Company Performance-Post Privatization: A Synthesis of Literature Review

The main objective of the study is to present a synthesis of literature review about post privatization company performance. Furthermore, this study is conducted to determine the impact of this evaluation on business activities. The approach for this research is by using synthesis of literature revi...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Emhemed, Assadeg Musbah
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng
Published:	2009
Subjects:	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3627/1/s800435.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.3627
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng
advisor	Abidin, Shamharir
topic	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
spellingShingle	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management Emhemed, Assadeg Musbah Company Performance-Post Privatization: A Synthesis of Literature Review
description	The main objective of the study is to present a synthesis of literature review about post privatization company performance. Furthermore, this study is conducted to determine the impact of this evaluation on business activities. The approach for this research is by using synthesis of literature review. The findings and conclusion of this study depends on the full utilization of analysis and conclusions of other studies. Hopefully, the final report and the result of this study will successfully help future research.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Emhemed, Assadeg Musbah
author_facet	Emhemed, Assadeg Musbah
author_sort	Emhemed, Assadeg Musbah
title	Company Performance-Post Privatization: A Synthesis of Literature Review
title_short	Company Performance-Post Privatization: A Synthesis of Literature Review
title_full	Company Performance-Post Privatization: A Synthesis of Literature Review
title_fullStr	Company Performance-Post Privatization: A Synthesis of Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed	Company Performance-Post Privatization: A Synthesis of Literature Review
title_sort	company performance-post privatization: a synthesis of literature review
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Business (COB)
publishDate	2009
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3627/1/s800435.pdf
_version_	1747827614733565952
spelling	my-uum-etd.36272013-11-04T03:23:05Z Company Performance-Post Privatization: A Synthesis of Literature Review 2009 Emhemed, Assadeg Musbah Abidin, Shamharir College of Business (COB) College of Business HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management The main objective of the study is to present a synthesis of literature review about post privatization company performance. Furthermore, this study is conducted to determine the impact of this evaluation on business activities. The approach for this research is by using synthesis of literature review. The findings and conclusion of this study depends on the full utilization of analysis and conclusions of other studies. Hopefully, the final report and the result of this study will successfully help future research. 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3627/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3627/1/s800435.pdf text eng validuser masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Adam, Christopher, William Cavendish and Percy S. Mistry, 1992. Adjusting Privatization: Case Studies from Developing Countries (London: James Currey Ltd.). Ahmad, Sultan (1991). “Trends of privatization in the Asian-Pacific Region with particular reference to Bangladesh,” Asian Affairs 3: (July-September) 35-80. Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., and Lehmann, D. R., “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58: 53-66, July 1994. Barber, B. M., and Odean, T., “Online Investors: Do the Slow Die First?”, Working Paper, referred to http://faculty.gsm.ucdavis.edu/~odean/ on February 2001. Berry, L., “Relationship Marketing of Services: Growing Interest, Emerging Perspectives”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4): 236-245, 1995. Brent N. Chun and David E. Culler. Market-based proportional resource sharing for clusters. Technical Report CSD- 1092, University of California at Berkeley, January 2000. Bryman, A. (1996). Quantity and Quality in Social Research, Contemporary Social Research: 18. Routledge, pp 31, 47. Berle, A., and G. Means (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: World Inc. Barberis, N., M. Boycko, A. Shleifer, and N. Tsukanova, 1996. “How Does Privatisation Work? Evidence From the Russian Shops”, Journal of Political Economy 104(4): 764-90. Boycko, Maxim, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 1996, “A Theory of Privatization,” Economic Journal, 309-319 Boubakri, Narjess and Jean-Claude Cosset, 1998, “The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries,” Journal of Finance, 1081-1110. Bhaskar, Venkataraman (1993). “Privatization in developing countries: Theoretical issues and the experience of Bangladesh,” UNCTAD Review (4): 83-98. Boycko, Maxim, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny. 1996. “A Theory of Privatization.” Economic Journal 106: 309–19. Bekaert, Geert and Campbell Harvey, 2000, “Foreign Speculators and Emerging Equity Markets Journal of Finance, 565-613. Cisco systems and University Texas at Austin, Measuring the Internet Economy, http://www.internetmetrics.com, 1999. Czepiel, J. A., and Gilmore, R., “Exploring the Concept of Loyalty in Services. in J.A. Czepiel, C. A. Congram, and J. Shanahan(ed.)”, The Services Challenge: Integrating for Competitive Advantage, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 91-94, 1987. Cook, P. & Kirkpatrick, C. (1988). Privatisation in Less Developed Countries, Wheatsheaf, Hamel Hempstead. Cook, P. (1986). Liberalisation in the Context of Industrial Development in LDCs. Manchester Discussion Papers in Development Studies, No.8602, University of Manchester. Demsetz, Harold, and Kenneth Lehn, 1985. “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences”, Journal of Political Economy 93: 1155-1177. Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. (1985), “The structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 93 no. 6. Djankov, 1997. “Privatization and Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe–Evidence and Policy Options”. World Bank Technical Paper No. 368. Washington: The World Bank. Dornbusch, Rudiger, 1992, “The Case of Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 69-85. D’Souza, Juliet and William Megginson et Nash Robert, 2000, “Determinants of Performance Improvements in Privatized Firms: The Role of Restructuring and Corporate Governance,” Working Paper, University of Oklahoma. Davis, F.D., “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319-340, 1989. Emory, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business Research Method, 4th Edn. IRWIN, pp. 332-339. Fan, M., Stallaert, J., and Whinston, A. B., “The Internet and the Future of Financial Markets”, Communications of the ACM, 43(11): 82-88, 2000. Galal, Ahmed, Leroy Jones, Pankaj Tandon and Ingo Vogelsang, 1994. Welfare Consequences of Selling Public Enterprise: Case Studies from Chile, Malaysia, Mexico and the U.K. (New York: Oxford University Press). Gupta, Anand, 1996. “Political economy of privatisation in India”. Economic and Political Weekly, September 28, 1996: 2687-2694. Gary, L. (2001). For Whom the Bell Curve Tolls. Harvard Management Review. November. Grote, R. C. and D. Grote (c2005). Forced ranking: making performance management work. Boston, Massachusetts. Henley, John S., 1990. “Privatization in Africa: prospects for Tanzania”. In Thomas Clarke and Christos Pitelis, eds., The Political Economy of Privatization (London and New York: Routledge) pp. 455-474. Herbst, Jeffrey, 1990. “The politics of privatization in Africa”. In Ezra N. Suleman andJohn Waterbury, eds., The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization (Boulder: Westview Press), pp. 234-254. House of Commons (1992), Consequences of Electricity Privatisation, Energy Committee, House of Commons, London: HMSO 1113-1 Holmstrom, Bengt and Jean Tirole, 1995, “Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring,” Journal of Political Economy, 678-709. Hamel, Gary and Sampler, Jeff “The E-Corporation” Fortune Magazine (December 7, 1998), p. 92. Quebecor Printing Corp., Clarksville, Tenn. Hatry, Harry, Louis Blair, Donald Fisk, and Wayne Kimmel. “Improving on Crystal Ball Gazing The Basic Elements of Program Analysis.” Chap. 3 in Program Analysis for State and Local Governments. Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press, 1988. Hoffman, Donna L. and Novak, Thomas P., “Marketing in Hypermedia”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60: 50-68, July 1996. Hong, S. J., “Information-Processing Costs in Online Stock Trading”, EM-Electronic Markets, 10 (3), November 2000. Hong, S. and Kim, J., “A Comprehensive Evaluation Methodology of Web Sites as Living Places in Cyber Space”, Internet Business Research Center Working Paper Series[on-line], Available: http://ibiz.re.kr, 2002. Institute for contemporary studies. Privatization and Development. Steve Hanke Edition, San Francisco, California, 1987. Jupiter Communications, Financial Service Online, http;//www.jup.com, Sept. 1999. Jensen, C.M., and W. Meckling, (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Cost, and Capital Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-60. Kelegama, Saman, 1995. “The impact of privatization on distributional equity: the case of Sri Lanka”. In V.V. Ramanadham, ed., Privatization and Equity (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 143-180. Karatas, Cevat (2001) “Privatization in Turkey: Implementation, Politics of Privatizationand Performance Results” Journal of International Development, (13): 93-121. Kikeri, Sunita, John Nellis, and Mary Shirley. 1992. Privatization: The Lessons of Experience. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Kay, J.A. and Thompson, D.J. (1986). Privatisation: A Policy in Search of a Rationale. Economic Journal, 96, 18-32. López-de-Silanes, Florencio, 1997, “Determinants of privatization Prices,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 965-1025. Levine, Ross and Sara Zervos, 1998a, “Capital Control Privatization and Stock Market Development,” World Development 26, 1169-1183. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, (1998), “Law and Finance”, Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6), 1113-55. La Porta, Rafael and Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, 1999. “The benefits of privatiza-tion: evidence from Mexico”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXIV(4): 1193-1242. Lee, K., and Chung, N., “Empirical Study on a Business Model for the Internet-based Stock Trade”, Korean Management Information Systems Review, 10(2): 125-147, Seoul, Korea, 2000. Megginson, William L., Robert C. Nash, and Matthias van Randenborgh. 