version, Grand Rapids, Zondervan, 2005 Attix, C., “Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Are Taiwan's Trading Partners Implying Recognition of Taiwanese Statehood?”, 25 Cal. W. Int'l L.J.357 (1995) Barktus, V.O., The Dynamic of Secession, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999 Bauböck, R., “Why secession is not like divorce”, in Goldmann, K.,(ed.), Nationalism and Internationalism in the Post-Cold War Era, London, Routledge, 2000, p. 214 Bayefski, A.F., Self-Determination in International Law: Quebec and Lessons Learned, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2000 Berlin, A.H., “Recognition as Sanction: Using International Recognition of New States to Deter, Punish, and Contain Bad Actors”, 31 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 531 (2009) Bieber, F., “Power-sharing and International Intervention: Overcoming the Post-conflict Legacy in Bosnia and Herzegovina” in Weller, M., and Metzger, B., (eds.), Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice, Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, p. 193 Bisset, A., History of the Commonwealth of England: From the Death of Charles I to the Expulsion of the Long Parliament by Cromwell, London, John Murray, 1867 Blay, S., “Self-Determination: A Reassessment in the Post-Communist Era”, 22 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y (1994) 275 Borgen, C. J., “Imagining Sovereignty, Managing Secession: The Legal Geography of Eurasia's ‘Frozen Conflicts’”, 9 Or. Rev. Int'l L. 477, (2008) Borgen, C.J., “Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence: Self-Determination, Secession and Recognition”, ASIL Insights, Vol. 12 (2), 2008, available at http://www.asil.org/insights080229.cfm last visited October 19, 2010 Brierly, J.L., Law of Nations, 6th (ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1963 Brilmayer, L., “Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Approach”, 16 Yale J. Int’l L (1991) 177 Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law, 6th ed., Oxford, 2003 Buchanan, A., “Democracy and Secession”, in Moore, M. (ed.), National Self-Determination and Secession, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 14 Buchanan, A., “The International Institutional Dimension of Secession”, in Lehning, P.B., (ed.), Theories of Secession, London, Routledge, 1998, p.225 Cassese, A., International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2nd (ed.), 2005 Cassese, A., Self Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995 Clapham, A., “Secession, Terrorism and the Right of Self-Determination”, in Kohen, M.G., ed., Secession: International Law Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 46 Conforti, B., The Law and Practice of the United Nations, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005 Coppieters, B., “Conclusion: Just War Theory and the Ethics of Secession”, in Coppieters, B., and Sakwa, R., (ed.), Contextualizing Secession: Normative Studies in Comparative Perspective, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 225 Crawford, J., “State Practice and International Law in Relation to Unilateral Secession”, Report on Quebec Secession Case, reproduced in Bayefski, A.F., Self-Determination in International Law: Quebec and Lessons Learned, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2000, p. 31 Crawford, J., The Creation of States in International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2nd (ed.), 2006 Criekemans, D., “Final Status Negotiations on Kosovo within the UN Security Council”, University of Antwerp, December 2007, pp. 25-27, available at http://www.vvn.be/files/u1/ CASUS_KOSOVO_2007_DEFINITIEF.pdf last visited October 19, 2010 Cristescu, A., The Right to Self-Determination, Historical and Current Development on the Basis of United Nations Instruments, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/404/Rev.1, UN Sales No. E. 80. XIV. 3 (1981) D'Amato, A., “The Invasion of Panama Was a Lawful Response to Tyranny”, 84 AJIL 516 (1990) Delahunty, R.J., and Perez, A.F., “The Kosovo Crisis: A Dostoievskian Dialogue on International Law, Statecraft, and Soulcraft”, 42 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 15 (2009) Downes, P., Democracy, Revolution and Monarchism in Early American Literature, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002 Dubinsky, G., “The Exceptions That Disprove the Rule? The Impact of Abkhazia and South Ossetia on Exceptions to the Sovereignty Principle”, 34 Yale J. Int'l L. (2009) 241 Dugard, J., and Raic, D., “The Role of Recognition in the Law and Practice of Secession”, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.), Secession: International Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 94 Dumberry, P., “Lessons Learned from the Quebec Secession Reference before the Supreme Court of Canada”, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.) Secession: