Salaried and Waged Taxpayers' Internal States and Assessment System in Malaysia

The change of taxpayers’ responsibilities as a result of the introduction of the Self Assessment System (SAS) had triggered debates on whether taxpayers are able to perform the required tasks under the new system. SAS demands taxpayers to perform the primary tasks that were previously handled by the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noraza, Mat Udin
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/3470/1/s90379.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3470/8/s90379.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.3470
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Md Idris, Kamil
Mohd Hanefah, Hajah Mustafa
topic HJ4771.6 Income Tax
Tax Returns.
spellingShingle HJ4771.6 Income Tax
Tax Returns.
Noraza, Mat Udin
Salaried and Waged Taxpayers' Internal States and Assessment System in Malaysia
description The change of taxpayers’ responsibilities as a result of the introduction of the Self Assessment System (SAS) had triggered debates on whether taxpayers are able to perform the required tasks under the new system. SAS demands taxpayers to perform the primary tasks that were previously handled by the tax authority, which emphasise on completing tax returns accurately, including computing the correct tax liabilities. Therefore, the successful implementation of SAS would rely heavily on the performance of the taxpayers in carrying out their responsibilities. However, submitting error-free tax returns is not an easy task, especially for an average taxpayer. It is believed that taxpayers must achieve and possess certain states intrinsically developed to perform their responsibilities successfully. Due to the change in the tax assessment system, the tax authority is currently carrying out new functions, which include providing assistance to taxpayers to assist the latter in performing their new responsibilities. This study reports the results of an investigation of the relationships between taxpayer’s internal states as well as taxpayer assistance and assessment performance and simultaneously considered the moderating influence of taxpayer assistance. The data is collected using a quasiexperimental design known as posttest-only no-treatment control group design. The sample comprises of post-graduate students, who are actual taxpayers as well. Among the elements of the taxpayer’s internal states considered in this study, tax knowledge is found to have significant relationship with assessment performance. The findings also show positive relationships between each tax knowledge dimension and assessment performance. However, taxpayer assistance does not have moderating effect on the relationships of taxpayer’s internal states and assessment performance. The findings of this study have contributed to the body of knowledge because there is a general dearth of published research, particularly in Malaysia that investigates such relationships.
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Noraza, Mat Udin
author_facet Noraza, Mat Udin
author_sort Noraza, Mat Udin
title Salaried and Waged Taxpayers' Internal States and Assessment System in Malaysia
title_short Salaried and Waged Taxpayers' Internal States and Assessment System in Malaysia
title_full Salaried and Waged Taxpayers' Internal States and Assessment System in Malaysia
title_fullStr Salaried and Waged Taxpayers' Internal States and Assessment System in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Salaried and Waged Taxpayers' Internal States and Assessment System in Malaysia
title_sort salaried and waged taxpayers' internal states and assessment system in malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2012
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/3470/1/s90379.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3470/8/s90379.pdf
_version_ 1747827580070789120
spelling my-uum-etd.34702016-04-20T06:47:59Z Salaried and Waged Taxpayers' Internal States and Assessment System in Malaysia 2012-10 Noraza, Mat Udin Md Idris, Kamil Mohd Hanefah, Hajah Mustafa Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HJ4771.6 Income Tax. Tax Returns. The change of taxpayers’ responsibilities as a result of the introduction of the Self Assessment System (SAS) had triggered debates on whether taxpayers are able to perform the required tasks under the new system. SAS demands taxpayers to perform the primary tasks that were previously handled by the tax authority, which emphasise on completing tax returns accurately, including computing the correct tax liabilities. Therefore, the successful implementation of SAS would rely heavily on the performance of the taxpayers in carrying out their responsibilities. However, submitting error-free tax returns is not an easy task, especially for an average taxpayer. It is believed that taxpayers must achieve and possess certain states intrinsically developed to perform their responsibilities successfully. Due to the change in the tax assessment system, the tax authority is currently carrying out new functions, which include providing assistance to taxpayers to assist the latter in performing their new responsibilities. This study reports the results of an investigation of the relationships between taxpayer’s internal states as well as taxpayer assistance and assessment performance and simultaneously considered the moderating