An Empirical Analysis of State Government Revenue- Expenditure Nexus: The Case of Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis

The nexus between state government revenue and expenditure is vital because it is relevant for state fiscal policy makers with respect to the budget deficit. The aim of this study is to examine the direction of causality relationship between state government revenue and expenditure in Kedah, Kelanta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nor Hidayah, Harun
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/3704/1/s804809.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.3704
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
advisor Abdul Jalil, Ahmad Zafarullah
topic HJ Public Finance
spellingShingle HJ Public Finance
Nor Hidayah, Harun
An Empirical Analysis of State Government Revenue- Expenditure Nexus: The Case of Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis
description The nexus between state government revenue and expenditure is vital because it is relevant for state fiscal policy makers with respect to the budget deficit. The aim of this study is to examine the direction of causality relationship between state government revenue and expenditure in Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis. Thus, in order to investigate the cointegration between the state government revenue and expenditure, the study uses bound testing approach and Granger causality test with applying Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) and Vector autoregression (VAR) methods for the period 1980 to 2009. Besides, the study examines whether state government revenue causes state government expenditure (tax-spend hypothesis) or whether the causality runs from state government expenditure to state government revenue (spend-tax hypothesis), and if there is bi-directional causality (fiscal synchronization). Results of finding on the direction of causation are mixed: (i) For Perlis in the long-run and for Kelantan in both the short-and long-run, empirical result supports for the spend-and-tax hypothesis; (ii) Perlis in the short-run is in conformity with the institutional separation hypothesis; (iii) For Kedah and Penang, there is evidence of separated decision making of revenue-expenditure in both the short-and long-run. The policy implication of states which are consistently with spend-and-tax hypothesis suggests that budget deficit reduction can be achieved through the reduction in expenditures. While states which are in conformity with the institutional separation hypothesis, it is suggested for policy makers to find alternative so as there is a relationship between these two state fiscal variables.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nor Hidayah, Harun
author_facet Nor Hidayah, Harun
author_sort Nor Hidayah, Harun
title An Empirical Analysis of State Government Revenue- Expenditure Nexus: The Case of Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis
title_short An Empirical Analysis of State Government Revenue- Expenditure Nexus: The Case of Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis
title_full An Empirical Analysis of State Government Revenue- Expenditure Nexus: The Case of Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis
title_fullStr An Empirical Analysis of State Government Revenue- Expenditure Nexus: The Case of Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis
title_full_unstemmed An Empirical Analysis of State Government Revenue- Expenditure Nexus: The Case of Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis
title_sort empirical analysis of state government revenue- expenditure nexus: the case of kedah, kelantan, penang and perlis
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/3704/1/s804809.pdf
_version_ 1747827630034386944
spelling my-uum-etd.37042016-04-27T07:26:53Z An Empirical Analysis of State Government Revenue- Expenditure Nexus: The Case of Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis 2011 Nor Hidayah, Harun Abdul Jalil, Ahmad Zafarullah College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences HJ Public Finance The nexus between state government revenue and expenditure is vital because it is relevant for state fiscal policy makers with respect to the budget deficit. The aim of this study is to examine the direction of causality relationship between state government revenue and expenditure in Kedah, Kelantan, Penang and Perlis. Thus, in order to investigate the cointegration between the state government revenue and expenditure, the study uses bound testing approach and Granger causality test with applying Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) and Vector autoregression (VAR) methods for the period 1980 to 2009. Besides, the study examines whether state government revenue causes state government expenditure (tax-spend hypothesis) or