International Perspectives, Cambridge , Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 416 Efevwerhan, D.I., The Principle of Non-Intervention: How Sacrosanct? An Appraisal of the Act of Intervention in the Liberian, Sierra Leonean, Gulf and Kosovo Wars, 2002, (unpublished), being LL.M. dissertation submitted to the University of Benin, Nigeria Emerson, R., “Self-Determination”, 65 AJIL (1971) 459 Erika de Wet, “The Governance of Kosovo: Security Council Resolution 1244 and the Establishment and Functioning of EULEX”, 103(1) AJIL (2009) 83 Falola, T., The History of Nigeria, Westport, CT., Greenwood Publishing Group, 1999 Farer, T. J., “Panama: Beyond the Charter Paradigm”, 84 AJIL 503 at 507 (1990) Fierstein, D., “Kosovo's Declaration of Independence: An Incident Analysis of Legality, Policy and Future Implications”, 26 B.U. Int'l L.J. 417 (2008) Figgis, J.N., The Divine Right of Kings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Archives, 1934 Fitzpatrick, S., The Russian Revolution, New York, Oxford University Press, 2001 Franck, T.M., “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance”, 86 AJIL 46 (1992) Gilbert, G., “Autonomy and Minority Groups: A Right in International Law?” 35 Cornell Int'l L.J. 307(2002) Grant, T.D., Admission to the United Nations: Charter Article 4 and the Rise of Universal Organization, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill NV, 2009 Greene, K., “Are International Institutions Doing Their Job?”, International Responses to Secessionist Conflicts, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, March 27-30, 1996, 90 Am. Soc'y Int'l L. Proc. 296 (1996) Groarke, P., Dividing the State, Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2004 Hannum, H., “Rethinking Self-Determination”, 34 Va. J. Int'l L. 1, (1993) Hannum, H., “Self-Determination in the Twenty-First Century”, in Hannum, H., and Babbit, E.F., ed., Negotiating Self-Determination, Oxford, Lexington Books, 2006, p. 61 Hannum, H., Autonomy, Sovereignty and Self-Determination: The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights, (Revised ed.), University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996 Harris, D.J., Cases and Materials on International Law, London, Sweet and Maxwell, 6th ed., 2004 Harris, J.P., ‘Kosovo: An Application of the Principle of Self–Determination’, 6 Hum. Rts. Br. 28 (1999) Higgins, R., Problems and Process, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994 Hilpold, P., “The Kosovo Case and International Law: Looking for Applicable Theories”, 8 Chinese J. Int'l L. 47 (2009) Hunt, J., French Revolution, London and New York, Routledge, 1998 Ijalaye, D.A., “Was Biafra at Any Time a State in International Law?”, 65 AJIL (1971) 551 Jansen, G.R., “Albanians and Serbs in Kosovo: An Abbreviated History An Opening for the Islamic Jihad in Europe”, Colorado State University, available at http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/kosovohistory.html last visited October 10, 2010 Jarve, P., “Gagauzia and Moldova: Experiences in Power-sharing”, in Weller, M., and Metzger, B., (eds.), Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice, Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, p. 307 Jia, B.B., “The Independence of Kosovo: A Unique Case of Secession?”, 8 Chinese J. Int’l L. 27, (2009) Kelsen, H., “Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations”, AJIL 35 (1941) 605 Khan, A.L., A Theory of International Terrorism: Understanding Islamic Militancy, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006 Kheyap, T., “Homeless But Not Hopeless: How the Tibetan Constitution Governs a People in Exile”, 36 Hastings Const. L.Q. 353 (2009) Kiwanuka, R.N., “The Meaning of ‘People’ in the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights”, 82 AJIL 80 (1988) Knoll, B., “From Benchmarking to Final Status? Kosovo and the Problem of an International Administration's Open-Ended Mandate”, 16 EJIL 637 (2005) Knoll, B., The Legal Status of Territories Subject to Administration by International Organisations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008 Knop, K.C., Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002 Krieger, H., (ed.) The Kosovo Conflict and International Law: An Analytical Documentation, 1974-1999, Cambridge International Documents Series, Vol. 11, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001 Lalonde, S., Determining Boundaries in a Conflicted World: The Role of Uti Possidetis, Montreal, McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002 Lata, L., Structuring the Horn of Africa As a Common Homeland : Conflict Resolution Through Multi-Dimensional Self-Determination, Waterloo, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2004 Lavranos, N., “The Entering Into Force of the Lisbon Treaty – A European Odyssey”, ASIL Insight, Vol. 13, No. 26, December 14, 2009, available