Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pemilihan Projek Sistem Maklumat

The effectiveness of an information system (IS) project selection is measured by the success of the project and the expected impact. An information system project is difficult to select due to many factors that influence it, which leads to the possibility of fail to perform. Among the possible reaso...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Syaifudin,
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng
Published:	2011
Subjects:	T58.5-58.64 Information technology
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3440/1/SYAIFUDIN.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.3440
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng
advisor	Abdullah, Che Sobry Mohamed Udin, Zulkifli
topic	T58.5-58.64 Information technology
spellingShingle	T58.5-58.64 Information technology Syaifudin, , Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pemilihan Projek Sistem Maklumat
description	The effectiveness of an information system (IS) project selection is measured by the success of the project and the expected impact. An information system project is difficult to select due to many factors that influence it, which leads to the possibility of fail to perform. Among the possible reasons are lack of consideration to the user involvement and acceptance, and the organizational capability to innovate. In Indonesia these problems are look similar almost in every state. The lack of model in selecting the project has initiated the idea to conduct this research. The objective of this study is to develop a model that is more effective to use in making decision during the IS project selection process. Based on literatures and existing theories, the theoretical framework or model of research is proposed, which consists of exogenous and endogenous variables. The exogenous variables are technology, economy and environment, while endogenous variables are user acceptance, organizational capability and effectiveness of information system project selection. Data are collected from Bureau Planning, and Data and Information Center for each ministry in the Indonesian government. Out of 294 questionnaires completed only 263 were usable for further analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). From the analysis, it found that technology has direct effect on the information system project selection while user acceptance and organizational capability directly influence the project selection. Furthermore, economics and environment factors directly affect the user acceptance. As a conclusion, this research has proposed four models and revealed that the technology factor is the most dominant factor that influence to the information system project selection. The contribution of the research is not only could identified the dominant factor or variable for IS project selection process, but also could guide decision makers to make decision based on those proposed models. This research ends with the suggestion for the industry, discusses the limitations of the study and gives some suggestions for future research.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Syaifudin, ,
author_facet	Syaifudin, ,
author_sort	Syaifudin, ,
title	Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pemilihan Projek Sistem Maklumat
title_short	Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pemilihan Projek Sistem Maklumat
title_full	Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pemilihan Projek Sistem Maklumat
title_fullStr	Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pemilihan Projek Sistem Maklumat
title_full_unstemmed	Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pemilihan Projek Sistem Maklumat
title_sort	faktor yang mempengaruhi keberkesanan pemilihan projek sistem maklumat
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate	2011
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3440/1/SYAIFUDIN.pdf
_version_	1747827573721661440