whether the causality runs from state government expenditure to state government revenue (spend-tax hypothesis), and if there is bi-directional causality (fiscal synchronization). Results of finding on the direction of causation are mixed: (i) For Perlis in the long-run and for Kelantan in both the short-and long-run, empirical result supports for the spend-and-tax hypothesis; (ii) Perlis in the short-run is in conformity with the institutional separation hypothesis; (iii) For Kedah and Penang, there is evidence of separated decision making of revenue-expenditure in both the short-and long-run. The policy implication of states which are consistently with spend-and-tax hypothesis suggests that budget deficit reduction can be achieved through the reduction in expenditures. While states which are in conformity with the institutional separation hypothesis, it is suggested for policy makers to find alternative so as there is a relationship between these two state fiscal variables. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3704/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3704/1/s804809.pdf text eng validuser masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Jalil, Ahmad Zafarullah. (2009). Decentralization, Subnational Government’s Behavior and Macroeconomic Instability: The Case of Malaysia. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), pp. 194-200. Abdullah, H., Ali, J. & M. Hylmee. (2010). Re-Examining the Demand for Money in Asean-5 Countries. Asian Social Science , Vol.6, no. 7, pp. 146-155. Albatel, A.H. (2002). The Relationship Between Government Revenue and Expenditures in Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Gulf and Arabian Peninsula, Vol. 104, no. 28, pp. 13-36. Al-Hakami, A.O. (2002). Analyzing the Causal Relationship between Government Expenditure and Revenues in Saudi Arabia, Employing Cointegration and Granger Causality Models. Public Administration, Vol. 42, no.3, pp. 475-493. Anderson, W., M.S. Wallace and J.T. Warner. (1986). Government Spending and Taxation.: What Causes What? Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 3, no. 52, pp. 630-639. Baghestani, Hamid. (2004). The Causal Relation Between Government Revenue and Spending: Evidence from Egypt and Jordan. Journal of Economic and Finance, pp. 1- 7. Baghestani H, McNown R (1994). Do Revenues or Expenditures Respond to Budgetary Disequilibria? Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 2, no 61, pp. 311-322. Baro, R.J. (1979). On the Determination of Public Debt. Journal of Political Economy, No 81, pp. 940-971. Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica, No. 49, pp. 1057-1072. Eita, J. H., and Mbazima, D. (2008). The Causal Relationship Between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Namibia. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), No. 9154, pp.1-14. Engle, R. F.,& Granger, C.W. J. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction Representation: Estimation and Testing. Econometrica, No.55, pp. 251–276. Ewing, B. T., & Payne, E. J. (1998). Government Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Economic Development, Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 57- 69. F. E. Oteng., & M. J., Frimpong. (2006). Bounds Testing Approach to Cointegration: An Examination of Foreign Direct Investment Trade and Growth Relationships. American Journal of Applied Sciences. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2080-2084. Granger, Clive W.J. (1980). Testing for Causality. Journal of Economic and Control, No. 4, pp. 161-194. Granger, C.W.J. & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious Regression in Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, No. 2, pp.111-120. Gounder, N., Narayan, P.K. & Prasad, A. (2007). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure: The Case of Fiji Island, International Journal Of Social Economics, Vol. 3, no.34, pp. 147-158. Islahi, A.A. (2010, March 26). Ibn Khaldun’s Theory of Taxation and Its Relevance Today. Retrieved from http://www.muslimheritage.org/ Jalil, M. Anwar & Hye, Qazi Muhammad Adnan. (2010). Revenue and Expenditure Nexus: A Case Study of Romania. Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy, Vol. 1, no.1, pp. 22-28. Jayaraman, T.K. & Dahalan, J. (2006). Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Fiji: A Test of Effectiveness. Pacific Economic Bulletin, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 94-102. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, No 12, pp. 213–254. _________. (1995). Likelihood Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Katircioglu, S. (2009), Testing the Tourism-led Growth Hypothesis for Singapore: An Empirical Investigation from Bounds Test to Cointegration and Granger Causality Tests, Tourism Economics, pp. 18-20. Keho, Y. (2010). Budget Balance through Revenue or Spending Adjustments? An Econometric Analysis of the Ivorian Budgetary Process, 1960–2005. Journal of Economics and international Finance, Vol. 2, no.1, pp. 1-10. Khalid H. A. Al- Qudair. (2005). The Relationship Between Government Expenditure and Revenues in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Testing for Cointegration and Causality. Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 31-43. Maamor, Selamah. & Sahlan, Rizaudin. (2005). Penggunaan Sumber Tenaga, Guna Tenaga dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Malaysia : Analisis Sebab-Penyebab. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia , No.39, pp.25-52. Manage, N. & M.L. Marlow. (1986). The Causal Relation Between Federal Expenditures and Receipts. Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 52, pp. 617-629. Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of the Government. Journal of Political Economy , No.89, pp. 914–927. Miller, S & Russek, F. (1990). Co-integration and Error- Correction Model: The Temporal causality between Government Taxes and Spending. Southern Economic Journal, No. 57, pp. 221-229. Mithani, D.M., and Goh Soo Khoon. (1999). Causality between Government Expenditure and Revenue in Malaysia: A Seasonal Co integration Test. ASEAN Economic Bulletin Vol.16, pp. 68-79. Mohammad Agus Yusoff. (2006). Malaysian Federalism: Conflict or Consensus. Bangi: FSSK, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: pp. 76-81. Morley, B., 2006. Causality between Economic Growth and Immigration: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Economics Letters, No.90, pp. 72-76. Narayan, P.K. (2004). Reformulating Critical Values for the Bounds F-statistics Approach to Cointegration: An application to the Tourism Demand Model for Fiji. Discussion Papers, No. 02.04. Melbourne: Department of Economics, Monash University. ____________. (2005). The Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus: Empirical Evidence from Nine Asian Countries, Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 15, pp. 1203- 1216. ____________. (2005). The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests Applied Economics. No.37, pp. 1979–1990. Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2003). Attendance and Pricing at Sporting Events: Empirical Results from Granger Causality Tests for the Melbourne cup. Applied Economics, No.35, pp. 1649–1658. National Audit Department. www.audit.gov.my Ouattara, B. (2004). Foreign Aid and Fiscal Policy in Senegal. Mimeo University of Manchester. Owoye, O. (1995). The Causal Relationship between Taxes and Expenditures in the G7 Countries: Cointegration and Error- Correction Models. Applied Economics Letters, No.2, pp. 19-22. Pesaran, M.H. & B. Pesaran. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Pesaran, M.H., Y. Shin & R.J. Smith. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal Application Econometric, No.16, pp. 289-326. Phillips, P.C., B.P. Perron. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrica, No.75, pp. 335- 446. Raju, S. (2008). The Revenue- Expenditure Nexus: Evidence For India. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences , pp. 1-33. Ram, R. (1988). Additional Evidence on Causality between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure. Southern Economic Journal, No.54 (January), pp.763-769. Saunoris, James W. & Payne, James E. (2010). Tax More or Spend Less? Asymmetries in the UK Revenue-Expenditure Nexus. Journal of Policy Modelling, pp. 1-10. Singh, B. and Sahni, B. S. (1984) Causality Between Public Expenditure and National Income. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 66, pp. 630-644. Tang, Tuck Cheong (2001): Testing the Relationship between Government Expenditure and National Income in Malaysia. Analysis, 8(1 & 2). pp. 37-51. Von Furstenberg, V.G.M., Green, R.J. and Jeong, R.J (1986). Tax and Spend or Spend and Tax. Review of Economics and Statistics, No.68, pp. 179-188. Wee Chong Hui. (2006). Regional Disparities and Federalism in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaysia Press: pp. 67-89. Wilson L.S (1996). Federal-State Fiscal Arrangements in Malaysia. John Deutsch Institute for the study of Economic Policy (JDI) publication series. Zortuk, M. & Uzgoren, N. (2008). The Relationship between the Taxation and Government Expenditure in Turkey- Bounds Test Approach. Banks and Bank Systems, Vol. 3,(1), pp. 57- 62. Zulkefli Abdul Karim, Aminuddin Mokhtar, Mohd Azlan Shah Zaidi dan Mustazar Mansur. (2003). Hubungan Antara Hasil Dengan Perbelanjaan: Bukti Empirikal Kerajaan Persekutuan dan Kerajaan Negeri di Malaysia. Pascasidang Seminar Kebangsaan Fakulti Ekonomi 2003 yang berjudul "Dasar Awam Dalam Era Globalisasi: Penilaian Semula Ke Arah Pemantapan Strategi". Fakulti Ekonomi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 16-17 September 2003; 219-236.