1994. “The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance 49: 403–52. Mueller, C. D. (2003), The Corporation: Investment, Mergers and Growth, Routledge, London and New York, 63-93. Millward, R. and Parker, D. (1983) ‘Public and Private Enterprise: Comparative Behaviour and Relative Efficiency,’ in Millward, R., Parker, D., Rosenthal, L., Summer, M. and Topham, N. (eds), Public Sector Economics (London: Longman) Megginson, William, Robert Nash and Matthias Van Randenborgh, 1994. “The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Analysis”, Journal of Finance 49: 403-452. Marcinein, Anton, and Sweder Van Wijnbergen, 1997. “The Impact of Czech Privatization Methods on Enterprise Performance Incorporating Initial Selection Bias Correction”, The Economics of Transition 5: 289-304 Mackenzie, G.A, 1998. “The macroeconomic impact of privatization”. IMF Staff Papers, 45(2): 363-373. Mansoor, Ali, 1988. “The fiscal impact of privatisation”. In Paul Cook and Colin Kirkpatrick, eds., Privatisation in Less Developed Countries (Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books), pp. 180-194. Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 1994. Changing Social Security in Latin America, Toward Alleviating the Social Costs of Economic Reform. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Martin, S. and Parker, D. (1995). Privatization and economic performance throughout the UK Business Cycle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16 (3), 225-237. Poister, Theodore H. “Productivity Monitoring: Systems, Indicators, and Analysis.” Chap. 10 in Public Productivity Handbook, edited by Marc Holzer. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1992. Pajuste, A. (2002), Corporate Governance and Stock Market Performance in Central and Eastern Europe: A Study of Nine Countries, 1994-2001, SSEES, University College London, Centre for the Study of Economic and Social Change in Europe. Provida, Una AFP de exportation.” 1996. Internet: http://lemuy.chilepac.net/home/AFPgrovida. Pollitt, M.G. (1998) ‘The restructuring and privatization of the Electricity Supply Industry in Scotland’, Cambridge: mimeo, June Roth, G. (1987). Airport Privatization, in Prospects for Privatization, edited by Steve Hanke for the Academy of Political Science, New York, Octobe. Ramamurti, R., 1999. “Why haven’t developing countries privatized deeper and faster?” World Development, 27(1): 137-155. Rajan, Raghuram and Luigi Zingales, 1998, “Financial Dependence and Growth,” American Economic Review, 225-249. Rees, R. (1984) Public Enterprise Economics, 2nd edition (Oxford: Philip Allan Publishers, Ltd.). Rose, G., Khoo, J., and Straub, D. W., “Current technological impediments to business-to-consumer electronic commerce”, Communications of the AIS, 1(16): 1- 74, 1999. Rosenberg, Philip. “Estimate Revenues.” Working paper. Prepared for the Modernizing Financial Management for Hungarian Local Governments Program, United States Agency for International Development. October 1996. Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny (1996), “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, Working Paper 5554, Cambridge, MA, 1996. Shirley, M. and P. Walsh (2001). “Public versus private ownership: the current state of the debate” (Washington, D.C.: World Bank). Subrahmanyaman, Avanidhar and Sheridan Titman, 1998, “ The Going Public Decision and The Development of Financial Markets, ” Journal of Finance, 1045-1082. Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert W. Vishny, 1997. “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, Journal of Finance 52(2): 737-783. Sanger, Mary Bryna. “When the Private Sector Competes.” Reform Watch brief no. Center for Public Service. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, October 2001. Sarkar, M. B., Butler, B., and Steinfield, C., “Intermediaries and Cybermediaries: A Continuing Role for Mediating Players in the Electronic Marketplace”, 1996. Sekeran, U. (2000). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 3rd Ed. John Wiley and Sons. Sekaran, U. (1992). Instructor’s Resource Guide with Test Questions and Transparency Masters, 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons. Su-Hui Chiang and Mary Vernon. Production job scheduling for parallel shared memory systems. In Proceedings of 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium , April 2001. The Economist. 1997. “Financial Indicators: Privatization.” March 22, p. 125.Galal, Ahmed, Leroy Jones, Pankaj Tandon, and Ingo Vogelsang. 1994. U.S Department of Commerce, “The Emerging Digital Economy” Washington D.C. (1998). Vittas, Dimitri. 1995. “Strengths and Weaknesses of the Chilean Pension Reform.” Financial Sector Development Department, World Bank (May). Vernon-Wortzel, Heidi, and Lawrence H. Wortzel. 1989. “Privatization: Not the Only Answer.” World Development 17: 633–41. Vickers, John and George Yarrow, 1991. “Economic perspectives on privatization”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2): 111-132. Valente, Carl F., and Maureen Godsey Valente. "City of Smithville." Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association, 1980. Vigvari, András. “A Possible Method for Government Financial Capacity Analysis and Forecast (The CLF Method).” Working paper. Prepared for the Modernizing Financial Management for Hungarian Local Governments Program, United States Agency for International Development. November 1998. World Bank, 1999. Global Development Finance. Washington, DC., 1997. Global Development Finance. Washington, DC., 1995. Bureaucrats in Business: The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership (New York: Oxford University Press). , 1996. Private Sector Development in Low-Income Countries. Washington, DC. World Bank. World Development Report 1996: From Plan to Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. Yarrow, George, 1999. “A theory of privatization, or why bureaucrats are still in business”. World Development, 27(1): 157-168. Zona Research, “Challenges in the Electronic Economy” – Part 11 (November 23,1998) Available on the World Wide Web Dennis, William J. Jr., “ Small Businesses and the Y2k Problem: Part 11” NFIB Education Foundation, (December 28, 1998).

Company Performance-Post Privatization: A Synthesis of Literature Review

Similar Items