Pengaruh Personaliti dan Kepimpinan Terhadap Keberkesanan Pasukan PTD Gred M41

Pengaruh Personaliti dan Kepimpinan Terhadap Keberkesanan Pasukan PTD Gred M41

Civil Service in Malaysia has undergone a change due to emphasize elements in each performance and the effectiveness of policy implementation as well as issued. Every great success is the result of the contribution of small units that work well through the spirit and teamwork shown in each assignmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wan Khairi, Wan Hamat
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2013
Subjects:
HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/3522/1/s811256.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3522/7/s811256.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.3522
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Cheng, Wei Hin
topic HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
spellingShingle HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
Wan Khairi, Wan Hamat
Pengaruh Personaliti dan Kepimpinan Terhadap Keberkesanan Pasukan PTD Gred M41
description Civil Service in Malaysia has undergone a change due to emphasize elements in each performance and the effectiveness of policy implementation as well as issued. Every great success is the result of the contribution of small units that work well through the spirit and teamwork shown in each assignment. Examining the importance of teams in each achievements, this study has taken steps to examine the effectiveness of the team in the Administrative and Diplomatic Officer (PTD), which is common services Civil Service officer who manages the affairs management in the Ministry/Department/Unit in the production of services whether competitive locally and globally. This finding suggests that two main factors have been studied personality factor and leadership factor provide a significant value towards team effectiveness of PTD Grade M41 through Correlation and Regression Testing. Accordingly, some suggestions are made in this study to help improve the effectiveness of PTD Grade M41 towards achieving world class public services
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Wan Khairi, Wan Hamat
author_facet Wan Khairi, Wan Hamat
author_sort Wan Khairi, Wan Hamat
title Pengaruh Personaliti dan Kepimpinan Terhadap Keberkesanan Pasukan PTD Gred M41
title_short Pengaruh Personaliti dan Kepimpinan Terhadap Keberkesanan Pasukan PTD Gred M41
title_full Pengaruh Personaliti dan Kepimpinan Terhadap Keberkesanan Pasukan PTD Gred M41
title_fullStr Pengaruh Personaliti dan Kepimpinan Terhadap Keberkesanan Pasukan PTD Gred M41
title_full_unstemmed Pengaruh Personaliti dan Kepimpinan Terhadap Keberkesanan Pasukan PTD Gred M41
title_sort pengaruh personaliti dan kepimpinan terhadap keberkesanan pasukan ptd gred m41
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2013
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/3522/1/s811256.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3522/7/s811256.pdf
_version_ 1747827593724297216
spelling my-uum-etd.35222022-04-10T02:55:46Z Pengaruh Personaliti dan Kepimpinan Terhadap Keberkesanan Pasukan PTD Gred M41 2013 Wan Khairi, Wan Hamat Cheng, Wei Hin Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management. Employment Civil Service in Malaysia has undergone a change due to emphasize elements in each performance and the effectiveness of policy implementation as well as issued. Every great success is the result of the contribution of small units that work well through the spirit and teamwork shown in each assignment. Examining the importance of teams in each achievements, this study has taken steps to examine the effectiveness of the team in the Administrative and Diplomatic Officer (PTD), which is common services Civil Service officer who manages the affairs management in the Ministry/Department/Unit in the production of services whether competitive locally and globally. This finding suggests that two main factors have been studied personality factor and leadership factor provide a significant value towards team effectiveness of PTD Grade M41 through Correlation and Regression Testing. Accordingly, some suggestions are made in this study to help improve the effectiveness of PTD Grade M41 towards achieving world class public services 2013 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3522/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3522/1/s811256.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/3522/7/s811256.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ahmad W., Wan Najwa Arifah (2011). The Moderating Effect Of Educational Achievement On The Relationship Between Personality And Leadership Indiference. Master Of Human Resource Management, College Of Business. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Alice H. Eagly. (1969). Leadership Style and Role Differentiation as Determinants of Group Effectiveness. 509-524. Barrick R. Murray & Micheal K. Mount. (1991, March). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology. Bass M. Bernard. (1998). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. U.S.A.: Sage Publication Ltd. Birgit Schyns, Tina Kiefer, Rudolf Kerschreiter & Alex Tymon (2011). Teaching Implicit Leadership Theories to Develop Leaders and Leadership: How and Why It Can Make a Difference. Academy of Management Learning and Education Vol.10, 397-408. Bruck S. Carly & Allen D. Tammy. (2003, December). The Relatinship Between Big Five Personality Traits, Negative Affectivity, Type A Behaviour & Work-Family Conflict. Journal Of Vocational Behaviour. Burns M. John (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row. Chou Huey-Wen & Yeh Ying-Jung (2005). Team Composition and Learning Behaviors in Cross-Functional Teams. Social Behavior and Personality Vol.33, 391-402. Chua Yan Piaw (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan Edisi Kedua. McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Davis J. Newsom (1971). Elementary Survey Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Dess G. Gregory (1993). Strategic Management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Dionne D. Shelley, Francis J. Yammarino, Leanne E. Atwater & William D. Spangler (2004). Transformational Leadership and Team Performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management Vol. 17, 177-193. Elaine M. Wong, Margaret E. Ormiston & Philip E. Tetlock (2011). The Effect of Top Management Team Integrative Complexity And Decentralized Decision Making on Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1207-1228 George M. Jennifer (2000). Emotions and Leadership: The Role of Emotional Intelligence. Human Relation Vol. 53, 1027-1055. Gregory R. Berry (2011). Enhancing Effectiveness on Virtual Teams. Journal of Business Communication Vol. 48, 186-206. Hair J.E., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. & Black W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Harvey H. John, Jerry Suls & David P. James. (1995). Personality and Coping: Three Generation of Research. Journal Of Personality. Helen M. Williams, Sharon K. Parker & Nick Turner (2010). Proactively Performing Teams: The Role of Work Design, Transformational Leadership and Team Composition. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Vol. 83, 301- 324. Hirschfeld R. Robert, Mark H. Jordan, Christopher H. Thomas & Hubert S. Field (2008). Observed Leadership Potential of Personnel in a Team Setting: Big Five Traits and Proximal Factors as Predictors. International Journal of Selection and Asessment Vol. 16, 385-402. Hsieh Kaifeng Yang & Jun Yi (2007).Managerial Effectiveness of Governnment Performance Measurement: Testing a Middle- Range Model. Public Administration Review, 861-879. Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam, M. (2011). Johari, Nor Azmi. (2004). A Study Of Team Effectiveness In The Police Department For The District Of Kangar, Perlis. Degree Masters Of Science, Academic Affairs Department. Universiti Utara Malaysia. John P. Oliver & Srivastava Sanjay (1999). The Big-Five Traits Taxonomy: History, Measurement, & Theoretical Perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (2nd ed). New York: Guilford Press. Kenis Izzettin (1978). Leadership Behavior, Subordinate Personality and Satisfaction With Supervision. The Journal of Psychology, 99-107. Koh W.L., Steers R.M., & Terborg J.R. (1995). The Effects Of Transformational Leadership On Teacher Attitudes And Student Performance In Singapore. Journal of Organizational Development, 16, 319-333. MAPPA, M.P. (2010).Majlis Perdana Perkhidmatan Awam (MAPPA). Martin Elaine Russo. (2006). Team Effectiveness in Academic Medical Libraries: A Multiple Case Study. J Med Libr Assoc Vol. 94, 271-278. Matthew L. Jensen, Paul Benjamin Lowry, Judee K. Burgoon & Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr. (2010). Technology Dominance in Complex Decision Making: The Casse of Aided Credibility Assessment. Journal of Management Information System, 175- 201. Model Baru Ekonomi, U.P. (2011). Model Baru Ekonomi 2011, Bab 4: Transformasi Sektor Awam. Modrick A. John. (1986). Team Performance And Training. Human Productivity Enhancement: Training and Human Factors In System Design. New York, NY: Praeger. Morgan V. Robert & Krejcie W. Daryle. (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research Activities. Education And Psychological Measurement. Nair Srivastava Nivedita & Shreekumar K. (2010). Emotional Intelligence and Managerial Effectiveness: Role of Rational Emotive Behaviour. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relation Vol. 46, 313-325. Nord E. Douglas & Durand R. Walter (1976). Perceived Leader Bahvior as a Function of Personality Characteristics of Supervisors and Subordinates. Academy of Management Journal Vol.19, 427-437. Pawar S. Badrinarayan. (2003). Central Conceptual Issues In Transformational Leadership Research. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 24 Iss: 7, pp.397-406 . MCB UP Ltd. Prilleltensky Isaac (2000). Value-Based Leadership in Organizations: Balancing Values, Interest and Power Among Citizens, Workers and Leaders. Ethics and Behavior Vol. 10, 139-158. Randel D. de Jong, Stephanie A. Bouhuys & John C. Barnhoorn (1999). Personality, Self-Efficacy and Functioning in Management Teams: A Contribution to Validation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment Vol. 7, 46-49. Raynor, DA., Levin H., (2009). Associations Between The Five-Factor Model of Personality And Health Behaviors Among College Students. Rebecca J. Slotegraaf & Kwaku Atauhene-Gima. (2011). Product Development Team Stability and New Product Advantage: The Role of Decision-Making Processes. Journal of Marketing Vol. 75, 96-108. Robbins P. Judge & Stephen A. Timothy (2011).Organizational Behavior 14th Edition. Pearson Education Limited. Roberto A. David & Garvin A. Micheal (2001). What You Don't Know About Making Decision. Harvard Business Review, 108-115 Rozi Mohd Ibtisam Hayati (2010, May). The Influences Of Transformational Leadership And Big Five Personality Traits Towards Individual's Job Performance. Master Of Business Administration, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Tichy N. & Devanna M.A. (1998).The Transformational Leader. U.S.A.: John Wiley & Sons Incorporation. Tricia Varvel, Stephanie G. Adams, Shelby J. Pridie & Bianey C. Ruiz Ulloa (2004). Team Effectiveness and Individual Myers-Briggs Personality Dimensions. Journal of Management in Engineering, 141-146. West A. Micheal, Carol S. Borrill, Jeremy F. Dowson, Felix Broadbeck, David A. Shapiro & Bob Haward (2003). Leadership Clarity and Team Innovation In Health Care. The Leadership Quarterly Vol. 14 , 393-410. Zhong Chen-Bo (2011). The Ethical Dangers of Deliberate Decision Making. Administrative Science Quarterly Vol.56, 1-25.

Similar Items