spelling	my-uum-etd.34402016-04-24T01:26:05Z Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pemilihan Projek Sistem Maklumat 2011-08 Syaifudin, , Abdullah, Che Sobry Mohamed Udin, Zulkifli Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business T58.5-58.64 Information technology The effectiveness of an information system (IS) project selection is measured by the success of the project and the expected impact. An information system project is difficult to select due to many factors that influence it, which leads to the possibility of fail to perform. Among the possible reasons are lack of consideration to the user involvement and acceptance, and the organizational capability to innovate. In Indonesia these problems are look similar almost in every state. The lack of model in selecting the project has initiated the idea to conduct this research. The objective of this study is to develop a model that is more effective to use in making decision during the IS project selection process. Based on literatures and existing theories, the theoretical framework or model of research is proposed, which consists of exogenous and endogenous variables. The exogenous variables are technology, economy and environment, while endogenous variables are user acceptance, organizational capability and effectiveness of information system project selection. Data are collected from Bureau Planning, and Data and Information Center for each ministry in the Indonesian government. Out of 294 questionnaires completed only 263 were usable for further analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). From the analysis, it found that technology has direct effect on the information system project selection while user acceptance and organizational capability directly influence the project selection. Furthermore, economics and environment factors directly affect the user acceptance. As a conclusion, this research has proposed four models and revealed that the technology factor is the most dominant factor that influence to the information system project selection. The contribution of the research is not only could identified the dominant factor or variable for IS project selection process, but also could guide decision makers to make decision based on those proposed models. This research ends with the suggestion for the industry, discusses the limitations of the study and gives some suggestions for future research. 2011-08 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3440/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3440/1/SYAIFUDIN.pdf text eng validuser Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Archer, N. and F. Ghasemzadeh (1999). "An Integrated framework for project porfolio." International Journal Of Project Management, 17(4): 207-216 Apperson C, Arefzadeh F, Dinsmore A, Grabowski R, May D, Morandi K, Tawnep B, White KP. (2005). Project Selection for Technology Invesment. Proceeding of the 2005 System and Information Engineering Design Symposium Asher, D.I. (1962). A linear programming model for the allocation of R&D efforts. IRE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 9, 154-157. Atkinson, S. & Haran, D. (2005). Individual And District Scale Determinants of Users' Satisfaction With Primary Health Care In Developing Countries. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 501-513. Bamber CJ, Sharp JM and Hides MT (1999). Factor affecting successful implementation of total productive maintenance a UK manufacturing case study perspective, Jurnal of Quality in Maintenance Engeneering Vol 5 No 3 pp 162-181. Barth MM (2008)." Deciphering Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Factor Analysis Approach". Journal of Education for Busines, September 2008 :40-46. Bappenas (2006). Petunjuk Teknis Pengisian Daftar Isian Pengcadangan Kegiatan, Bappenas Beer M (2001). "How to Develop an Organization Capable of Sustained High Performance: Embrace the Drive for Results-Capability Development Paradox". Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 233-247. Belout A. (1998) Effects of human resource management on project effectiveness and success: toward a new conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 21-26, 1998. Bergerona, F., Raymond, L. & Rivard, S. (2001). Fit in strategic information technology management research:an empirical comparison of perspectives. Omega 29 (2001) 125 {142. Bergman, M. & Mark, G. (2002). Exploring the Relationship between Project Selection and Requirements Analysis: An Empirical Study of the New Millennium Program, Joint International Conference on Requirement Engineering, IEEE. Bertoni M, Braglia M, Carmignani G (2006). Application of the AHP Methodology in Making a Proposal for a Public Work Contact, lnternational Journal of Project Management, IEEE. Blili S., Raymond L., Rivard S. (1998). Research Impact of task uncertainty, end user involvement, and competence on the success of end-user computing, Information & Management 33 (1998) 137-153 Bloom, P.N. and Chatterji, A.K. (2009). Scaling social Entrepreneurial Impact, California Management Review, Vol 51, no 3. Bradford M., Florin J. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 4 (2003) 205-225 Brazeal, D.V. (1996). Managing An Entrepreneurial Organizational Environment A Discriminant Analysis of Organizational Individual Differences between Autonomous Managers and Department Managers. Journal of Business Research, 35,55-67. Brown, R.M., Gatian, A.W. & Hicks, J.R. (2006). Strategic Information Systems and Financial Performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 215-248 Brown S, Fai F, Strategic Resonance Between Technological And Organisational Capabilities N The Innovation Process Within Firms, Technovation 26 (2006) 60-75 Buchanan, J & Vanderpooten (2007), Ranking Projects For An Electricity Utility Using Electre III. International Transactions in Operational Research, 14,(4), 309-323. Bowman, R.A. (2006). Discrete Optimization Developing activity duration specification limits for effective project control, European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 1191-1204. Byrne, B.M. (2010), Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 2nd edition, Taylor and Francis Group, New York, USA Calisir, F. & Ferah, C. (2004). The Relation of Interface Usability Characteristics, Perceived Usefulness, And Perceived Ease Of Use To End-User Satisfaction With Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 505-515 Camprieu, RD., Desbiens, J. & Feixue, Y. (2007). 'Cultural' differences in project risk perception: An empirical comparison of China and Canada. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 683-693 Card, D., Robin, P.K. (2005). How important are "entry effects" in financial incentive programs for welfare recipients? Experimental evidence from the Self- Sufficiency Project. Journal of Econometrics, 125, 113-139. Chang, W., Park, J.E. & Chaiy, S. (2010). How does CRM technology transform into organizational performance'? A mediating role of marketing capability. Journal of Business Research, 63, 849-855. Chen, C.T. & Cheng, H.L. (2009). A Comprehensive Model For Selecting Information System Project Under Fuzzy Environment. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 389-399 Chung, B. _2007_. "An analysis of success and failure factors for ERP systems in engineering and construction firms." Thesis, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md. Churchland, P.S. (1996). Feeling Reasons. In A.R. Damasio, H. Damasio & Y.Christen (Eds.), Neurobiology of Decision-Making (pp. 181-199). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Cohen, SG. & Bailey, DE. (1997). What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite. Journal Of Management, Vol 23, 234-290. Coldrick S, Lawson CP, Ivey PC (2002), A Decision Framework for R&D Project Selection, IEEE, 0-7803-7385-51021. Clark CE et all (1997)."Buildingg Change-Readiness Capabilities in the IS Organization: Insights From the Bell Atlantic Experience". MIS Quarterly/Desember 1997: 425-455 Clement P (1995). A Poverty-Oriented Cost-Benefit Approach to the Analysis of Development Projects. World Development, Vol.23, No.4, pp.571-592, 1995 Chung, H.R., Chi, K.W. & Tsaur, M.J. (2009). Weaknesses And Improvement Of Wang Et Al.'S Remote User Password Authentication Scheme For Resource-Limited Environments. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 31, 863-868. Davis, F.D. (1993).User Acceptance of Information Technology : System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impact. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 38,475-487. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13,(3), 319-340. Davis, F.D. dan Venkatesh, V. (1995). Measuring User Acceptance of Emerging Information Technologies: An Assessment of Possible Method Biases, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Davies. A. & Brady, T. (2000). Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy, 29, 931-953. Dean, B.V. and Sengupta, S.S. (1962). Research budgeting and project selection. IRE Trans. Eng. Manag., 1962 Dedrik, J., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K. (2003). Information Technology and Economic Performance: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1-28. DeLone WH., McLean ER. (2001). Information system success: The Quest for the Dependent variable, Information System Research 3: 1 Depkeu, (2006) Petunjuk Teknis Penyusunan dan Penelaahan RKA-KL Tahun 2006, Kementerian Kewangan Republik Indonesia. Dollinger M.J. (1984). Environmental Boundary Spanning and Information Processing Effects on Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, 