at http://www.asil.org/insights091214.cfm last visited January 18, 2010 Ludwig, R., “The UN’s Electoral Assistance: Challenges, Accomplishments, Prospects”, in Newman, E., and Rich, R., ed., UN Role in Promoting Democracy : Between Ideals and Reality, Tokyo, United Nations University Press, 2004, p.169 Lung-chu, C., and Reisman, W.M., “Who Owns Taiwan: A Search for International Title”, 81 Yale L.J. 599 (1972) Lyew, B.H., “An Examination Of The Philippines' Anti-Terror Law”, 19 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J., (2010) 187 Manela, E., The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anti-colonial Nationalism, Oxford University Press, 2007 Martinez-Paoletti, J., “Rights and Duties of Minorities in a Context of Post-Colonial Self-Determination: Basques and Catalans in Contemporary Spain”, 15 Buff. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. (2009) 159 Mayall, J., “Nationalism, Self-Determination and the Doctrine of Territorial Unity”, in Weller, M., and Metzger, B., (eds.), Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice, Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, p.5 McWhinney, E., Self Determination of Peoples and Plural-Ethnic States in Contemporary International Law, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2007 McPhee, P., Social History of France, 1789-1914, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2004 Milano, E., “Security Council Action in the Balkans: Reviewing the Legality of Kosovo's Territorial Status”, 14 EJIL 999 (2003) Moore, M., “Introduction”, in Moore, M., (ed.), National Self-determination and Secession, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 1 Müllerson, R., “Precedents in the Mountains: On the Parallels and Uniqueness of the Cases of Kosovo, South Ossetia and Abkhazia”, 8 Chinese J. Int'l L. 2, (2009) Musgrave, T.D., Self-Determination and National Minorities, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997 Nanda, V.P., “The New Dynamics of Self-Determination: Revisiting Self-Determination as an International Law Concept: A Major Challenge in the Post-Cold War Era”, 3 ILSA J Int’l & Comp L. 443 (1997) Nanda, V.P., “The Validity of United States Intervention in Panama under International Law”, 84 AJIL 494 (1990) Newman, E., “UN Democracy Promotion: Comparative Advantages and Constraints”, in Newman E., and Rich, R., ed., UN Role in Promoting Democracy : Between Ideals and Reality ,Tokyo, United Nations University Press, 2004, p. 188 Nolte, G., ‘Secession and External Intervention’, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.) Secession: International Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 65 O’Leary, B., “Complex Power-sharing in and over Northern Ireland: A Self-determination Agreement, a Treaty, a Consociation, a Federacy, Matching Confederal Institutions, Intergovernmentalism, and a Peace Process”, in Weller, M., and Metzger, B., (eds.), Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice, Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, p. 61 Okeke, C.N., The Theory and Practice of International Law in Nigeria, Enugu, Fourth Dimensions Publishers, 1986 Okoronkwo, P.L., “Self-Determination and the Legality of Biafra's Secession under International Law”, 25 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 63 Ouguergouz, F., and Tehindrazanarivelo, D.L., “The Question of Secession in Africa”, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.) Secession: International Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 257 Pavkovic, A., and Radan, P., Creating New States: Theory and Practice of Secession, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2007 Pazartzis, P., “Secession and International Law: The European Dimension”, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.) Secession: International Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 355 Pfirter, F.A., and Napolitano, S.G., “Secession and International Law: Latin American Practice”, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.) Secession: International Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 374 Pipes, R., The Formation of the Soviet Union: Communism and Nationalism, 1917-1923, Harvard, Harvard University Press, 1997 Pomerance, M., Self-Determination in Law and Practice: The New Doctrine in the United Nations, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1982 Raic, D., Statehood and the Law of Self-Determination, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2002 Ratner, S. R., “Drawing a Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Borders of New States”, 90 AJIL 590 (1996) Regan, A.J., “Resolving the Bougainville Self-determination Dispute: Autonomy or Complex Power-sharing?” in Weller, M., and Metzger, B., (eds.), Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice, Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, p. 125 Reisman, W.M., “Coercion