influence of taxpayer assistance. The data is collected using a quasiexperimental design known as posttest-only no-treatment control group design. The sample comprises of post-graduate students, who are actual taxpayers as well. Among the elements of the taxpayer’s internal states considered in this study, tax knowledge is found to have significant relationship with assessment performance. The findings also show positive relationships between each tax knowledge dimension and assessment performance. However, taxpayer assistance does not have moderating effect on the relationships of taxpayer’s internal states and assessment performance. The findings of this study have contributed to the body of knowledge because there is a general dearth of published research, particularly in Malaysia that investigates such relationships. 2012-10 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3470/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3470/1/s90379.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/3470/8/s90379.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul, M. (2003). Income tax non-compliance in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Prentice Hall. Abdul Manaf, N. A. (2004). Land tax administration and compliance attitudes in Malaysia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Nottingham, Nottingham. Abdul Wahab, N. S., Che Ahmad, A., & Mat-Udin, N. (2004). Ethical judgment among university accounting students: The case of prescriptive and deliberative moral reasoning behaviour. Utara Management Journal, 1(1), 41-51. Ahmad, M. A. R., Mohd Hanefah H. M., & Mohd Noor, M. A. (2007, July). The effect of knowledge on tax compliance behaviours among Malaysian taxpayers. Paper presented at the International Conference on Business and Information, Tokyo, Japan. Ahmed Razman, A. B., & Bany Ariffin, A. N. (2000, October). Tax literacy rate among taxpayers in Klang Valley. Paper presented at the FEP 2000 Seminar, Penang, Malaysia. Aiken, L. R. (2002). Attitudes and related psychosocial constructs: Theories, assessment and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. Alexander, D. C. (1974). Facilitating the self-assessment income tax system. The CPA Journal (pre-1986), 44, 9-10. Alm, J. (1988). Uncertainty tax policies, individual behavior and welfare. The American Economic Review, 78(1), 237-245. Alm, J. (1991). A perspective on the experimental analysis of taxpayer reporting. The Accounting Review, 66, 577-593. Alm, J., Bloomquist, K. and McKee, M. (November, 2010). On the external validity of tax compliance experiment. Paper presented at the National Tax Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL. Alm, J., Cherry, T., Jones, M., & McKee, M. (2010). Taxpayer information assistance services and tax compliance behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 577-586. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.018 Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Russians attitudes towards paying taxes - Before, during and after the transition. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(12), 832-857. doi: 10.1108/03068290610714670 Ang, C.-L., Davies, M., & Finlay, P. N. (2000). Measures to assess the impact of information technology on quality management. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 17(1), 42-65. Armenic, H. J., & Beechy, T. H. (1984). Accounting students' performance and cognitive complexity: Some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review, LIX(2), 300-313. Ayers, B. C., Kachelmeier, S. J., & Robinson, J. R. (1999). Why do people give interest-free loans to the government? An experimental study of interim tax payments. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 21(2), 55-74. Baker, M. J. (2001). Selecting a Research Methodology. The Marketing Review, 1, 373-397. Baldry, J. C., & Kasipillai, J. (1996). Malaysia: income tax enforcement. Asia-Pacific Tax Buletin, 2(9), 268-272. Bardai, B. (1992). Tax illiteracy in Malaysia: Problems and solution. Journal of School of Accountancy MARA Institute of Technology, II(2), 6-35. Barr, N. A., Prest, A. R., & James, S. (1977). Self Assessment for Income Tax. London: Heinemann Educational Books. Barrick, J. A. (2001). The effect of code section knowledge on tax-research performance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 23(2), 20-34. Barrick, J. A., & Spilker, B. C. (2003). The relations between knowledge, search strategy, and performance in unaided and aided information search. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00002-5 Beck, P., Davis, J., & Jung, W. (1991). Experimental evidence on taxpayer reporting under uncertainty. The Accounting Review, 66, 535-558. Becker, G. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1967). Value: Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 18, 239-286. Belsley, D., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Birnberg, J. G., & Nath, R. (1968). Laboratory experimentation in accounting research. The Accounting Review(January), 38-45. Birnberg, S., & Shields, M. (1984). The role of attention and memory in accounting decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(3), 365-382. Bonner, S. E. (1990). Experience effects in auditing: The role of task-specific knowledge. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 72-92. Bonner, S. E. (1994). A model of the effects of audit task complexity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(3), 213-234. Bonner, S. E., Davis, J. S., & Jackson, B. R. (1992). Expertise in corporate tax planning: The issue identification stage. Journal of Accounting Research, 30(Supplement), 1-28. Bonner, S. E., & Lewis, B. L. (1990). Determinants of Auditor Expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(Supplement), 1-28. Bonner, S. E., & Pennington, N. (1991). Cognitive processes and knowledge as determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Literature, 10, 1-50. Bonner, S. E., & Walker, P. L. (1994). The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 157-178. Boy, G. A. (2007, July). Perceived complexity and cognitive stability in human-centered design. Paper presented at the HCI International 2007 Conference, Beijin, China. Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1982). Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 421-436. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 687-732). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press. Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual diffreneces and behavior in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Carnes, G. A., & Cuccia, A. D. (1996). An analysis of the effect of tax complexity and its perceived justification on equity judgments. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18(2), 40-56. Caroll, J. S. (1987). Compliance with the law: A decision-making approach to taxpaying. Law and Human Behavior, 11(4), 319-335. Carroll, J. S. (1992). How taxpayers think about their taxes: Frames and values. In J. Slemrod (Ed.), Why people pay taxes: Tax compliance and enforcement (pp. 43-63). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Casti, L. (1995). Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York: Harper Collins Publishers. Chan, C. W., Troutman, C. S., & O'Bryan, D. (2000). An expended model of taxpayer compliance: Empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 83-103. Chang, C. J., Ho, J. L. Y., & Liao, W. M. (1997). The effects of justification, task complexity and experience/training on problem-solving performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9(Supplement), 98-116. Chen, X., Ender, P. B., Mitchell, M., & Wells, C. (2005). Stata Web Books: Regression with Stata. Retrieved from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/webbooks/reg/default Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 121-152. Choong, K.-F. (2011). Malaysian taxation: Principles and practice (17th ed.). Kuala Lumpur: InfoWorld. Christensen, A. L., Weihrich, S. G., & Gerbing Newman, M. D. (1994). The impact of education on perceptions of tax fairness. Advances in Taxation, 6, 63-94. Chung, J., & Trevedi, V.U. (2003). The effect of friendly persuasion and gender on tax compliance behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(2), 133-145. doi: 10.1023/A:1026004716676 Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, XVI(February), 64-73. Clayton, G. E., & Cate, T. (2004). Predicting MBA no-shows and graduation success with discriminate analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 10, 235-243. Clotfelter, C. T. (1983). Tax evasion and tax rates: an analysis of individual returns. The Review of Economics and Statistics, LXV(3), 363-373. Cloyd, C. B. (1995). Prior knowledge, information search behaviors, and performance in tax research tasks. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 17(Supplement), 82-107. Cloyd, C. B. (1997). Performance in tax research tasks: The joint effect of knowledge and accountability. The Accounting Review, 72(1), 111-131. Cloyd, C. B. (1999). Discussion of: Contextual features of tax decision-making settings. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 21(Supplement), 74-77. Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. J. (2001). SPSS analysis without anguish, version 10 for windows. Brisbane: John Wiley and Sons. Collins, J. H., Milliron, V. C., & Toy, D. R. (1990). Factors associated with household demand for tax preparers. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 9-25. Collins, J. H., Milliron, V. C., & Toy, D. R. (1992). Determinants of tax compliance: A contingency approach. Journal of American Taxation Association, 14(2), 1-29. Crumbley, D. (1973). Behavioral implication of taxation. The Accounting Review, 48(October), 759-763. Cullis, J., & Lewis, A. (1985). Some hypotheses and evidence on tax knowledge and preferences. Journal of Economic Psychology, 6, 271-287. Davis, J. S., & Mason, J. D. (2003). Similarity and precedent in tax authority judgment. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 25(1), 53-71. Davis, J. S., & Solomon, I. (1989). Experience, expertise, and expert-performance research in public accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 150-164. De Vaus, D. A. (1993). Survey in social research. London: UCL Publisher. Dennis, B. (2011). Notes for a lecture on pre-experimental designs for description. Retrieved from www.indiana.edu/~educy520/lecture_slides/520pre_experimental_designs.pdf Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.my Devos, K. (2005). The attitudes of tertiary students on tax evasion and the penalties for tax evasion - a pilot study and demographic analysis. e-Journal of Tax Research, 3(2), 222-273. Dusenbury, R. (1994). The effect of prepayment position on individual taxpayers' preferences for risky tax-filing position. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 16(1), 1-16. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. Earley, P. C. (1985). Influence of information, choice and task complexity upon goal acceptance, performance and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 481-491. Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. Eaglewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 12, 473-498. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Journal of Accounting Research, 19(1), 1-31. Elugardo, R. (1988). Against weak psychophysical supervenience. Dialectica, 42(2), 129-143. Emory, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business research methods (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Irwin, Inc. Enrick, N. L. (1963). A pilot study of income tax consciousness. National Tax Journal, 16(2), 169-173. Enrick, N. L. (1964). A further study of income tax consciousness. National Tax Journal, 17(3), 319-321. Eriksen, K., & Fallan, L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation; A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387-402. Fallan, L. (1999). Gender, exposure to tax knowledge, and attitudes towards taxation: An experimental approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 173-184. Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3, 87-99. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G., & Sakakibara, S. (1994). A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. Journal of Operation Management, 11, 339-366. Frederick, D. M. (1991). Auditors' representation and retrieval of internal control knowledge. The Accounting Review, 60(2), 240-258. Frisbie, D. A. (1988). Reliability of scores from teacher-made test. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 7(1), 25-35. Gibbins, M. (1984). Propositions about the psychology of professional judgment in public accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1), 103-125. Glover, S. M., Prawitt, D. F., & Spilker, B. C. (1997). The influence of decision aids on user behavior: Implications for knowledge acquisition and inappropriate reliance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(2), 232-255. Goedde, H. (1988). An empirical study of tax practitioners perceptions of the effect of the 1986 tax reform act on simplification and fairness of the federal income tax. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://books.google.com.my Goodwin, J., & Goodwind, D. (1999). Ethical judgement across cultures: A comparison between business students from Malaysia and New Zealand. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 267-281. Gore, R. (1998). Toward a more complete framework for investigating the acquisition and use of knowledge in accounting: Extending the Libby model. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & These Database. (UMI No. 41402616) Green, S. (1999). Self-assessment: A new era for United Kingdom taxpayers, but what about the costs? Behavioural Tax Research, 2, 107-119. Groenland, E. A. G., & Veldhoven, G. M. v. (1983). Tax evasion behavior: A psychological framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 129-144. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Hair, J. F., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research method for business. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Hammond, K. R., McClelland, G. H., & Mumpower, J. (1980). Human judgment and decision making: Theories, methods and procedures. New York: Praeger Publisher. Harris, T. D. (1989). The effect of type of tax knowledge on individuals' perceptions of fairness and compliance with the federal income tax system: An empirical study. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & These Database. (UMI No. 9005115). Hasseldine, J., & Li, Z. (1999). More tax evasion research required in new millennium. Crime, Law & Social Change, 31(2), 91-104. Hite, P. A. (1988). An examination of the impact of subject selection on hypothetical and self-reported taxpayer noncompliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 445-466. Hite, P. A. (1997). An investigation of moral suation and vertical equity arguments on intended taxpayer compliance. Law and Policy, 19(1), 1-22. Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications Ltd. Hughes, J., & Summers, B. (2004, September). Does understanding taxation change your attitudes? Paper presented at the 13th Taxation Research Network Conference, University of Bournemouth, Bournemouth. Hussey, J., & Hussey, R. (1997). Business research. Chippenham, United Kingdom: MacMillan Press Ltd. Ilgen, D. R., & Schneider, J. (1991). Performance measurement: A multi-discipline view. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 71-108). Chichester: Wiley. Income Tax Act 1967 (With Completed Rules & Regulations). (2008). Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. (2001). IRBM Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.hasil.gov.my Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. (2002). IRBM Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.hasil.gov.my Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. (2003). IRBM Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.hasil.gov.my Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. (2004). IRBM Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.hasil.gov.my Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. (2006). IRBM Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.hasil.gov.my Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. (2007). IRBM Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.hasil.gov.my Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. (2008). IRBM Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.hasil.gov.my Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.hasil.gov.my Jackson, & Jones, S. (1985). Salience of tax evasion penalties versus detection risk. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 6(2), 7-17. Jackson, & Milliron, V. (1986). Tax compliance research: Findings, problems and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 125-165. Jackson, B., & Jaouen, P. R. (1989). Influencing taxpayer compliance through sanction threat or appeals to conscience. Advances in Taxation, 2, 131-147. Jacoby, J. (2002). Experimental design and the selection of controls in trademark and deceptive advertising surveys. Official Journal of the International Trademark Association, 92(4), 890-956. James, S. (1983). The Economics of Taxation. Great Britain: Heritage Publishers. James, S. (1994). Self-assessment for Income Tax. British Tax Review, 3, 204-212. James, S., Sawyer, A. J., & Wallschutzky, I. (1998). The complexities of tax simplification: Progress in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. In C, Evans and A. Greenbaum (Eds.), Tax Administration: Facing the challenges of the future (pp.333-356). Sydney: Prospect Media Pty Ltd. James, S., & Wallschutzky, I. (1997). Tax law improvement in Australia and the UK: The need for a strategy for simplification. Fiscal Studies, 18(4), 445-460. Johns, R. (2010). Likert items and scales. Retrieved from http://www.surveynet.ac.uk/sqb/datacollection/likertfactsheet.pdf Joyce, E. J., & Libby, R. (1981). Some accounting implications of "behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice". Journal of Accounting Research, 19(2), 544-550. Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 75-170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Kaplan, S. E., Reckers, M. J., West, S. G., & Boyd, J. C. (1988). An examination of tax reporting recommendations of professional tax preparers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 427-443. Karlinsky, S. S., & Koch, B. S. (1983). Readability is in the mind of the reader. The Journal of Business Communication, 20(4), 57-69. Karlinsky, S. S., & Koch, B. S. (1987). Impact of tax law complexity on professionals. Journal of the American Taxation Association(Fall), 24-34. Kasipillai. (1997). Aspects of hidden economy and tax non-compliance in Malaysia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New England, Armidale. Kasipillai. (2000). A Practical Guide to Malaysian Taxation-Current Year Assessment. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill. Kasipillai, Aripin, N., & Amran, N. A. (2003). The influence of education on tax avoidance and tax evasion. e-Journal of Tax Research, 1(2), 134-146. Kasipillai, J. (2002). Investigations and tax audit under the self assessment system. The Chartered Secretary Malaysia(January), 16-22. Kasipillai, J., & Abdul Jabbar, H. (2006). Gender and ethnicity differences in tax compliance. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 11(2), 73-88. Kasipillai, J., Mat-Udin, N., & Zainol-Arifin, Z. (2003). How do moral values influence tax compliance behaviour? Findings from a survey. The Chartered Secretary Malaysia(June), 10-15. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: CBS College Publishing. Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The "slippery slope" framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 210-225. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004 Klepper, S., Mazur, M., & Nagin, D. (1991). Expert intermediaries and legal compliance: The case of tax preparers. Journal of Law and Economics, 34(April), 205-229. Koch, B., & Karlinsky, S. S. (1984). The effect of federal income tax law reading complexity on students' task performance. Issues in Accounting Education, 1, 98-110. Kraemer, H. C., & Thiemann, S. (1987). How many subjects?: Statistical power analysis in research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Krishnamoorthy, M. (2006, August 26). 1.3 million did not pay tax. The Star Online. Retrieved from http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp? Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151- 160. Kwok, W. C. C., & Sharp, D. J. (1998). A review of construct measurement issues in behavioral accounting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 17, 137-174. Lai, M.-L., & Choong, K.-F. (2009, June). Self-assessment tax system and compliance complexities: Tax practitioners' perspectives. Paper presented at the Oxford Business & Economics Conference Program, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom. LeBaube, R. A., & Vehorn, C. L. (1983). Assisting taxpayers in meeting their obligations under the law. In S. B. Hansen (Ed.), The politics of taxation (pp.310-334). New York: Praeger Publication. Lewis, A. (1982). Introduction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2, 155-163. Libby, R. (1995). The role of knowledge and memory in audit judgement. In R. H. Ashton & A. H. Ashton (Eds.), Judgement and Decision Making Research in Accounting and Auditing (pp. 176-205). New York: Cambridge University Press. Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgement performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 425-450. Libby, R., & Tan, H.-T. (1994). Modeling the determinants of audit expertise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(8), 701-716. Long, S. B., & Swingen, J. A. (1987). An approach to the measurement of tax law complexity. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 8(2), 22-36. Loo, E. C. (2006a, September). Determinants of individual taxpayers' compliance behaviour: Experience of the transition from pre to post self assessment in Malaysia. Paper presented at the 7th International Tax Administration Conference, Sydney, Australia. Loo, E. C. (2006b, September). A qualitative case study on the impact of self assessment on individual taxpayers in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Asian Academic Accounting Association Conference, Sydney, Australia. Loo, E. C. (2006c). Tax knowledge, tax structure and compliance: A report on a quasi-experiment. New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy, 12(June), 1-27. Loo, E. C., & Ho, J. K. (2005). Competency of Malaysian salaried individuals in relation to tax compliance under self assessment. Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/eJTR/2005/3.html Loo, E. C., McKerchar, M., & Hansford, A. (2005). An international comparative analysis of self assessment: What lessons are there for tax administrators? Australia Tax Forum, 20, 669-710. Loo, E. C., McKerchar, M., & Hansford, A. (2008, March). Tax compliance behaviour: Findings derived from a mixed method design. Paper presented at the 8th International Tax Administration Conference, Sydney. Loo, E. C., McKerchar, M., & Hansford, A. (2009). Understanding the compliance behaviour of Malaysian individual taxpayers using a mixed method approach. Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association, 4(1), 181-202. Madeo, S., Schepanski, A., & Ueker, W. (1987). Modeling judgment of taxpayer compliance. The Accounting Review, 62, 323-342. Madi, N. (1999). Tax literaxy among sole proprietors and partners at Tabuan Jaya and King Centre Kuching, Sarawak. (Unpublished master's thesis). Curtin University of Technology, Perth. Madi, N., Kamaluddin, A., Janggu, T., Aba-Ibrahim, M., Abu-Samah, A., & Jusoff, K. (2010). Tax literacy among employees: Sabah and Sarawak's perspective. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(1), 218-223. Magro, A. M. (2005). Knowledge, adaptivity, and performance in tax research. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 703-722. Marchant, G. (1990). Discussion of Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(Supplement), 21-28. Marshall, R., Smith, M., & Armstrong, R. W. (1997). Self-assessment and the tax audit lottery: the Australian experience. Managerial Auditing Journal, 12(1), 9-15. Martindale, B. C. (1989). Impact of tax complexity on taxpayer understanding (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas, Texas. Martindale, B. C., Koch, B. S., & Karlinsky, S. S. (1992). Tax law complexity: The impact of style. Journal of Business Communication, 29(4), 383-400. Martinez-Vazquez, J., Hardwood, G. B., & Larkins, E. R. (1992). Withholding position and income tax cmpliance: Some experimental evidence. Public Finance Quarterly, 20(2), 152-174. Massa, L. J., Mayer, R. E., & Bohon, L. M. (2005). Individual differences in gender role beliefs influence spatial ability test performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2004.11.002 McKerchar, M. (2003). Complexity, fairness and compliance: A study of personal income taxpayers in Australia. Sydney: Australian Tax Research Foundation. Md Idris, K. (2002). Gelagat Kepatuhan zakat gaji di kalangan kakitangan awam [Compliance behaviour of zakah on employment income among civil servants]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University Utara Malaysia, Sintok. Md Idris, K., & Ayob, A. M. (2001). Attitude towards zakah on employment income:Comparing outcomes between single score and multidimensional scores. Malaysian Management Journal, 5(1&2), 47-63. Milliron, V. (1985a). A behavioral study of the meaning and influence of tax complexity. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(Autumn), 794-816. Milliron, V. (1985b). An analysis of the relationship between tax equity and tax complexity. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 7(Fall), 19-33. Mock, T. J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (1983). Context, findings and method in cognitive style research: A comparative study. Retrieved from http://raw.rutgers.edu/MiklosVasarhelyi/Resume%20Articles/OTHER%20PUBLICATIONS/L19.%20context%20findings.pdf Mohd Hanefah, H. M. (1997). An evaluation of the Malaysian tax administrative system, and taxpayers' perceptions towards assessment systems, tax law fairness, and tax law complexity. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok. Mohd Hanefah, H. M. (1998). Some lessons for the Malaysian Individual taxpayers. The Malaysian Accountant(December), 2-7. Mohd Shukor, M. (1994). An investigation of a taxpayer education program for developing countries: A Malaysian example. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & These Database. (UMI No. 9502323). Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual diffrences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83. Mottiakavandar, R., Ramayah, T., & Haron, H. (2003). Factors influencing compliance behaviour of small business entrepreneurs. Tax Nasional, 1st Quarter, 20-26. Mueller, D. J. (1986). Measuring social attitudes. Columbia University, New York: Teachers College. Murphy, K. (2004). An examination of taxpayers' attitudes towards the Australian tax system: Findings from a survey of tax scheme investors (Working Paper No. 46). Canberra: Centre for Tax System Integrity, The Australian National University. Nicolosi, G., Peng, L., & Zhu, N. (2004). Do individual investors learn from their trading experience?, Retrieved from http://faculty.gsm.ucdavis.edu. Norsiah, A. (2004). Gender differences of attitude towards taxation. Akademika, 65(July), 125-135. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Oates, W. E. (1969). The effects of property taxes and real estate spending on property values: An empirical study of the capitalisation and the Tiebout hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, 77, 957-970. O'Donnell, E., Koch, B., & Boone, J. (2005). The influence of domain knowledge and task complexity on tax professionals' compliance recommendations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 145-165. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2003.12.003 Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 139-158. doi: 10.1080/10573560390143085 Palil, M. R. (2005). Does tax knowledge matter in self-assessment system? Evidence from Malaysian tax administrative. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 2, 80-84. Palil, M. R. (2010). Tax knowledge and tax compliance determinants In self assessment system in Malaysia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Birmingham, Birmingham. Park, C.-G., & Hyun, J. K. (2003). Examining the determinants of tax compliance by experimental data: a case of Korea. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25, 673-684. doi: 10.1016/S0106-8938(03)00075-9 Phillips, F. (1998). Accounting students' beliefs about knowledge: Associating performance with underlying belief dimensions. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(1), 113-126. Piaget, J. (1972). To understand is to invent. New York: The Viking Press, Inc. Pope, J. (1993). The compliance costs of taxation in Australia and tax simplification: The issues. Australian Journal of Management, 18(1), 69-89. Porcano, T. M. (1988). Correlates of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 47-67. Price, J. E. (1992). The taxpayer knowledge index as a clue to noncompliance. Paper presented at the 1992 IRS Research Conference, Washington, D.C. Reckers, P., Sanders, D., & Wyndelts, R. (1991). An empirical investigation of factors influencing tax practitioner compliance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 13(Fall), 30-46. Reinganum, J. f., & Wilde, L. L. (1988). A note on enforcement and compliance in the presence of tax practitioners. The Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 7, 163-181. Richardson, & Sawyer, A. J. (2001). A taxonomy of the tax compliance literature: Further findings, problems and prospects. Australian Tax Forum, 16, 137-284. Richardson, G. (2008). The relationship between culture and tax evasion across countries: Additional evidence and extensions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 17(2), 67-78. Roberts, L. H., Hite, P. A., & Bradley, C. F. (1994). Understanding attitudes towards progressive taxation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 165-190. Roberts, M. L. (1998). Tax accountants' judgement/decision-making research: A review and sysnthesis. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 20(1), 78-121. Roberts, M. L., & Ashton, A. H. (2003). Using declarative knowledge to improve information search performance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 25(1), 21-38. Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Saad, N. (2009, November). Fairness perceptions and compliance behaviour: New Zealand evidence. Paper presented at the 10th Asian Academic Accounting Association Conference, Istanbul. Saad, N. (2011). Fairness perceptions and compliance behaviour: Taxpayer's judgment in self-assessment environments. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Canterbury, Christchurch. Saad, N., Mansor, M., & Ibrahim, I. (2003, December). The self-assessment system and its compliance costs. Paper presented at the SEMACC 2003, Kangar. Sakurai, Y., & Braithwaite, V. (2003). Taxpayers' perceptions of practitioners: Finding one who is effective and does the right thing? Journal of Business Ethics, 46(4), 375-387. Sandford, C., & Wallschutzky, I. (1994). Self-assessment of income tax: Lessons from Australia. British Tax Review, 3, 213-220. Sapiei, N. S., & Abdullah, M. (2008). The compliance cost of the personal income taxation in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(5), 219-230. Schisler, D. L. (1995). Equity, aggressiveness, consensus: A comparison of taxpayers and tax preparers. Accounting Horizons, 9(4), 76-87. Schlindwein, S. L., & Ison, R. (2004). Human knowing and perceived complexity: Implications for systems practice. E: CO Issue, 6(3), 27-32. Scotchmer, S. (1989). The effect of tax advisors on tax compliance. In J. Roth & J. Scholz (Eds.), Tax compliance: Social science perspectives (pp. 182-199). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Simmons, R. S., & Cheng, T. Y. (1996). Citizens' attitudes towards tax evasion in Hong Kong. Asian Review of Accounting, 4(1), 98-117. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. Singh, V. (2005). Tax Thoughts on Todays Taxing Times (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Digibook Sdn Bhd. Siti Mariam, C. A. (1994). Tax administrative reform for the Malaysian Inland Revenue Department with an adaptation of the voluntary tax compliance function. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Golden Gate University, San Francisco. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 1-39. Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nation. London: Penguin Books. Smith, K. (1990). Integrating three perspectives on non-compliance: A sequential decision model. Crminal Justice and Behaviour, 17, 350-367. Song, Y., & Yarbrough, T. (1978). Tax ethics and taxpayer attitudes: A survey. Public Administration Review, September-October, 442-452. Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2005). Performance concepts and performance theory. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychology Management of Individual Performance (pp. 3-25). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/0470013419.ch1 Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated Rating Scale Construction: An introduction. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Spicer, M. W., & Becker, L. A. (1980). Fiscal inequity and tax evasion: An experimental approach. National Tax Journal, 33(2), 171-175. Spilker, B. C. (1995a). The effects of time pressure and knowledge on key word selection behaviour in tax research. The Accounting Review, 70(1), 49-70. Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (1998). Human abilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 479-502. Strader, J., & Fogliasso, C. E. (1989). An investigation of some factors affecting taxpayer non-compliance. Accounting and Business Research, 20(77), 39-46. Sulaiman, A., & Mohezar, S. (2006). Student success factors: Identifying key predictors. Journal of Education for Business, July/August, 328-333. Tan, H.-T., & Kao, A. (1999). Accountability effects on auditors' performance: The influence of knowledge, problem-solving ability and task complexity. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 209-223. Tan, L. M., & Chin-Fatt, C. (2000). The impact of tax knowledge on the perceptions of tax fairness and attitude towards compliance. Asian Review of Accounting, 8(1), 44-58. doi: 10.1108/e6060720 Thyer, B. (Ed.). (2010). The handbook of social work research methods (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications Ltd. Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 65, 416-424. Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking to theorist and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. Journal of Economic Survey, 16(5), 658-683. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00185 Torgler, B. (2007). Tax compliance and tax morale: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar. Trochim, W. M. (2006). The research methods knowledge base. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/ Tubbs, R. M. (1992). The effect of experience on the auditor's organization and amount of knowledge. The Accounting Review, 67(4), 783-801. Turner, J. L., Smith, M., & Gurd, B. (1998). Auditing income tax self-assessment: The hidden cost of compliance. Managerial Auditing Journal, 13(2), 95-100. doi: 10.1108/02686909810202782 Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526-535. Van Wagstaff, J. (1965). Income Tax Consciousness under Withholding. Southern Economic Journal, 32(1), 73-80. Wallace, R. S., & Mellor, C. J. (1988). Non-response bias in mail accounting survey: A pedagogical note. British Accounting Review, 20(2), 131-139. Waller, W., & Felix, W. (1984). Cognition and the auditor's opinion formulation process: A schematic model of interactions between memory and current audit evidence. In S. Moriarity & E. Joyce (Eds.), Decision Making and Accounting: Current Research (pp. 27-48). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. Wallschutzky, I. (1984). Possible causes of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 5, 371-384. Walpole, M., Evans, C., Ritchie, K., & Tran-Nam, B. (1999). Taxation compliance costs: Some lessons from "Down-under". British Tax Review, 4, 244-271. Wearing, A., & Heady, B. (1997). The would-be tax evader: A profile. Australia Tax Forum, 13, 3-17. Webb, J. (2000). Questionnaires and their designs. The Marketing Review, 1, 197-218. White, R. A., Curatola, A. P., & Samson, W. D. (1990). A behavioral study investigating the effect of knowledge of income tax laws and tax policy on individual perceptions of federal income tax fairness. Advances in Taxation, 3, 165-185. Williams, D. E. (1999). Self assessment: A tax practitioner's view. British Tax Review, 4, 229-240. Wilt, D., & Perng, S. (1990). The effects of taxpayer asssistance on compliance: A laboratory tests. Paper presented at the IRS Research Conference, Washington. Yang, B., & Lu, D. R. (2001). Predicting academic performance in management education: An empirical investigation of MBA success. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 15-21. doi: 10.1080/08832320109599665 Zikmund, W. G. (2003). Business Research Method (7th ed.). Ohio: Thomson South-Western.