351-368. Fang K, Wu AC,Yang CT, A Study of Information System Integration-with the Structuration Model of Technology as the Foundation, PICMET 2007 Proceedings, 5-9 August, Portland, Oregon-USA O 2007 PICMET. Falahuddin, M.J. (2010). Mengapa e-Government Gagal di Indonesia? [Online], [download 01 Nopember 2010], http://us.detikinet.com/read/2010/11/01/173530/1481829/328/. Fedor, DB., Ghosh, S., Caldwell, SD., Maurer, TJ, Singhal (2003). The Effects of Knowledge Management on Team Members' Ratings of Project Success and Impact. Decision Sciences Volume 34 Number 3 Fisher Helen, Tomlinson A, Ramnarayan & Yoshep Brotto (2003) . Isabel: Support with clinical decision making. Journal of Decision Support System, Vol 15 Issu 7 Pg 34. Fuentes MM, Albacetes CA, Montes FJ, The impact of environmental characteristics on TQM principles and organizational performance, Omega 32 (2004) 425-442 Garguilo, G.R. (1981).Developing systematic procedures for directing research programs. IRE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. EM-8, pp. 24-29, Mar. 1981 Ghasemzadeh, F. & Archer, N.P. (2000). Project Portofolio Selection Through Decision Support, Decision Support System , 29, (73-88). Ghobakhloo, M. (2010). The Interactive Model of User Information Technology Acceptance and Satisfaction in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. European Journal of Economics , Finance and Administrative Sciences, 19, 7-27, Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A. & Segars, A. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, 185-214. Goldstein , D. & Hilliard, R. (2008). Organisational Capabilities For Sustainable Production. DIME International Conference: 'Innovation, Sustainability, and policy', September 2008, Bordeaux, France Go'mez PJ, Lorente JC, Cabrera RV, Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement, Journal of Business Research 58 (2005) 715-725 Go'mez, C. & Ranfi, A.L. (2003). The lnfluence Of Organizational Variables On The Transferability Of Management Practices: An Examination Of Traditional And Learning Manufacturing Environments In Mexico. Journal of Business Research, 56, 989-997. Grewal R and Slotegraaf RJ (2007). "Embeddedness of Organizational Capabilities". Decision Sciences Volume 38 Number 3: 451-488 Grigoroudis, E., Litos, C., Moustakis, V.A., Politis, Y. & Tsironis, L. (2008). The Assessment Of User-Perceived Web Quality: Application Of A Satisfaction Benchmarking Approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 187, 1346-1357 Gupta, J. and A. Sravat (1998). "Development and project financing of private power project in developing countries: a case studi of India." International Journal of Project Management 16(2): 99-105. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010) . Multivariate Data Analysis a Global Perspective. Pearson Prentice Hall USA. Hall, D.L. & Nauda, A. (1988). A Strategic Methodology for IR&D Project Selection. IEEE. 1988. Hall DL. and Nauda A (1990), An Interactive Approach for Selecting IR&D Project, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Vol 37 No 2 May 1990. Hasan, B. and J. Ali (2007). "An empirical examination of factors affecting group effectiveness in information system projects."Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 5(2): 229-243. Hides MT and Irani Z (2000). Facilitating total quality thrugh effective project management, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol 17 no 415 pp 407- 422 Hsu YH., Fang W., 2009. Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 76 (2009) 664-677 Huang,C., P.Chu, et al. (2008). A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega. 36: 1038-1052 Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G.B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-114 Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P. & Cavaye, A.L. (1997) . Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 279-305. Itakura, H. (2007). IT Governance: Organizational Capabilities' View. PICMET 2007 Proceedings, 5-9 August, Portland, Oregon, USA. Johnston, M.R. (1988). Innovation: How is it encouraged?" in Proc. Nut. Conf. Strategic Manag. R&D (Arlington, VA). Jouini SB, Midler C, Garel G. (2004). Time-to-market vs. time-to-delivery Managing speed in Engineering, Procurement and Construction projects, International Journal of Project Management 22 (2004) 359-367 Jacob W.F. & Hoon Y.K, (2003). In search of innovative techniques to evaluate pharmaceutical R&D Projects, Elservier-Technovation 23 (2003) 291-296 Jiang, J.J. & Klein, G. (1999). Research Project Selection Criteria By Strategic Orientation. Information & Management , 36, 63-75. Jiang, J.J., Klein, G. & Carr, C.L. (2002). Measuring Informations System Service Quality: Servqual From The Other. MIS Quarterb Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 145-166. Jiang, J.J., Klein, G. & Pick, R.A. (2003). The Impact Of IS Department Organizational Environments Upon Project Team Performances. Information & Management, 40, 213-220. Joshi K, Lauer T.W. (1998).Impact of information technology on users' work environment: A case of computer aided design (CAD) system implementation, Information & Management, 34, 349-360. Kaplan, R.S and Norton, D.P. (2001). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part 11. Accounting Horizons, v15 no2 p 147-160 Kang, H.R, Yang, H.D. and Rowley C. (2006). Factors in team effectiveness: Cognitive and demographic similarities of software development team members. Human Relations ,Volume 59(12): 1681-1710 Khalifa, V. dan Liu (2003). Determinants of satisfaction at different adoption stages of Internet-based services, Journal of AIS 4(5), 2003, pp. 206--232, Kim, H.D. (2001). An XML based modeling language for the open interchange of decision models, Journal of Decision Support System, vol 31 pg 429-441. Kim H, Ryong Oh, Lee S, Kiln T, Sangloon Lee, Chung Y, Cho C, (2009). A fingerprint-based user authentication protocol considering both the mobility and security in the telematics environment, Computer Standards & Interfaces 31 (2009) 1098-1107 Kinney, V.M, Yoon, K. &. Zahedi (2002) The measurement of Webcustomer satisfaction:an expectation and disconfirmation approach, lnformation Systems Research 13(3), 2002, pp. 296-315. Kjetil Fagerholt (2004). A computer based decision support system for vessel fleet scheduling experience and future research, Journal of Decision Support System, vol 37 pg 35-47 Kourouthanassis PE, Giaglis GM, Vrechopoulos AP, Enhancing user experience through pervasive information systems: The case of pervasive retailing, International Journal of lnformation Management 27 (2007) 319-335 Kumar U, Kumar V and Grosbois (2008). "Development of technological capability by Cuban hospitality organizations". International Journal of Hospitality Management 27: 12-22 Lam, W. (2010). Teaching Case Information Systems lntegr- ation and Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) Adoption: A Case from Financial Services. Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 18(2). Lefebvre E, Lefebvre LA, Mfontaine L, (1994). Relating technology management capabilities to the use of information technology, Proceedinga of the Twenty- Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1060-3426/1994, IEEE. Leachman, R.C., Dincerler, A. and Kim, S. (1990). Resource-constrained scheduling of projects with variable-intensity activities. IIE Transactions, 22(1), 31-40. Lee YH., Chen C. (2007). An effective and efficient code generation algorithm for uniform loops on non-orthogonal DSP architecture, The Journal of Systems and Software 80 (2007) 410-428 Lee, J.W. & Kim, S.H. (2001). An lntegrated Approach For Interdependent Information System Project Selection. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 111-118. Lee, J.N. (2001). The Impact Of Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Capability And Partnership Quality On IS Outsourcing Success. Information & Management, 38, 323-335 Lee JW, Kim SH, (2000), Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection, Computers & Operations Research 27 (2000) 367}382 Lee, S.H., Beamish, P.W., Lee, H.U. & Park, J.H. (2009). Strategic Choice During Economic Crisis: Domestic Market Position, Organizational Capabilities and Export Flexibility. Journal of Business, 44, l-15. Lefebvre, E., Lefebvre, L.A. & Prefontaine, L. (1994)- Relating Technology Management Capabilities To The Use Of Information Technology. Proceedings Of The Twenty-Sevent Annual Hawai International Conference On System Sciences, IEEE. Levine, H.A. (2005). Project Portfolio Managemen: a practical guide to selecting project, managing portfolios, and maximing benefits, Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint, USA. Li, Q. and H. Sherali (2003). "An approach for analyzing foreign direct investment project with application to China's Tumen River Area development." Computer & Operation Research 30: 1467-1485. Liang, C. & Li, Q. (2008). Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 810-820. Liao Y.P. & Wang S.S., (2009). A Secure Dynamic ID Based Remote User Authentication Scheme For Multi-Server Environment. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 31, 24-29. Luhukay, J.F. (2011). E-Government Jangan Sampai Senasib dengan Pendahulunya. [Online], [download 20 Februari 2011, http://hukumonline.com/berita/baca/ho16797/ Madhok, A. (1996). The Organization of Economic Activity: Transaction Costs, Firm Capabilities, and the Nature of Governance Author(s): Anoop MadhokSource: Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 577-590 Mahdi IM, Alreshaid K, (2005), Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), International Journal of Project Management, 23, 564-572 Maldonado (2009). The impact of training, IT skills and Project management on ERP system implementation success, Relcasi, vol 2, no 1, 35-53 Paoluci, M., Sacile, R. & Boccalatte, A. (2002). Allocating Crude Oil Supply To Port And Refinery Tanks: A Simulation- Based Decision Support System. Journal of Decision Support System, 33, 39-54 Meade, L. and A. Presley (2002). "R&D Project Selection Using the Analytic Network Process." lEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49(1): 8 Meredith, R. (2004). On the Philisophies of Rationality and the Nature of Decision Support System. Ph.D. thesis, School of Information Management & System, Monash University, Australia Meredith, J.R. and Mantel, S.J. Jr. (2003). Project management. A managerial approach. Fifth edition. Wiley & Sons. Milosevic DZ. (2003). Project Management ToolBox Tools and Techniques for Practicing Project Manager, John Wiley & Son, lnc, New Jersey. Norman, A., Ngai, E.W.T. & Cheng, T.E. (2002). A Critical Review Of End-User Information System Satisfaction Research And A New Research Framework. Omega, 30, 451-478. Nusair K, Hua N. (2010). Comparative assessment of structural equation modeling and multiple regression research methodologies: E-commerce context, Tourism Management 31 (2010) 314-324 Ogunlana S., Siddiqui, Z., Yisa, S, & Olomolaiye, P.(2002) Factor and procedures used in matching project managers to construction projects in Bangkok. International jurnal of Project Managemen 20 (2002) 385-400, Pergamon. Oral M, Kettani 0 , Cinar U, (2001). Project evaluation and selection in a network of collaboration: A consensual disaggregation multi-criterion approach, European Journal of Operational Research 130, 332-346 Ozan E, SireIi Y, Kauffrnan P, A New Market Adoption Model for the Information Systems Industry, Engineering Management Journal Vol. 19 No. 1 March 2007. Payne, J.H. (1995). Managing of multiple simultaneous projects: a state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Project Management, 13(3), 163-168. Palvia PC., Palvia SC.,(1999). Research An examination of the IT satisfaction of small-business users, Information & Management 35 (1999) 127-137. Pan M., Viswanathan N and Chu C., (2005). An Efficient and Effective Detailed Placement Algorithm, IEEE, 0-7803-9254-X/05/2005. Pan D, Yap CM, Effective Information Processing between Users and Developers during Information System Project Development, Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 0-7695-0001-9/1999, IEEE. Paul M, David W & Rohit R (2004). Model selection for medical doagnosis decision support system. Journal of Decision Support System, vol36 pg 247-259. Perez PD and Falcon JMG (2002). A resource-based view of human resource management and organizational capabilities development. International Journal of Human Resource Management 13: 123-140. Pissinou N, Makki K, Konig-Ries B, Mobile users in heterogeneous environments with middleware platform, Computer Communications 26 (2003) 700-707 Puthamont S, Charoenngen C (2007). Strategi project selection in public sector: contruction project of the Ministry of Defence in Thailand, International Jurnal of Project Management. 25 (2007) 178-188. Quaddus, M. & Lau, A. (2007). Impact Of User Participation On Web-Based Information System: The Hong-Kong Experience. In Proceedings Qf The 10th International Conference On Computer And Information Technology (ICCIT 2007), Dhaka: United International University. Raggad G Bel (1996). Effects of information structure and problem solving on decision support system choice, Industri Management & Data systems, 21-27 MCB University Press [ISSN 0263-5577], Raghunathan, B., Raghunatahan, T.S. & Tu, Q. (1998). An Empirical Analysis of the Organizational Commitment of Information System Executives. Omega Int. J.Mgmt. Sci., 26, (5), 569-580. Raz T & Michael E (2001). Use and benefits of tools for project risk