and Self-Determination: Construing Charter Article 2(4)”, 78 AJIL 642 (1984) Reisman, W.M., “Haiti and the Validity of International Action”, 89 AJIL 82 (1995) Reisman, W.M., “Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law”, 84 AJIL 866 at 871(1990) Richardson, N., “Breaking Up Doesn't Have to be so Hard: Default Rules for Partition and Secession”, 9 Chi. J. Int'l L. 685 (2009) Rosas, A., “Internal Self-Determination”, in Tomuschat, C., ed., Modern Law of Self-Determination, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993, p. 225 Ruffert, M., “The Administration of Kosovo and East-Timor by the International Community”, ICLQ 50(3) (2001) 613 Ryngaert, C. and Griffioen, C., “The Relevance of the Right to Self-Determination in the Kosovo Matter: In Partial Response to the Agora Papers”, 8 Chinese J. Int'l L. 573 (2009) Sanford, C.B., The Religious Life of Thomas Jefferson, Charlottesville, University Press of Virginia, 1984 Sautman B., and Dreyer, J.T., (eds.), Contemporary Tibet: Politics, Development, and Society in a Disputed Region, New York, M.E. Sharpe Inc., 2006 Schachter, O., “The Legality of Pro-Democratic Invasion”, 78 AJIL 645 (1984) Schneckener, U., “Third-party Involvement in Self-determination Conflicts”, in Weller, M., and Metzger, B., (eds.), Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice, Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, p. 467 Shaw, M.N., International Law, 5th (ed.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003 Shaw, M.N., International Law, 6th (ed.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009 Shaw, M.N., International Law, London, Cambridge, 4th ed., 1997 Sterio, M., “On the Right to External Self-Determination: “Selfistans,” Secession, and the Great Powers' Rule”, 19 Minn. J. Int'l L. 137 (2010) Sunstein, C.R., “Approaching Democracy: A New Legal Order for Eastern Europe” 58 U. Chi. L. Rev. 633 (1991) Tancredi, A., “A Normative ‘Due Process’ in the Creation of States Through Secession”, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.), Secession: International Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 171 Thio, L., “International Law and Secession in the Asia and Pacific Regions”, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.) Secession: International Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 297 Thornberry, P., “The Democratic or Internal Aspect of Self-Determination with Some Remarks on Federalism”, in Tomuschat, C., ed., Modern Law of Self-Determination, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993, p. 101 Tomuschat, C., ‘Secession and Self Determination’, in Kohen, M.G., (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 23 Turner, M., “Resolving Self-determination Disputes through Complex Power-sharing Arrangements: The Case of Mindanao, Southern Philippines” in Weller, M., and Metzger, B., (eds.), Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice, Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, pp. 161 Turns, D., “The Stimson Doctrine of Non-Recognition: Its Historical Genesis and Influence on Contemporary International Law”, 2 Chinese J. Int'l L. 105 (2003) Umozuruike, U.O., Introduction to International Law, Ibadan, Spectrum, 1993 van der Vyver, J.D., “Statehood in International Law”, 5 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 9 (1991) Vidmar, J., “International Legal Responses to Kosovo's Declaration of Independence”, 42 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 779 (2009) Wade, R.A., The Russian Revolution, 1917, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005 Warbrick, C., “Kosovo: The Declaration of Independence”, ICLQ 2008, 57(3), 675 Warbrick, C., “The New British Policy on Recognition of Governments”, ICLQ 30(3) (1981) 568 Watson, K.W., “When in the Course of Human Events: Kosovo's Independence and the Law of Secession”, 17 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 267 (2008) Weller, M., “Kosovo’s Final Status”, International Affairs 84: 6 (2008) 1223–1243 Weller, M., Escaping the Self Determination Trap, Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff, 2008 Wilde, R., “From Danzig to East Timor and Beyond: The Role of International Territorial Administration” 95 AJIL (2001) 583 Wood, A., The Origins of the Russian Revolution, 1861-1917, (3rd ed.), London, Routledge, 2003 Wood, H.M., “The Treaty of Paris and Turkey's Status in International Law” 37(2) AJIL (1943) 262 Xanthaki, A., “The Right to Self-Determination: Meaning and Scope”, in Ghanea, N., and Xanthaki, A., (ed.), Minorities, Peoples and Self-Determination: Essays in Honour of Patrick Thornberry, Leiden, Brill Academic Publishers, 2005 Zacklin, R., “Beyond Kosovo: The United Nations and Humanitarian Intervention”, in Ku, C., and Diehl, P.F., (ed.), International Law, Classic and Contemporary Readings, Boulder, Lynne Reinner Publishers, 2003, p. 367 |