Dyadic Relational Quality and Communication Satisfaction among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Employees

This study attempts to investigate the dyadic relations quality and communication satisfaction among employees of Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM). Specifically, these studies examine the relationship between Leader-member-exchange (LMX) quality and subordinates communication satisfaction. Multiple r...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Aida Suhana, Abdul Hamid
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng
Published:	2010
Subjects:	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3725/1/s804695.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.3725
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng
advisor	Abu Bakar, Hassan
topic	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
spellingShingle	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management Aida Suhana, Abdul Hamid Dyadic Relational Quality and Communication Satisfaction among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Employees
description	This study attempts to investigate the dyadic relations quality and communication satisfaction among employees of Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM). Specifically, these studies examine the relationship between Leader-member-exchange (LMX) quality and subordinates communication satisfaction. Multiple regression analysis used to examine the relationship among 130 employees in UUM. Findings indicate that affect, loyalty, perceived contribution and respect are strongly related to subordinate’s communications satisfaction. The implications of this study discussed further are elaborated.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Aida Suhana, Abdul Hamid
author_facet	Aida Suhana, Abdul Hamid
author_sort	Aida Suhana, Abdul Hamid
title	Dyadic Relational Quality and Communication Satisfaction among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Employees
title_short	Dyadic Relational Quality and Communication Satisfaction among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Employees
title_full	Dyadic Relational Quality and Communication Satisfaction among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Employees
title_fullStr	Dyadic Relational Quality and Communication Satisfaction among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Employees
title_full_unstemmed	Dyadic Relational Quality and Communication Satisfaction among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Employees
title_sort	dyadic relational quality and communication satisfaction among universiti utara malaysia (uum) employees
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate	2010
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/3725/1/s804695.pdf
_version_	1747827634410094592
spelling	my-uum-etd.37252022-04-21T06:50:33Z Dyadic Relational Quality and Communication Satisfaction among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Employees 2010 Aida Suhana, Abdul Hamid Abu Bakar, Hassan College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management This study attempts to investigate the dyadic relations quality and communication satisfaction among employees of Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM). Specifically, these studies examine the relationship between Leader-member-exchange (LMX) quality and subordinates communication satisfaction. Multiple regression analysis used to examine the relationship among 130 employees in UUM. Findings indicate that affect, loyalty, perceived contribution and respect are strongly related to subordinate’s communications satisfaction. The implications of this study discussed further are elaborated. 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3725/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3725/1/s804695.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000775404 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Adler, R. B. & Rodman, G. (2003). Understanding Human Communication. (8th ed). New York: Oxford. Ang Magdalene Chooi Hwa, Muhamad Jantani & Mahfooz A. Ansari, A, (2009). Supervisory vs. Subordinate perception on leader member exchange quality: A Malaysian perspective. Jurnal of Business and Management, vol. 4(7). Berger, C.R. (2005). Interpersonal communication: Theoretical perspective, future research. Journal of Communication, pp. 415-447. Berita Harian. (12th April 2010). Pensyarah saman Nain Canselor. Retrieved on 25th August 2010 from www.beritaharianonline.com.my. Bhal. T. K., Gulati. N. and Ansari (2009) A. M. Leader-member exchange and subordinate outcomes: Test of a mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 30(2), pp. 106-125 Clampitt, P.G. & Downs, C.W. (1994). Employee perception of the relationship between communication and productivity: A field study. The Journal of Business Communication, vol. 30(1), pp. 5-29. Cooper, D. W., & Schindler, P. S. (2000). Business research methods (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Dansereau, F., Graen, G. B., & Haga, W. J. (I 975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human performance, vol. 15, pp. 278-296. Dienesch, R. M.. & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leadermember exchange model of relationship: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review; vol. 1(6), pp. 18-634. DeVito, J. (2009). Interpersonal communication: A definition. Retrieved on 17th July 2010 from http://tcbdevito.blogspot.com/2009/03/interpersonal-communi cation-definition.html Devito, J.A. (2007). Human Communication: The basic course. New York: Longman. Downs C. W., & Hazen, M. A. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, vol. 14(3), pp. 63-74. Downs. W. C., Downs A. A., Potvin. T., Varona.F., S. Gribas. J., Ticehurst. W. (1996). Cross-Cultural Comparison of Relationship between Organizational Communication. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Conference of the international Communication Association. Albuquerque, New Mexico. Epitropaki, O. & Martin, R. (2005). From Ideal to Real: A Longitudinal Study of the Role of Implicit Leadership Theories on Leader–Member Exchanges and Employee Outcomes. Journal of applied Psychology, vol. 90(4), pp. 659-676 Erdogon, B. & Enders, J. (2007). Support From the Top: Supervisors’ Perceived Organizational Support as a Moderator of Leader–Member Exchange to Satisfaction and Performance Relationships, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 92(2), pp 321-330. Fairhurst, G. T. (1993). The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs, vol. 60, pp. 321-351. Fairhurst, G. T., & Chandler, T. A. (1989). Social structure in leader-member interaction. Communication Monographs, vol. 56, pp. 215-239. Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward psychology of dyadic organizing. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 9, pp. 175-208. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press. Graen, G. B.. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship- based approach: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, vol. 6(2), pp. 19-247. Graham, L.N. & Witteloostuijn, A.V. (2010). Leader-Member Exchange, communication frequency, and burnout. Discussion Paper Series 10-08, pp. 1-41. Grant. J. A. & King, P. E. (1994). Compliance-gaining strategies communication satisfaction and willingness to comply. Communication Report, vol. 7(2), pp. 99-109. Gray. J. & Laidlaw. H. (2002). Part-time employment and communication satisfaction in a Australian retail organisation. The Journal Of Employee Relation, vol. 24(2), pp. 211-228. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 82, pp.827–844. Hassan Abu Bakar & Bahtiar Mohamad. (2004). Dimensions of supervisory communication and organizational commitment: A case study of a Malaysian organization. The Malaysian Journal of Language and Communication, vol. 1(1), pp. 1-19. Hassan Abu Bakar, Bahtiar Mohamad & Iran Herman (2004). Leader-member exchange and superior-subordinate communication behavior : A case of Malaysian organization. Malaysian Management Journal, vol. 8(1), pp. 83-93. Hassan Abu Bakar, Che Su Mustaffa & Bahtiar Mohamad. (2009) . LMX quality, supervisory communication and team-oriented commitment : A multilevel analysis Approach. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, vol. 14(1), pp. 11- 33. Hassan Abu Bakar, Che Su Mustaffa & Bahtiar Mohamad. (2009). Dyadic Relationships Quality and Team-Oriented Commitment. Communication, Creativity and Global Citizenship, pp. 825-850. Hassan Abu Bakar & Connaughton, S.L. (2010). Relationships between supervisory communication and commitment to workgroup: A multilevel analysis approach. International Journal of Strategic Communication, vol. 4(1), pp. 39-47. Hect. M. L (1978). Measures of communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, vol. 4(4), pp. 350-368. Hooper, D.T & Martin, R. (2008). Beyond personal Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. The Leadership Quaterly, vol. 19(1), pp. 20-30. Jablin, F. M. (1979). Superior-subordinate communication: The state of art. Psycological Bulettin, vol. 86, pp. 1201- 1222. Jablin, F. M. (1987). Organizational entry, assimilation, and exit. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 679- 740). Newbury Park: Sage Publication. Jablin, F. M., & Krone, K. J. (1994).Task work relationship : A life-span perspective. In M.L. Knapp & G.R. Miller (Eds.). Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Kacmar,K. M., Witt, L. A., Zivnuska, S. & Gully, S.M. (2003). The interactive effect of Leader–Member Exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88(4), pp. 764-772. Keyton, J. (1991). Evaluating individual group member satisfaction as a situational variable. Small Group Research, vol. 22(2), pp. 200-220. Larzelere, R.E. & Huston, T.L. (1980). The dyadic trust scale: Towards understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 42(3), pp. 595-604 Lee. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange, the ‘Plez Effects’ and cooperative communication between group members. Managerial Communication Quarterly, vol. 11(2), pp. 266-287. Lee. J., & Jablin. F. M. (1995). Maintenance communication in superior-subordinate work relationship. Human Communication Research, vol. 22(2), pp. 220-258. Liden, R.C. and Maslyn, J.M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, vol. 24(1), pp. 43-73. Mueller B. H. & Lee, J. (2002). Leader-member exchange and organizational communication satisfaction in multiple contexts. The Journal of Business Communication, vol. 39(2) , pp. 220-224. Pearce. C. G., Segal. G. J., (1998). Effects of Organizational Communication Satisfactionon Job Performance and Firm Growth in Small Business. Pelz, D. (1 952). Influence: A key to effective leadershipin the first line supervisor. Personnel, vol. 29, pp. 209-217. Pincus, J. A. (1986). Communication satisfaction, job satisfaction and job performance. Human Communication Research, vol. 12, pp. 359-419. Raja Basu & Green, S. G. (1997). Leader-Member Exchange and Transformational Leadership: An Empirical Examination of Innovative Behaviors in Leader-Member Dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 27, pp. 477–499. Rubin, A. M. (1993). The effect of locus of control on communication motives, anxiety and satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, vol. 41, pp. 162-171. Seung Yong Kim & Taylor, R. R. (2001). A LMX Model: Relating Multi-level Antecedents to the LMX Relationship and Citizenship Behavior. Paper submitted to Organizational Behavior and Organizational Theory, Midwest Academy of Management AssociationConference, pp 1-19. Smidts, A. C., Riel, V & Pruyin, T. (2000). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Erasmus Research Institute of Management. Sparrowe R. T., Soetjipto B. W., and Kraimer M. L. (2006). Do Leaders’ Influence Tactics Relate to Members’ Helping Behavior? It Depends on the Quality of the relationship In Press at the Academy of Management. Bil 28/April/2010. Retrieved from: http://apps.olin.wustl.edu/workingpapers/ pdf/2005-10-002.pdf Tse H. H. M., (2006). Understanding Leader-Follower and Team-Member Exchange Relationships in Teams: A Multilevel Investigation. Newcastle Graduate School of Business, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia. Varona, F. (1996). Relationship between Communication Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Three Guatemalan Organizations. The Journal of Business Communication, vol. 33(2), pp. 111-140. Varona, F. (2002). Conceptualization and Management of Communication Satisfaction and organizational Commitment in Three Guatemalan Organzations. America Communication Journal, vol. 5(3). Yrle, A.C., Hartman, S. & Galle, W.P. (2002). An investigation of relationship between communication style and LMX. Journal of Communication Management, vol. 6(3), pp. 257-268. Yulk, G., & Fu. P. P (1999). Determinants of delegation and consultation by managers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 20(2), pp. 19-232 Zikmund, W. G. (2000). Business research methods (6th ed.). Forth Worth: The Dryden Press.

Dyadic Relational Quality and Communication Satisfaction among Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Employees

Similar Items