management, lnternational Journal of Project Management 19 (2001) 9-17 Reiss, G. (2002). Multi-project scheduling and management. Chapter 9 in: Pennypacker, J.S. and Dye, L.D. (2002a). Also available at http://www.eprogramme.com/articles/multi_proj. htm. Rengarajan S. and P. Jagannathan, (1997). Project selection by scoring for a large R&D organisation in a developing country, R&D Management 27, 2, 1997, Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Reza B, Varghese S & Hasan P (2004). The influence of communication mode and incentive structure on GDSS process and outcome. Journal of Decision Support System, vol 37 pg 287-305. Roberts, C., Salter, S.B. & Kantor, J. (1996). The Iasc Comparability Project and Current Financial Reporting in Europe. British Accounting Review, 28, 1-22. Rondeau PJ, Ragu-Nathan TS, Vonderembse MA.,How involvement, IS management effectiveness, and end-user computing impact IS performance in manufacturing firms, Information & Management 43 (2006) 93-107. Rosacker. K.M. & Olson, D.L. (2008). An Empirical Assessment of IT Project Selection and Evaluation Methods in State Government Project management Journal, 39,49-58. Saaty, T.L. (1988) Multicriteria Decision Making The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation', Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Sadikin, M. (2011). Mayoritas proyek teknologi informasi gagal. [Online], [download 1 Februari 2011], http://moedjionosadikin,wordpress.com/2011/02/01 Santhanam R. and Kyparisis J. (1995). A Multiple Criteria Decision Model For Information System Project Selection. Computers Ops Res. Vol. 22, No, 8, pp. 807-818 Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Method for Business. 4th Edition. Singapore: John Wiley & Son Inc. Sharma, S., Aragon, J.A. and Rueda, A. (2007). The Contingent Influence of Organizational Capabilities on Proactive Environmental Strategy in the Service Sector: An Analysis of North American and European Ski Resorts.Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24, 268-283 Shen, Q. & Dai, C. (2005). Measuring the Organizational Capabilities of Knowledge-Intensive Enterprises through the Model of NPD: A Field Study of Chinese Electric Power Automation Industry. Proceedings International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, Vol.2, 917-922. Sikora, R.& Piramuthu, S. (2007). Computing, Artificial Intelligence And Information Management Framework For Efficient Feature Selection In Genetic Algorithm Based Data Mining. European Journal of Operational Research, 180, 723- 737 Song, Y I., Lee, DH., Lee Y G., Chung, YC., (20077). Managing uncertainty and ambiguity in frontier R&D projects: A Korean case study. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 24 231-250 Steiger P., Stoke M., (1997). Effective Product Selection in Electronic Catalogs, ACM CHI 97. 22-27 MARCH 1997. Stein, T. (1998). "Dell Takes 'Best-Of-Breed' Approach In ERP Strategy." Information Week, May 11th 1998. Steven A., Gabriel SA, Kumar S, Ordo J, Nasserian A , (2006) A multiobjective optimization model for project selection with probabilistic considerations, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 40 (2006) 297-313 Talias MA, 2007, Optimal decision indices for R&D project evaluation in the pharmaceutical industry: Pearson index versus Gittins index, European Journal of Operational Research 177 (2007) 1105-1112 Tam, M. and V. Tumala (2001). An aplication of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 29, 171-182. Tang, V. (2006).Corporate Decision Analysis: An Engineering Approach Thesis PhD, Massachusets Institute of Technologi. Thamhain, HJ. (2004), Team Leadership Effectiveness In Technology based Project Environ. Project management Journal Tian Q, Jian Mi, Liu (2002) A Hybrid knowledge and model system for R&D Project Selection, Expert System with Application 23 (3) 265-271. Tian Q, Jian Mi, Liang J, Kwah, Liu (2005)An Organizational Decision Support System for effective Project Selection, Decision support System 39, 403-413. Tiong. R,K. & Alum, J. (1997). Financial commitments for BOT Projects. International Journal ofProject Management Vol.15, No.2, pp.73-78, 1997 Trepper (2000). E-commerce Strategies, Microsoft Press, Washington, DC. Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1147-1161. Tse, A.C., Sin, L.Y., Yau, O.H. (2003). Market orientation and business performance in a Chinese business environment. Journal of Business Research, 56, 227-239. Tung, F.C., Lee, M.S., Chen, C.C. & Hsu, Y.S. (2009). An Extension Of Financial Cost And Tam Model With Idt For Exploring Users' Behavioral Intentions To Use The Crm Information System. Social Behavior And Personality, 37, (5) , 621-626 Turban, E., Aronson, J.E. (2001). Decision Support System and Intelligent System (6 th eds). New Jersey: Prentice- Hall Inc. Turner, R., Huemann, M., Keegan, A. (2008). Human resource management in the project-oriented organization: Employee well-being and ethical treatment. International Journal of Project Management 26 (2008) 577-585 Vaidya S Omkarprasad & Kumar Sushi1 (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 1-29. Vargas, A., Hernandez, M.J. & Bruque, S. (2003). Determinants of Information Technology Competitive Value. Evidence From A Western European Industry. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 245-268. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four Longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46 (2), 186-204. Vlahos GE. & Ferratt TW. (1995). Research Information technology use by managers in Greece to support decision making: Amount, perceived value, and satisfaction. Information & Munagement, 29, 305-315. Vlahos, G.E. & Ferratt T.W. (1996). A Comparative Study Between Managers Of Corporations In Greece And The U.S. Regarding Their Use And Perceived Value Of Computer-Based Information Systems In Supporting Decision Making. SIGCPR/SIGMIS '96 ACM, Denver Colorado USA. Vlahos, G.E., Ferratt, T.W. & Knoeple, G. (2004). The use of computer-based information systems by German managers to support decision making. Information & Management, 41, 763-779 Walker, G,, Madsen, T.L., & Carini, G. (2002). How does institutional change affect heterogeneity among firms? Strategic Management Journal, 23(2): 89-104. Wang J & Hwang WL, (2007). A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. Omega 35, 247-257. Wang ETG, Wei HL, Jiang JJ, Klein G, User Diversity Impact On Project Perforniance In An Environment With Organizational Technology Learning And Management Review Processes. International Journal of Project Management 24 (2006) 405-411. Wang, Y.S. & Liao Y.W. (2007). The conceptualization and measurement of mcommerce user satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 381-398 Wang, J., Xu, Y. & Li, Z. (2009). Research On Project Selection System Of Pre-Evaluation Of Engineering Design Project Bidding. International Journal of Project Management , 27, 584-599. Wang, E.T., Chang, J.Y., Jiang, J.J., & Klien, G. (2010). User advocacy and information system project performance. International Journal of Project Management xxx (2010) Wei, C.C., Liang, G.S., & Wang, M,J. (2007).A comprehensive supply chain management project selection framework under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 627-636. Xinchen, Z. & Shouyin, L. (2008). Wireless video Access for talent Market Multimedia Information. International Seminar Business and Information Management, Vol. l, 63-66, IEEE Conferences. Yan, X., Gong, M., & Thong, J.Y. (2006). Two tales of one service: user acceptance of short message service (SMS) in Hong Kong and China. Info, Vol.8, NO.1, 16-28, Emerald Group Publishing Yang, L.R., 07Connor, J.T. & Wang, C.C. (2006). Technology utilization on different sizes of projects and associated impacts on composite project success. International Journal of Project Management, 24 (2006) 96-105 Yap, C.S., Ram, K.S. & Leong, C.M. (1992). Methods for Information System Project Se1ection:An Experimental Study of AHP and SMART. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1992. Yen, H.R., Li, E.Y., Niehoff, B.P. (2008).Do organizational citizenship behaviors lead to information system success? Testing the mediation effects of integration climate and project management, Information & Management, 45, 394-402 Yoon, C.Y. (2009). Measures of perceived end-user computing competency in an organizational computing environment, Knowledge-Based Systems, 22,471-476 Youngberg E, Olsenb D, Hauser K. (2009). Determinants of professionally autonomous end user acceptance in an enterprise resource planning system environment, International Journal of Information Management 29 (2009) 138-144 Zhou, T. (2008). The Impact of Perceived Value on User Acceptance of Mobile Commerce. International Symposium on Electronic Commerce and Security. Zviran M, Glezer C, Itay Avni I (2006) User satisfaction from commercial web sites: The effect of design and use, Information & Management 43 (2006) 157-178

Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pemilihan Projek Sistem Maklumat

Similar Items